April 20th, 2010 at 10:52 AM ^
It's practice so their can be multiple people running around with the same number.
April 20th, 2010 at 10:52 AM ^
The red-numbered jerseys aren't used on regular gamedays (obviously), so they probably didn't bother to add nameplates to them.
April 20th, 2010 at 11:12 AM ^
Maybe we should try using them in a game and see if the other team would respect them and not tackle the QB. It wouldn't work on a smart team but maybe we could try it on Oct. 9th.
April 20th, 2010 at 10:53 AM ^
No idea, but I guess with the crazy red numbers they didn't bother wasting the effort to put their names on jerseys that wouldn't be worn much. Just a hunch if the other jerseys had their names on it.
April 20th, 2010 at 10:54 AM ^
When Jack Kennedy came into the game for the first time I thought "Why is Michael Shaw lining up at QB?" Then I felt like an idiot.
April 20th, 2010 at 11:04 AM ^
I turned to a friend and said "Why is Michael Shaw at..."
Then I trailed off and was like "holy shit that's Jack Kennedy, hell yes"
April 20th, 2010 at 10:54 AM ^
1 minute.....Newman!!!!
April 20th, 2010 at 11:11 AM ^
Denard has dreads, the others do not. If I was Tate and played so miserably, I wouldn't want my name on that shirt either.
April 20th, 2010 at 11:14 AM ^
^^^^ dickweed
April 20th, 2010 at 11:16 AM ^
what I meant to imply was that Denard was the one who showed an element of the "it" factor. I thought Tate was really, well, exactly was he was vs. OSU-a gunslinger who takes a lot of chances. Not exactly sure why I'm getting negged?
April 20th, 2010 at 11:24 AM ^
Let me turn this around on you.
If I was Tate and played so miserably, I wouldn't want my name on that shirt either.
How is this quote not being a dickweed? Tate is a true sophomore, playing hurt, in a practice scrimmage. Give the guy just a little bit of slack. You are implying that he should be embarrassed by his level of play as a hurt true freshman playing OSU last year, with a horrid o-line blocking for him? Really?
April 20th, 2010 at 11:25 AM ^
Probably because Tate was one of the only reasons we even won 5 games last season, so maybe you should cut him a little slack. Second, if you had said that in the first place you wouldn't have to clarify.
April 20th, 2010 at 11:27 AM ^
You can't back pedal better then that?
April 20th, 2010 at 11:30 AM ^
Shredder we need an MS-Paint of a good old fashioned troll killing.
April 20th, 2010 at 11:37 AM ^
He must not play corner then
April 20th, 2010 at 11:33 AM ^
Just looked like a blur to the untrained eye.
April 20th, 2010 at 11:46 AM ^
I thought the odds were stacked against the Blue Team for the Spring Game. For the life of me I can't remember who their quarterback was and the number he wore?
April 20th, 2010 at 12:43 PM ^
You would have needed a PhD in Mathematics to figure out how they scored that game. I know of at least one defensive player that had no idea if he was on the winning or losing team.
April 20th, 2010 at 12:45 PM ^
Jack Kennedy getting more snaps then Devin Gardner this year!
(think about it)
somewhat concealed "I hope we're good and DG can redshirt and Kennedy gets some garbage time 'cause we're up by some much" reference?
April 21st, 2010 at 12:12 AM ^
Was Tate wearing the non-red jersey at any point on Saturday? I'm just curious if he'll still be wearing "T. Forcier" like last year. Or now that his brother is definitely not on the team (as compared to the uncertainty at the beginning of last season) he'll wear just "Forcier."