Home
i'm an actor, not a reactor

Primary links

  • About
    • $upport (lol)
    • Ethics
    • FAQ
    • Glossary
    • Privacy Policy
  • Contact
  • MGoStore
    • Hail to Old Blue
  • MGoBoard
    • MGoBoard FAQ
    • Michigan bar locator
    • Moderator Action Sticky
  • Useful Stuff
    • Depth Chart By Class
    • Hoops Depth Chart by Class
    • 2017 Recruiting Board
    • Unofficial Two Deep
    • MGoFlickr
    • Diaries, Windows Live Writer, And You
    • User-Curated HOF
    • Where To Eat In Ann Arbor
  • Schedule/Tix
    • Future Schedules (wiki)
    • Ticket spreadsheet
Home Forums MGoBoard

Navigation

  • Forums
  • Recent posts

User login

  • Create new account
  • Request new password

MGoElsewhere

  • @MGoBlog (Brian)
  • @aceanbender
  • @Misopogon (Seth)
  • @Aeschnepp (Adam)
  • @BISB
  • @EUpchurchPhoto
  • @FullOfTwitt (Fuller)
  • Hail to the Victors 2016
  • MGoFacebook
  • MGoPodcast
  • WTKA
  • Instagram

Michigan Blogs

  • Big House Blog
  • Burgeoning Wolverine Star
  • Genuinely Sarcastic
  • Go Blue Michigan Wolverine
  • Holdin' The Rope
  • MVictors
  • Maize 'n' Blue Nation
  • Maize 'n' Brew
  • Maize And Go Blue
  • Michigan Hockey Net
  • MMMGoBlueBBQ
  • The Blog That Yost Built
  • The Hoover Street Rag
  • The M Zone
  • Touch The Banner
  • UMGoBlog
  • UMHoops
  • UMTailgate
  • Wolverine Liberation Army

M On The Net

  • mgovideo
  • MGoBlue.com
  • Mike DeSimone
  • Recruiting Planet
  • The Wolverine
  • Go Blue Wolverine
  • Winged Helmet
  • UMGoBlue.com
  • MaizeRage.org
  • Puckhead
  • The M Den
  • True Blue Fan Forum

Big Ten Blogs

  • Illinois
    • Illinois Loyalty
    • Illinois Baseball Report
  • Indiana
    • Inside The Hall
    • The Crimson Quarry
  • Iowa
    • Black Heart, Gold Pants
    • Fight For Iowa
  • Michigan State
    • The Only Colors
  • Minnesota
    • GopherHole.com
    • The Daily Gopher
  • Nebraska
    • Corn Nation
    • Husker Max
    • Husker Mike's Blasphemy
    • Husker Gameday
  • Northwestern
    • Sippin' On Purple
    • Lake The Posts
  • Notre Dame
    • The House Rock Built
    • One Foot Down
  • Ohio State
    • Eleven Warriors
    • Buckeye Commentary
    • Men of the Scarlet and Gray
    • Our Honor Defend
    • The Buckeye Nine
  • Penn State
    • Slow States
    • Black Shoe Diaries
    • Happy Valley Hardball
    • Penn State Clips
    • Linebacker U
    • Nittany White Out
  • Purdue
    • Boiled Sports
    • Hammer and Rails
  • Wisconsin
    • Bruce Ciskie

Links of Note

  • Baseball
    • College Baseball Today
    • The College Baseball Blog
  • Basketball
    • Ken Pomeroy
    • Hoop Math
    • John Gasaway
    • Luke Winn/Sports Illustrated
  • College Hockey
    • Chris Heisenberg (Class of 2016)
    • College Hockey Stats
    • Michigan College Hockey
    • Hockey's Future
    • Sioux Sports
    • USCHO
  • Football
    • Smart Football
    • Every Day Should Be Saturday
    • Matt Hinton/Grantland
    • Football Study Hall
    • Football Outsiders
    • Harold Stassen
    • NCAA D-I Stats Page
    • The Wizard Of Odds
    • CFB Stats
  • General
    • Sports Central
  • Local Interest
    • The Ann Arbor Chronicle
    • Arborwiki
    • Arbor Update
    • Ann Arbor Observer
    • Teeter Talk
    • Vacuum
  • Teams Of The D
    • Lions
      • Pride of Detroit
    • Pistons
      • Detroit Bad Boys
      • Need4Sheed
    • Tigers
      • Roar Of The Tigers
      • Bless You Boys
      • The Daily Fungo
      • The Detroit Tigers Weblog
    • Red Wings
      • Winging It In Motown
      • On The Wings
    • Michigan Sports Forum

Beveled Guilt

Site Search

Diaries

  • New
  • Popular
  • Hot
  • This Month in MGoBlog History - April 2008: No Spring Game at the Big House! Hockey loses to ND in the Frozen Four!
    Maize.Blue Wagner - 1 day ago
  • Thirteen unlucky minutes (TL;DNR-This is a bit of rant about the refs)
    docwhoblocked - 2 weeks ago
  • Fan Satisfaction Index End of Season Bball Survey
    OneFootIn - 2 weeks ago
  • How likely are we to revert to the mean?
    Bo Glue - 2 weeks ago
  • It's time to avenge Villanova's 1985 NCAA tourney upset over Michigan
    Communist Football - 2 weeks ago
  •  
  • 1 of 2
  • ››
more
  • This Month in MGoBlog History - April 2008: No Spring Game at the Big House! Hockey loses to ND in the Frozen Four!
    Maize.Blue Wagner - 576 views
  • 14 Months Ago: The Fire Beilein Threads.
    stephenrjking - 91 comments
  • Thirteen unlucky minutes (TL;DNR-This is a bit of rant about the refs)
    docwhoblocked - 61 comments
  • It's time to avenge Villanova's 1985 NCAA tourney upset over Michigan
    Communist Football - 11 comments
  • This Month in MGoBlog History - April 2008: No Spring Game at the Big House! Hockey loses to ND in the Frozen Four!
    Maize.Blue Wagner - 6 comments

