Question - Deep Safety

Submitted by ciszew on

So RR said for the most part that deep safety is his biggest concern in the secondary and it may be a position in which true freshman can contribute. 

Who are all the candidates to play this position?  (even the true freshmen)

Is JT Turner a candidate for deep safety?  Or would he fit more of the Cam Gordon safety position?  Why is the coaching staff reluctant to turn Turner into a safety? (I'm assuming depth at CB)

What are some creative solutions to the deep safety postion?  I.E. Could Woolfolk go back?

Interested to hear the opinions out there. 

Dark Blue

August 2nd, 2010 at 3:53 PM ^

In the 2010 football preview of The Wolverine, they had Cam Gordon listed as the starting free saftey, with Vlad backing him up. Tony Gibson said in an interview that he thought JT Turner could be a VERY GOOD corner. I don't think we'll really know until Opening Day who the starting Deep Saftey will be.

Victory Collins

August 2nd, 2010 at 3:54 PM ^

seems reluctant to even acknowledge Turner's existence.  Not a very good sign, unless he is some sort of Secret Weapon X they will spring upon unsuspecting offenses.

 

Carvin Johnson could contribute as a true freshmen at safety.  The guy is the real deal.

BiaBiakabutuka21

August 2nd, 2010 at 6:42 PM ^

anyone will know if he is the real deal until we see him play in a college game.  We will know more once fall camp starts, of course.

But to answer your question, there have been some rumblings that I read mostly on Scout that he is much faster than previously thought and that he arrived on campus in great physical condition.   He was one of very few freshman to be put in an accelerated work out program with Barwis... meaning they expect him to compete to be in the 2 deep.

So nothing very concrete at this point.  But I do think he has the potential to surprise some people this year.  It may have more to do with the depth chart as opposed to his physical ability.

umjgheitma

August 2nd, 2010 at 3:57 PM ^

Every other DB besides like Woolfork, Floyd, Christian, and Talbott are up for playing deep safety. Could be like Vlad or Turner back there (wouldn't mind seeing a young WR take a shot at it).

icefins26

August 2nd, 2010 at 3:57 PM ^

Woolfolk needs to stay at corner for now; I am hoping Cam steps up as our deep safety but he definitely won't start.  I am guessing Vlad will start at deep safety and then Cam will get some looks periodically until he is ready.  Turner will stay at corner.

steve sharik

August 2nd, 2010 at 4:33 PM ^

...in what game has Vlad played deep safety?

Gordon ran with the 1s in spring ball; Vlad, with the 2s.  Since neither has played a game yet at deep safety, since Gordon was with the 1s in spring, and since all players and coaches interviewed have loved what Gordon has done at deep safety, I believe you are jumping to conclusions regarding Rodriguez's statement today.

icefins26

August 2nd, 2010 at 4:09 PM ^

My source was strictly RR.  He mentioned this today:

Cameron Gordon hasn't played in a game yet, so they're hesitant to anoint him before he plays. He was one of the best players on the whole team this spring, however. True freshmen might have an opportunity to contribute at safety.

BiaBiakabutuka21

August 2nd, 2010 at 4:32 PM ^

was saying that he was hesitant to call him one of their best players or a star on defense and obviously he is not going to name the starter before fall camp starts.

But by no means, did he say that he was hesitant to start Cam Gordon because he is a freshman.  We are going to have people playing in the secondary with very little experience whether it be a RS Freshman, Sophmore, or True Freshman.

wlubd

August 2nd, 2010 at 4:03 PM ^

I don't think RR was referring the the deep safety positions, but more of the spur/bandit position. Gordon seems to have the free safety spot nailed down with Emilien behind him.

For spur/bandit, I'd assume Kovacs is up there for one of the spots but not necessarily. Lump in Simmons, T.Jones, Turner (Probably) and maybe M.Robinson and Furman from the true freshmen. Have a feeling I'm missing someone obvious to include in here as well.

jtmc33

August 2nd, 2010 at 4:51 PM ^

Part of me wants to see Furman start at Spur, Christian at CB, and M. Robinson at Bandit from the first week of the season and start 13 games.

The other part of me knows that is a pipe dream and prays that Kovacs improves his pass coverage, T. Gordon is a  super-sleeper, and JT Floyd is actually as greatly improved as the buzz indicates.

Either way, the wanting, praying, and hoping is going to continue until 3:30 on 9/4/10 and probably last throughout the season.

Hey, at least the front 6 and Woolfolk are settled in.  That's assuming Big Will is ready, and the Ezeh and Mouton regain their ............. Oh, Jesus Make It Stop!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Blueskins

August 2nd, 2010 at 6:25 PM ^

I like Cam Gordon at FS and Kovacs at Bandit. Rich Rod did mention Mike Williams in his press conference FWIW. I just hope the true freshman safety competition he was referring to was for the spur position cuz if Mike Williams starts, tight ends will routinely be getting 100+ yards against us.

ciszew

August 2nd, 2010 at 4:08 PM ^

...yeah you are right RR said the "safety position" and some of the mods on another site said it was deep, but you are right it could be any of the safety positions. 

