Reason No. 1597 I Want RichRod Around

62 posts / 0 new
Login or register to post comments
Last post
June 24th, 2010 at 4:42 PM
#1
touchdown chad henne
touchdown chad henne's picture
Joined: 07/19/2009
MGoPoints: -327
Reason No. 1597 I Want RichRod Around

I was writing (in a not very good article) about how Rodriguez had to invent/innovate a purpose and place for our above-average tight ends, whether it was because of landing Kevin Koger and promising to play him on offense in 2008, or just because we have good tight ends who can catch (sometimes).

It made me realize again why I want Rodriguez to succeed. The man is rewriting how college football is played with each new formation (the rise of the H-back in 2009) and innovation he throws on the field. It's been tempered in our case because he has to find a base first, but he's really an interesting and innovative mind to have on our side should he remain. I'm excited to see how our offense evolves over the course of this season—how he can get Gallon and TRob and Koger, and, shoot, Denard, more involved.

One of the strengths of his coaching resume is his ability to reinvent the attack, which is never something you could say about Lloyd, with all due respect to the man (and he probably wouldn't deny it).

P.S. I do not mean this as an attack against Lloyd, to anticipate the accusation. But I took someone's advice and tracked down the games on Hulu and watched our comeback against Minnesota in 2003, and it was funny how even the announcers knew that at the time we had no mid-range passing game. It was either screens or bombs—until the second half, of course ;).

Top
Tags:

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
June 24th, 2010 at 6:19 PM | Nice (Score:1)
palazzola123
palazzola123's picture
Joined: 01/20/2010
MGoPoints: 1857

Nice avatar! No but seriously I fully agree with what your saying!  We have such a young raw team, that by next year the experience is really going to payoff.

One thing you notice as well, when Tom interviews a recruit they always say how they have a better understanding of the direction of the coaching staff/program.  Looks like the staff address quite a few questions from the recruits regarding the future of the staff.  It seems to me like its a much bigger deal in the media regarding RR future than it is in house.  Obviously another 5 win season won't cut it, but I think RR, DB, etc... see the potential of this team and where its headed.

“When your team is winning, be ready to be tough, because winning can make you soft; on the other hand, when your team is losing, stick by them.  Keep believing.” Bo

June 24th, 2010 at 9:08 PM | I can remember when (Score:1)
maizenbluenc
maizenbluenc's picture
Joined: 07/21/2009
MGoPoints: 2677

I can remember when it was a much bigger deal on whether Lloyd should continue as coach or not in the media, but not in house. Of course that all ended with a National Championship. Hopefully this will too ...

June 24th, 2010 at 5:01 PM | Nicely put. I tracked down (Score:1)
touchdown chad henne
touchdown chad henne's picture
Joined: 07/19/2009
MGoPoints: -327

Nicely put. I tracked down the 2003 recruiting class and saw that that was why we were in close Big Ten contention for two years (from 06-07). It's loaded. same as our 2009 class. RichRod really is a great recruiter to do such a thing off a 3-9 record.

June 24th, 2010 at 7:48 PM | I know his exact words don't (Score:1)
joeyb
joeyb's picture
Joined: 10/12/2008
MGoPoints: 11300

I know his exact words don't reflect it but I have a feeling he means any outcome of reasonable probability.

June 24th, 2010 at 7:49 PM | Whatever brigade you are in, (Score:1)
michgoblue
michgoblue's picture
Joined: 11/16/2009
MGoPoints: 11210

Whatever brigade you are in, I want in.  That is exactly where I am on RR.  I fully support him, think that he has the potential to do great things, but also believe that to date - even with the deficiencies in the talent pool - he has not done a good job. 

June 24th, 2010 at 5:01 PM | I agree totally, there would (Score:1)
PIJER
PIJER's picture
Joined: 07/12/2009
MGoPoints: 330

I agree totally, there would have to be a monumental meltdown or new rules violations for RR to be fired. Othewise M would be set back another two to three years.

