Pistons to acquire Brandon Jennings

Submitted by jethro34 on

Multiple outlets reporting sign-and-trade with the Bucks for Jennings, with his contract being 3 yrs $24 million. No word on what the Pistons are giving up. I'm not a fan of this move.EDIT: sending Knight, Middleton, and Kratsov. link:http://sports.yahoo.com/news/nba--pistons-to-acquire-brandon-jennings-in-sign-and-trade-deal-211830240.html

bronxblue

July 30th, 2013 at 7:35 PM ^

I know people love the idea of Rondo, but he's recovering from a pretty nasty injury that might alter his game.  Also, and I know people love to gloss over this, but he played with between 2 and 3 HOF players for most of his "peak".  And even with that, the offense usually struggled somewhat in scoring points.  He's a good PG, but let's see him do ANYTHING without Garnett, Pierce, and Allen before we all bow down to the Rondo throne.

DertyDoc

July 30th, 2013 at 5:48 PM ^

Then my second thought was at least Jennings is still young and has shown flashes of ability at the NBA level already. That's just me trying to rationalize the perceived lack of competence this front office has shown lately in my humble opinion. Still feels like a borderline playoff team at best.

MI Expat NY

July 30th, 2013 at 5:56 PM ^

As much as I love Trey, I'm not sure he'll ever be as productive as Jennings is right now.  Meanwhile, they added a shooter on the wing with the draft pick and now have upgraded PG for relatively little money.  Even granting that the Smith deal might end up being awful, I think the front office could have done much worse this offseason.  

bronxblue

July 30th, 2013 at 7:32 PM ^

Because right now Brandon Jennings is a WAY better NBA player than Trey?  I love Burke as a college player, but he has shown nothing in the NBA, obviously.  Maybe he'll be a great, maybe he'll be the mess he was in the preseason, who knows.  But when you can get a player like Jennings for not that much (I've never been high on Knight), you have to do it.

Fab and Fresh

July 30th, 2013 at 9:35 PM ^

The fact that they made this move makes it ok that they didn't draft Trey. At least Joe is acknowledging that we didn't have a PG up until today. And that we didn't have a 2 up until draft day either.

We will actually be a competitive team in the East this year with the moves We made this offseason. I have to admit I was wrong about Joe and jumped the gun a bit in being critical of him after not drafting Trey.

Skiptoomylou22

July 30th, 2013 at 5:41 PM ^

He takes A LOT of shots but he's an upgrade that's for sure. Although I didn't/don't want to give up on Knight so quickly, i don't hate this move. Must have been asking to much for Rondo so they made their move. What a vastly different roster from one year to the next.

xcrunner1617

July 30th, 2013 at 5:43 PM ^

I like the move.  Not a bad player at all for the money he is getting.  And who knows, getting out of Milwaukee could be just what he needs to continue developing into a top 10 point guard. 

TTUwolverine

July 30th, 2013 at 5:45 PM ^

Doesn't seem like we're giving up a whole lot, and at 3 years/24 mil, it's not a huge cap hit.  I am not sold on Brandon Knight's potential, which to me isn't any higher than what Brandon Jennings is right now. 

TTUwolverine

July 30th, 2013 at 5:49 PM ^

Joe D is putting a LOT of faith in KCP and Datome to open things up on the perimeter.  It would be nice to see some development out of Singler, too.  Otherwise, it's going to be tough sledding because as as been discussed before, none of our three big men can shoot and Jennings certainly isn't going to clear out that space with his presence alone. 

learmanj

July 30th, 2013 at 7:11 PM ^

I think a lot of people forget that we still have Stuckey.  Stuckey will never live up to his potential but he is a good 3rd option at guard with Billups/Jennings/KCP in there as well.  I didn't include Datome because I have no idea what to expect from him.  If I had to guess, he will fill the old Jon Barry role: Come in and immediately do a heat check.  If he hits a couple, you leave him in there, if not...sit him down quickly before he kills you defensively.

bronxblue

July 30th, 2013 at 7:39 PM ^

Personally, I think Jennings is significantly better than Knight.  Knight has better range in theory, but he's had a couple of years to figure out the rest of his game and all I've seen is regression.  

kev.phelps

July 30th, 2013 at 5:47 PM ^

Remeber a few years ago signing Gordon and Villanueva?  That really panned out and this off season is eerily similar by signing Smith and getting Jennings?  Really?  Come on Dumars.

althegreat23

July 30th, 2013 at 8:04 PM ^

While Jennings does have poor shot selection (shot 39% from the field), he also averaged 6.5 assists, which was 2.5 more than Brandon Knight. Also, Jennings will have more weapons in Detroit than he did with the Bucks.

Derek

July 30th, 2013 at 10:10 PM ^

This is exactly the point that nobody seems to grasp, and it's kind of surprising to see it from readers of this efficiency-obsessed blog. All points are not equal. Brandon Jennings is a good player and an effective scorer if you ignore all statistics that reflect efficiency. Was Brandon Knight going to be a star? No. Will this move make the Pistons a contender? No. I'd stick with the worse roster and wait a year before committing even that much more cash over the next few years.

bacon1431

July 30th, 2013 at 7:30 PM ^

They don't seem similar at all. Jennings for 8 mil for 3 seasons is a small risk and a movable contract if he doesn't work out. Same with Smith's. and while both are limited players IMO, they fill roles and will be productive. BG was an undersized SH getting starters money to come off the bench. CV was just a terrible player. Those were signings just for the sake of signing players. Smith and Jennings - far from it.

BlueNation

July 30th, 2013 at 5:46 PM ^

I heard it's for Brandon Knight. Regardless, I don't like Jennings coming here. I don't know that he will be an unselfish PG. If he plays PG the right way and not be a ball-hog, it might be fine. If he plays like he is known for, it won't work.

x98

July 30th, 2013 at 5:49 PM ^

This guy averages close to 18 & 7 game, far from a bad move. Only time will tell if the team will be successful, but from the looks of it they look a lot better.

tigers17fan

July 30th, 2013 at 5:51 PM ^

He's an upgrade over Knight, that's for sure. We needed a starting point guard and that's what we got with him. Stop with the comparisons to Villanueva and Gordon...Knight is younger and cheaper than Gordon. Smith is younger and better than villanueva

TheGhostofChappuis

July 30th, 2013 at 5:56 PM ^

Seems like a decent move to me.  These days, Dumars could bring in the entire all-star team and people would say it's a bad move.

MGomaha

July 30th, 2013 at 5:56 PM ^

Some people on this site really annoy me with their NBA "analyisis." Getting Jennings is far from a dumb move, as the Pistons get a point guard who's actually, well, played point guard in the NBA at a high level.