People need to Calm down
People need to relax, our defense hasnt been good good since 2006 even then the last 2 games were horrible.
Everyone has read the articles about our decimated defense. People know we don't have elite upperclass men on defense. We have 3 year starters at linebacker who have looked like the worst linebackers in 1A. We are starting a walkon, flip floped senior a RS freshman and someone try tried not to let play last year.
So why after above average performances people feel this team was going to go out and pitch a shutout like OSU. We won. We didnt have the usual big play faults. While yes they drove it doesnt bother me the defense will learn and it will make us better in the long run.
I would have worried if we won 14-7 or 7-3. Why cause it means they stopped our offense. The one that has great depth and experience. The one that is suppose to carry our Defense for the next year or three until we can get the skill on defense.
September 18th, 2010 at 4:01 PM ^
Look at the total yards we gave up then tell me to relax.
September 18th, 2010 at 4:01 PM ^
I hear you. But your argument is based on the unstated proposition that there are not degrees of bad. You're correct. We knew our defense was "bad." We hoped it could show major improvement as the season went on. Post-UMass, I think we know it's scary bad, and improvement, while possible, is far from assured. We'll see.
September 18th, 2010 at 4:01 PM ^
it's because we thought the team was ready to take a step forward on defense. I'm glad we got the win, but today was just very disappointing.
September 18th, 2010 at 4:02 PM ^
Our defense is horrible and it will take a Heisman effort from Denard just to save Rod's job. Maybe I should relax, but after watching that abortion of a football game, UMass better be D1 good or the Big 10 season is going to be loooooooooooooong.
September 18th, 2010 at 4:27 PM ^
I think the word you were looking for is "abomination," not "abortion." That is all.
September 18th, 2010 at 5:07 PM ^
our defense is what most people thought it was before the season so this game should not have been a surprise. without the fumbled int and the ridiculous blocked punt, it would have looked like a comfortable victory.
September 18th, 2010 at 5:57 PM ^
a tad dramatic; we did create 2 turnovers, didn't we? If special teams didn't blow the punt that was blocked, and had Cam done a better job HOLDING ON TO THE FRIGGIN' BALL' it wouldn't have been so bad. I do feel you have to give UMass credit, they executed well, I really like their running backs and the quarterback did a good job too. Also, you have to remember that we were the 'Golden Child' of college football last week; whatever the coaches told the players about ignoring the press, we are talking about 19ish year old guys; mentally, they weren't prepared. That said, we all know there are/were defensive deficiencies from before the season started; this was really part of our expectations going in, wasn't it?
September 18th, 2010 at 4:02 PM ^
But it doesn't mean that I am happy. It better get better next week or we are in for a long season.
September 18th, 2010 at 4:02 PM ^
You're right- our defense is definitely not part of the aristocracy.
September 18th, 2010 at 4:03 PM ^
They are a combination of not stopping UMASS on 3rd and 4th down, not HOLDING ON TO THE DAMN BALL after the interception, and scoring 42 points during our meager 22 minutes of possession. UMASS won the line of scrimmage today, but if we can still be that "bend but dont break" defense we will win a lot of games this year. UMASS may have played well, but I still feel they had to earn every yard.
September 18th, 2010 at 4:12 PM ^
Our ends got rolled all day on those cut backs. When we finally brought pressure on those rollouts things looked better. When you say they won the line of scrimmage, I agree. Very dismaying and frightening as we go forward.
Better to discover issues in a win though.
September 18th, 2010 at 4:06 PM ^
However,thank gawd for Martin and Kouvac; other than these two, defense was a BIG no show today.
September 18th, 2010 at 4:25 PM ^
Where'd you get the U, and where'd you lose the S?
September 18th, 2010 at 4:40 PM ^
Somewhere between beer and liquor?
September 18th, 2010 at 4:07 PM ^
just win baby...one game at a time...for all we know, it was an off day...because we saw how they played the last 2 games, and it was not this bad...and those offenses were definitely better than UMASS'...and thankfully we have an offense that can keep us in shootouts...
