A plea for sanity re the WVU investigation

Submitted by blueloosh on
Before everyone gets hysterical about the new splashy RR story, let's get a few things straight. 1. This cannot, and will not, add to any punishment Michigan may receive for violations in Ann Arbor. If violations occur, the school involved is punished. Sanctions don't travel with the coach. This impacts PR, not the bottom line with respect to the NCAA. 2. WVU will not be eager to serve up RR misconduct that occurred in Morgantown. Related to point 1, the fact that a coach has left does not insulate the school (just ask any school that employed John Calipari before Kentucky). WVU may not like Rodriguez but they're not stupid. I'm not suggesting they'll execute a cover-up but they will not manufacture evidence of misconduct just to stick it to us...because they realize they would be sticking it to themselves. 3. This fuels the "hot seat" only to the extent that Michigan's own base freaks out about it. Brandon will make a decision on retaining Rodriguez. His analysis will not be impacted by fans of other schools commenting at the bottom of news stories. 7 wins kept his job before this, and still does. Nothing new is coming to light. At both schools, RR thought stretching was not countable and trusted his compliance staff to ensure they were in accordance with the rules. Brandon will not be moved to fire RR if he learns WVU's compliance staff was as sloppy as ours. The actual charges with regard to RR have to do with inattention, not affirmative misconduct. If you've seen Brandon talk even once, you realize that we now have a strong, self-assured decision maker as AD. He will not panic because someone on ESPN looks gravely at a camera and says the coach "has got to go." Not if the WVU investigation simply yields more of the same parking ticket type infractions found at Michigan. 4. This is not evidence of a vast and sinister conspiracy. Does the attention to this story illustrate something lopsided in the coverage of Michigan and Rodriguez? Sure. If it was another coach or school it's not a big story. But that's the point. This is exactly the kind of story ESPN wants. Their reporter broke it, and everyone will talk about it. As we speak people are emailing the link around like crazy. Why? We, and RR, are big news. It's an unfortunate fact. This may have been leaked because somebody doesn't like Rodriguez, but that's not why ESPN has a story up. They have a story up because this item is absolutely perfect for a business trying to produce interest-generating content for a 24 hour news cycle (and trying to beef up the credentials of their in-house reporters). It sucks for us, but this is simply a matter of page views. You'll notice there are always links to nothing stories about Michigan's or Notre Dame's spring practices on ESPN NCAAF page, despite the fact that we're not particularly great teams right now. It's not due to a conspiracy to give our programs better exposure than others. People just eat up content about us (and ND). We generate interest. That interest is churning against us in a harmful way now, but it is simply the natural downside of our considerable stature and the nature of news in this era. We don't need to panic about RR's future. We don't need to write letters to an editor. We'll be ok. As every pundit has said (correctly) in his/her token offseason Michigan profle , it all comes down to our performance on the field this fall. And personally, I'm optimistic on that front.

Huntington Wolverine

April 13th, 2010 at 5:13 PM ^

The only panic I've see so far is the multiple posters that are panicked that other fans might panic. We got the memo and yes we're using the new cover sheet. We just forgot the last time.

jrt336

April 13th, 2010 at 5:16 PM ^

Unless something absolutely huge is found out while digging through this stuff, it won't have much of an effect on whether he keeps his job. 7-8 wins, including the bowl game, is what he needs to stay. Of course this will get some Michigan fans to panic, but it'll be the same people who already want him gone.

Zone Left

April 13th, 2010 at 5:19 PM ^

Let's refrain from all of this until we find out what we're talking about here. If it's the practice time issue, then it probably doesn't matter that much. However, if he was selling heroin to small children on road trips, then we need to be concerned.

aaamichfan

April 13th, 2010 at 5:23 PM ^

Like every other Rich Rod story, this is only a big deal in the eyes of the Freep. Whenever the "worried face" picture of Rich Rod appears on the front page, you know they mean business!!!

Logan88

April 13th, 2010 at 6:43 PM ^

except the U.S. has AWESOME shows like this on TV, yet we, in America, still have to listen to the whining of the ultra-conservative religious right about how "decadent" American culture is? Besides the various Muslim nations, is there any country in the world more uptight about sexuality than the U.S.?

steelymax

April 13th, 2010 at 5:33 PM ^

Notice it takes potential violations at Michigan for the NCAA to investigate WVU. Can Michigan start hiring former OSU and Notre Dame coaches? They'd draw scrutiny they'd never been subject to before.

