Home
we had subs it was crazy

Primary links

  • About
    • $upport (lol)
    • Ethics
    • FAQ
    • Privacy Policy
  • Contact
  • MGoStore
  • MGoBoard
    • MGoBoard FAQ
    • Ticket spreadsheet
    • Michigan bar locator
    • Moderator Action Sticky
  • Useful Stuff
    • Depth Chart By Class
    • Unofficial Two Deep
    • 2013 Offer Board
    • Crude Bug Tracking System
    • Third Down Stats
    • Diaries, Windows Live Writer, And You
    • Michigan Future Schedules
    • User-Curated HOF
    • 2013 Recruiting Board
    • Where To Eat In Ann Arbor
Home Forums MGoBoard

Navigation

  • Forums
  • Recent posts

User login

  • Create new account
  • Request new password

MGoElsewhere

  • @MGoBlog (Brian)
  • @aceanbender
  • @TomVH (Tom)
  • RSS Feed
  • iPhone App
  • Facebook profile
  • MGoKindle Store
  • mgo.licio.us
  • Brian @ TSB [Archive]
  • Brian @ AOL [Archive]
  • Sour Salty Bitter Sweet

Michigan Blogs

  • Big House Blog
  • Burgeoning Wolverine Star
  • Genuinely Sarcastic
  • Go Blue Michigan Wolverine
  • Holdin' The Rope
  • MGoFootball
  • MVictors
  • Maize 'n' Blue Nation
  • Maize 'n' Brew
  • Maize And Go Blue
  • Michigan Hockey Net
  • The Blog That Yost Built
  • The Hoover Street Rag
  • The M Block
  • The M Zone
  • The Wolverine Blog
  • Touch The Banner
  • UMGoBlog
  • UMHoops
  • UMTailgate
  • Wolverine Liberation Army

M On The Net

  • mgovideo
  • MGoBlue.com
  • Mike DeSimone
  • Recruiting Planet
  • The Wolverine
  • Go Blue Wolverine
  • Winged Helmet
  • UMGoBlue.com
  • MaizeRage.org
  • Puckhead
  • The M Den
  • True Blue Fan Forum

Big Ten Blogs

  • Illinois
    • A Lion Eye
    • Hail To The Orange
    • Illinois Baseball Report
    • Illinois Loyalty
  • Indiana
    • Inside The Hall
    • The Crimson Quarry
  • Iowa
    • Black Heart, Gold Pants
    • Fight For Iowa
  • Michigan State
    • The Only Colors
  • Minnesota
    • GopherHole.com
    • The Daily Gopher
    • I'm In Love With A Fringe Bowl Team
    • TNABACG
  • Nebraska
    • Big Red Network
    • Corn Nation
    • Husker Mike's Blasphemy
    • Husker Gameday
  • Northwestern
    • Sippin' On Purple
    • Lake The Posts
  • Notre Dame
    • The House Rock Built
    • One Foot Down
  • Ohio State
    • Eleven Warriors
    • Buckeye Commentary
    • Men of the Scarlet and Gray
    • Our Honor Defend
    • The Buckeye Nine
  • Penn State
    • Slow States
    • Black Shoe Diaries
    • Happy Valley Hardball
    • Penn State Clips
    • Linebacker U
    • Nittany White Out
  • Purdue
    • Boiled Sports
    • Hammer and Rails
  • Wisconsin
    • Bruce Ciskie

Links of Note

  • Baseball
    • Big Ten Hardball
    • College Baseball Today
    • The Baseball Zealot
    • The College Baseball Blog
  • Basketball
    • Ken Pomeroy
    • Basketball Prospectus
    • Midmajority
  • College Hockey
    • Chris Heisenberg
    • College Hockey Stats
    • Inside College Hockey
    • Michigan College Hockey
    • Hockey's Future
    • Sioux Sports
    • USCHO
    • Western College Hockey
    • CCHA
      • LSSU Hockey
      • Bronco Hockey Blog
  • Football
    • Smart Football
    • Every Day Should Be Saturday
    • Doctor Saturday
    • CFB Stats
    • Harold Stassen
    • NCAA D-I Stats Page
    • The Wizard Of Odds
  • General
    • Sports Central
  • Local Interest
    • The Ann Arbor Chronicle
    • Arborwiki
    • Arbor Update
    • Teeter Talk
    • Vacuum
  • Teams Of The D
    • Lions
      • Pride of Detroit
      • Fire Millen
    • Pistons
      • Detroit Bad Boys
      • Need4Sheed
    • Tigers
      • Roar Of The Tigers
      • The Detroit Tigers Weblog
      • The Daily Fungo
    • Red Wings
      • On The Wings
      • Behind The Jersey
      • Winging It In Motown
    • Michigan Sports Forum

Archive

  • May 2013 (42)
  • April 2013 (94)
  • March 2013 (104)
  • February 2013 (81)
  • January 2013 (93)
  • December 2012 (74)
  • November 2012 (142)
  • October 2012 (143)
  • September 2012 (107)
  • August 2012 (103)
  •  
  • 1 of 11
  • ››

Get Yer Tickets

Football Display Case

NFL Watches

Follow your favorite team with localtv-satellite.com: Click Here.