"Homey don't play dat"

June 24th, 2010 at 5:02 PM | He can innovate all he wants (Score:1)
blueblueblue
Joined: 12/29/2008
MGoPoints: 2257

He can innovate all he wants - as long as doing so wins us games. At the end of the day, or season, that's really all that matters. He might be the Tesla of football, but he has to win some games for it to amount to anything positive (rather than negative, if you get my pun). 

June 24th, 2010 at 5:05 PM | "Tesla of football" (Score:1)
Engin77
Joined: 07/02/2008
MGoPoints: 2095

that's funny.
So who's the Edison of football?
Paterno? But no, RR never worked for JoePa.

Taking it one week at a time

June 24th, 2010 at 5:10 PM | Joe Pa? (Score:1)
Tater
Tater's picture
Joined: 08/13/2008
MGoPoints: 10360

Joe Pa can't be the Edison of football; he is already the Methuselah of football.

 

 

 

June 24th, 2010 at 5:27 PM | What about this - The (Score:1)
blueblueblue
Joined: 12/29/2008
MGoPoints: 2257

What about this - The relationship between Tesla and Edison has been called the "War of Currents" - Tesla's AC and Edison's DC. But it really was a war between systems and their institutions - Tesla was an institution, as was Edison. The same can be said of RichRod's system - it is an institution here at Michigan, struggling for superiority. It is an institution at war with the past football institution here at Michigan. Thus, the Michigan Football institution pre-RR is Edison. I am not saying Lloyd is analogous to Edison, but rather the institution he left behind is analogous to the Edison Institution: it works against RR's system - one lagging, waning institution fighting a new incumbent institution. 

Or maybe I am over-thingking this analogy....I think so.

June 24th, 2010 at 6:02 PM | Except, (Score:1)
Engin77
Joined: 07/02/2008
MGoPoints: 2095

neither DC nor AC was an established standard; the "war" was to see which system would gain widespread adoption as this nation was wired for electricity. Lloyd's system was clearly a well established institution, so the analogy breaks down a bit.

I interpreted your reference to Tesla as a reference to a brilliant theoretician, one whose ideas typically lead to either stupendous success or stupendous failure.  Tesla also had his problems with the media.

For myself, I side with the OP, and want to see RR given time to make his system work at Michigan.

Taking it one week at a time

June 24th, 2010 at 6:35 PM | sign sign (Score:1)
umchicago
Joined: 02/05/2009
MGoPoints: 3531

everywhere a sign...

June 24th, 2010 at 6:43 PM | ... blocking out the scenery, (Score:1)
Engin77
Joined: 07/02/2008
MGoPoints: 2095

breaking my mind ...

Taking it one week at a time

June 24th, 2010 at 5:12 PM | Excellent (Score:1)
James Burrill Angell
James Burrill Angell's picture
Joined: 08/12/2009
MGoPoints: 3377

Excellent Motor City-Automotive Industry analogy. Props.

June 24th, 2010 at 5:09 PM | i wouldn't want to... (Score:1)
Center Ice
Center Ice's picture
Joined: 04/03/2010
MGoPoints: 2853

... turn into nebraska from a few years ago, when they fired solich and brought in callahan and the west coast offense, only to dump him a few years later and start the rebuilding again from square one.

Twitter

June 24th, 2010 at 5:16 PM | So you were in favor of (Score:1)
Run 2 Daylight
Run 2 Daylight's picture
Joined: 09/01/2009
MGoPoints: 2273

So you were in favor of keeping Callahan around until he got results because his west coast offense was so unique? We won't be set back at all in the event Rodriguez is fired if the kids we've recruited are as good as we all say they are, they're not spread-drones, they're football players.

Go Blue!

June 24th, 2010 at 5:22 PM | im not... (Score:1)
Center Ice
Center Ice's picture
Joined: 04/03/2010
MGoPoints: 2853

... a nebraska fan, im just saying i wouldn't want to start a rebuild again, i would guess it's easier to switch from a spread to a pro-style than pro style to spread, but im a cubs fan so im always optimistic that we can win every year, that's why i cant wait until the opener to show everyone what we can do.

