POST-GAME SNOWFLAKES

Submitted by uniqenam on

THANKS FOR LETTING ME FILL IN AS PBP, LET'S LET IT SNOW LET IT SNOW LET IT SNOW.

 

Al Borges game ball plz.

Generic MGoBlogger

September 8th, 2013 at 12:52 AM ^

I'm still speechless... We are still a work in progress, but man, we showed flashes of greatness.

1. Gardner... Can't even put it into words... The guy is a pure leader with gobs of talent. Seemed to get rattled late, and he really needs to cut back on the sketchy throws, but he was very consistent tonight. If he wins the Heisman in his time here, I won't be surprised. So excited to watch him the rest of the season. Plus, his reads are fantastic (something Denard never excelled at).

2. Notre Dame is good... I would even go as far to say that they are better than last season.  Obviously the luck played a role on two of their touchdowns, but they look more explosive at RB, have powerful lines, and have a much improved Tommy Rees.

3. Fitz... Definitely back to 2011 form... Was very patient with the ball and made cuts that were pretty amazing.

4. Lines are a work in progress... Mind you Notre Dame's lines are REALLY good, but there needs to be a better pass rush... Got better as the game went on, but we need to be able to consistently rush 4 and not rely on the blitz to get pressure on the quarterback. As for the offensive line, they proved to be better than I thought. They were sketchy early but as the game progressed, Nix was shut down and holes began to open up in the middle.  Pass protection has to be better, though, so Gardner isn't constantly being flushed from the pocket.

5. Secondary... Must have been schematic, but other than the two picks, I was not very impressed by the secondary... They never really blew up plays, and Rees's incompletions were just bad throws. I guess you can blame the soft zone coverage scheme that they played with most of the game.

6. Linebackers... Weren't really the playmakers we see game in and out... Ross and Morgan were really the only ones that stuck out to me the most, and they weren't too impressive either. Gordon was nonexistant which kind of disappointed me considering his game last weekend.  

7. Gallon is something special... Don't even need to say anything else.

8. Notre Dame will be our second or third best opponent we will have faced by the end of the season... Right now, they look like a team that is better than Ohio State. I assume the team we face in our bowl game will be the best team we play all season.

This is going to be a good year. Oh, and Corso can take a chubby.

 

trueblueintexas

September 8th, 2013 at 12:56 AM ^

Great win.

What the heck was purple face doing going for it on fourth down? You need a field goal, touchdown, and 2 point conversion no matter how you slice it. Take the three points and keep playing. Very odd. Thanks though.

funkywolve

September 8th, 2013 at 1:02 AM ^

There was one point in the game - I think it was when they came out after a kick off or something (it was first down, first play of their possession and they had plenty of time to get the call they wanted) and ND had to use a time out and as the offense was coming to the sideline Kelly was going ape sh*t on one of the olineman. 

gopoohgo

September 8th, 2013 at 1:01 AM ^

Tape delay snowflakes!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Just finished watching on DVR after a drunken wedding reception!!!!!!!!

1) Devin is the man.  I hope to hell he stays....but he may have played himself into Tanihill #2 after tonight.  People gave me shit preseason about the same statement, but....holy crap that was a clutch night

2) Interior Oline needs a little seasoning, but lookout next year.  Nix had a few good plays, but we have at least 2 years of absolute road graders on the interior.

3) Al Borgess, I take back all the swearing from last year; masterfull call

4) Fuck Notre Dame!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

PS way too drunk

gwkrlghl

September 8th, 2013 at 1:05 AM ^

MSU has won two games in which their defense basically outscored their offenses. Those two teams they beat have lost to FCS schools in their other game this year. MSU's in for an awfully rough year

tbeindit

September 8th, 2013 at 9:00 AM ^

To be fair though, you can't really compare MSU's margin of victory to other teams though.  We'll say MSU wins by 10 points for instance and a team like Nebraska wins by 13 points.  The 13 point win looks more impressive on paper, but do you think it's easier to score 13 against Nebraska or 10 against MSU?  I would take Nebraska any day.  

MSU doesn't have a great offense by any means.  Not even a decent one.  However, a lot of people fell into this trap last year.  Every game MSU plays will be close because it's just the nature of their team.  Not going to claim their great or will go 10-2 or something, but margins of victory probably isn't the best method to use to judge the Spartans.

Ryan

September 8th, 2013 at 1:10 AM ^

Lot's of good things to build on there:

  • Devin looked in change of a capable offense.  He also seems like a genuinely awesome person, which is nice because Denard set the bar high.
  • Devin can throw the ball.  Accurately.
  • The O-line managed against a very tough ND D-line.  Plenty of room for improvement there, but still reassuring.
  • Very pleased with Al Borges this weekend.  Never felt like we were beating ourselves on offense.
  • The Defense made plays when they had to.  I would like to hear the coaching rationale for all the secondary cushion.
  • Everyone in South Bend got knocked down a notch, which they always need.

Pretty awesome way to conclude UM vs. ND in the Big House.  It's a shame those bastards were/are/will continue to be too stubborn to do the right thing and join the B10 (when they had the chance.)  I will miss frustrating all my South Bend friends.

BOX House

September 8th, 2013 at 1:29 AM ^

Texas and USC may be getting on the coaching search soon. Texas was embarassed by BYU (and they've been calling for Mack Brown's head for years already) and USC is in jeaopardy of losing to Washington State currently, a game in which the Trojans were heavily favored. 

CompleteLunacy

September 8th, 2013 at 1:51 AM ^

Something about those lights means that no matter what happens in the first 3 quarters, buckle up cuz some shit's gonna go down in the 4th. It was awesomeness two years ago...not so much tonight. Fortunately, the crazy went Michigan's way in the end again, despite the gnashing of teeth that the game was causing starting with the Devin WTF INT. 

