Home
we had subs it was crazy

Primary links

  • About
    • $upport (lol)
    • Ethics
    • FAQ
    • Privacy Policy
  • Contact
  • MGoStore
  • MGoBoard
    • MGoBoard FAQ
    • Ticket spreadsheet
    • Michigan bar locator
    • Moderator Action Sticky
  • Useful Stuff
    • Depth Chart By Class
    • Unofficial Two Deep
    • 2013 Offer Board
    • Crude Bug Tracking System
    • Third Down Stats
    • Diaries, Windows Live Writer, And You
    • Michigan Future Schedules
    • User-Curated HOF
    • 2013 Recruiting Board
    • Where To Eat In Ann Arbor
Home Forums MGoBoard

Navigation

  • Forums
  • Recent posts

User login

  • Create new account
  • Request new password

MGoElsewhere

  • @MGoBlog (Brian)
  • @aceanbender
  • @TomVH (Tom)
  • RSS Feed
  • iPhone App
  • Facebook profile
  • MGoKindle Store
  • mgo.licio.us
  • Brian @ TSB [Archive]
  • Brian @ AOL [Archive]
  • Sour Salty Bitter Sweet

Michigan Blogs

  • Big House Blog
  • Burgeoning Wolverine Star
  • Genuinely Sarcastic
  • Go Blue Michigan Wolverine
  • Holdin' The Rope
  • MGoFootball
  • MVictors
  • Maize 'n' Blue Nation
  • Maize 'n' Brew
  • Maize And Go Blue
  • Michigan Hockey Net
  • The Blog That Yost Built
  • The Hoover Street Rag
  • The M Block
  • The M Zone
  • The Wolverine Blog
  • Touch The Banner
  • UMGoBlog
  • UMHoops
  • UMTailgate
  • Wolverine Liberation Army

M On The Net

  • mgovideo
  • MGoBlue.com
  • Mike DeSimone
  • Recruiting Planet
  • The Wolverine
  • Go Blue Wolverine
  • Winged Helmet
  • UMGoBlue.com
  • MaizeRage.org
  • Puckhead
  • The M Den
  • True Blue Fan Forum

Big Ten Blogs

  • Illinois
    • A Lion Eye
    • Hail To The Orange
    • Illinois Baseball Report
    • Illinois Loyalty
  • Indiana
    • Inside The Hall
    • The Crimson Quarry
  • Iowa
    • Black Heart, Gold Pants
    • Fight For Iowa
  • Michigan State
    • The Only Colors
  • Minnesota
    • GopherHole.com
    • The Daily Gopher
    • I'm In Love With A Fringe Bowl Team
    • TNABACG
  • Nebraska
    • Big Red Network
    • Corn Nation
    • Husker Mike's Blasphemy
    • Husker Gameday
  • Northwestern
    • Sippin' On Purple
    • Lake The Posts
  • Notre Dame
    • The House Rock Built
    • One Foot Down
  • Ohio State
    • Eleven Warriors
    • Buckeye Commentary
    • Men of the Scarlet and Gray
    • Our Honor Defend
    • The Buckeye Nine
  • Penn State
    • Slow States
    • Black Shoe Diaries
    • Happy Valley Hardball
    • Penn State Clips
    • Linebacker U
    • Nittany White Out
  • Purdue
    • Boiled Sports
    • Hammer and Rails
  • Wisconsin
    • Bruce Ciskie

Links of Note

  • Baseball
    • Big Ten Hardball
    • College Baseball Today
    • The Baseball Zealot
    • The College Baseball Blog
  • Basketball
    • Ken Pomeroy
    • Basketball Prospectus
    • Midmajority
  • College Hockey
    • Chris Heisenberg
    • College Hockey Stats
    • Inside College Hockey
    • Michigan College Hockey
    • Hockey's Future
    • Sioux Sports
    • USCHO
    • Western College Hockey
    • CCHA
      • LSSU Hockey
      • Bronco Hockey Blog
  • Football
    • Smart Football
    • Every Day Should Be Saturday
    • Doctor Saturday
    • CFB Stats
    • Harold Stassen
    • NCAA D-I Stats Page
    • The Wizard Of Odds
  • General
    • Sports Central
  • Local Interest
    • The Ann Arbor Chronicle
    • Arborwiki
    • Arbor Update
    • Teeter Talk
    • Vacuum
  • Teams Of The D
    • Lions
      • Pride of Detroit
      • Fire Millen
    • Pistons
      • Detroit Bad Boys
      • Need4Sheed
    • Tigers
      • Roar Of The Tigers
      • The Detroit Tigers Weblog
      • The Daily Fungo
    • Red Wings
      • On The Wings
      • Behind The Jersey
      • Winging It In Motown
    • Michigan Sports Forum

