Reasons to be optimistic in 2014

Submitted by B1G_Fan on

 With only a handful of bowl games left to finish off the 2013 college football season and so many fans feeling disappointed and panicking about the future of Michigan football. I figured I'd share some of the reasons why I'm optimistic about the 2014 season and beyond.

 1. We'll have real competition at the QB position. For the first time since ... God knows when, We'll have  alegit competiton at the QB spot. It's Devin spot to loose but we'll have 4 scoloarship QB's gunning for the starting job. 3 of the 4 have college game experience!

2. The Offensive line will play better as a whole. I heard all the doom and gloom about how can they possibly improve with losing two NFL caliber tackles. They are right in a way the tackles position will be downgraded next year. The major point is with so much pressure coming up the middle, we could have had Tony Boselli and Jonathon Ogden as tackles and not done much better. Point is there will be competition on the line as well. These guys want to win championships, they are hungry, young and talented. They'll push eachother this off season because nobody is guarenteed a starting job.

3. The running backs as a whole will improve. Green and Smith both played better later in the season even with the offensive line problem and when they played more pass protection looked ALOT better ( sorry fitz but you cant block very well). Denard was an extremely talented college football player but the guy we missed most after Denard had to be Vincent (bang-bang) Smith. Running touissant as an every down back when he couldn't block to save his life got Devin killed most of the time. De'veon smith seemed like a better over all back as far as blocking/ running goes. I'm also not forgetting Drake Johnson was the number 2 back before he got injured.

4. Key players and possible key players coming off major injuries. Jake Ryan came back mid season after tearing his ACL in the fall. It's hard to imagine he was 100% jake Ryan. Countess had a major injury last year, Wormley too. this Year Pipkins went down, Darboh, Drake Harris, Chris Bryant, Chris Fox and Gardner was beat up all year, I wouldn't believe you if you told me Touissant was 100% all year after that fracture. Hopefully these guys are all healthy enough to play their best football next year.

 5. Funchess and Butt are the real deal! Funchess had the dropsies a bit this year but, he was a sophmore and honestly didn't get targeted enough as a freshman. When you drop a 1-2nd down pass yea that sucks but when you drop a 3rd down pass that kills a drive. If Funchess can correct the drops he is a great receiver... Tight end. Jake Butt had an awesome freshman year and physically he and Ian Bunting are very similar. If bunting comes in and plays like Butt as a freshman and Jake improves from his freshman year they are going to be 3 guys who are crazy hard to cover. I'm not even going to mention all th other WR's, someone coming back has got to be good atleast. I mean Darboh was the 2nd coming of Jerry Rice before he messed up his foot... right

6. The defense is what it is. This is the same staff that turned around one of our worst defenses ever and made them servicable. They get a pass from me, so i'm expecting the defense to play a lot better as a whole. We played 3 freshman in the secondary. 2 where true freshman. Part of the season we played a true freshman Linebacker, and our D line had mutiple true freshman and red shirt freshman getting alot of play time. I'm not worried about next year.

 Now I admit i'm one of those guys who looks at the schedule and says 10-2,11-1 every year. I've been a fan for a long time and thats usually how it went with one head scratcher (why the hell did we lose that game) a year. So 9-10 wins season are what I am used to. I look at our 2014 Schedule and I see 2 really good teams , 2 good teams and 6 teams we should roll. Ohio state and MSU are really good teams and should be really good next year. They are our best chances for a loss. Everybody else tho, come on you have got to like our chances against. We play well at Notre Dame  who loses their 2 best defensive players and even when play like crap they can barely beat us. We had 13 turn overs in our last 2 losses to Notre Dame. Utah plays terrible away from home and everbody else is a home game or mediocre. We usually beat mediocre teams on the road. I'll call us 10-2 and 3rd place in our division. If we finish any worse atleast you guys will see some staff changes, so there is another reason to be optimistic!

B1G_Fan

January 2nd, 2014 at 8:00 AM ^

   No, there is competition there. I said it's Gardners job to lose but, in 2013 it was just Gardners job or else you play a walk on or a true freshman. Morris will push Devin to become a better QB and visa versa. If Shane came out as a sophmore and played like Peyton Manning and Devin didn't improve, you don't think Shane would start over Devin?