Site Search

Diaries

  • New
  • Popular
  • Hot
  • OT - Kentucky Derby 2012
    k.o.k.Law - 2 weeks ago
  • Observations on the National Championship Game
    Paps - 2 weeks ago
  • Recalling My First Experiences With MGoCulture
    LSAClassOf2000 - 2 weeks ago
  • 2013 NFL Draft Recap: B1G Team Comparisons
    UMgradMSUdad - 2 weeks ago
  • The Blockhams in "TIE YOUR LACES"
    Six Zero - 3 weeks ago
  • ‹‹
  • 2 of 4
  • ››
more
  • Big Ten Recruiting Rankings 5-15-13
    Ace - 1,342 views
  • Future Non-Conference Opponent Recruiting Watch
    EGD - 495 views
  • Way Too Late B1G Men's Basketball Scheduling Idea
    BeileinBuddy - 356 views
  • More Milford Men Than Michigan Men: Comparing the 11-12 and 12-13 Hockey Teams
    MGoBlueline - 39 views
  • Big Ten Recruiting Rankings 5-15-13
    Ace - 50 comments
  • MGoAcceptance: Another MGoAnecdote
    LSAClassOf2000 - 19 comments
  • The Blockhams in "HOCKEY HANGOVER"
    Six Zero - 13 comments
  • Future Non-Conference Opponent Recruiting Watch
    EGD - 13 comments
  • Way Too Late B1G Men's Basketball Scheduling Idea
    BeileinBuddy - 2 comments
  •  
  • 1 of 2
  • ››
more

MGoBoard

  • New
  • Recent
  • Hot
  • OT: Ron English & Mike Hart to jump out of a plane for new EMU bathrooms
    0 replies
  • OT: ESPN Mag/Insider special $5/Year
    0 replies
  • BBall year in review Deleted...
    7 replies
  • OT: RIP Dick Trickle and Ken Venturi
    12 replies
  • Siva Admits Trey Burke's Title Game Block Was Clean
    43 replies
  • Softball Open Thread 7pm vs Valpo ESPN3
    33 replies
  • OT Staee shutout by Penn St 9-0 in baseball
    20 replies
  • Alex Bars to Notre Dame
    89 replies
  • OT - The Friday Night Alcoholics - Early Edition Thread
    59 replies
  • Trey Burke current on ESPN2 at NBA Combine
    28 replies
  • OT: End of Drew and Mike on 101WRIF
    37 replies
  • Michigan has #1 recruiting class on ESPN now.
    72 replies
  • The Talented Shallmans
    41 replies
  • OT: Advice on moving to Ann Arbor
    71 replies
  • Speight to compete in Oakland Elite 11 camp
    45 replies
  •  
  • 1 of 7
  • ››
  • OT: Ron English & Mike Hart to jump out of a plane for new EMU bathrooms
    0 replies
  • OT: ESPN Mag/Insider special $5/Year
    0 replies
  • OT: RIP Dick Trickle and Ken Venturi
    12 replies
  • OT Staee shutout by Penn St 9-0 in baseball
    20 replies
  • Speight to compete in Oakland Elite 11 camp
    45 replies
  • OT: End of Drew and Mike on 101WRIF
    37 replies
  • Alex Bars to Notre Dame
    89 replies
  • OT: Advice on moving to Ann Arbor
    71 replies
  • Siva Admits Trey Burke's Title Game Block Was Clean
    43 replies
  • Trey Burke current on ESPN2 at NBA Combine
    28 replies
  • Michigan has #1 recruiting class on ESPN now.
    72 replies
  • Hawaii football changing name back to Rainbow Warriors
    59 replies
  • BBall year in review Deleted...
    7 replies
  • OT - The Friday Night Alcoholics - Early Edition Thread
    59 replies
  • OT: Notre Dame 2013, pretty much BCS or bust
    44 replies
  •  
  • 1 of 7
  • ››
  • OT: Red Wings @ Ducks Game 7 Open Thread
    229 replies
  • OT: Red Wings vs. Blackhawks Open Thread
    201 replies
  • Shane Morris to wear the famed #7 jersey, J.J. McGrath #46
    175 replies
  • Jabrill Peppers Announcement Date Set
    169 replies
  • Brady Hoke Calls Notre Dame A Chicken
    162 replies
  • Hello: Lawrence Marshall
    124 replies
  • UM 2014 Conf schedule football
    123 replies
  • Saturday night drinking thread
    121 replies
  • Brandon on Uniformzzz
    119 replies
  • Notre Dame's Nix fires back at Coach Hoke
    110 replies
  • GoBlueWolverine's Dre Barthwell: Marvin Robinson to leave Michigan
    96 replies
  • Sparty losing recruits to the rap game
    95 replies
  • Wading in the waters of tRCMB, post Marshall
    95 replies
  • Alex Bars to Notre Dame
    89 replies
  • PSU about to get blasted again by SI investigative report
    88 replies
  •  
  • 1 of 7
  • ››

mgo.licio.us

  • Big Ten football procrastinates on parity-based scheduling, and nothing ever changes

    the just released schedules were a flat-out statement that the B10 doesn't believe SOS will matter in playoff selection

    1 comments
  • Michigan's Glenn Robinson III, Mitch McGary ranked inside top 20 on ESPN's 2014 draft board

    but I thought that draft was supposed to be incredibly loaded?

    0 comments
  • Tim Hardaway Jr. turning heads, viewed as a first-rounder by some teams, analyst says

    If you're gonna go please be in the first round.

    0 comments
  • Michigan-Ohio State once, Indiana-Purdue once? The Big Ten has to protect its hoops rivalries

    another delightful side effect of a 14 team conference

    0 comments
  • Beilein on transfers: All should have to sit a year, regardless of situation

    I disagree.

    0 comments
  • Julie Hermann takes over as Rutgers AD, won't try to spend like Michigan

    GOOD PLAN

    1 comments
  • Jay Harris says no to Michigan State, decides to become a rapper

    hahahahaha

    0 comments
  • The Difference Between A Good Fan And A Bad Fan

    thoughtful piece from Jacobi on middle finger lady

    3 comments
  • Michigan's rising recruiting profile exciting John Beilein, who remains true to his scouting form

    Their high school coaches and AAU coaches have probably a better appreciation of Michigan than maybe they had before," Beilein said. "It's a tough balance right now. Tim Hardaway and Trey Burke weren't really high-profile players, nor was Darius Morris, and all were high-profile players. "We're still looking at 'who is the best fit.' "

    0 comments
  • Charles Barkley discusses Michael Jordan, Dream Team and more - NBA - Jack McCallum - SI.com

    "When I call somebody a midget, clearly I'm not trying to insult f---ing midgets. I'm just using basketball terminology."