Archive

  • May 2013 (42)
  • April 2013 (94)
  • March 2013 (104)
  • February 2013 (81)
  • January 2013 (93)
  • December 2012 (74)
  • November 2012 (142)
  • October 2012 (143)
  • September 2012 (107)
  • August 2012 (103)
  •  
  • 1 of 11
  • ››

Get Yer Tickets

Football Display Case

NFL Watches

Follow your favorite team with localtv-satellite.com: Click Here.

Site Search

Diaries

  • New
  • Popular
  • Hot
  • MGoAcceptance: Another MGoAnecdote
    LSAClassOf2000 - 1 week ago
  • OT - Kentucky Derby 2012
    k.o.k.Law - 2 weeks ago
  • Observations on the National Championship Game
    Paps - 2 weeks ago
  • Recalling My First Experiences With MGoCulture
    LSAClassOf2000 - 2 weeks ago
  • 2013 NFL Draft Recap: B1G Team Comparisons
    UMgradMSUdad - 3 weeks ago
  • ‹‹
  • 2 of 4
  • ››
more
  • Big Ten Recruiting Rankings 5-15-13
    Ace - 1,461 views
  • Future Non-Conference Opponent Recruiting Watch
    EGD - 686 views
  • More Milford Men Than Michigan Men: Comparing the 11-12 and 12-13 Hockey Teams
    MGoBlueline - 463 views
  • Way Too Late B1G Men's Basketball Scheduling Idea
    BeileinBuddy - 451 views
  • Using Rivals' Star Ratings To Look At Big Ten Football Recruiting: 2002-2013
    LSAClassOf2000 - 16 views
  • Big Ten Recruiting Rankings 5-15-13
    Ace - 51 comments
  • Future Non-Conference Opponent Recruiting Watch
    EGD - 15 comments
  • The Blockhams in "HOCKEY HANGOVER"
    Six Zero - 13 comments
  • More Milford Men Than Michigan Men: Comparing the 11-12 and 12-13 Hockey Teams
    MGoBlueline - 7 comments
  • Using Rivals' Star Ratings To Look At Big Ten Football Recruiting: 2002-2013
    LSAClassOf2000 - 1 comments