Twitter

June 24th, 2010 at 5:39 PM | or... (Score:1)
dahblue
dahblue's picture
Joined: 11/09/2009
MGoPoints: 1468

There aren't just two forms of offense in college football.  This notion (that many here subscribe to) that we are either RR-spread or Carresque pro-style is flawed.  

The OP discusses the role of the tight ends, and RR's use thereof.  That is adapting, if I may, to the "Carr" style.  It's my humble opinion that if RR did more adapting, his first two years would not have been so brutal.  Anyway...our bread-and-butter play (under Carr) sent the TE on a crossing route mirrored by the WR on a deep cross.  It was unstoppable.  If RR wants to use the TE more, I'm all for it.  I'm just not for the notion that there exist only two offensive styles.

June 24th, 2010 at 5:46 PM | Getting specific with (Score:1)
Run 2 Daylight
Run 2 Daylight's picture
Joined: 09/01/2009
MGoPoints: 2273

Getting specific with generalizations is rather pointless. No amount of offensive adaptation could have fixed 08, and the offense was good enough last year.

Go Blue!

June 24th, 2010 at 5:52 PM | Quote of the day: (Score:1)
bluebrains98
bluebrains98's picture
Joined: 01/14/2009
MGoPoints: 1235

"Getting specific with generalizations is rather pointless."

 

Are you sure your last name isn't Berra?

June 24th, 2010 at 5:55 PM | My eyes aren't closed (Score:1)
dahblue
dahblue's picture
Joined: 11/09/2009
MGoPoints: 1468

C'mon...seriously?  You think our offense was as good as possible in 08?  No way.  Granted, I know your next statement will be that the "cupboard was bare", but RR does have some responsibility for that.  He thought he'd get Pryor so he ignored Mallet and let him split.  That was a choice he made, but he made that choice.  Anyway, I'm not trying to get into the "bare cupboard" debate, but Carr would have won a lot more than 3 games in 08.

Hoping that RR will succeed (even for those of us who aren't thrilled with him) doesn't mean that we have to pretend that he did better than anyone else could have in 08 (or 09 for that matter).  He thought he could come into the BigTen and run shit like he did in the Big East.  It didn't work.  Now, we'll see how he adapts.  I'm hoping it works well, as I don't want to wait another minute for a return to Michigan football.

June 24th, 2010 at 6:06 PM | Adaptation implies melding X (Score:1)
Run 2 Daylight
Run 2 Daylight's picture
Joined: 09/01/2009
MGoPoints: 2273

Adaptation implies melding X components of the previous offense into the new offense, more of that wouldn't have fixed the problem of not being able to do anything correctly. Personel decisions are irrelevant to this conversation. Whether or not he would did as well as anyone else would have (and how we view that question) is also irrelevant. I don't know what the implications of "He thought he could come into the BigTen and run shit" are, but I'm guessing that wasn't the case.  

Go Blue!

June 24th, 2010 at 6:18 PM | Did the dog eat his homework too? (Score:1)
dahblue
dahblue's picture
Joined: 11/09/2009
MGoPoints: 1468

When you make a blanket statement like:

No amount of offensive adaptation could have fixed 08, and the offense was good enough last year.

...You're saying that 08 was going to suck no matter what and I'm not sure what excuse you're giving for 09, but I'm sure you've got a handful ready.  You continue:

Personel decisions are irrelevant to this conversation.

Say what???  Personnel decisions are 100% relevant to this discussion.  We are, after all, talking about his use of...wait for it...wait for it...personnel (like TE's).  RR chose not to "meld" Ryan Mallet into his offense.  Part of the reason 08 was so bad is because RR did not adapt.  You'll notice that he is now (smartly) increasing player size...an adaptation, if you will, to Big Ten football.  Having hope for the future doesn't mean you have to ignore the reality of the past.

June 24th, 2010 at 7:00 PM | I'm not going to continue (Score:1)
Run 2 Daylight
Run 2 Daylight's picture
Joined: 09/01/2009
MGoPoints: 2273

I'm not going to continue arguing with you if you're going to keep changing the topic. I'm not sure when "No amount of ADAPTATION" became "No matter what." Say what? Imagined personel decisions are irrelevant to our conversation that began about offensive adaptation benefiting the team the past two years? Correct.