MGoBoard

  • New
  • Recent
  • Hot
  • OT: Lazy Sunday NBA/NHL playoffs open thread
    12 replies
  • Chris Partridge Presser From This Afternoon, video
    3 replies
  • Beaubien No-Hitter Clinches Sweep of Maryland, 8-0 (6 inn.)
    7 replies
  • New in-state offer: 2020 CB Enzo Jennings
    11 replies
  • New in-state offer: 2020 TE/DE Braiden McGregor
    7 replies
  • META : Drupalgeddon2. Unpatched Drupal servers being hacked
    11 replies
  • UCF Knights unveil 2017 championship banner
    67 replies
  • OT: Whose shirt did I buy? Also, thanks for the shirt
    41 replies
  • OT - LSU Spring Game Currently on ESPN/SEC Network
    33 replies
  • Baseball's win streak at 19 after 11th inning walkoff over PSU
    16 replies
  • OT: RIP Verne Troyer
    56 replies
  • OT: Record Store Day 2018!
    32 replies
  • Notre Dame Spring Game: analysis from M n B, video
    117 replies
  • Michigan Mercies Maryland, Softball Wins 12-1 (5 inn.)
    18 replies
  • Michigan Football Hype Video 2018-19 Season
    31 replies
  •  
  • 1 of 6
  • ››
  • OT: Lazy Sunday NBA/NHL playoffs open thread
    12 replies
  • OT: Whose shirt did I buy? Also, thanks for the shirt
    41 replies
  • Chris Partridge Presser From This Afternoon, video
    3 replies
  • Beaubien No-Hitter Clinches Sweep of Maryland, 8-0 (6 inn.)
    7 replies
  • This Week/Weekend's Football Visitors
    51 replies
  • UCF Knights unveil 2017 championship banner
    67 replies
  • New in-state offer: 2020 CB Enzo Jennings
    11 replies
  • Baseball's win streak at 19 after 11th inning walkoff over PSU
    16 replies
  • New in-state offer: 2020 TE/DE Braiden McGregor
    7 replies
  • Notre Dame Spring Game: analysis from M n B, video
    117 replies
  • OT - LSU Spring Game Currently on ESPN/SEC Network
    33 replies
  • Michigan Football Hype Video 2018-19 Season
    31 replies
  • OT: RIP Verne Troyer
    56 replies
  • The Evolution of Commerce - What Industries are Dying, What's Thriving?
    148 replies
  • Michigan Mercies Maryland, Softball Wins 12-1 (5 inn.)
    18 replies
  •  
  • 1 of 6
  • ››
  • Belleville coach Jermain Crowell mad at UM again
    244 replies
  • Police investigating Elysee Mbem-Bosse for death threat against Harbaugh
    224 replies
  • "Being Not-Rich at UM" Guide
    168 replies
  • Buckle Up
    159 replies
  • Semi-OT: What sports would you fix?
    158 replies
  • Elysee Mbem-Bosse disturbing tweets
    157 replies
  • Whats the Best Way to Make Flight Arrangements?
    149 replies
  • The Evolution of Commerce - What Industries are Dying, What's Thriving?
    148 replies
  • What past season would you have liked to see an Amazon-style documentary on?
    121 replies
  • OT - Jalen Hurts possibly looking to transfer
    121 replies
  • OT: best-selling musical artists by state of birth
    120 replies
  • Notre Dame Spring Game: analysis from M n B, video
    117 replies
  • No additional protest of Shea Patterson appeal by Ole Miss
    113 replies
  • NCAA changes rules to restrict James Doug Foug's super power
    107 replies
  • OT: MSU digs hole deeper, Engler adviser: Nassar survivor's claims of payout 'fake news'
    106 replies
  •  
  • 1 of 6
  • ››

Support MGoBlog: buy stuff at Amazon

People losing minds, mass idiocy ensues: Boise get 7 first place votes in poll

71 posts / 0 new
Login or register to post comments
Last post

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
September 8th, 2010 at 8:47 AM
#302
ShockFX
ShockFX's picture
Joined: 07/16/2008
MGoPoints: 4069
Well, Florida looked like

Well, Florida looked like shit against Miami (Ohio), and Boise beat the ACC favorite and a team ranked from #5 (Coaches) to #10 (AP) in a virtual road game. After week 1, they may be the best team. It likely won't stay that way. But for now, you can't conclusively say any other team is better.

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
September 8th, 2010 at 9:13 AM
(Reply to #3) #303
Edward Khil
Edward Khil's picture
Joined: 03/06/2010
MGoPoints: 999
The Problem Is...

The problem is that now you probably won't be able to say any other team is better even after week 13!  MAN I was rooting for Va Tech.  I think that essentially those seven voters were saying that they expect Boise State to go undefeated the rest of the way, and that they have a better shot of doing so than any other team in football.  And that's perfectly reasonable.

Go Toledo!

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
September 8th, 2010 at 8:50 AM
#304
Bodogblog
Bodogblog's picture
Joined: 06/08/2010
MGoPoints: 21192
See what you did with your original post?

This is why we can't have nice things

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
September 8th, 2010 at 8:51 AM
#305
Blazefire
Blazefire's picture
Joined: 04/17/2009
MGoPoints: 25034
Dude

15 game winning streak. Though that isn't against a BCS schedule, they did win all of their BCS games during that time. Furthermore, the Boise State AD has made it quite clear that, "if you call and agree to a home and home, we will play you."

Could they beat those teams? I dunno. Then again, would any of the top teams be expected to run the table against the other top teams? Would OSU be expected to emerge undefeated from a string of games against Alabama, Texas, Florida, Boise State, etcetera? Probably not. So does BSU have to do that to get the respect?

Sorry. You win 15 games in a row and play at least some of them against top quality opponents, AND you beat the crap out of your tomato cans, you deserve consideration for first place. You just do.

