Patiots trade for Burgess

Submitted by Beantown Wolverine on
The Pats just traded a conditional 7th round pick for Prescott Burgess. For those keeping count they now have 3 Michigan LBs on their defense (Crable, Woods, Burgess). EDIT: thier, their, there, they're, theyre, teher

DesHow21

September 23rd, 2009 at 9:23 AM ^

being a Michigan fan and a Pats fan. The Pats defense has been pretty darn horrible this year...so I wouldn't bring this up in conversation with rivals...

Beantown Wolverine

September 23rd, 2009 at 9:51 AM ^

Seymour was not really utilized as a pass rusher in that defense. He was mostly tasked with taking up multiple blockers so that the LBs had gaps to attack. That being said losing Harrison, Vrable, Bruschi, Seymour, Hobbs, and now Mayo is really taking it's toll on the D. Dan Pees on the pass rush: "We can always improve in the rush, but also some of it designed by gameplan to play some coverage and some of it was designed to put some pressure on them. We didn't always get there like wanted to, but really we've just got to improve in both the coverage part of it and the rush."

DesHow21

September 23rd, 2009 at 10:07 AM ^

and the line looks very ordinary. The delay of game I believe resulted because Tom was having to make multiple adjustments to the blocking schemes. Put Jake Long there and watch Tom tear the Jets apart. I have to say I am getting a little tired of the Pats letting good players go just because they don't want to pay them.

Block M

September 23rd, 2009 at 10:08 AM ^

more the offensive play callings fault than it is Bradys fault. He's thrown 100 times in 2 games while they've only run like 50 times. Its not hard to defend a passing game when a team is not concerned with the run. Isn't Pierre Woods on the Patriots as well?...