Post Game Late Night Open Thread

Submitted by M-Wolverine on
Smoke 'em if you got 'em, and crack open a tall cool one.

Clarence Beeks

January 11th, 2011 at 1:30 AM ^

I'm with you 100% on that.  Rodriguez made a great schematic adjustment by going back to the I-formation elements for those situations; I just wish he would have stuck with them as the season went along, but I think that had a lot to do with the personnel necessary to run that just wasn't ready yet (or in place).  That is something that Oregon is going to have to do if they are ever going to get over the hump against teams with elite defenses.  The problem is that to win the PAC-10/12, they aren't going to need to do that, so they probably won't.

Haxel Rose

January 11th, 2011 at 12:25 AM ^

either way, that's another example of why that rule is a little screwy. For all intents and purposes, he was down. The only reason he wasn't "tackled" is because he happened to land on top of the guy that tackled him. His knee touches the ground, this game is probably in OT

SanFrancisco_W…

January 11th, 2011 at 12:21 AM ^

I hearby commence the opening of the official late night meeting. Those who were here last night, let the games begin.  [Hopefully] Just one more night of nonsense before we know who is about to take over the reigns of our beloved university.

slblue

January 11th, 2011 at 1:19 AM ^

Don, it became clear to me as all of this was playing out that we should have seen this coming sooner.  I think Miles has been the guy from day one.  Probably planned since December or earlier.  The way DB has done his ¨succession planning¨ it really makes sense to me that this has been lined up for a long time.  The fact that DB and LM know each other really, really well tells me that DB did not just happen to call LM this week.  This has been packaged for a long time.  The rest has been a play out required to save face of good folks like RR, JH, BH, Fitz, etc.  Higher ed and corporate types often conduct ¨searches¨when the winning candidate was selected in a board room or clubhouse months before.  I am not being conspiratorial, and I´m not being critical of DB.  I just think this is the way things are done.  I simply refuse to believe that a corporate warrior like DB would let the single most important job of his tenure get started on January 1, 2011.  This was ready to go, with a timeline planned out, weeks if not months before.  Now the press would never approve of that, and various consituencies (like the pro RR faction) would never abide this kind of thing.  So that is why a ¨search¨has been conducted.

m_go_blue

January 11th, 2011 at 12:20 AM ^

talked about no one betting their last dollar on Auburn at the beginning of the season...I am just wondering if his dad did bet one of his last dollars from Mississippi State....

Swazi

January 11th, 2011 at 12:20 AM ^

Countdown to when the NCAA strips Auburn of its wins and title, and Newton's heisman has just begun.

 

Oh, and Newton's countdown to failing in the NFL has also begun.

OmarDontScare

January 11th, 2011 at 12:35 AM ^

Chizik was only hired bc he's a company man and was in on the pay for play scheme from the very beginning. Do you think Cecil Newton turns down $180K from Miss. St. And then all of a sudden he's cool with Cam going to Auburn for free? NCAA is such a joke

itauditbill

January 11th, 2011 at 12:24 AM ^

Hey they don't vacate those baby's three years later. Thankfully! I haven't won in 11 years... hopefully my long sports nightmare is coming to an end.

Probably not though.

I think it'll be Les, and I predict that it will only take 6 games for Brian's head to explode over clock management.

AMazinBlue

January 11th, 2011 at 12:25 AM ^

Oregon on the other hand proved to me for once and for all that the spread can't beat a big physical team.  They had no room to run all night and were a shadow of their former selves.

I rooted all night for Oregon and once again the damn spread let me down.

PLEASE Les, bring back Michigan Football and let's show 'em how it's done.

DB should be in AA now and hopefully will get Les to sign tomorrow and bring him back from Dallas for a intro presser.

Mitch Cumstein

January 11th, 2011 at 12:29 AM ^

I think you're going too far there considering Auburn's offense had some spread components to it as well.  I do agree though, those "basketball on grass" type offenses fly from 20 to 20 but have a lot of trouble in the red zone against good physical D's. 

Something that I complain about a lot that came to fruition is 2 goalline stands (1 for each team) as the result of QBs not being able to get up under center in short yardage situation.  Really a pet peeve of mine.

MichiganFootball

January 11th, 2011 at 12:37 AM ^

Oregon's problem was Darren Thomas. Against the defense they faced they were going to need a QB that was way more accurate. It's not that the spread doesn't get the job done, it's that your offense can't be one-dimensional. Cause the defense can always take that away. Really the only throws they could consistently hit were those wr screen.

Mitch Cumstein

January 11th, 2011 at 12:40 AM ^

But also on those goalline stands the D line is in the back field essentially right off the snap and the QB/RB are 5 yrds deep trying to develope a read play.  I'm just saying 4th and goal from the 1 I'm going power I up under center, not shotgun.  I feel like that is a big problem with these spread type offenses.  Short yardage situations.

Bodogblog

January 11th, 2011 at 12:41 AM ^

Auburn/Malzahn runs a spread.  Did you notice the shotgun, read option, running QB, or any of their games this season? 

Auburn played better and won a close game that was tied up until there were 2 seconds left.  Drawing any conclusions about the futility of the spread is pure ridonkulousness

Auburn beat 'Bama's pro style, as Oregon beat Stanford's.  These are probably better comparisons given which teams made it to the title game.