Now, if VT goes out and has a horrible season, thus proving that BSU's marquee win isn't all that marquee, I'm sure the view will be properly adjusted. But that record earns top respect no matter what.

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
September 8th, 2010 at 9:06 AM
(Reply to #5) #306
wolverine1987
wolverine1987's picture
Joined: 07/07/2008
MGoPoints: 11612
I already respect them. That is not the same

as saying they could be the best team in the country. There is no possible way that is true. A 15 game win streak with a BCS win earns you respect, but when literally 10 of those wins are against teams that any team in the B10, including Indiana, could beat easily, the respect only goes so far. For me, that is into the top ten and into BCS bowls.

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
September 8th, 2010 at 9:42 AM
(Reply to #12) #307
mgomistercheezle
Joined: 11/10/2009
MGoPoints: 701
Ditto.  I respect BSU, and

Ditto.  I respect BSU, and they do deserve to be a "top 10" team and play in BCS bowls...but on the other hand, you'd have a real hard time convincing me that an undefeated Boise State deserves a shot at the NC over a 1-loss team like a Texas or Alabama who play in a real conferences.

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
September 8th, 2010 at 9:35 PM
(Reply to #26) #308
TheMadGrasser
TheMadGrasser's picture
Joined: 11/11/2009
MGoPoints: 1199
Sorry

But it's just my opinion that Boise would be able to play with any team on any day. As far as Texas goes, they would probably stomp all over them, to be honest. Every game I see Texas play, they sleep walk through half the game and almost lose. BSU has been winning games and winning games for a number of years now. Seemingly every BCS top 25 team they play, they win. How do they not deserve to be top 3? I used to be in the non-BCS hating hater pool too, but I think it's time we give them a shot. I really think they could beat anyone right now.

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
September 8th, 2010 at 10:07 AM
(Reply to #12) #309
Bodogblog
Bodogblog's picture
Joined: 06/08/2010
MGoPoints: 21192
Ditto Part II

I'm a fan of Boise, really like watching them play.  They hit you, don't get rattled, and are very well coached.  Not to mention innovative

But you take such a bruising in the B10/SEC/B12 - every week for the most part you need to play your starters every snap, at a very high level.  Have to be up for every game.  Boise has played well in big games, but what happens when they have a bad game?  Every team has a down week at some point.  When 'Bama does it they could be playing Georgia or Auburn (or LSU or South Carolina)... when Boise has an off week they're playing a flag football team.  How often during the season to they 1) get to rest their starters and keep them fresh, and 2) get underclassmen and 2nd and 3rd teamers experience because they're up by 40 pts?  B10/SEC/B12 teams don't have that luxury once the meat of the schedule starts.  Boise can go to sleep after Oregon State

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
September 9th, 2010 at 3:25 AM
(Reply to #37) #310
duffman is thru...
duffman is thrusting in your direction's picture
Joined: 05/20/2010
MGoPoints: 1059
I strongly feel this way too.

I strongly feel this way too.  Put Boise in the B10, for example, and they are facing serious competition most weeks. That means more than people give credit.  We look at the schedule every year as Michigan fans and have either a couple games circled, or, until recently have many games circled as possible losses.  Why would Boise St. succeed in this type of environment?

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
September 8th, 2010 at 10:17 AM
(Reply to #12) #311
joeyb
joeyb's picture
Joined: 10/12/2008
MGoPoints: 14048
Last year, they beat the

Last year, they beat the Pac10 champion and an undefeated TCU that started in the top 10 this year. This year, they beat the likely ACC champion and will have to beat Oregon State, whom will be competing for the Pac10 championship this year. That's likely 3-4 teams in the top 25 at the end of this season that will be part of their 26 game winning streak going into bowl selection. I know it's spread out over two seasons, but that is a pretty respectable resume.

Besides, if they get into the game there are two possibilities. They could win and the BCS would either go away or get completely redone. Or, they could lose and you never have to worry about this happening again because people would point to this game and say "See, this is what happens when you put non-BCS teams in the NC game."

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
September 8th, 2010 at 12:09 PM
(Reply to #39) #312
mgomistercheezle
Joined: 11/10/2009
MGoPoints: 701
They beat someone who could

They beat someone who could contend for the ACC title, and the Pac-10 looks like it will be wide open this year--almost everyone in that conference has a shot at winning it all.  Little has been established so far, and even in the event that VT does win the ACC, they'll have had to play the U, UNC, FSU along the way.  I'm not saying what Boise State does is easy to replicate, but in sports (football especially), getting up for one or two "big" games is a lot easier than sustaining that level of intensity over the course of a season.

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
September 8th, 2010 at 11:48 AM
(Reply to #5) #313
steviebrownforh...
Joined: 02/01/2009
MGoPoints: 3525
dude

Alabama is riding a 25 or 26 game winning streak in (supposedly...) the hardest conference in college football.  This includes beating Colt McCoy's Longhorns and Tebow's Gators in the same season.  They are returning most of their firepower on offense, and have enough talent stockpiled to field 2 teams that could play with Boise State.

I've said it before and I'll say it again: Boise is Top 25 good. They ARE NOT top 5 good. that is all.

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
September 8th, 2010 at 3:47 PM
(Reply to #47) #314
joeyb
joeyb's picture
Joined: 10/12/2008
MGoPoints: 14048
Actually its 15 games. They

Actually its 15 games. They lost to Florida and Utah to end the previous season.

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
September 8th, 2010 at 4:22 PM
(Reply to #58) #315
steviebrownforh...
Joined: 02/01/2009
MGoPoints: 3525
sorry, i mis-spoke

25 or 26 game regular season win streak. (SEC Championship and Bowl Game)

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
September 8th, 2010 at 9:33 PM
(Reply to #47) #316
kgh10
Joined: 06/30/2008
MGoPoints: 3107
FYI: They beat Garrett

FYI: They beat Garrett Gilbert's Texas Longhorns.