September 18th, 2010 at 4:07 PM ^
It seem to me that the defense was taking the day off. I don't think they played hard and seem to go through the motions without much emotion. I don't think our defense is this bad but hopefully RR will kick them in gear for next week game. The offense started out lethargic as well but kicked in high gear during the late 2nd QTR and through most of the 2nd half. This could have been much worse since UMASS ws up for this game and looked to have spent a lot of time preparing for our team. Hopefully this will knock our young team back to the ground and they will be hungrier and play better next week. I think next week we'll see a different UM defense!
September 18th, 2010 at 4:22 PM ^
They either took the game off, or were simply trying really hard to avoid injuries. This became apparent when Mouton didn't even attempt to tackle the UMass QB on their second to last TD.
September 18th, 2010 at 5:04 PM ^
Mouton held up because he didn't want to get a late hit penalty -- not because he was trying to avoid injury.
September 18th, 2010 at 4:08 PM ^
September 18th, 2010 at 5:15 PM ^
September 18th, 2010 at 4:08 PM ^
The "decimated defense" argument doesn't apply here. I appreciate efforts to cheer people up, but it's okay to be upset sometimes. We have talented players (at least Rivals 3-stars) at every defensive position, except for Kovacs. FCS don't. We gave up more points to UMass than either of their FCS opponents this season and all but three FCS opponents last years (the mighty Albany, Hofstra, and Stony Brook). Just to reiterate, Holy Cross held UMass to fewer points this season. Guess how many three-star players Holy Cross has on their roster? Zero.
This is a site to analyze U-M football and share thoughts. The analysis right now is depressing. That's just the way it is. Brian's UFRs will cofirm this.
September 18th, 2010 at 4:09 PM ^
I mean, yeah, we knew it was bad. But it is perfectly understandible to be upset about the way they played today. They did not do anything particularly well, from the playcalling to execution, to just tackling... and all against what should be an inferior opponent. After all the optimism of the improved play of the corners and linebackers, this was a major step backwards and it does not bode well for us in Big Ten play. Remember Indiana last year? Remember how our defense played poorly and we all chalked it up to Indiana turning a corner? This seems eerily familiar.
Let me be clear... firing Gerg is not the answer right now. But this needs to stop if we're going to contend in the Big Ten this season.
September 18th, 2010 at 4:13 PM ^
September 18th, 2010 at 4:18 PM ^
...had RR run Hopkins or DRob on that 3rd and 1 instead of Smith.
September 18th, 2010 at 4:19 PM ^
we shouldn't have to rely on turnovers to shut down an FCS school. In retrospect, our finish to the first half was miraculous and we had no business putting up 14 in two mintues.
September 18th, 2010 at 5:07 PM ^
While I agree it's okay to be disappointed with our performance, our offense has every business putting up 14 points in two minutes on an FCS team. Our offense has shown itself to be capable of such things.
September 18th, 2010 at 4:16 PM ^
I can't be the only person that is happy we won, and isn't worried about future games, can I?
I understand the concern, but we are 3 and 0. FAWKING ENJOY IT.
Next up Bowling Green.
September 18th, 2010 at 4:44 PM ^
you can be happy AND not worried. It's one thing to be happy we won, but you'd have to ignore the facts of the game and how badly we played on the D side of the ball. Unless you are high or drunk and then it's completely understandable until you sober up. ;-)
September 18th, 2010 at 5:10 PM ^
I don't get how you can be happy AND not worried.It's actually quite easy.
September 18th, 2010 at 5:38 PM ^
but you're gonna have a hell of a hangover.....
September 18th, 2010 at 7:18 PM ^
A month ago I would have benn happy with 3-0 to start the year no matter how we won.
September 18th, 2010 at 4:16 PM ^
Did anyone really think that our D was anything but bad? Jesus, we played badly across the board (yes, the O sucked in the 1st Q) and still got the win. It's not like we were ranked in the top 5 with Jr's and Sr's in all the skill positions.
