Patterson to be dismissed this morning at TX

Submitted by wigeon on
According to Sirius College Sports.

BlueCube

September 15th, 2015 at 11:27 AM ^

As I stated above. Why are you concerned that Texas isn't strong? Explain how that is a good thing for us. Secondly, Hackett hasn't given indications he is staying long term so assuming Texas learns and actually picks the best AD that would take a prime candidate off the table for us. So please explain how any of this benefits Michigan.

CorkyCole

September 15th, 2015 at 9:52 AM ^

Note to future CEO types - You do not know everything in the world and are not the best at everything in the world, and therefore it is wise to not be a controlling weinerschnitzel in every aspect of your department/organization looking for a bunch of "yes men." You will eventually piss nearly everyone off who isn't only there for the $$$, and virtually everyone will praise your departure.

This is coming from someone who is currently working for an organization with a Patterson/Brandon type in control, and all of those who know what the heck is actually going on in this organization (and most of those who don't) are eagerly waiting his retirement at the end of next year. This stuff is real.

FreddieMercuryHayes

September 15th, 2015 at 9:51 AM ^

Maybe the Texas president finally read BLL? Also it amazes me that he even got the job. The search firm recommended Oliver Luck, but Texas decided to go with the corporate GM of professional teams. Why do people keep thinking this is a good idea?



Sent from MGoBlog HD for iPhone & iPad

jblaze

September 15th, 2015 at 9:51 AM ^

in the professional ranks, so his moves make sense for pro teams. He doesn't understand the college game and the reasons people go to/ watch/ root for UT.

I guess his actions make more sense than Brandon's in that Patterson was successful doing the same things at other sports organizations, while Brandon was slinging sub-par Pizza.

 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Steve_Patterson_(sports_executive)

FauxMo

September 15th, 2015 at 10:01 AM ^

You must be young, because USC had a pretty mediocre 1990s before Cheat Carroll, as did Texas before Mack Brown. Tennessee is pretty much a mirror image of UM, in that they had their own Lloyd Carr in Phil Fulmer - a very good coach who won an NC, then got a bit stale, then got replaced by a series of failures...

WolverineHistorian

September 15th, 2015 at 10:34 AM ^

USC in the 90s was really bad. They were often referred by the media as SC Community College. I posted on MLive in those days (the very early years of MLive) and I remember Michigan fans saying things like, "Remember the days of hating USC? You can't even hate them anymore because they're so bad."

Texas was pretty mediocre for about 25 years until Mack Brown showed up. Michigan fans being angry about Lloyd Carr getting 9-3 seasons out of 11-1 talent were grateful in the sense that, hey, at least we're not Texas.

And Oklahoma was bad in the 90s. The media could care less about the Red River Rivalry then.

LSU was pretty awful for a huge chunk of the 90s as well.



Sent from MGoBlog HD for iPhone & iPad

EGD

September 15th, 2015 at 12:11 PM ^

USC did have that one good year (1995) with Keyshawn Johnson when they went to the Rose Bowl and beat Northwestern.  But even that team lost to UCLA and got smoked by ND.  

Speaking of 1995 Northwestern, I always thought Gary Barnett was a hell of a football coach.  As a person, not so much.

funkywolve

September 15th, 2015 at 10:18 AM ^

is it that surprising?  They have no built in recruiting area.  The state of Colorado maybe sends 3-5 players to power 5 programs in a year.  Most of the surrounding states are even worse - Wyoming, South Dakota, New Mexico.  The states that send more have blue blood programs - Nebrasa, Oklahoma, Texas, that CU has to compete against.  Outside of a 10-15 year run from the early 90's to the early 00's, Colorado hasn't done much in football.

mgoblue0970

September 15th, 2015 at 1:34 PM ^

Huh?  Have you NOT been to Boulder?!?!

It's a crime they recruit as poorly as they do... good school/academics, Front Range weather is the best weather there is where there isn't palm trees.  Colorado has been completely overrun by Californians in the last 10 - 15 years and there is talent there.  Why CU doesn't show recruits the mountains, the beautiful campus and all the pretty coeds from LA and Phoenix is beyond me.  If CU knew what the hell they were doing, they'd have players beating down the door to play there.

Colorado hasn't done much in football recently but only due to their own incompetence.  Nothing else.

Blue4U

September 15th, 2015 at 6:59 PM ^

I see that you went back and downvoted every post I ever made.  That takes alot of time to do. You have some serious mental issues along with your anger problems.  You need some help.  Talk about keyboard warrior and troll.  You seem like a very bitter person from your posts.  I feel very sorry for you and the life you must have.  

LJ

September 15th, 2015 at 10:12 AM ^

And Alabama, which was pretty atrocious for a little while there.  Sadly, it seems like the only program that is basically immune from this is OSU, which has prertty  unquestionably been the most consistent program of the past few decades.  Their time is coming, I hope.

The Mad Hatter

September 15th, 2015 at 10:21 AM ^

I'm hoping they make a disastrous hire when Meyer is eventually fired (for what I don't know yet, but all their coaches get fired).

Maybe someone that wants to install a completely different system, something akin to what happened here in 08.  That would be good.

It's their turn to suck now.

EGD

September 15th, 2015 at 10:29 AM ^

Sure. But there are not a ton of coaches better than Charlie Strong--and most of the ones who exist already have top college jobs or are in the NFL. I don't think the pool of coaching candidates has swelled significantly since we all ran though the options last fall.