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
September 8th, 2010 at 8:54 AM
#317
Hard Gay
Hard Gay's picture
Joined: 10/01/2008
MGoPoints: 1421
well

I remember Utah beat Bama pretty bad, so i wouldn't be surprised if boise beat bama

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
September 8th, 2010 at 9:49 AM
(Reply to #6) #318
Huntington Wolverine
Joined: 10/26/2009
MGoPoints: 2586
Utah beat Bama two years

Utah beat Bama two years ago.  Saban has the Tide rolling now.

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
September 8th, 2010 at 10:18 AM
(Reply to #30) #319
joeyb
joeyb's picture
Joined: 10/12/2008
MGoPoints: 14048
You mean they weren't rolling

You mean they weren't rolling when they were 12-1 with their only other loss coming against the National Championship team that year?

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
September 9th, 2010 at 3:30 AM
(Reply to #6) #320
duffman is thru...
duffman is thrusting in your direction's picture
Joined: 05/20/2010
MGoPoints: 1059
Nicely done.

Nicely done.

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
September 8th, 2010 at 8:54 AM
#321
Anonymosity
Anonymosity's picture
Joined: 06/30/2008
MGoPoints: 2480
BSU just won at Virginia

BSU just won at Virginia Tech.  What has any other team done this season to deserve to be #1?

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
September 8th, 2010 at 9:08 AM
(Reply to #7) #322
wolverine1987
wolverine1987's picture
Joined: 07/07/2008
MGoPoints: 11612
They exist. With FAR superior talent.

All poling is projection, it is usually not based solely on that week's victory.

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
September 8th, 2010 at 9:23 AM
(Reply to #14) #323
Blue2000
Blue2000's picture
Joined: 01/06/2009
MGoPoints: 6032
All poling is projection, it

All poling is projection, it is usually not based solely on that week's victory.

 

That's an inherent flaw in the polls.  They SHOULD be based solely upon a team's body of work, not upon preseason projections.  Based upon the games that have actually been played, Boise State is more worthy of first-place votes than any other team in the country.  Whether or not they deserve to stay at #1 given their creampuff schedule from here on out is an entirely different question. 

 

Personally I don't think the first polls should be released until week 4, after a bunch of games have been played and we actually know who's good.  But everyone needs something to talk about in the preseason, I guess. 

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
September 8th, 2010 at 10:21 AM
(Reply to #23) #324
joeyb
joeyb's picture
Joined: 10/12/2008
MGoPoints: 14048
I agree with you, but the

I agree with you, but the inherent flaw in your logic is that all teams are either 1-0 beating an 0-1 team or 0-1 losing to a 1-0 team. The only way that you can say that BSU is more deserving is if you use preseason projections to determine that VaTech was the best team that lost during the week.

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
September 8th, 2010 at 10:33 AM
(Reply to #42) #325
Blue2000
Blue2000's picture
Joined: 01/06/2009
MGoPoints: 6032
That's a fair point, which is

That's a fair point, which is why I think the ideal solution is to not release the polls until week 4, after multiple games have been played.  Under the current system, it's impossible to not factor in some projections to determine how good teams are going into the games, but at least in voting Boise St. #1 after one week, you're saying that actual performance far outweighs those projections on a going-forward basis. 

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
September 8th, 2010 at 9:56 AM
(Reply to #14) #326
chally
Joined: 11/25/2008
MGoPoints: 510
I disagree

There are several ways a voter might approach his/her ranking system.  Among them:

* Which team would likely beat all the other teams on a neutral field?

* Which team will likely end the season with the best body of work?

* Which team has put together the best body of work to date?

You seem to be focused on the first or second approach.  I agree that Boise should probably not be in the conversation for the first.  I'm also inclined to agree that it would take some far-fetched speculation to put Boise number one based on the second criteria. 

However, the third approach is also valid, and I have no reason to think that the eight voters who consider Boise the number one team in America didn't reach that conclusion based on precicely that kind of reasoning.  Without question, theirs was the best win of the season so far.  If I had to award a trophy today, it would go to Boise State. 

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
September 8th, 2010 at 8:56 AM
#327
Maize and Blue in OH
Maize and Blue in OH's picture
Joined: 10/01/2008
MGoPoints: 1132
Resume Voting

One of the seven, Doug Lesmerises of the Cleveland Plain Dealer, based his vote solely upon the week one play and quality of opponent.  His number 8 team in the country - Michigan.  It was week one.  I wouldn't get too upset.  Boise will drop back once they start playing their conference schedule.

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
September 8th, 2010 at 8:55 AM
#328
formerlyanonymous
formerlyanonymous's picture
Joined: 06/30/2008
MGoPoints: 38897
Crazier, the guy who voted

Crazier, the guy who voted Michigan #8, or the people who voted Boise #1? Boise beat a team most have in their top 10-15. No one else has done that this year. Seems more than reasonable to me.

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
September 8th, 2010 at 12:08 PM
#329
ChasingRabbits
ChasingRabbits's picture
Joined: 01/19/2010
MGoPoints: 2170
"Why not?"  I tend to agree

"Why not?"  I tend to agree with ShockFX here.  After week 1 who is the best?  Who had the best win? As long as these 7 "journalists" are willing to change their vote in a week where other top teams are beating big time opponents and Boise is beating Idaho St., then I see nothing wrong with it.  Of course we know that some, to justify the fact that they put them there to begin with, will continue to put them there through every garbage game they play.  That is where it gets ludicrous. 

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
September 8th, 2010 at 9:03 AM
#330
goody
goody's picture
Joined: 06/30/2008
MGoPoints: 1532
They will get more first place

votes in a couple of weeks when they beat Oregon State.   Do they deserve the first place votes for their win against VT, probably not.  But they will continue to get those votes as long as they keep winning and everyone else loses atleast one game.

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
September 8th, 2010 at 9:08 AM
#331
gnrgoblue
Joined: 06/30/2008
MGoPoints: -17
Allowing Boise State into the

Allowing Boise State into the national title game would destroy almost any hopes we have that programs will schedule more competitive nonconference games going forward. At the very least, removing strength of schedule as a factor definitely eliminates one of the major incentives to play games that will improve it.