    0 comments
  • Why does the NFL make for such bad media?

    robots

    0 comments
  • Pictured: Detroit's Robocop Statue nears completion date

    elsewhere in awesome things kickstarter made happen

    0 comments
  • Spectacular images of the madness that was the first FA Cup final

    And you think you're crowded at Michigan Stadium

    0 comments
  • Bear Vs. Monkey Bicycle Race Ends With Bear Eating Monkey

    IMPORTANT: Ondre Pipkins not involved.

    11 comments
  • Damon Bullock Has the Greatest Vine Account of All Time

    this is amazing

    7 comments

A Question for Borges: What Happened to the Veer?

75 posts / 0 new
Login or register to post comments
Last post
November 5th, 2012 at 1:14 AM
#1
stephenrjking
stephenrjking's picture
Joined: 03/15/2012
MGoPoints: 1294
A Question for Borges: What Happened to the Veer?

We now know that Devin Gardner was basically Michigan's only serviceable quarterback Saturday. Bellomy was hurt (and it's pretty obvious it was legit, given his absence from warmups and Kennedy's insertion in garbage time) and Denard was unavailable.

We also suspect that Al Borges isn't a huge fan of using a quarterback in designated runs, and that starting next year the "Let Denard Run" portion of the playbook will be mothballed. He had a week of Devin Gardner as his first-team quarterback, knowing that Denard and Bellomy might not go. 

The result? A gameplan that completely ignored the quarterback as a runner. Devin's a pretty fast guy, but his running plays were mostly improvised, with a light helping of traditional drop-back draws. There were no veers where Devin actually could have made a run read. No QB isos or sweeps. We just saw what might be our QB next year; did we just see a preview of our new offense?

My question: Did Borges remove the QB run plays from the gameplan because he preferred Gardner as a more traditional drop-back-and-occasionally-scramble QB? Or did he merely take runs out of the plan because Michigan absolutely could not afford to have Devin get hurt?

This question is in good faith; I think either answer is reasonably valid, and on this weekend at least the Manball grind-and-torch-clock huddle offense was absolutely perfect for Michigan. The second quarter was brilliant. This question is relevant, though, because if Devin starts next year but has a valid backup or two, he can still do damage in an inverted veer that seems to work pretty well.

Servant. Pastor. Husband. Michigan fan in Duluth. 

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
Tags:
  • MGoBoard
  • football

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
November 5th, 2012 at 1:23 AM | It is a good question. (Score:5 Normal)
raptor
raptor's picture
Joined: 04/11/2009
MGoPoints: 1544

It is a good question. Another possibility is that Devin wasn't sharp on his reads during these plays from not taking many qb snaps so Borges removed them from the plan rather than having some bad decisions being made.

EEB c/o 2014

www.amassingmiles.blogspot.com

  • Login or register to post comments
November 5th, 2012 at 2:56 AM | This is what I was thinking. (Score:1)
kevin holt
kevin holt's picture
Joined: 03/16/2010
MGoPoints: 2807

This is what I was thinking. Gardner might know the playbook, and he's a smart kid, but a lot of the really quick decisions take a lot more than a week's practice. It has to be automatic, and the read plays might just not be there yet.

Mike Martin told me he loves me. My life is quite possibly complete.

Join the bone marrow donor registry today: www.dkmsamericas.org (do it.)

  • Login or register to post comments
November 5th, 2012 at 4:03 AM | That's another reasonable (Score:0 Flamebait)
stephenrjking
stephenrjking's picture
Joined: 03/15/2012
MGoPoints: 1294

That's another reasonable explanation. DG's only inverted veer practice snaps this year have probably been from the wide receiver position. It makes sense not to put him in a play that he hasn't practiced reading.

Servant. Pastor. Husband. Michigan fan in Duluth. 

  • Login or register to post comments
November 5th, 2012 at 12:16 PM | I'm thinking it is a combination of (Score:3 Insightful)
maizenbluenc
maizenbluenc's picture
Joined: 07/21/2009
MGoPoints: 2677

keeping the playbook simple for a guy who's been practicing in another position the whole season, and protecting that guy because the backup is a throwing handless Denard, or a musically talented 4th string back-up.

[Edit:] Actually in this DetNews article, Devin Gardner said the following after the game:

I feel like it was kind of safe due to the fact we didn't have as much depth at quarterback today so they couldn't run the quarterback, ... I'm comfortable doing that (running), but there's no way we could have done that. It wouldn't have been smart.

So they game planned to protect him. (It also says if Devin went down, a limited Denard was the backup plan.)

 

  • Login or register to post comments
November 5th, 2012 at 4:29 PM |  Or it could have been the (Score:0)
B1G_Fan
Joined: 10/11/2012
MGoPoints: 322

 Or it could have been the fact that Devin was the only scholarship QB available for that game and didn't want him to run and risk injury. If Devin goes out you have Jack Kennedy in as your QB.

  • Login or register to post comments
November 5th, 2012 at 1:23 AM | It veered right out of the playbook (Score:5 Normal)
ShruteBeetFarms
Joined: 09/25/2010
MGoPoints: 1527

hey yo

"I'm not a vegetarian b/c I love animals. I'm a vegetarian b/c I hate plants"

  • Login or register to post comments
November 5th, 2012 at 1:41 AM | Fire. Him. (Score:-1 Trolling)
marti221
Joined: 04/21/2010
MGoPoints: 516

Fire. Him.