Go Blue!

June 24th, 2010 at 11:37 PM | I love the "RichRod chose not (Score:1)
BigBlue02
Joined: 06/29/2009
MGoPoints: 1853

I love the "RichRod chose not to do anything with Ryan Mallet because he was having Pryor's lovechild" argument. It is not only proven wrong but it sounds ridiculous. I am sure RichRod looked at all of our options, even with the possibility of getting Pryor and him telling us numerous times that he likes to have 4 or 5 QBs on the roster, and said, "Mallet...fuck him, I am going to ignore him and have Threet/Sheridan as my backup to Pryor." Your assumptions are not only wrong but stupid. Anyone who tells you RichRod ran out Mallet and Boren is on the same Mlive/freep mindset as the no family values folks.

June 24th, 2010 at 7:14 PM | Mallet? (Score:1)
blueheron
blueheron's picture
Joined: 03/26/2009
MGoPoints: 2302

"... so he ignored Mallet and let him split."

Sorry -- I think you're at "Bleacher Report" level with that assertion.  Can you back it up?

Do you really think a loose cannon like Mallet would keep quiet if RichRod pushed him out the door?  I think it's far more likely that they parted ways politely.  It appears that Mallet fled to a more (overall) welcoming environment and RichRod accepted that.

That's the conventional wisdom, anyway.

- - -

"Carr would have won a lot more than 3 games in 08."

How many without Mallet?

"..."

June 24th, 2010 at 11:28 PM | This... but RR does have (Score:1)
dakotapalm
dakotapalm's picture
Joined: 07/15/2008
MGoPoints: 1879

This...

but RR does have some responsibility for that.  He thought he'd get Pryor so he ignored Mallet and let him split.  That was a choice he made, but he made that choice.

...is historically inaccurate. If you followed the goings on of the team in late 2007, it was clear that Mallett was not on board with what the remainder of the team was doing.

Don't just say, "Carr would have won a lot more than 3 games in 08." Demonstrate. Tell us how. Then, as you do, remember how 2007 began. Third, quit.

June 25th, 2010 at 9:56 AM | How would Carr have won? (Score:1)
dahblue
dahblue's picture
Joined: 11/09/2009
MGoPoints: 1468

Well...I look at Carr's past record, where he never had a losing season and always went to bowl games.  I extend that forward to make the extremely reasonable inference that he would have won a lot more than 3 games.

June 25th, 2010 at 7:02 AM | And how, exactly (Score:1)
TIMMMAAY
TIMMMAAY's picture
Joined: 09/08/2008
MGoPoints: 5950

Was the bare cupboard RR's fault? Nice to know he just "ignored" Mallett, because he thought Pryor was in the bag. You must have some good sources...

not just "douchey" MGoBlog user, but now TRUSTED MGoBlog user

June 25th, 2010 at 10:11 AM | Really? (Score:1)
dahblue
dahblue's picture
Joined: 11/09/2009
MGoPoints: 1468

Hold on a sec...maybe you don't remember, but I'm the same guy who has accurately predicted multiple football commitment dates, accurately predicted the opening of certain bball scholarships, accurately stated the date Manny signed with an agent weeks before it was public knowledge (and was blasted for daring to claim he had done so), etc.  Yes.  I do have good sources.

So, I'll just say that the feeling was that Pryor would be coming to A2.  If you don't believe anything I'm saying, that's perfectly understandable.  I have no issue with that...just trying to share info with other Michigan fans.  Sometimes, a coach has to work to keep important players on a team.  I'm not aware of anyone saying that RR tried to keep Mallet in a manner like Beilein did in having to work to keep star players like Manny and DeShawn (even though they didn't perfectly fit his system).  RR may (we all hope) turn into a great, winning Michigan coach, but that doesn't mean he hasn't made mistakes along the way.

June 25th, 2010 at 10:20 AM | The only thing that is worse (Score:1)
blueblueblue
Joined: 12/29/2008
MGoPoints: 2257

The only thing that is worse than a poster claiming that RR ignored or in one way or another ran off Mallett is the 50 posters who must reply to that poster to tell him he is wrong.