 

EDIT: I agree that polls are pointless right now and I don't care where Boise State or anyone else is ranked. My post is only for the sake of conversation in case it's relevant in early December.

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
September 8th, 2010 at 9:32 AM
(Reply to #13) #332
Fuzzy Dunlop
Fuzzy Dunlop's picture
Joined: 09/22/2009
MGoPoints: 5687
Allowing Boise into the

Allowing Boise into the national title game might finally get ADs at the big conference schools in favor of a playoff system, which would be the best possible result.

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
September 8th, 2010 at 9:40 AM
(Reply to #13) #333
ihartbraylon
Joined: 01/03/2009
MGoPoints: 698
I would disagree.

The respect given to Boise is more of a reflection of an entire decade of success. If this was the first year they were good, they wouldn't be ranked that high in the first place, and certainly we wouldn't be discussing whether or not they deserve a chance at the title. We all know their schedule and they're still not on level ground because of it. They have a chance based on a decade of success whereas AQ's get the luxury of getting respect based on one season. Plus, BSU still probably wouldn't get in over an undefeated team from the Big 10, Big 12, Pac 10, or SEC, it's generally acknowledged that the debate is between an undefeated Boise vs a one-loss AQ champ.

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
September 8th, 2010 at 9:56 AM
(Reply to #13) #334
IdealistWolverine
IdealistWolverine's picture
Joined: 09/01/2009
MGoPoints: 784
Why?

I guess from my point of view one big factor in the championship formula for teams is winning the first big game of the season.  For example OSU, Texas, LSU, USC, Alabama, and now Boise. They all have played huge, huge games at the beginning of the season and when they won it put them in the national eye and on the fast track to the national championship.

05: Texas beats OSU, never looked back.

06: OSU beat Texas, put them in drivers seat for NC game (lost to Fla.)

07: LSU beats Va Tech, loses two games but still ends up in Nat. Title game.  W/out that extra quality win do they end up in game still?

08: USC beats OSU, makes statement, sets themselves up with #1 ranking until the other OSU wins a wierd game up in Corvallis two Thursdays later.

09: Alabama beats VaTech in first game of season, makes mark on national scene.  Ends up in national championship game.

10: Boise beats VaTech, LSU beats UNC, OSU vs. Miami.  What are the chances Boise, LSU, or OSU/Miami makes the nat. championship game?

Conclusion?

VaTech is to season openers as tOSU is to national championship games.  Also, if you want to secure a spot in the national championship game you need to win a big out of conference game, because that's the most secure way into the championship game.

So... looking into the future...

2012: Michigan beats Alabama, earns #1 ranking and never looks back!

2012 National Champs baby!

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
September 8th, 2010 at 9:10 AM
#335
bacon
bacon's picture
Joined: 01/04/2009
MGoPoints: 18534
Since it's highly unlikely

Since it's highly unlikely that Michigan's season has national championship (or even BCS) aspirations, I don't really give a damn who plays for the NC this year.  Might as well be Boise St. or TCU for all I care.  Either they're good enough to win, in which case they will, or they're not, and we can stop talking about for a while.  

There's a good chance it's OSU vs. Boise in the NC game. Honestly, I'd cheer for Boise if it was against OSU in the NC game.  It's a win-win, because if Boise wins, OSU loses and if OSU wins, then it's somehow cheapened by the fact that they only beat a WAC team in the final game. 

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
September 8th, 2010 at 9:18 AM
(Reply to #15) #336
Edward Khil
Edward Khil's picture
Joined: 03/06/2010
MGoPoints: 999
But

What if it's Boise St. v. TCU in the National Championship game?

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
September 8th, 2010 at 12:04 PM
(Reply to #22) #337
mgomistercheezle
Joined: 11/10/2009
MGoPoints: 701
I'd root for the meteor

I'd root for the meteor

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
September 8th, 2010 at 9:12 AM
#338
Tater
Tater's picture
Joined: 08/13/2008
MGoPoints: 30564
Outliers

Polls like this one have a lot of voters, so there will always be outliers like the seven who voted BSU number one. I don't agree with their votes, but I am resigned to BSU being one of the teams that makes it into the "championship" game. Despite the old "any given day" adage, Oregon State seems to be the only team with a legitimate chance to win, and it is a home game for BSU.

If BSU and/or TCU makes it and the system isn't changed, it should make teams in good conferences think twice before scheduling tough OOC games. Why would a team that already has four or five tough conference games schedule another tough game preseason after BSU or TCU proves that you only have to beat one or two top-25 teams to get into the "championship" game?

For that matter, why would a Big East team with maybe two tough conference games bother scheduling tough OOC games if BSU, TCU, or both prove that the risk is higher than the upside?

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
September 8th, 2010 at 9:12 AM
#339
Scotthany
Scotthany's picture
Joined: 10/07/2008
MGoPoints: 2247
Well, everything I came in to

Well, everything I came in to say has already been said.  Stupid knowledgable and eloquent fan base. 

 

::kicks random can in road, shuffles off home to pout::

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
September 8th, 2010 at 9:13 AM
#340
Hannibal.
Hannibal.'s picture
Joined: 09/09/2008
MGoPoints: 6297
A lot of people vote Boise

A lot of people vote Boise State up there because they want to send a big "fuck you" to the BCS.  Nobody voting Boise State over Ohio State would would pick them to beat OSU on a neutral field without a point spread.

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
September 8th, 2010 at 9:48 AM
(Reply to #19) #341
dakotapalm
dakotapalm's picture
Joined: 07/15/2008
MGoPoints: 2267
Nobody voting Boise State

Nobody voting Boise State over Ohio State would would pick them to beat OSU on a neutral field without a point spread.