  • Login or register to post comments
November 5th, 2012 at 1:34 AM | Trust? (Score:4 Normal)
HartAttack20
HartAttack20's picture
Joined: 06/08/2009
MGoPoints: 1371

I think it's pretty obvious that Denard's skill set makes QB runs a necessity. If you're going to have Denard as your QB, and I agree he should be the QB, there has to be a reason for it. I'm sorry, but he's not playing QB based on his throwing ability. I think Gardner looked, at least on Saturday, a lot more comfortable as a thrower. Borges may just trust Gardner more passing. I'm not sure if that's the way Borges wants it to be, but that's the way it is. The running game hasn't gone well without Denard (due to both the RB's and the linemen). Maybe they just thought they could exploit the Gophers through the air. Maybe Devin just is not great with the decision making involved with the veer/option. There's a lot of variables. I'm just tryin to enjoy the ride, man. It's fairly obvious that Borges doesn't plan on continuing the QB run attack forever, but it may not be the best idea to scrap it completely when we no longer have Denard.

 

TL;DR Version: I don't know, man.

I can only continue to reference the fact that I live in an onion factory.

  • Login or register to post comments
November 5th, 2012 at 1:35 AM | I seem to remember some (Score:3 Normal)
bklein09
bklein09's picture
Joined: 08/24/2009
MGoPoints: 3023

I seem to remember some called runs with Gardner. One was a QB sweep that picked up a first down.



But let's be honest, Borges wants to run a more traditional system. In addition, he was probably a little concerned about Gardner getting injured.



I think everyone needs to stop their hand wringing over the offense and see how this season and next season play out. Borges seems pretty set in the way he des things and I don't see it changing. Lets just hope his plan for the offense and the players he end up with make for a good combo in coming years.

Those Who Stay...

  • Login or register to post comments
November 5th, 2012 at 1:39 AM | Prevention of injury (Score:5 Normal)
Sinsemillaplease
Joined: 01/01/2011
MGoPoints: 489

Borges gameplanned to keep Gardner healthy.

2014 Offer List BOYCOTT ADIDAS

  • Login or register to post comments
November 5th, 2012 at 1:49 AM | Question for op? (Score:-1 Trolling)
Michigan248
Michigan248's picture
Joined: 01/25/2011
MGoPoints: 697

The veer? The veer is the original triple option ran out of splitbacks formation, when did we run this?

  • Login or register to post comments
November 5th, 2012 at 1:57 AM | OP means the play Chris Brown (Score:3 Normal)
colin
colin's picture
Joined: 07/01/2008
MGoPoints: 1332

OP means the play Chris Brown from Smart Football dubbed "Inverted Veer":

http://smartfootball.com/run-game/what-is-the-inverted-veer-dash-read

Most(ish?) teams run it with power blocking, but it's functionally similar in read since you get downblocking and a frontside DE read.  It's "inverted" because it's not the B back smashing up the middle and the QB taking the edge but vice versa.  

You could run it either way, but the teams that have used it in this fashion have often had larger QBs like Tim Tebow or Cam Newton to run it.  We use it because Borges likes power blocking and Denard is a very good north-south runner.

Since like the middle of last year, it's been our base running play.

...the Canadians make up for it with their emotion and classic ice-dancing skill.

  • Login or register to post comments
November 5th, 2012 at 3:03 AM | You can also put lipstick on (Score:-1 Trolling)
Michigan248
Michigan248's picture
Joined: 01/25/2011
MGoPoints: 697

You can also put lipstick on a pig but that doesnt mean its a woman.

  • Login or register to post comments
November 5th, 2012 at 8:35 AM | He means inverted veer. (Score:2)
joeyb
joeyb's picture
Joined: 10/12/2008
MGoPoints: 11300

He means inverted veer. Brian's just been calling it veer lately. I didn't notice it until my friend started to call it veer. I corrected him, then started noticing Brian calling it veer. It's a lot harder to correct Brian, especially when he already knows the difference and chooses not to make the distinction.

FWIW, a veer from pistol or shotgun would have been a fantastic play to setup the screen to Gallon.

  • Login or register to post comments
November 5th, 2012 at 9:05 AM | I have a feeling that a big (Score:2)
SituationSoap
Joined: 09/22/2012
MGoPoints: 156

I have a feeling that a big part of the reason that Brian's dropped the "Inverted" is because there's basically no one on the national or even regional stage who runs the traditional veer, so there's no particularly useful reason to differentiate. 

  • Login or register to post comments
November 5th, 2012 at 11:49 AM | Actually, I just saw some (Score:2)
joeyb
joeyb's picture
Joined: 10/12/2008
MGoPoints: 11300

Actually, I just saw some video of a team running veer out of pistol and shotgun, but I can't remember which team it was. Regardless, that's still a bad reason to drop the distinction. If he wants to shorten it up, then call it dash as that's what a good number of teams call the play.