Why are you all still having this argument? Why even respond? Why do you all feel you have to put your 2 cents in? Get in on the negbang and move on. Stop clouding up a thread or the board rehashing these stupid arguments. 

June 25th, 2010 at 4:37 PM | While you're at it (Score:1)
InterM
InterM's picture
Joined: 01/16/2009
MGoPoints: 1101

Can you accurately predict tonight's winning lottery numbers for me?

June 25th, 2010 at 6:16 PM | Powerball or Daily 4? (Score:1)
dahblue
dahblue's picture
Joined: 11/09/2009
MGoPoints: 1468

Daily 4:   3 9 5 7 

Powerball:  19 50 21 5 42  *12

June 24th, 2010 at 5:22 PM | Pelini IMMEDIATELY turned Nebraska around (Score:1)
Logan88
Joined: 01/05/2009
MGoPoints: 2906

Why would you not be in favor of that? Despite the we-are-screwed-for-at-least-three-years-if-we-fire-RR meme that is constantly bleated out, it IS possible for a good coach to win quickly with another coaches' players.

It only took (at most) two years for Carroll, Stoops, Tressel, Saban, Meyer, Kelly, et. al to get their respective programs to elite level when they took over.

We ARE Michigan....COME GET SOME!!!

June 24th, 2010 at 6:47 PM | Great! Are we going to hire the next Stoops or... (Score:1)
befuggled
befuggled's picture
Joined: 07/01/2008
MGoPoints: 1020

The next John Blake?

Are we going to hire the next Urban Meyer or the next Ron Zook?

Where's Charlie Bauman when you need him?

June 24th, 2010 at 11:32 PM | And which one of those (Score:1)
dakotapalm
dakotapalm's picture
Joined: 07/15/2008
MGoPoints: 1879

And which one of those coaches would you actually want?

Carroll- NCAA violations.

Stoops- you can bring much different players to OU than you can to Michigan.

Tressel-?

Saban- Seriously. Oversign like he does, and you can turn a program around in 2 months.

Meyer- you want 30 arrests like he's had? Also, an incredibly dishonest person.

Kelly- Okay, I'd take him.  Actually wanted him when Carr retired. But again, recruiting players to Cincinnati (juco, etc) is a lot different than Michigan.

Et al- Haven't heard of him.

June 24th, 2010 at 5:28 PM | Offense wasn't rebuilt (Score:1)
spam and beans
Joined: 09/30/2009
MGoPoints: 13

I am pretty sure Callahan's OC stuck with the new coaching staff at Nebraska.  The Defense is what was rebuilt at Nebraska.  But I agree that I wouldn't want a drastically different Offense put in place if things turn bad this year.  What would really be bad if a change is made, is that I really think 2011 in going to be an amazing year for Rich Rod and Michigan, if Rich Rod is allowed to stay.

June 24th, 2010 at 8:38 PM | Well, it wasn't just the (Score:1)
Bando Calrissian
Bando Calrissian's picture
Joined: 07/02/2008
MGoPoints: 7912

Well, it wasn't just the offense when it came to Callahan.  He came in and, quite literally, took a flamethrower to that program.  Severely curtailed their walkon program.  Stonewalled alumni.  Did quite everything he possibly could to make sure that transition was as drastic and "my way or the highway" as possible.  Nebraska sure didn't like his results on the field, but there was just as much vitriol about what he was doing to set that up.  Thus, short tenure.

June 25th, 2010 at 9:59 AM | Ironic (Score:1)
dahblue
dahblue's picture
Joined: 11/09/2009
MGoPoints: 1468

With the exception of curtailing the walkon program (which RR expanded), your comment is ironic in that it really captures a lot of people's feelings about how RR went about things upon taking over at Michigan.  In any event, we all probably agree that his tenure length will not be dictated by his attitude, but instead by his record.

June 24th, 2010 at 5:13 PM | I believe the correct (Score:1)
FabFiver5
FabFiver5's picture
Joined: 09/24/2008
MGoPoints: 814

I believe the correct verbiage is "aboverage" tight ends.