This will be a really interesting position to watch during the year. 

Seth

August 2nd, 2010 at 4:58 PM ^

Remember, there are three safety positions. The first is inhabited by Cam Gordon, whom RR mentioned in his (RR's) response to the same question:

We mentioned Cam Gordon, who has not played yet. So always a little hesitant to anoint someone as, hey, this guy's going to be a player until they actually do it in games. But we feel really good about Cam Gordon his role in the secondary.

He then hyped up J.T. Floyd for a breath, which: okay, we know Floyd plays hard and smart and that he can get outrun by Indiana running backs and is thus limited but RR didn't say that. Then he moved on to this:

And the safety position, it's kind of wide open. That's the one position where we may have a few freshmen, true freshmen, have an opportunity to contribute. And that's a little scary to say that.

But we really feel confident in the guys we signed that they're smart guys, they're tough guys. If they can learn quickly in camp, they may be able to help us in the secondary.

I think it's pretty obvious that Rodriguez is talking about Spur/Spinner* and Bandit**, which in spring were held down, respectively, by Jordan Kovacs and Thomas Gordon. For those scoring at home, that's a redshirt sophomore student body walk-on, and a not-hyped redshirt freshman.

When he says "a few freshmen, true freshmen," he is speaking of Marvin Robinson and Josh Furman, both highly regarded and college-ready linebacker/safety tweener types who were among the top three players in our 2010 defensive recruiting class.***

----------------------------------------

* best to call it "strong safety" even though it's a weakside position.
** What Stevie Brown played last year.
*** The third is Cullen Christian, who by year's end my also be starting.

Seth

August 2nd, 2010 at 6:10 PM ^

I am going to get those two confused forever.

GERG told us that one likes his meat raw while the other gets his cooked, so I figured the guy eating Carpaccio and Steak Tartare was the more slight, refined position than the guy ordering Rib-Eye and Barbecue Beef.

BiaBiakabutuka21

August 2nd, 2010 at 5:16 PM ^

also throw Carvin Johnson in there with Marvin Robinson and Josh Furman as a true freshman candidate to have a chance to crack the two deep at various Safety positions whether it be Bandit, Spur or even Deep.

Marvin Robinson, Cullen Christian, Carvin Johnson, Jibreel Black, and possibly Josh Furman were all reportedly the only freshman to be extended invites into Barwis' main work out group

Magnus

August 2nd, 2010 at 9:39 PM ^

You're right about the first four, but Josh Furman shouldn't be included in that group.  He's got a lot of work to do if he wants to play safety at the next level.  At best, we should expect to see him sprinting downfield on kickoff coverage.

BiaBiakabutuka21

August 2nd, 2010 at 10:53 PM ^

potential to be an absolute beast this year on Special Teams duty though.

Picturing him sprinting downfield on kickoff coverage with his dreads flapping in the wind gets me a little bit pumped up.  I think he is probably still a little raw to expect him to contribute at the Spur this year, although you never know.  However, his straight line speed and athleticism is perfect for special teams.

jbibiza

August 2nd, 2010 at 5:20 PM ^

In Casteel's  West Virginia 3-3-5 the Bandit is more like a true safety (strong) and the Spur is the Stevie Brown hybrid LB/Safety with less deep coverage responsibility.  The Deep/Free Safety is self-explanatory (this year).

http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:nL6eFRfPCfEJ:www.sportsnewsandscores.com/tag/bandit+spur+and+bandit+positions&cd=1&hl=en&ct=clnkafety 

Michigan4Life

August 2nd, 2010 at 5:36 PM ^

be the starting box safety until someone beat him out.  As of now, it appears that no one seriously challenged Kovacs for the starting spot.  Kovacs has been very good against the run and can tackle which is change from previous defensive players from the past few years where we keep seeing them missing tackles after takckles.  The only deficiencies that he showed is coverage skills and his speed.

 

Is that so bad that a walk on is playing?  I mean is it bad that Brian Griese started at QB even though he was a walk on?  Or Owen Schmitt playing at FB when he's a walk on.  Jim Leonhard, a FS for Wisconsin a few years ago is a walk on?  Why can't Kovacs be that guy?

jtmc33

August 2nd, 2010 at 5:44 PM ^

He can, and maybe will.  but  you answered your own question when you stated "The only deficiencies that he showed is coverage skills and his speed."

Those are two very big deficiencies.  If a true freshman, or any other player for that matter, can be almost as good as Kovacs against the run (and he is very very good) but better in defending the pass in the flats (speed) and covering TE and slots (coverage skills) then I invite the change.

jmblue

August 2nd, 2010 at 7:06 PM ^

The "Griese was a walk-on" notion has more lives than Dracula.  It makes for a great story but it's not true.

For the record, Griese was a regular recruit.  However, he committed at the very end of the year, after we'd run out of available scholarships.  Gary Moeller promised him one as soon as one opened up, and one opened up that fall.  Griese's story has virtually nothing in common with that of Kovacs (a student who made the team on a walk-on tryout).  Basically, we oversigned by one in the 1993 recruiting class and Griese was the one guy who had to wait until a spot opened up.