  • Login or register to post comments
November 5th, 2012 at 2:11 AM | OSU last year was the big (Score:1)
TSS
TSS's picture
Joined: 09/21/2009
MGoPoints: 1339

OSU last year was the big inversion veerathon.

http://mgoblog.com/content/picture-pages-inverted-veer-ftw

  • Login or register to post comments
November 5th, 2012 at 7:29 AM | Actually... (Score:3 Normal)
CoachBuczekFHS
CoachBuczekFHS's picture
Joined: 01/05/2012
MGoPoints: 146

The Veer can be run out of gun, it's not just a split back thing (although thats most common, espcially in HS). You can run veer out of I, Gun, even single back with WR motion. But, you are correct in the sense that our option isn't a veer. Our version of the spread option isn't a veer at all, in fact. A veer is 3 frontside reads (Normally 3 tech in an even front, DE, OLB). We use MLB,  backside DE reads, and 1 tech reads...which aren't truely veer plays (not even inverted). If anything our version resembles more of an inverted mideline option (in the mideline 1 techs get read, and the MLB could be considered a second level 1 tech, as well). So, if you want to compare our option to anything it would be mideline option, which isn't veer. The orginial triple option is the mideline option run out of wishbone/double wing (Georgia Tech, Navy) and you're only reading 2 players really. In the veer there is 3 reads, our option is innovative in the sense that we read 2nd level defenders too, as opposed to just first level defenders. I don't mean to be a technical Tom, but I'm a football coach and it annoys me, lol. I love the spread option, and if you really are bored Youtube Oregons guru his name is fish something (just type fish oregon into the search bar), and he complains about people calling their option an inverted veer too. It will give you some insight into Borges thought process. I guess I understand it a little more now (I know we all complain about it). Obviously, our S.O. is different than theirs, but you  get a much better sense of how exactly it works, and coaches mindsets. It's good for any of you hardcore technical fans out there, like myself. I agree that Devin doesn't get enough reps at QB in practice (spending the majority of the season at WR) to run the S.O. It takes timing and a million reps in practice to get it right. I thought Borges had some nice plays (like roll out double lead out of I) to get Devin going in the run game a little. Plus, Devin is better than Denard at knowing when to take 3-4 yards when he's in gun and the pass isn't there, rather than just throwing the ball up and yelling "500" in his head. But, I still love Denard though. 

Elite Athletics. Elite Academics. 
896-310-36, 53-42-6 vs. Ohio, 94-74  vs. Little Brother, 20-6-1 vs. SEC
Let them throw rocks...they still have to HAIL! 
  • Login or register to post comments
November 5th, 2012 at 1:48 AM | Risk aversion (Score:1)
Papochronopolis
Papochronopolis's picture
Joined: 09/17/2009
MGoPoints: 1554

You don't want to run your only serviceable qb unless you need to. I think the veer would've come out had it been a close game in the 3rd quarter. Maybe they will brim it back out if the next game is a close one

  • Login or register to post comments
November 5th, 2012 at 2:04 AM | I think risk aversion and (Score:5 Normal)
colin
colin's picture
Joined: 07/01/2008
MGoPoints: 1332

I think risk aversion and Devin's limited practice probably coincided.  We ran what looked to me like the base offense minus the IV.  

...Not exactly on topic, but I think the UFR is going to be ugly.  Our interior line, especially Barnum and Mealer, are really hurting us right now.  In the Nebraska UFR there was some speculation that Mealer isn't nearly as good as Molk in calling the blocks.  I could be wrong, but I think that's decided on between the two guys who need to communicate.  But the sacks iirc all came up the middle and were perhaps the result of bad declaration by Mealer.  

I also wonder if Barnum's knee issues have hurt his ability to play.  Thanks to our depth issues, we really don't have anybody who can really push them or give them time off if they're not seriously hurt but are still impaired.

...the Canadians make up for it with their emotion and classic ice-dancing skill.

  • Login or register to post comments
November 5th, 2012 at 7:12 AM | It looked to me like Lewan (Score:1)
Trebor
Trebor's picture
Joined: 06/30/2008
MGoPoints: 1003

It looked to me like Lewan was making a lot of the line calls on Saturday. Or at least on a few plays that I bothered to notice.

  • Login or register to post comments
November 5th, 2012 at 9:01 AM | I agree with you 100% (Score:2)
Blue in Yarmouth
Blue in Yarmouth's picture
Joined: 02/18/2009
MGoPoints: 2327

This is the first game I really watch the line as the last UFR was really the first one that gave me any indication that there was something wrong there. What I saw was atrocious. The interior of that line and really everyone other than Lewan seemded to be letting guys through like nobodies business. On the run plays, there literally no holes for the back to hit.

I thought when A.B.  and Hoke were saying there weren't any holes for Toussaint and that was the reason he was struggling I thought they were just trying to be nice, but after watching that game I agree. There simply is no running room at all. I think the line is at least decent, I just wonder what they are being taught to do in pracitce.

  • Login or register to post comments
November 5th, 2012 at 2:19 AM | We were playing Minnesota. We (Score:2)
ken725
ken725's picture
Joined: 10/26/2008
MGoPoints: 4540

We were playing Minnesota.

We don't really know how much of the playbook Devin is comfortable with or what they really worked on in practice. All we know is he took more snaps in practice. My hope is that Borges thought we didn't need to run Devin or run the inverted veer to beat Minnesota.

Greetings from Bolivia.

"It's special how the real true people hang together. And if you don't support the program you're not a true Michigan guy. It's that simple."  - Gary Moeller

  • Login or register to post comments
November 5th, 2012 at 7:10 AM | I don't know, man (Score:1 Overrated)
Njia
Njia's picture
Joined: 09/15/2009
MGoPoints: 6038

I remember when, just a year ago, most of us thought that between DRob and DG, the QB position was an embarrassment of riches. This year, not so much, obviously.

The TD to Dileo was awesome, and showed that DG had great vision, but it looked to me like he threw the ball off his back foot and - hard to tell - but its possible he was actually in the air when he released it. Ugh.

So, Borges is probably trying to play with the cards he's been dealt. He doesn't have a great OL, his #1 QB is hurt and even when healthy, is no one's idea of an elite passer. His primary backup, now hurt, is also an INT machine. His new back up is his former #1 WR. His RBs haven't been effective and, along with his remaining WRs, aren't the speediest bunch.

Net net, no veer.