Trebor

January 2nd, 2014 at 8:48 AM ^

Is Al Borges still the OC? Do we still not really have anyone to replace Lewan and Schofield, and coming off a season with the worst interior OL at Michigan in a very long time? I don't think even Peyton Manning makes this offense a week-in-week-out functional unit.

Blue Mike

January 2nd, 2014 at 9:47 AM ^

No, Shane will never start of Devin.  There is no "competition" for Devin's position.  As much as some people hate to admit it, Devin Gardner is the quarterback of this team and will be until the OL gets him so seriously injured that he can't stand upright.  Shane Morris could be Steve Young and he wouldn't displace Gardner this year.  

Your reason for optimism for this year is that our 5th year senior quarterback could possibly be benched in favor of a sophmore with one game of experience?  The same senior who was the 2nd best quarterback in the B1G last year?  That would would be a doom-and-gloom scenario to me.

 

The reason for optimism for next year is that we have a 5th year senior quarterback who, when the OC actually calls a game to meet his skillset, is probably the most all-around talent in the B1G.

BoWoody

January 2nd, 2014 at 10:58 AM ^

that is exactly what i was thinking when i was reading the OP.  Hoke will never change gardner out even if he has broken body parts.  What makes you think that hoke will change a healthy gardner with morris.  Even if morris out plays gardner, gardner will be your starter. So there is no competition.  The other point is how do we not lose to mediocre teams on the road, iowa, psu last year come to mind.  Actually the reverse is true, we can be sure we will lose to a cupcake team on the road with this staff.  I see 4 losses this upcoming season, ND, MSU, OSU, and a road loss in there

BlueinLansing

January 2nd, 2014 at 7:51 AM ^

for spring and sift through the over-hype headlines and stories for some shreds of optimism.

 

Today I'm going to watch the UA game and maybe that will lift my spirits.

TESOE

January 2nd, 2014 at 10:15 AM ^

saved by the winnowing oar.

 

scholarship <> scoloarship...

alegit competiton 

scoloarship

eachother

guarenteed

fitz touissant

De'veon smith 

sophmore

all th other WR's

servicable

mutiple

alot  ... no wait... ALOT

i'm

thats

Everybody else tho

everbody

atleast

 

... standards are getting low on and off the field...

 

 

 

...it makes it hard to be optimistic about the board.

B1G_Fan

January 2nd, 2014 at 8:13 PM ^

You have to know typos happen.

Obviously they'll happen more on a message board

Unless of course you proof read everything

Really you could take yout time

Everybody is in a hurry sometime.

 

A lot of folks just want to type and get on with what they are doing.

 

Didn't know it would be so offensive

I definitely didn't intend for it to mess up your day.

Can't really think of an excuse besides being tired at 5 am.

Kugler ! I can't believe I forgot about Patrick Kugler in my things to be optimistic about!.

 

  Seriously tho relax guy, who is to say in 10 years everything I messed up on won't be perfectly accepted by Websters. I bet you used to say ain't, ain't a word :D. AWW man the formating messed up, boo

TESOE

January 3rd, 2014 at 10:11 PM ^

Spelling and grammar separate this site from others.  I didn't call you out until people started the negs.  I made a pun on your laziness - that is all.  Own it.  Better yet... fix it and make me look stupid.  It's not that hard to pop it back into a spell checker and resave.  Instead you made this comment which probably took you longer.

It's Michigan forgodsake.

 

Blue in Yarmouth

January 2nd, 2014 at 8:04 AM ^

I'm optimistic every year during the off-season. I even managed to maintain my optimism through the penn state disaster. The problem is when your just not that good, it catches up to you. 

I understand people being optimistic, I will probably be right there with you come the spring game but right now the disaster that was the 2013 season is just to fresh to forget. I honestly can't see how this team gets a lot better with the assistants we have. If there isn`t major improvement across the entire team this off-season I don`t see how we escape with even a 7-5 record next year with the schedule we have. 