 

Perhaps... However, game on the line, trailing by four at the close of the fourth- would you rather have Boise State with the ball attempting to win the game, or Ohio State with the ball attempting to win it? I'd rather trust the Broncos in the situation.

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
September 8th, 2010 at 9:14 AM
#342
koolaid
Joined: 10/31/2009
MGoPoints: 650
they should get those first place votes

They deserve ALL of the first place votes at this point in the season.  Who has Alabama played?  Ohio State?  Boise State beat VT, Alabama beat SJSU and OSU beat Marshall.  Of those, Boise is the only one that actually played competition and thus deserve first place.  Lets not discuss cup cakes in the schedule since Boise hasn't played any yet.   Boise is moving to the MWC, which will help their schedule competitiveness.

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
September 8th, 2010 at 9:16 AM
#343
Glutton
Glutton's picture
Joined: 08/18/2009
MGoPoints: 2151
I refuse to take them

I refuse to take them seriously while they have smurf turf.

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
September 8th, 2010 at 9:44 AM
#344
dakotapalm
dakotapalm's picture
Joined: 07/15/2008
MGoPoints: 2267
Yeah! There's no way they

Yeah! There's no way they could be a "big boy" team like... Alabama (what, Utah beat them?)... or Oklahoma (ooh, they lost to Boise State?) ... If they played in the SEC and had to play the tough teams like Ole Miss (ouch) or Vanderbilt (tough school) or South Carolina (routed by UConn)... Oh, wait.

I think you are missing the real "idiocy" which is believing that Boise State can't beat a "real" team because... well, they just couldn't. Ignoring the facts of beating Oklahoma, TCU, Oregon and Virginia Tech but preferring to abide in the realms of believing what you feel is true instead of what you observe.

And the truly sad thing is that beliefs of SID's and coaches are relevant to the equation for determining a national champion. In basketball, if you don't believe Butler could compete with Duke, it's a moot point because Butler (or Duke) gets to prove it. This alone is an enourmous reason why our national championship system sucks.

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
September 8th, 2010 at 9:55 AM
(Reply to #27) #345
MCalibur
MCalibur's picture
Joined: 07/16/2009
MGoPoints: 2670
That's not the argument

Boise is a very good football team by any standard. No one is saying that can't beat good teams, that's plainly visible. But can they beat a great team? I'm talking about Alabama 2009, Florida 2008 level great. They have never done that. This is their "awesome" resume:

  • 2006: beat Oklahoma 43-42 in overtime in a bowl game (extra preparation).
  • 2008: beat Oregon in Eugene, 37-32.
  • 2009: beat Oregon in Boise, 19 - 8, in first game of season (extra preparation).
  • 2010: beat Virginai Tech on the Road, 33 - 30, in first game of season (extra preparation.)

That's it. Four years, four notable wins; three of them with a month or more to prepare. If they beat Oregon State, it'll be five. Missing from that resume is a loss in 2007 to a Washington team that ended up 4-9.

Boise's accomplishments are emetically overstated. They've done nothing that Iowa, Wisconsin, LSU, Oregon, Georgia Tech, Miami, Oklahoma, so on so forth, haven't done or couldn't do.

Whatever, at this point I hope they make it. I think it will precipitate two things: A) a real play off for the FBS championship, B) annhilation at the hands of the elite AQ school they meet in the championship game. Let it happen, I care not.

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
September 8th, 2010 at 10:13 AM
(Reply to #33) #346
Anonymosity
Anonymosity's picture
Joined: 06/30/2008
MGoPoints: 2480
How is "extra preparation"

How is "extra preparation" for bowl games relevant when the opposing team gets the same amount of "extra preparation"?

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
September 8th, 2010 at 1:15 PM
(Reply to #38) #347
MCalibur
MCalibur's picture
Joined: 07/16/2009
MGoPoints: 2670
You missed the point.

I wasn't pointing that out to say "they got lukcy to win those games." I didn't say anything even close to that. I'm saying that having 1 whole month (or summer) to scout and prep for a game is different than having 1 week. Do you disagree?

Also, their opponents need to put more of their playbook on tape in order to make it through their schedule than Boise does because of the drastic difference in strength of schedule. It matters. I'd love to hear your counter argument to that specidic point.

Give them a week to prepare for Iowa, then turn around and play Wisconsin, then turn around and play Penn State, then turn around and play Northwestern, then turn around and play Ohio State and then let's see them go undefeated. That's the point.

They've played 8 games against BCS competition and TCU in 4 seasons (plus 1 game) and thier record in those games is 6-2 (0.750). That's very, very good but not National Championship good.

Sorry, the fact remains that their schedule is shit and it doesn't matter that they're willing to play anyone, anywhere, anytime. Being willing to play someone isn't the same thing as playing them.

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
September 9th, 2010 at 12:42 AM
(Reply to #54) #348
TheMadGrasser
TheMadGrasser's picture
Joined: 11/11/2009
MGoPoints: 1199
I don't think he missed anything

I don't think his point was that you said they were lucky. Why does it matter how long they had to prep for the game? Didn't every other team have the same time before the season and at bowl games?

Your second point is noted. However, don't you think coaches save a bunch of playbook strictly for bowl games? See UM vs. Florida a few years ago. I bet Urban didn't see much of that on tape. Right? So you're penalizing Boise for having a coach that is better than another teams because their coach didn't same material for the bowl game? I don't understand the logic.

They may not go undefeated in the Big Ten, who knows. They don't have the chance to do that. So you're going to penalize them even though (.750) time they play a big bad BCS powerhouse, they beat them? That's ridiculous.

Yeah, their schedule is weak. No one can dispute that, but it's weird that almost everytime Boise and TCU play the big bad BCS schools, they win. I guess it really comes down to what should the title game be?