"If life is the road, then Ohio is simply a place to stop for gas." -- Scott Burgess, Detroit News, 9/16/2010
  • Login or register to post comments
November 5th, 2012 at 8:14 AM | Talking points (Score:3 Normal)
STW P. Brabbs
Joined: 08/27/2008
MGoPoints: 2409

Maybe I'm wrong, but this sounds like a post where you've heard a lot about throws off the back foot, so you're applying that newfound knowledge to Gardner. Gardner, a right-handed quarterback was rolling hard to his left under pressure, had no time to set his feet, jumped and threw the ball across his body ... 55+ yards in the air to an open receiver. Let's criticize his technique then.

  • Login or register to post comments
November 5th, 2012 at 8:37 AM | "Newfound knowledge"? (Score:2)
Njia
Njia's picture
Joined: 09/15/2009
MGoPoints: 6038

WTF are you talking about?

"If life is the road, then Ohio is simply a place to stop for gas." -- Scott Burgess, Detroit News, 9/16/2010
  • Login or register to post comments
November 5th, 2012 at 9:08 AM | I think what he was saying was.... (Score:2)
Blue in Yarmouth
Blue in Yarmouth's picture
Joined: 02/18/2009
MGoPoints: 2327

you must not know what you are talking about. Basically, given the play there was literally no possible way for Garnder to NOT throw off his back foot. We hear it here all the time because Borges is so set on having Denard being a pocket passer who throws when his feet are set, but that ignores the fact that many times, when you have a mobile QB who is scrambling and looking downfield they almost always throw the ball on the run without setting their feet. If you are moving toward the line of scrimage (which Devin was) starting the throw on your back foot is the only technique that will work. His momentum is carrying him forward so it isn't the same as a guy in the pocket, backing up and throwing off his back foot with his momentum going backwards.

I guess what I am saying is Devins technique on that throw was spot on IMHE. I also think that what the guy above you is saying as well.

  • Login or register to post comments
November 5th, 2012 at 9:08 AM | He's talking about the fact (Score:4 Normal)
SituationSoap
Joined: 09/22/2012
MGoPoints: 156

He's talking about the fact that criticizing a QB who was in the middle of a scramble, throwing against his body, putting a ball 55 yards in the air on the dot to a wide open reciever is kind of vapid. That was an excellent play by Gardner, and criticizing him because you didn't think his throwing motion was perfect seems a bit short sighted.

  • Login or register to post comments
November 5th, 2012 at 9:33 AM | Well ... that same throw with (Score:1 Overrated)
DonAZ
DonAZ's picture
Joined: 12/05/2011
MGoPoints: 653

Well ... that same throw with those same mechanics with tighter defensive coverage could easily have been a pick.  There was air under that throw and the receiver just camped out and waited for it to come down.  Good thing he was all alone.

It's not criticism of that particular play's outcome ... it's a cautionary warning that when a QB throws like Gardner did on that play then the odds of success go down.

Midwestern born and raised ... now living in the heat of the Arizona desert

  • Login or register to post comments
November 5th, 2012 at 9:58 AM | Exactly my point (Score:2)
Njia
Njia's picture
Joined: 09/15/2009
MGoPoints: 6038

In watching the play again, it's pretty clear that DG stepped into the throw and delivered on target to Dileo, so perhaps his accuracy wasn't as much in question. However, Minny doesn't have the same calibur DBs as other teams we have faced and will face again this season. I'm not sure the same play would have turned out as fortuitously for DG had he been facing a better defense.

"If life is the road, then Ohio is simply a place to stop for gas." -- Scott Burgess, Detroit News, 9/16/2010
  • Login or register to post comments
November 5th, 2012 at 10:30 AM | You could also look at (Score:1)
TaiStreetsMyHero
TaiStreetsMyHero's picture
Joined: 08/08/2012
MGoPoints: 724

The play where DG is throwing from our own endzone and launches a rifle off of his backfoot to a tightly covered receiver (forget who) for a huge 15 yard pass.



Minnesota grains of salt apply, but it could be that Gardner has the gunslinger mentality and the gun to make some of those plays.

I do it for my love of the Streets

  • Login or register to post comments
November 5th, 2012 at 12:12 PM | "Minnesota grains of salt (Score:2)
DonAZ
DonAZ's picture
Joined: 12/05/2011
MGoPoints: 653

"Minnesota grains of salt apply, but it could be that Gardner has the gunslinger mentality and the gun to make some of those plays."

And the chance of throwing a pick-6 if not careful ... particularly against better defensive backs who know how to give the illusion of openness but then close on the ball when thrown.

The issue is whether it's better on the whole for a QB to have good throwing mechanics.  The answer is clearly "yes". 

Does that mean Gardner's mechanics invalidate him as a QB?  Absolutely not.  Does it mean Gardner has room for improvement?  Yes, of course ... who doesn't?.  Does it mean he should abandon all gunslinger risk-taking?  No, of course not.  Does it mean the better a player is at mechanics and decision making the better the QB he becomes?  Yes, of course.

Midwestern born and raised ... now living in the heat of the Arizona desert

  • Login or register to post comments
November 5th, 2012 at 12:55 PM | But on that play it was 3 and (Score:3 Normal)
gbdub
gbdub's picture
Joined: 02/16/2010
MGoPoints: 2468

But on that play it was 3 and 17 from outside field goal range and Dileo was hand waving lay open. I'm totally okay with an arm punt in that situation, especially when it's a pretty accurate arm punt.



If the coverage was better I don't think Devin attempts the throw. If it wasn't 3rd down he probably never cuts back to his left in the first place.