Anyway, I envy those who can muster optimism at this point. Good for all of you.

BoWoody

January 2nd, 2014 at 11:43 AM ^

that is what losing does to you and not having a proper coach for almost 10 years.  Man watching the MSU game yesterday is so frustrating.  Their team was well prepared for the opponent.  Studied the strength and weakness of the opponent.  Took advantage of their weeakness.  Their player development is so apparent, that I dont need an mgoblogger football guru to tell me there is improvement.  Look at this qb from the begining of the season to the end.  One could tell there is significant improvement, look at the r/b significant improvement, look at the W/R significant improvement.  i wont talk about the defense cuz that is so obvious.  I also couldn't help to think about the game next year.  And all i can think about it as how much will we lose to them, is it going to be a beat down next year similar to the one we got this year or will it be worth.  Then I came to realization that michigan has become a second tier program in a sucky b10 and MSU is playing with OSU.  Even listening to espn radio today and they mentioned michigan will probably be third in their division.  And I couldn't even argue this to myself that that is complete ps.  It is true, MSU and OSU game will probably determine the winner of the division not the game.

robpollard

January 2nd, 2014 at 11:53 AM ^

Some people act like getting to nine wins next year would be the equivalent of parting the Red Sea or some other miracle.

Losing 2 out of 3 (or all 3) to MSU, OSU, ND by definition makes it a non-successful season for UM. It doesn't mean we should fire everyone if we, say, go 10-2 with losses to MSU and OSU; that certainly would be something to build on. But that's not the measuring stick -- we need to start aiming higher than that.

BoWoody

January 2nd, 2014 at 12:51 PM ^

10-2 with losses to MSU and OSU, is a complete failure in my book next season.  This means you are not even close to competing for a b10 championship and probably MSU or OSU is going to the b10 championship game.  Yet another year with 0-2 to your two biggest rivals in your division.  We have yet to show up to the b10 championship.  When will we go to that game.  When will we go into the game with a purpose or something in the balance instead of the ps we are playing for our seniors. Losing those two games will probably means yet another step backward in this downhill slide we are as a program

mackbru

January 2nd, 2014 at 1:21 PM ^

Oddly, despite the fact that we get our three top rivals on the road, there is reason to be optimistic. OSU and MSU are likely (but not certain!) losses. And ND, which M sort of owns, will be taking a step back. If M can beat ND, or one of the other two, it should end up with a respectable record. I don't see any other "likely" losses on the schedule, especially re the home games. I'm thinking 9 wins, with a best-case of 10.

 

PeteM

January 2nd, 2014 at 8:07 AM ^

I agree. I think we'll be better at the skill positions.  Yes, I know that we're losing Toussaint and Gallon, and that especially Gallon is huge loss in terms of production.  That said, I think that with Gallon being our only reliable target through much of the year, Gardner being banged up and Toussaint not generating much it wasn't just our line that stymied our offense.

With Darboh, Funchess, Chesson, Butt and Harris to throw to Gardner should be able to find some reliable targets.  With Green, Smith, Johnson, Rawls, Hayes etc. in the backfield I feel like there should be some reliable running options even with the questionable line.

Speaking of the line, I know that we're young and losing our best 2 guys but I also think there's talent there and that Funk and Borges knowthat their jobs depend on gettting them to play better, which will make it a point of emphasis.

Finally, I think that it's very possible that Gardner has a breakout year.  He showed signs in the ND, Ohio State and Indiana games that he can be an all B10 QB.

clarkiefromcanada

January 2nd, 2014 at 8:10 AM ^

When Michigan starts winning again in 2014 the daily Wailing Wall of Text posts analyzing Michigan's failings and potentials will diminish as celebratory posts of muppets will become the norm. 

Note: OP, I like your optimism and I appreciate the effort indicated in making your analysis but that's a fair bit o text there.

massblue

January 2nd, 2014 at 8:13 AM ^

This coaching staff is not competent. We saw last night the coaching staff that we have to compete with going forward and we know what they have at OSU. We are going to look up at both of them in the EASTERN division of BIG for years to come. I do not care if we beat a bunch MAC level teams by higher scores next year.