Should the title game be 1.) the two teams that survived the hardest schedule, won the most games, and have the most "street cred" OR 2.) the two teams that are potentially undefeated, didn't make excuses as to why they lost a game to an inferior opponent, and are the best in ONE GAME? I guess we know your answer. However, that's why a bowl is a GAME, singular. Boise will play with and possibly beat anyone in FBS in a title GAME. They've taken it to many teams that people claimed they couldn't share the same field with. When's this going to stop? When they actually get to the title game this year and route someone? Will it be good enough for you then? Probably not. You know what they say about excuses....Well, Boise doesn't have any.

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
September 9th, 2010 at 6:49 AM
(Reply to #66) #349
MCalibur
MCalibur's picture
Joined: 07/16/2009
MGoPoints: 2670
We're talking about a

We're talking about a national championship here. Therefore we're talking about going undefeated against a reasonably difficult schedule. The extra preparation time is key to the 4 or 6 praise-worthy games Boise has won in the last five seasons. If you don't get that, cool.

Other coaches didn't neglect to same save material for the bowl, they couldn't afford to. If they did, they wouldn't get to the bowl. That's the point.

I acknowledge Boise's prowess in beating respectable teams 75% of the time  in the last five seasons. I don't think that's worthy of being granted the opportunity to play for the National Championship as others do. Cool.

My position is clear, the two teams with the best resumes at the end of the year should play for the crystal ball; that won't be Boise St. If it is, I declare bullshit. Sue me.

If Boise gets to the title game and route routs someone, I'll give them credit. They won't do that because they've never routed anyone. But, in case they do, I'd give them credit.

Boise doesn't make excuses except for that part where they bitch and moan about "we can't get anyone to play us because there's nothing in it for them."

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
September 9th, 2010 at 11:49 AM
(Reply to #67) #350
mgomistercheezle
Joined: 11/10/2009
MGoPoints: 701
Amen, brother, amen...

Amen, brother, amen...

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
September 9th, 2010 at 4:02 PM
(Reply to #67) #351
TheMadGrasser
TheMadGrasser's picture
Joined: 11/11/2009
MGoPoints: 1199
That's fine

That's your opinion and I completely understand it. However, I think it's time they play the big one, obviously if they win out.

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
September 8th, 2010 at 10:22 AM
(Reply to #33) #352
dakotapalm
dakotapalm's picture
Joined: 07/15/2008
MGoPoints: 2267
Boise's accomplishments are

Boise's accomplishments are emetically overstated. They've done nothing that Iowa, Wisconsin, LSU, Oregon, Georgia Tech, Miami, Oklahoma, so on so forth, haven't done or couldn't do.

I'll buy that argument. But when LSU gets off to a good start, they aren't discounted saying, "well, they couldn't play with the big boys...." If you want to give them the same credit you would to an Iowa, Wisconsin, etc, on a regular year, I would think that would be fair.

On a side point, I wouldn't put last year's Bama team in the "great" category. I'd put the 08 Florida team, 05 Texas/USC, 03 USC, 01 Miami-  but Alabama was whiskers away from losing to Tennessee, and barely beat Texas w/o Colt McCoy.... but that's another argument. I don't think the Boise team would compete well with any other great teams that I listed.

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
September 8th, 2010 at 1:50 PM
(Reply to #43) #353
MCalibur
MCalibur's picture
Joined: 07/16/2009
MGoPoints: 2670
Word. That's all I'm

Word. That's all I'm sayin'.

Also, don't forget that Alabama completely neutralized Florida in an all-the-marbles showdown in the SEC title game. Bama held Florida about 100 yards under average in the title game...that's something. The fact that Alabama struggled against Tennessee is just further testament to how difficult it is to make it through a real schedule. Florida vs. Arkansas, too.

The Texas thing was probably related to Bama going into clock-kill mode after the game was in hand. Boise would have gotten creamed. But that's just my opinion, I guess.

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
September 8th, 2010 at 9:45 AM
#354
cadmus2166
cadmus2166's picture
Joined: 01/04/2010
MGoPoints: 1233
I am not opposed to Boise St. getting votes at #1

Their place near the top of the polls has been proven on the field, at least to a certain degree.  Plus, with 20 of 22 starters back from last year's unbeaten team, how can you not rank them near or at the top of the polls?

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
September 8th, 2010 at 9:50 AM
#355
Huntington Wolverine
Joined: 10/26/2009
MGoPoints: 2586
This why polls shouldn't be

This why polls shouldn't be taken until at least 3 weeks in, preferably 5.

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
September 8th, 2010 at 9:58 AM
(Reply to #31) #356
GRBluefan
Joined: 02/13/2009
MGoPoints: 7202
That's...

what she said?

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
September 8th, 2010 at 9:57 AM
#357
stillMichigan
stillMichigan's picture
Joined: 09/05/2009
MGoPoints: 1822
Gonna be cool

Gonna be cool when we are getting first place votes again.  At this point I don't care who else gets them. But frankly, they are the first team that has earned any on the field  this year.

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
September 8th, 2010 at 10:17 AM
#358
jamiemac
Joined: 06/30/2008
MGoPoints: 8444
LOL

I find it funny that the 2 programs that get shredded the most in these forums as undeserving of their accomplishments--Boise and Iowa--are two teams I've won stacks and stacks of money on.

I feel like my work is falling on deaf ears, folks.

I'd get into another Boise argument here, but I am way too busy counting money after one of their games.

Again.

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
September 8th, 2010 at 11:30 AM
#359
jeag
jeag's picture
Joined: 06/30/2008
MGoPoints: 586
Well, Boise doesn't play

Well, Boise doesn't play anyone else, so it'll be pretty tough for them to move up from here.

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
September 8th, 2010 at 11:42 AM
#360
M2NASA
M2NASA's picture
Joined: 06/30/2008
MGoPoints: 8368
If Michigan plays their

If Michigan plays their schedule last year, we likely go 9-3, 10-2, or even 11-1 given all of the cannon fodder.

If Boise plays in the Big Ten or SEC, they have mutiple losses.

If Boise plays Ohio State, Texas, Florida, USC, et. al., who do you think is favored?

And yet the most often cited reason is that they're likely to go 12-0 given their schedule.  What does that have to do with anything?  So would any number of teams in college football.