  • Login or register to post comments
November 5th, 2012 at 7:13 AM | Dude he's trying to protect (Score:1)
Jeff09
Jeff09's picture
Joined: 06/25/2011
MGoPoints: 441

Dude he's trying to protect the only functional QB he has left

Call Mr. Plow, that's my name, that name again is Mr. Plow

  • Login or register to post comments
November 5th, 2012 at 8:54 AM | Use Of The Veer... (Score:2)
LSAClassOf2000
LSAClassOf2000's picture
Joined: 01/07/2011
MGoPoints: 8703

I went back through some of my own notes on this year,  and for the last several weeks anyway, we've run the "inverted veer" about 6-7 times per game (at least, up to and including Nebraska), so it is occasionally in the mix. I think that many of these plays this season, especially lately, have been gives to the RB, however, or at least this is what I noticed - as the season has progressed, it seems fewer of them have been keepers for Robinson. It also seems like there have been quite a bit more inside zone runs and some off-tackle plays in the calls in order to get the RBs involved more, especially this season. As others have mentioned, having watched the  Minnesota game, we ran the base offense virtually the whole game, so my assumption as well is that the inverted veer was just not an  option in this game given the situation. 

"Funny isn't it, how naughty dentists always make that one fatal mistake."

Follow the random tweets of a Michigan alum - http://twitter.com/#!/LorneEC3

  • Login or register to post comments
November 5th, 2012 at 7:55 AM | I think it is also because DG (Score:1)
DefenseWins
DefenseWins's picture
Joined: 11/17/2011
MGoPoints: 274

I think it is also because DG is not the home run threat that Denard is. He's a big athletic guy but doesn't possess the kind of speed that makes the read plays as dangerous. Because of that, it is more effective to have him use his arm first, and his legs when he sees fit. And obviously, keeping DG healthy was part of the thought process.

Denied by UM multiple times, nonetheless lifelong M fan.

  • Login or register to post comments
November 5th, 2012 at 8:09 AM | Easy answer (Score:2 Normal)
Tater
Tater's picture
Joined: 08/13/2008
MGoPoints: 10353

My guess is that, despite those who whine to the contrary, Borges has done everything he can think of within his system to help accentuate Denard's strengths.  When Devin is in, he can see over the line of scrimmage, and more traditional WCO plays are more appropriate.

 Besides, unless Bellomy plays a lot better against live competition, it would be stupid to send Devin on too many runs due to risk of injury leaving them with their #3 as their starter.  I know it's human nature to second-guess the playcalling when "our" team loses, but they did just win pretty handily with a second-string QB at the helm.

I hope to see both QB's play against NW.  It would be a great change-of-pace having one guy as dangerous as Denard and another who can pass from the pocket and actually see what he is throwing at.

 

 

 

 

  • Login or register to post comments
November 5th, 2012 at 8:14 AM | I think its because DG doesnt (Score:1)
UM2018
UM2018's picture
Joined: 10/10/2012
MGoPoints: 152

I think its because DG doesnt need to run to be effective like Denard and he was able to easily beat Minnesota without running a lot and risking injury

-UM class of 2018 

  • Login or register to post comments
November 5th, 2012 at 8:41 AM | DG (Score:1)
DirkMcGurk
DirkMcGurk's picture
Joined: 06/12/2011
MGoPoints: 396

Gardner is a dual threat QB, but his size is better then Denard and he is more a passer then a runner. He can make plays with his legs, but seems better in a drop back setting and not trying to run. DG is much more a pro style guy then a spread guy in my opinion.

  • Login or register to post comments
November 5th, 2012 at 9:12 AM | Probably a bit of both, (Score:1)
jblaze
jblaze's picture
Joined: 08/29/2008
MGoPoints: 3170

if Gardner goes down, we are down to Jack Kennedy. Also, given our D, Minnesota's poor O Borges probably believed we don't need to win a shootout, so why take the risk (and while Gardner is fast, he's more of a traditional QB, who can run as opposed to a running QB, who can pass).

"They're stuck with that quarterback (sophomore Braxton Miller) for the next two or three years, that's fine with me. He throws worse than (Tim) Tebow. - Steve Everitt

  • Login or register to post comments
November 5th, 2012 at 9:17 AM | protecting him, someone suggested (didn't (Score:1)
MGlobules
Joined: 11/17/2008
MGoPoints: 5143

Devin himself say something to this effect?) Will be interesting to see what we do against a Northwestern team that's 103rd in passing defense but 24th in rushing D. Maybe more of the same, but I'm sure the coaches believe they need to get rushing production out of this O line, get better organized before OSU. 

  • Login or register to post comments
November 5th, 2012 at 9:18 AM | First let me say that I love Denard.... (Score:2)
Blue in Yarmouth
Blue in Yarmouth's picture
Joined: 02/18/2009
MGoPoints: 2327

and after this season I will miss seeing him in the Michigan uniform on Saturday's. The guy has been through so much and I have been a huge fans since he signed with us four years ago. 

Having said that, I would like to see Devin remain in the mix at QB for the rest of the year. Not taking every snap or anything, but getting significant snaps to further prepare him for next season when he should be our starting QB. 

If Denard was in the running for the heisman or something I wouldn't be saying this. If Denard was good at taking care of the ball on each and every possession I wouldn't be saying this. The fact is though, he hasn't shown that all year. I still want him to get the lions share of the snaps at QB, but would like to see Devin out the quite a bit too so he can really start getting some game experience before next season. 

He has shown some real signs of progress, and I don;t think there is much (if any) drop off when he is in there as opposed to Denard. You lose a little speed and gain a little in other areas. I would just like to see him get some more snaps going forward.

  • Login or register to post comments
November 5th, 2012 at 10:20 AM | We literally cannot run the (Score:2 Normal)
chitownblue2
chitownblue2's picture
Joined: 06/03/2009
MGoPoints: 7060

We literally cannot run the ball without Robinson on the field. Minnesota's rushing defense is THE WORST, and we were a garbage-time carry away from racking up under 3 yards per carry - a full 3 yards per carry WORSE than the next worst performance Minnesota allowed (6.4 YPC to Northwestern).