September 18th, 2010 at 4:18 PM ^
Final conclusion: We won and are 3-0. I think we'll win next week. One think I know is we'll be in every game this year and with a big play offense we'll have a good chance of winning at least half to the remaining games...if not more!
September 18th, 2010 at 4:30 PM ^
It was an ugly game, no doubt, but the end had two KEY plays go UMass's way.
If Cam doesn't fumble that interception, we have the ball 42-24 and grind out more time. Instead he does and they get the ball at the 26 yard line, and ultimately a TD, more confidence, and more momentum.
If Hagerup doesn't drop that snap, they have a much longer field to drive with not a lot of time. Instead he does drop it and they get even more momentum along with the ball at the 25 yard line.
Overall what I saw was our team looked like they underestimated UMass, which is never a good thing to do. They didn't execute well, and UMass got a couple of very good breaks at the end to close the gap. Florida did it against Miami(OH). Va Tech did it against James Madison and lost. Oklahoma did it against Utah State. West Virginia did it against Marshall. And Cal did it last night against Nevada and got killed.
So it's never fun, but it's a lot better to come out with the win and have a lot of ugly film to look at and learn from.
Go Blue!
September 18th, 2010 at 4:34 PM ^
I'm new, I realize. But I just need to say that I don't think the major concern is Gerg. It's that he doesn't have much talent to work with. That goes on the head coach.
September 18th, 2010 at 4:39 PM ^
UMass drove on Michigan with regularity. Whenever they needed something, they got it. The defense couldn't stop the trap, edge plays were always there, bootleg action killed them, tackling was awful, and as usual... Tight Ends were running free.
Michigan made UMass look like the New England Patriots. With B10 play looming, I understand why people are concerned.
September 18th, 2010 at 4:39 PM ^
September 18th, 2010 at 4:42 PM ^
...to hear people complaining about style points after a victory again. It's been awhile since the fanbase has been able to afford to do that.
September 18th, 2010 at 4:43 PM ^
But maybe this UMass team wins their conference this year. *shrug*
September 18th, 2010 at 4:55 PM ^
This is one of those wins that feels like a loss. Two things, though:
1) If our defense is going to take a day off, at least it's on a day we score 42 points.
2) No significant injuries.
That is all.
September 18th, 2010 at 4:55 PM ^
Ah, its frustrating we gave up 34 points to ND and UConn combined and 37 today, but we WON!
It was a trap game. In 2006, a pretty good season, we had a 5 game stretch where in 4 of those games we gave up 22 points total and in the 5th game we gave up 26. It was Ball State for those that forgot...
Our offense put up 525 yards in 22 minutes. Does that need to be repeated???
Our offense put up 525 yards in 22 minutes!!!!
Lets beat bgsu and IU and be 5-0 and go from there. GO BLUE.
September 18th, 2010 at 4:59 PM ^
Wow!
They let a lesser team play them much tougher than they should have.
It's not like that doesn't happen to EVERY-FUCKIN-ONE FROM TIME TO TIME. Seriously, it happens every weekend to someone... Only for Michigan does it mean DOOM!
September 18th, 2010 at 5:06 PM ^
Ball. State.
San. Diego. State.
September 18th, 2010 at 5:35 PM ^
if we had a defense that was even respectable? we would be miles ahead of where we are now.
September 18th, 2010 at 6:10 PM ^
There are clearly failings with this team that the game highlighted, but I have to agree that this might just be a very bad game defensively, exacerbated by a good UMass offense. They clearly had an offensive plan and stuck to it. I will say, I hope the team's inability to stop the PA was due to some breakdowns mentally and not an inability on defense, as there are going to be teams later in the schedule that will murder them. I will say with respect to the RB, there were a couple of runs by UMass that were stopped in the backfield or for a short gain and the Hernandez kid just made a play. Obviously, the run defense was bad, but like last week sometimes that just happens.