Maize and Blue…

April 13th, 2010 at 6:15 PM ^

Maybe if the NCAA would just get back to USC or have they already forgot that mess? Players getting benefits, hiring a walking violation even while you're under investigation, having a coach you're bringing with you from your old school call recruits committed to that former school telling them not to show up, a basketball program whose coach paid a player.

marc_from_novi

April 13th, 2010 at 6:40 PM ^

I think I have a different take on this. If the NCAA investigates WVU and finds that RR counted stretching they could conclude that his actions at UM were intentional and knowingly in violation of NCAA bylaws. Knowingly violating bylaws is a totally different animal than making a poor interpretation rules with no intent to cheat. My best guess, though, is that this ends up nothing more than another PR nightmare.

ijohnb

April 13th, 2010 at 6:41 PM ^

and good analysis. As one possible retort, it is starting to alarm me, not necessarily the substance of the allegations against RR at Michigan and whatever is being investigated at WV, but that RR seems to be a walking controversy, and there seem to be a large faction of important people that are expressing displeasure with his practices. From almost the minute after he left for Michigan, strangely and quickly I might add only a year after declining a more natural fit in Bama, there has been a steady stream of bad news associated with RR and his name. We all bleed maise and blue here, and it may be easy to let our desire for Michigan football to cloud our analysis to a certain degree. I want a happy ending for RR here, but with every new incident and relevation, I have to admit questions as to his core character are starting to emerge. I don't want to, but it can be hard not to at times. That being said, I agree with you that the particular incidents that have transpired thus far will be wiped clean with 8 or 9 wins, and seven and a bowl may do just enough.

gobluesasquatch

April 13th, 2010 at 7:40 PM ^

Sure, it makes sense that the NCAA would follow up and investigate RichRod's practices at West Virginia given his own admissions that he didn't know what he was doing when it came to tracking players time. But the bigger picture is it always seems like there is something new with this guy. From the buyout, to some of the remarks, to the allegations, the violations, the Fagen issue, the transfers, the condo investment thing ... it never ends. Yeah, I know, the Freep hates us now and loves MSU, but honestly, at some point, you have to ask yourself, can RichRod keep himself out of trouble. Sure, some players did stupid stuff under Carr. Moeller imploded before our eyes. But it wasn't like you were wondering what next all the time. And I'm starting to feel like that with Rodriguez. And lets stop with the comparisons to USC, Florida, Oklahoma, etc. Do we really want to do that?? Oklahoma was a violations regular from Wilkinson to Fairbanks to Switzer, and honestly, at some point, probably will be under Stoops. Florida - well before the ol' ball coach got there, they did some stuff that got them on probation, including his first year. As for USC - John Robinson coached there - nuff said. We are Michigan, and at least with football, we've held ourselves to a higher standard. It isn't just about wins, but winning with at least some illusion of integrity, if not real integrity. Sure, neg away, but what next with RR? Maybe I'm wrong, or I've missed this, outside of Clarrett, what legitimate issues has the sweater vest been involved in at tOSU. And keep in mind, this is taking over for John Cooper, who once suggested that his football players should have all their classes right next to the practice facilities to make things easier for them. I hope it's just due diligence, but if not ... Brandon needs to consider if RR is worth it, even if he can get Michigan back to winning the Big Ten and putting up 10+ win seasons again.

blueloosh

April 14th, 2010 at 9:40 AM ^

As far as OSU, to me they been guilty of the most serious stuff -- cash payments from boosters to star players (this is why Troy Smith was suspended for a bowl game, I believe). You already mentioned Clarrett. I happen to think OSU is reasonably clean and at least tries to stamp out these things where they crop up, but they actually do good job of illustrating the types of real live violations Michigan still has not been accused of (the sham "jobs," the loaned cars/apartments). I think Rodriguez more than anything has suffered from lousy counsel. He made some poor investments, handled the departure and settlement negotiations with WVU poorly, etc. But he is mostly, I think, the victim of lousy representation and advice. Coming down on him for pushing the envelope on practice time and off-season instruction is simply a Martha Stewart - insider trading type of deal.

bluebyyou

April 14th, 2010 at 5:54 AM ^

It is the timing that bothers me - right before the spring game this story pops up. In spite of the fact that in all likelihood there will be no impact upon Michigan's punishment for the alleged NCAA violations, it is ammunition for other schools to use to steer a recruit against coming to Michigan.

GOBLUE4EVR

April 14th, 2010 at 10:00 AM ^

if i'm worng, but didn't WVU do a self investigation days after the whole michigan/freep jihad and found no wrong doing on RR part while he coached there???