Report: Satellite camp ban will be reversed, possibly by Friday

Submitted by Wolverine Devotee on

From a Georgia writer on 247sports.

 

Hearing from multiple sources that looks like Satellite Camps will be reversed. Believe a final answer could be by Friday..

— Rusty Mansell (@Mansell247) April 26, 2016
MGoBoard
Football

Truthbtold

April 27th, 2016 at 12:16 AM ^

Apologizing for punishing all the respectful and thoughtful institutions participating in satellite camps and that it was a misguided effort to ban them all due to the low class, self serving, " hey everybody look at me " asshole behavior of Jim Harbaugh.

Joined: 01/28/2016

MGoPoints: 292

IvyLeague

April 27th, 2016 at 4:15 PM ^

I'm with you on this. Tons of Michigan Law alums in DOJ and this seems to have run up the flag pole rather quickly. Normally, it takes 5-6 months for DOJ to get involved or 1-2 months for something very big. This was in about a month or so.

Joined: 07/30/2009

MGoPoints: 1205

cbuswolverine

April 26th, 2016 at 9:16 PM ^

Not exactly.  It doesn't require a new vote by the conferences/schools.  What they passed is only a proposal for the NCAA Board of Directors.  The NCAA Board of Directors has a previously scheduled meeting on 4/28.  That's the day they decide whether or not to actually enact any proposals handed to them by the Division-1 Council.

Joined: 08/14/2008

MGoPoints: 5958

APBlue

April 26th, 2016 at 10:34 PM ^

Right.  But the proposal of "everyone but power of 5 schools" wasn't a proposal that was sent to them, so wouldn't that have be voted on and then submitted to the BoD?  

I know we're just talking hypotheticals, but I'm just bracing myself for how the NCAA is going to try to fuck us over in the name of the SEC.  

Joined: 01/07/2011

MGoPoints: 22020

carolina blue

April 27th, 2016 at 7:24 AM ^

I think you two may agree but I can't tell. APblue was saying that if the NCAA wanted to make the rule only applicable to the power five that it would require a new proposal vote by the council. You, cbus, then said that it wouldn't require one. Apblue then pointed out that it would have to because the proposal on the table doesn't say "only applicable to power 5". this means that, if the sec and ACC really wanted to try to screw us with an "only power 5" type rule, they would have to hold another proposal vote. The NCAA can only adopt a proposal that is in front of them, not some bastardized version thereof. It's a yea or nay vote.



Sent from MGoBlog HD for iPhone & iPad

Joined: 02/12/2014

MGoPoints: 30251

orangeda

April 27th, 2016 at 10:14 AM ^

meeting would just be a rubber stamping of previously proposed and passed legislation, but due to the controversial nature of the satellite camp, and the enormous backlash that has come from the sideshow way in which it was pushed through, instead of receiving it's normal rubber stamp, it will simply be denied.

Joined: 06/25/2009

MGoPoints: 515