"That's tremendous, Jim."
June 24th, 2010 at 5:14 PM | I can picture (Score:1)
Solipsist
Solipsist's picture
Joined: 02/24/2010
MGoPoints: 0

a change in defensive cordinator if the defense is as weak as i fear. Please pan out corners!

"Not everybody is the perfect person in the world,everyone does -- kills people, murders people, steals from you, steals from me." -Pryor

June 24th, 2010 at 5:44 PM | I highly doubt you will see a (Score:1)
joeyb
joeyb's picture
Joined: 10/12/2008
MGoPoints: 11300

I highly doubt you will see a new DC next year. Gerg had a pretty good year last year considering he was forced to start two walkons at one point and the lack of depth/skill at DB. I would expect a decent-to-good, but not great year on defense.

June 24th, 2010 at 5:20 PM | Oklahoma? (Score:1)
Space Coyote
Space Coyote's picture
Joined: 06/18/2009
MGoPoints: 4364

If I remember correctly, RR was starting see that Koger was a great talent and wanted (needed) to get him on the field, and because of that talked with several people from Oklahoma, who run a different spread, but utilize their TEs very well.

 

I'm not saying RR isn't innovative, he's done a lot in the spread offense, and while he may not have invented H-back in a spread formation (obviously he didn't invent the H-back as a position), one of the most important things a coach can do is view the landscape around them and understand what others are doing.  The more RR understands other offenses, and how they utilize similar talent, the better coach he will be, and the more innovative he can be.  I think RR is still using what he learned from the Oklahoma coaches and figuring out how to utilize that information in the offense he wants to run.  Either way, we all hope he's successful.

4/23/13 - Denard Robinson's NFL Future, Part II

June 24th, 2010 at 5:26 PM | Reason No. 1597 (Score:1)
Seth9
Joined: 04/01/2009
MGoPoints: 2336

I'd like to read your entire list.

June 24th, 2010 at 5:26 PM | I want to see him around until 2011 at the very least (Score:1)
Crime Reporter
Crime Reporter's picture
Joined: 12/19/2008
MGoPoints: 8045

These last two years have stunk up the joint big time, but I believe in what RR is doing. I'm treating this as his second year. The 2008 season was a waste any way you slice it.

Christ in me arise and dispel all the darkness.

June 24th, 2010 at 5:38 PM | Tesla - The Rock Band? (Score:1)
Slinginsam
Joined: 06/17/2009
MGoPoints: 16

How does that figure into Coach Rod's strategy?

June 25th, 2010 at 1:10 AM | This isn't funny. At all. (Score:1)
BigBlue02
Joined: 06/29/2009
MGoPoints: 1853

This isn't funny. At all.

June 24th, 2010 at 6:23 PM | My uncalled-for 2010 formulas, just because.... (Score:1)
blueblueblue
Joined: 12/29/2008
MGoPoints: 2257

 

Overly-simplistic approach based on MSU, OSU, and potential bowl game scenarios (my assumption is that we bowl with 6 wins):

8 wins or greater = he stays 

7 wins including win over OSU = he stays (no matter all other losses)

7 wins, which includes a bowl win, but losses to MSU and OSU = he stays (momentum)

7 wins including a win over MSU,  but losses to OSU and a bowl loss = he stays 

7 wins, but  losses to MSU and OSU and a bowl loss = he goes (iffy)

6 wins including win over OSU, but a loss to MSU and a bowl loss = he stays (iffy)

6 wins including win over MSU, but a loss to OSU and a bowl loss = he goes (iffy)

6 wins, but losses to MSU and OSU and bowl loss = he goes

5 wins or fewer = he goes

June 24th, 2010 at 6:26 PM | If Kwame... (Score:1)
VAWolverine
Joined: 11/06/2008
MGoPoints: 1783

has been given a minimum of 15 months then RR should get two years.

June 24th, 2010 at 8:46 PM | What happens if Rich Rod gets (Score:1)
SEAL Fan
Joined: 01/18/2010
MGoPoints: 1599

What happens if Rich Rod gets hit with 19 federal indictments? 

Theme provided by Roopletheme; sidebars adapted from Chris Murphy.