MGoBoard

  • New
  • Recent
  • Hot
  • OT- Miguel (not that Miguel) kicks fan in head at Billboard Music Awards
    20 replies
  • UMich NFL draft history, Part III
    1 replies
  • ESPN 30 for 30 on the Bad Boys
    30 replies
  • OT: Game of Thrones
    38 replies
  • Question about M receiving great Jim Smith
    29 replies
  • Rajin Cajuns Invade Ann Arbor for some Red Hot Softball
    22 replies
  • Tigers vs Rangers 5/19
    57 replies
  • Michigan Rowing Places Second at Big Ten Championships
    27 replies
  • Michigan Softball vs. Cal Open Thread
    75 replies
  • OT: Caption Contest - Preakness Fan
    33 replies
  • OT: Saturday Night Drinking/Open/Tigers Thread
    46 replies
  • B1G Network Helmet Bracket
    39 replies
  • Steve Everitt rips Notre Dame!
    54 replies
  • OT: IIHF Semifinal US vs Switzerland Open Thread
    3 replies
  • OT- happy World Whisk(e)y day everyone!
    45 replies
  •  
  • 1 of 6
  • ››
  • OT- Miguel (not that Miguel) kicks fan in head at Billboard Music Awards
    20 replies
  • UMich NFL draft history, Part III
    1 replies
  • ESPN 30 for 30 on the Bad Boys
    30 replies
  • OT: Game of Thrones
    38 replies
  • Question about M receiving great Jim Smith
    29 replies
  • OT: Ron English & Mike Hart to jump out of a plane for new EMU bathrooms
    43 replies
  • Rajin Cajuns Invade Ann Arbor for some Red Hot Softball
    22 replies
  • Tigers vs Rangers 5/19
    57 replies
  • Michigan Softball vs. Cal Open Thread
    75 replies
  • Michigan Rowing Places Second at Big Ten Championships
    27 replies
  • Marvin Robinson to FSU
    52 replies
  • OT: Caption Contest - Preakness Fan
    33 replies
  • Steve Everitt rips Notre Dame!
    54 replies
  • OT: ESPN Mag/Insider special $5/Year
    28 replies
  • Michigan Baseball vs Nebraska on BTN Open Thread
    45 replies
  •  
  • 1 of 6
  • ››
  • OT: Red Wings vs. Blackhawks Open Thread
    201 replies
  • Shane Morris to wear the famed #7 jersey, J.J. McGrath #46
    175 replies
  • Jabrill Peppers Announcement Date Set
    169 replies
  • Brady Hoke Calls Notre Dame A Chicken
    163 replies
  • UM 2014 Conf schedule football
    123 replies
  • Brandon on Uniformzzz
    119 replies
  • OT: Red Wings @ Hawks Game 2 Open Thread
    113 replies
  • Notre Dame's Nix fires back at Coach Hoke
    110 replies
  • Alex Bars to Notre Dame
    96 replies
  • Sparty losing recruits to the rap game
    95 replies
  • PSU about to get blasted again by SI investigative report
    88 replies
  • Michigan Softball vs. Cal Open Thread
    75 replies
  • Michigan has #1 recruiting class on ESPN now.
    73 replies
  • OT: Advice on moving to Ann Arbor
    72 replies
  • Jay Harris (the rapping WR) had schollie pulled by MSU a month ago
    70 replies
  •  
  • 1 of 6
  • ››

mgo.licio.us

  • Big Ten football procrastinates on parity-based scheduling, and nothing ever changes

    the just released schedules were a flat-out statement that the B10 doesn't believe SOS will matter in playoff selection

    1 comments
  • Michigan's Glenn Robinson III, Mitch McGary ranked inside top 20 on ESPN's 2014 draft board

    but I thought that draft was supposed to be incredibly loaded?

    1 comments
  • Tim Hardaway Jr. turning heads, viewed as a first-rounder by some teams, analyst says

    If you're gonna go please be in the first round.

    0 comments
  • Michigan-Ohio State once, Indiana-Purdue once? The Big Ten has to protect its hoops rivalries

    another delightful side effect of a 14 team conference

    0 comments
  • Beilein on transfers: All should have to sit a year, regardless of situation

    I disagree.

    0 comments
  • Julie Hermann takes over as Rutgers AD, won't try to spend like Michigan

    GOOD PLAN

    1 comments
  • Jay Harris says no to Michigan State, decides to become a rapper

    hahahahaha

    0 comments
  • The Difference Between A Good Fan And A Bad Fan

    thoughtful piece from Jacobi on middle finger lady

    3 comments
  • Michigan's rising recruiting profile exciting John Beilein, who remains true to his scouting form

    Their high school coaches and AAU coaches have probably a better appreciation of Michigan than maybe they had before," Beilein said. "It's a tough balance right now. Tim Hardaway and Trey Burke weren't really high-profile players, nor was Darius Morris, and all were high-profile players. "We're still looking at 'who is the best fit.' "

    0 comments
  • Charles Barkley discusses Michael Jordan, Dream Team and more - NBA - Jack McCallum - SI.com

    "When I call somebody a midget, clearly I'm not trying to insult f---ing midgets. I'm just using basketball terminology."

    0 comments
  • Why does the NFL make for such bad media?

    robots

    0 comments
  • Pictured: Detroit's Robocop Statue nears completion date

    elsewhere in awesome things kickstarter made happen

    0 comments
  • