Rich Rod, Casteel, and the Myth about Money

Submitted by Baloo on

I realize that this board will never agree on what caused Rodriguez to fail here. However, in an effort to focus our pointless bickering on the right questions, it's time to put to bed a very persistent myth. May the following remove one source of contention from our angry but increasingly-united fanbase.

The myth:

"In 2008, Bill Martin gave Rich Rodriguez only 265,000 to hire a defensive coordinator. This amount was too low to bring Casteel or any other top defensive coordinator to Michigan, which is why the defense was so terrible. Rich Rod was set up to fail."

Ignoring the silly notion that Martin would agree to furnish a new million-dollar weightroom and pay 2.5 million of RR's buyout but simultaneously put a $265,000 cap on the DC salary, let's take a look at what other power conference teams around the country were paying their DCs in 2008.

Ohio State (Jim Heacock): 260,510

Oklahoma (Brent Venables):  210,000

USC (Nick Holt): 300,000

Oregon (Nick Aliotti): 225,000

Alabama (Kirby Smart): 360,000

LSU (Bradley Dale Peveto): 200,000

Florida (Charlie Strong): 300,000

Nebraska (Carl Pelini): 190,000

Auburn (Ted Roof): 370,000

Georgia (Willie Martinez): 220,000

Florida State (Mickey Andrews): 295,483

Washington (Ed Donatell): 334,000

Cal (Bob Gregory): 168,000

Tennessee (John Chavis): 340,000

Texas (Will Muschamp): 250,000

Va Tech (Bud Foster): 300,000

Clemson (Vic Koennig): 260,000

                    Average: $269,611

Even assuming Michigan refused a requested increase, which is not supported by any documented facts, the offer of 265,000 was competitive even among the nation's richest big-name programs. The fact that it produced the 109th-ranked defense in 2010 is ridiculous and a spectacular indictment of the hiring abilites of one man. His name isn't Bill Martin. 

 

 

 

 

mGrowOld

October 30th, 2014 at 7:55 PM ^

You're omitting one very important salary in your analysis - Casteel's. It doesn't matter what the average is nationally - NOBODY is going to take a pay cut and then move their family to take a lateral position. Nobody.

Maybe you've never been in that position yet which is why you don't understand it but trust me someday you will.

Baloo

October 30th, 2014 at 8:06 PM ^

Again, you're assuming that the cap was 265,000 and that Casteel would have come here for more money, which we simply don't know.  This post isn't even primarily about Casteel.  It's about the failure of RR to hire a competent defensive coordinator and the ridiculous excuse that he didn't have enough money.  I'm actually questioning whether you even read the post.

RJWolvie

October 30th, 2014 at 8:44 PM ^

We have a winner! Just because it's beyond believably horrible now doesn't somehow make the horrible it was when Rich Rod was here somehow glorious. When RR was fired, EVERYBODY here, even Brian, agreed he had to be. Some were sad about that, like Brian was, but everyone knew it had to happen.

LJ

October 30th, 2014 at 9:08 PM ^

That's absolutely not true.  I remember lots of us who wanted that fourth year and were very disappointed when he was fired.

At the time my stance was, if you know with certainty that you can get harbaugh, go ahead and make the change.  Outside of that, it's taking a huge risk when you can do the same thing next year if he doesn't improve again.

Gulogulo37

October 31st, 2014 at 6:13 AM ^

Exactly. Like Brian said before, Hoke would have come to Michigan at any point, so there shouldn't have been a rush to get him. Brian did say he was fine with letting RR go, but I'm not sure he said it had to be done, and anyway, he didn't think Brandon was dead set on Hoke like it appears he was.

mgoBrad

October 30th, 2014 at 8:46 PM ^

The irony of this post is mindblowing. So says the guy who is making up his own narrative while directly contradicting reports that are public record (i.e. Bacon reporting that Casteel did not come to M because it would've been less pay, he would've had no guaranteed contract at M, and he was close personally with Bill Stewart). Amazing.

Baloo

October 30th, 2014 at 8:55 PM ^

Making up my own narrative? I'm using actual comparative salaries to show that Rich Rod had enough money to hire a competent coordinator regardless of whether it was Casteel or not.

I dont know how many times it will take until you accept this, but Bacon never reported that Casteel would have come here for more money. It just didn't happen.  You repeating it over and over again doesn't make it true.  

The only thing Bacon reported was that Michigan's initial offer to Casteel was lower than West Virginia's.  That's it.  The rest was pure editorial guesswork.  That's not "public record."

switch26

October 30th, 2014 at 9:32 PM ^

I don't know how many times u are gonna post before u accept the fact that rr wasn't given any option on who he could hire as a d coordinator.. Bill martin called the shots and made him hire gerg.. Ur wrong again

spicy tuna

October 30th, 2014 at 9:53 PM ^

I and most others that have been here since the RR days make the exact same arguments we did as Rodriguez was being fired. Just because half the fan base was wrong and can't let it go, doesn't mean our arguments (made in 2010) are revisionist. RR never had the support that Hoke did, period. I don't see how that can even be argued. And talking about RR bad recruiting is like saying hoke is a bad recruiter because of this year. Michigan recruits people on it's own, if the fans and former players are behind it. None of it really matters, since it can't be changed now, but it was obvious from day one that hiring Rodriguez was a long term play that the get-off-my-lawn crew cratered. Had Brandon said Rodriguez was getting another year during his final season (as he did for hoke last year), 2011 probably would have shown similar results and we'd be competing for titles right now because he'd have been able to recruit. Instead, hoke.

Incidentally, you've been here for a month and are possibly the most annoying poster I can remember in my time on this blog. Congrats!

mGrowOld

October 31st, 2014 at 5:09 AM ^

Lord Grantham, Ghost of Yost and a parade of other now banned personas preceded Baloo. The avatars change but the personality remains which is why this guy is easily the most frequently banned poster on the board. Maybe it's because I'm older but if I was repeatedly kicked out of a club for being an asshole to other patrons I'd like to think I'd either A: Find another club to frequent or B: Change how I interact with others. Not this guy-he thinks the way to handle the problem is to just find different disguises so he can fool the bouncers and get back inside for a little while.

Reader71

October 31st, 2014 at 8:11 AM ^

I've never agreed with Baloo in any of his incarnations, but his personality shouldn't cloud his point. Coach Rod had the money to hire someone better than GERG. Martin screwed him on Casteel. How I wish it wasn't so. But he got two cracks at hiring a competent DC (probably all he needed with those offenses) and failed. With roughly average money to offer. If he gets one of those hires right, he's probably still here.

mGrowOld

October 31st, 2014 at 8:57 AM ^

I do agree with that although (and hindsight is always 20-20) I wonder what would've happened if Robinson was still hired but he was allowed to run the defense he was familar with and not the one Rich liked.

Seemed to me that Gerg was reasonably competent at Texas last year.  Not world-beater great but competent.  Something he was anything but in Ann Arbor.

 

Reader71

October 31st, 2014 at 9:14 AM ^

I can't believe that GERG would have worked if left to his own devices. I find a stuffed beaver incompatible with sound defensive coaching. I cold be wrong, but that seems like a guy who might know his X's and O's but does not know how to teach kids. I think the one that got away was Schafer. I think he could have been OK if left to do his thing. I also think a one-year term as a coordinator is insane. Who knows how poisoned the relationship was?

aiglick

October 30th, 2014 at 10:09 PM ^

3-9 to 5-7 to 7-6 to 11-2 to 8-5 to 7-6 to balls. I mean we went from a guy who was very successful in a weak power conference to a guy 47-50 at Ball State and SDSU. What did we expect to happen? Chaos as illustrated by the uproar when he was first hired. If RichRod were going to be replaced with Harbaugh? Fine. The guy got three years and was shat on for much of them. I'd like to see you succeed in that kind of hostile environment.

los barcos

October 30th, 2014 at 8:40 PM ^

people are just anti losing , which we've done a lot during the rich rod years and the last two hoke years. But when hoke was winning even this blog had some meme that he pooped gold magic or something. That's all this is: Winning , losing, and revisionist history. No one and I mean no one (not even brian) wanted RR back after that gator bowl. And everyone loved the hoke hire after the sugar bowl. Can anyone just recognize that fact?

PurpleStuff

October 30th, 2014 at 8:43 PM ^

I wanted RR back, even after the Gator Bowl.  I also wasn't sold on Hoke simply because he did what I predicted he would do before he even took the job.

The same people who argued every prediction I made (we'd win 10 games in 2011 no matter the coach, Hoke would be our Charlie Weis, Arizona would be a much stronger program than us with Rich Rodriguez) are the same ones still making these arguments now.

The fact that people who were wrong about everything are still running their mouths is surreal.

los barcos

October 31st, 2014 at 2:02 AM ^

you talk about your predictions coming true, well, post them. Let's see the links. I want to see the sugar bowl game thread where you say this is going to be Charlie Weiss part two. While you're at it, I want to see the fire rr thread where you predict that any coach will come in and win 11 games the next year including a bcs win.

tricks574

October 30th, 2014 at 8:00 PM ^

And we can't have that. After all, the Michigan football program is a shining beacon of excellence, and gave Rodriguez it's full support. That's why he hasn't had any success since then, I mean, if you can't win at Michigan, why would you be able to win at Arizona

los barcos

October 30th, 2014 at 8:21 PM ^

You say: " NOBODY is going to take a pay cut and then move their family to take a lateral position. Nobody." I like you mgrowold but maybe you should Check your facts. Casteel HIMSELF took a pay cut to goto arizona -- which probably wouldn't even be considered a lateral move from WVU. So yeah, you're wrong here.

tubauberalles

October 30th, 2014 at 11:38 PM ^

The Arizona salary was 50% higher than the UM offer of $265,000 and that AZ salary was a cut only by dint of the WV counter-offer that Casteel did reject to move to AZ.  So, there are pay cuts and then there are pay cuts, I guess.

ak47

October 30th, 2014 at 11:24 PM ^

People do it all the time to further their careers or switch careers or work for non-profits. Being a successful dc at Michigan could have meant a head coaching job sooner in his career at a better school. Bacon wasn't a part of the negotiations nobody knows if we could have brought casteel for sure. However if rich rod can only be successful with one dc he wasn't worth hiring anyways since that means of casteel ever left Michigan's defense was bound to be shit. Rich had the money to make a decent hire and he either fucked up the hire or tried to control the defense too much and screwed his dc. I don't care which one it was but either way it is more on rich rod than anyone else and if your argument is that rich could have succeeded with casteel then you must not think rich rod is a very good head coach and is better suited as an oc.

Monkey House

October 30th, 2014 at 7:56 PM ^

blah blah blah blah. RR wasn't treated half as well from day one that Hoke was. you want stats, I'll take RR win lose coaching record all day over Hoke. RR failed here for numerous reason and high on that list is because people wanted him to because he isn't some Michigan man bull shit. part of the reason this program is shit is because it made itself this way.

ak47

October 30th, 2014 at 11:31 PM ^

So you preferred 15-22 and one bowl loss to 25-14 and a sugar bowl win? Interesting perspective you have. I'm not advocating for hoke to stay but he has been incredibly more successful than rich rod was and I don't give a shit about whether they did well before or after or whether the offense looked pretty against Illinois and Purdue. Hoke may suck as a coach but his first three years were more enjoyable to watch than rich rods 3 since we you know actually won more games than we lost.

BigBlue02

October 30th, 2014 at 7:59 PM ^

RichRod being successful everywhere other than Michigan is not because of RichRod. He isn't even a good coach. He has just gotten lucky for 8 consecutive seasons before Michigan and 3 seasons after Michigan. He's obviously the problem. I really don't get what point you are trying to make. You keep bringing up his defensive coordinator's salary and ignoring the fact that he is an amazing coach. You are pretty much the only one who thinks he is mediocre. His record suggests a different conclusion.

Baloo

October 30th, 2014 at 8:01 PM ^

You can keep repeating it over and over, but that doesn't make it true.  I think Rich Rod is a good coach provided he hires a competent defensive coordinator.  He didn't here.  That isn't anyone's fault but his, as these numbers are designed to lllustrate.

PurpleStuff

October 30th, 2014 at 8:09 PM ^

Are they competent offensive coordinators (both have had plenty of success elsewhere and Borges had his share here)?  If so, why has Michigan been so bad on offense the last two years?

Gary Patterson went 4-8 last year.  Did he just start coaching shitty for one season? 

Talent pretty much determines the outcome.  Your dumb analysis completely ignores it.

 

PurpleStuff

October 30th, 2014 at 8:31 PM ^

Yours is based on ratings of high school players put out by non-football people who have a lot of bandwidth.

My definition is based on people being good at playing college football.  Utah has a better line, better skill position talent, and a comparable defense.

Again, do you think Brady Hoke is getting dumber every year?  Or is it possible that the guys he brought in aren't as good as NFL guys like Omameh, Lewan, Schofield, etc.?