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
September 8th, 2010 at 12:02 PM
#361
Tacopants
Tacopants's picture
Joined: 07/06/2008
MGoPoints: 2714
I don't understand why

I don't understand why everybody's so upset.  Just let them make the title game, get monstrously blown out by a team like Alabama, thereby destroying any chance another BCS buster team ever has of making the MNC game.

Then push for a playoff!

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
September 8th, 2010 at 12:10 PM
#362
gobluerebirth
Joined: 10/11/2009
MGoPoints: 1612
I think they should be

I think they should be positivly rewarded for playing a good team and beating them in week 1. By doing this you could cancel out the cupcake week 1 games that we all love to hate. However, as the season progresses and they start to play more and more low tier programs you will see their ranking fall.

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
September 8th, 2010 at 12:30 PM
#363
Anunbiasedfan
Joined: 11/23/2009
MGoPoints: 11
Boise

You can contend all you want about Boise being a top team or not a top team, but the fact is, no one really knows what will happen until Boise actually gets a shot to play one.  That's probably not going to happen in the regualr season because I doubt a top school, like Alabama, Florida, or Texas will take the risk of scheduling them. 

Anyone can talk an offer an opinion.  I think Boise would beat OSU if they played them.  I think a Boise game against Bama, Florida, or Texas would be anyones game.  But that just an opinion.  What we really need is a legitimate playoff to really settle who is the best.  I don't think we even had a legitmate champion last season.  Boise St., a team that lost one game in two years, and was unbeaten last year, did not even have a chance at it.  For that matter, neither would Michigan if they would have went unbeaten.  They would have been on the outside looking in, playing in some also ran bowl.

I hope Boise gets a lot of 1st place votes, all season if they continue to win.  I'd like to see what they could do against so called top competition. 

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
September 8th, 2010 at 12:51 PM
#364
MichiganExile
Joined: 01/12/2009
MGoPoints: 11831
I actually like Boise St. but

I actually like Boise St. but I was rooting against them. Why? Because I honestly don't want to hear about this for the rest of the season. It's only the second week of college football and we are already talking about the NC game. I wish a month or two would go by before everyone starts talking about who belongs in the title game.

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
September 8th, 2010 at 1:34 PM
#365
dnak438
dnak438's picture
Joined: 08/12/2009
MGoPoints: 6956
Why are we getting so upset about seven votes in first AP poll?

Let's just see what happens.  It's perverse to talk about Boise St while simultaneously complaining that everyone is talking about Boise St.  They have to play Oregon St still, and lots can still happen.  None of the major powerhouse teams are really looking great at the moment, surely that is why Boise St has got everyone's attention.

Besides, we have more pressing issues to worry about.... like Mike Golic not knowing DR's last name and some dude saying mean things about Tate on local radio.

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
September 8th, 2010 at 2:28 PM
#366
Magnus
Magnus's picture
Joined: 07/17/2008
MGoPoints: 123001
First of all, Alabama lost a

First of all, Alabama lost a TON of players on defense from last year.  That should not go unheeded.

Secondly, who cares?  It's silly to get riled up about Week 2 polls when there are still about 12 or 13 weeks left in the season.  These are basically preseason polls, which almost all of us agree are completely useless.

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
September 8th, 2010 at 5:22 PM
(Reply to #57) #367
ForestCityBlue
ForestCityBlue's picture
Joined: 09/05/2010
MGoPoints: 257
The only snag in the "early

The only snag in the "early polls don't mean anything" argument is, if memory serves me correctly, that the farthest down in the first week's poll a team has come to win the National Championship is eighth.  This preseason hive mind love fest for certain over rated teams that have done nothing can have a huge impact on who wins the national championship. 

Suggestion: Make each team's day one ranking a product of their projected strength of schedule.  The harder your opponents project out to be, the higher you start.  If starting out top 10 in the initial rankings gives you an advantage to play in the MNC, perhaps more teams would schedule more meaningful non conference games...just an off the wall thought.

Edit: Phil Steele's initial SOS ranking:

1. Iowa State

2. South Carolina

3. UCLA

4. Mississippi State

5. Minnesota

6. Oregon State

7. Washington

8. Miami (FL)

9. Duke

10. LSU

11. Florida State

12. Vanderbilt

13.  Washington State

14. NC State

15. Alabama

16. Penn State

17. Notre Dame

18. Florida

19. Auburn

20.  Colorado

21. Illinios

22. Oklahoma

23. Texas A&M

24. North Carolina

25. UNLV

37. Michigan

61. Ohio State

87. Boise State (#1 argument for why they should almost never be considered for the MNC)

As far as pre-season rankings go, since no one has done anything, why not credit the balls to schedule a tough slate of opponents...its just one of those off the wall thoughs.  Practical?  Probably not.  But definitely a different way of looking at pre-season rankings.

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
September 8th, 2010 at 4:34 PM
#368
jmblue
Joined: 11/07/2008
MGoPoints: 56299
There really shouldn't even

There really shouldn't even be polls right now at all.  I have absolutely no idea who the top 10 teams in the country are, much less the #1 team.

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
September 8th, 2010 at 5:01 PM
#369
dennisblundon
dennisblundon's picture
Joined: 02/23/2010
MGoPoints: 9509
My two pennies

Boise is and always will be highly debated because they are only tested a few times a year so we don't really find out much about them. Do they dial it up on the rare occasions when they actually play a real opponent? You bet. Could they do it week in and week out in the Big Ten or SEC? We will never know. On average they were favored to win by 25 points against conference opponents last year. That stat is very telling.....

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
September 8th, 2010 at 8:40 PM
#370
phork
phork's picture
Joined: 11/01/2009
MGoPoints: 4486
If they don't fall flat on

If they don't fall flat on their faces they will be the 2010-2011 National Champs.

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
Powered by Drupal, an open source content management system
Theme provided by Roopletheme; sidebars adapted from Chris Murphy.