Gardner's ability as a passer does not outweigh the fact that Denard is the only person that makes our rushing game function. If people would look at our yards per play and total yards, they'd see that this was not, actually, a good offense performance (and I don't blame Gardner for that, at all).

wolverineliberationarmy.com/blog

  • Login or register to post comments
November 5th, 2012 at 10:49 AM | Yeah.... (Score:2)
Blue in Yarmouth
Blue in Yarmouth's picture
Joined: 02/18/2009
MGoPoints: 2327

so I guess you missed the part where I said I hoped Denard would get most of the snaps but Gardner would see some playing time at QB the rest of the season.

Honestly, I'm not trying to be a dick, but having seen you around here for some time it often seems as though the majority of your post are just trying to play devil's advocate with what ever post you choose to respond to. I mean, I didn't say I wanted Devin to replace Denard, I simply said I wanted him to get some reps at QB the rest of the season.

  • Login or register to post comments
November 5th, 2012 at 10:51 AM | I'm disagreeing with this (Score:2)
chitownblue2
chitownblue2's picture
Joined: 06/03/2009
MGoPoints: 7060

I'm disagreeing with this statement:

"He has shown some real signs of progress, and I don;t think there is much (if any) drop off when he is in there as opposed to Denard."

What we saw was a minor upgrade in the passing game (if the receivers were as competent for Denard as they were for Gardner (of course, Gardner didn't have himself out there to drop passes) and a dramatic decline in the running game.

I think the idea that there is no drop-off when we put up as many yards on Minnesota as we did against Michigan State is silly.

wolverineliberationarmy.com/blog

  • Login or register to post comments
November 5th, 2012 at 1:20 PM | Alright... (Score:2)
Blue in Yarmouth
Blue in Yarmouth's picture
Joined: 02/18/2009
MGoPoints: 2327

I can accept your perspective, but I just don't see the same thing. If you are talking about the dropoff in the run game from strictly a yards from the QB perspective on QB runs than yeah, anyone is going to be an immediate downgrade from Denard. What I saw though, is Devin not getting more than a couple of chances on designed QB runs and the major part of his production coming when he had no other option. 

See, that is where I think he is a little more dependable than Denard. If Denard would just run when no one was open, he would probably be the most dangerous player in CFB, but for some reason he won't do that. He sits and waits until the last second and if no one is open, he throws up a prayer (he won't even throw the ball away). 

I think when you combine how well Devin did as a passer, his decisions (which to me was the biggest difference) and his athletic ability it isn't much of a downgrade between the two. If we're just looking at running, definitley a noticable dropoff, but with the rest of it factored in, not so much IMHE. 

Keep in mind also, I wasn't advocating for Denard to be hauled out in favour of DG as the #1 QB. I was saying that in light of everything we saw Saturday that he should get more snaps at QB in real games to give him a head start on next season, nothing more.

  • Login or register to post comments
November 5th, 2012 at 9:25 AM | The Natural (Score:1)
Der Alte
Der Alte's picture
Joined: 07/30/2010
MGoPoints: 82

Given the consensus --- as I understand it --- that DG’s lack of QB PT would affect his ability to make the split-second reads that make the option go, Borgas seemed to focus DG’s run game on straight handoffs, quick pitches, and an occasional keeper. In the passing game, however, DG seemed to have more creative control.

On the highlight-film, reverse-direction rollout, Devin spotted an arm-waving Drew Dileo in the endzone and delivered a 40+ yard pass that Drew didn’t have to move a foot to catch. That whole sequence was far more talent that coaching. It showed why coming out of high school Devin was such a hot QB prospect.

In looking for some comparison to Devin I thought of VaTech’s Logan Thomas: a big, rangy guy with good speed, a good arm, who can see over defenses, who can make plays with his feet and who seemed genetically predisposed to playing QB. In fact, once he settled down after the first quarter, Devin really did make playing QB look easy, which is what great athletes do.

 

A lifetime of happiness! No man alive could bear it; it would be hell on earth!

George Bernard Shaw

  • Login or register to post comments
November 5th, 2012 at 10:58 AM | Borgas? (Score:1 Normal)
TIMMMAAY
TIMMMAAY's picture
Joined: 09/08/2008
MGoPoints: 5947

Whos' Borgas?

not just "douchey" MGoBlog user, but now TRUSTED MGoBlog user

  • Login or register to post comments
November 5th, 2012 at 6:54 PM | Pulling it down (Score:2)
STW P. Brabbs
Joined: 08/27/2008
MGoPoints: 2409

My personal theory has been that Denard is so intent to prove he's a quarterback - perhaps because of the legions of mouth-breathers who think he should move to the slot, though I hope that he doesn't look online for such-like nonsense - that he holds on to the ball far too long. 

I think he also lacks some natural feel for pulling it down, too, but I think this exacerbates the problem.  It's maddening thought - I agree that if he was just more decisive about pulling it down he'd be close to impossible to defend, as opposed to just plain' old damn scary to terrifying.  To borrow soccer parlance: 'unplayable.'

  • Login or register to post comments
November 5th, 2012 at 9:27 AM | Anybody else think that this (Score:-1 Trolling)
Newbs
Joined: 10/15/2012
MGoPoints: 181

Anybody else think that this week DG should get the start and put Denard at WR? I just think that our offense is alot harder to defend with a downfield passing threat and would be good if we could throw in a few plays with Denard at QB to keep the d on their heels

WOLVERINE NATION!

Twitter: @MckenzieNewby

 

  • Login or register to post comments
  • 1
  • 2
  • next ›
  • last »
Powered by Pressflow, an open source content management system
Theme provided by Roopletheme; sidebars adapted from Chris Murphy.