The only concern I have on offense is Devin's tendency to spin around and run further back. It works most of the time, but he can't afford to do that again deep in his own territory. Easy fix I think, the experience Devin got from making the mistake will get him to learn real quick. I'm somewhat concerned about the runnning game, but also think that ND was blitzing like crazy to stop the run so it was just one of those things.  

The Defense is obviously a concern, but (a) Jake Ryan will be back at some point before more real games come around, (b) Mattison is a genius, the defense will improve because it always does. 

ehatch

September 8th, 2013 at 8:14 AM ^

Surprised this hasn't been mentioned yet, but our ST Coverage teams were an absolute disaster.  We had 3 punts that I remembered.  One went about 35 yards in the air and was returned 15 yards to Michigan territory.  One pinned them on the 10, but was also only about 35 yards.  The final one was a complete shank for 21 yards.  In other words, we had a net average punt under 30 yards.  Our 2nd half kickoffs put us in a difficult situation.  3 times when we took a 2 score lead, we gave up a return to the 50, gave up a personal foul to bring the ball out past the 40, and kicked the ball out of bounds to the 35.  What happened to kicking the ball through the back of the end zone?

Like everyone else I thought that the Defensive game plan was a little strange.  It was a classic bend-but-don't-break defense and it worked.  Rees made some outstanding throws, some throws that were dropped (especially the back coming out of the backfield).  Some bad throws and 2 thank you Rees throws.  I thought ND should have run it more.  Our LBs were bailing at the snap for deep zone coverage giving up massive runs right up the middle.  I was disappointed in our DL play for most of the game.  They made a couple great plays, but for most of the night they were pwnd.  

QB play on the rest of the schedule doesn't look all that intimidating. Only Unstoppable Throw God will be better.  Also perhaps Hackenburg for PSU, but I can't see that conservative of a defensive game plan against a freshman QB.  

I think the so-called 'questionable' Pass Interference calls were definite pass interference.  Gallon got shoved 5 yards out of the way and Funchess was held the entire play.

I think Kalis and Schofield are going to have a rough day on UFR.  Miller and Glosgow held their own.  Lewan was outstanding. 

Devin MF Gardner.  He was the man.  ESPN flashed up his stats vs the Blitz and No-Blitz.  If ND didn't blitz Gardner was basically perfect (therefore great job by the O-line).  ND had to bring pressure.  Gardner numbers weren't as good as I thought via the eye test, because he constantly stared down the blitz and stepped into his throws. (One notable exception).  

Jeremey Gallon is such a comfort for DMFG.  I would like another receiver to step up because I worry what will happen if the opponent can lock him down.  Dileo is a fantastic possession receiver on 3rd downs, but I want another big target man.  I know I am being picky after picking up 460 yards against a Top 10 type defense.  

I loved Chesson's block on the opening TD.  Loved it.  Get that man the ball.

ehatch

September 8th, 2013 at 8:21 AM ^

Also, Hoke made a bad game theory decision.  On the DMFG WTF interception, he made a horrible decision to challenge that call.  ND missed the extra point, and we lost a timeout all to challenge something that wasn't going to get overturned.  

Only defense is the play was such a massive play in the game you are almost forced to challenge it.  That said, that was probably the only real bad decision Hoke made.   

tbeindit

September 8th, 2013 at 9:01 AM ^

I actually really disagree with this.  First, it looked debateable on the screen in the stadium.  I really didn't think it was incomplete.  Second, it gave Gardner valuable time to cool down before he had to walk right back onto the field.  That was easily worth a timeout.

CompleteLunacy

September 8th, 2013 at 2:33 PM ^

Probably was the wrong move, but it's not all that bad. Why not try the challenge? How was he supposed to predict that ND was about to miss an extra point? It was all pretty bad luck, imo. It worked out in the end, though. I'd rather Hoke take those sorts of calculated risks (that sometimes backfire) than play Ferentz/Tresselball-type conservative.

Red is Blue

September 8th, 2013 at 8:53 AM ^

On the much discussed Gardner brain cramp, if, hypothetically, the refs had overturned the call, could they have then flagged him for grounding evem though the didn't flag he during the play?

chatster

September 8th, 2013 at 9:12 AM ^

For one final time to The Big House they came
The green-clad “fig-thing” leprechauns of Notre Dame
The crowd broke a record; Eminem sparked debate
And they brought back a legend with “Old 98"
 
Lee Corso failed with “Win one for the chicken!”
Gibbons set a new record with his field goal kickin’
And three Irish defenders got to learn a harsh lesson
‘Bout the great downfield blocking of young Jehu Chesson
 
Michigan’s defense played just as they’d been taught
Offense got three touchdowns that J. Gallon caught
But after one end-zone miscue, it all looked for naught
Still, the outcome was just what the Maize and Blue sought
 
And in the end, purple faced Kelly’d been spanked
So now will Drew Sharp have the Wolverines ranked?

Soulfire21

September 8th, 2013 at 9:57 AM ^

Our defensive gameplan to me seemed very conservative and yet it worked go an extent. Wish we could generate more pressure with a 4 man rush but I think the idea was to keep as many men in coverage to force Rees to make good decisions and accurate throws. Rees had a really good game.

Offense was marvelous for most part, aside from Devin's, ahem, incident.

jblaze

September 8th, 2013 at 11:58 AM ^

But Rees seemed to check into max protect and the blitzes were picked up. I think Michigan realized that their blitz packages couldn't fool Rees (after all the guy started for like 4 years).



Also, Rees is still like 50/50 on hitting a semi covered WR and is good for a couple of picks a game if he throws a lot. I think M was just counting on Rees' mistakes throwing.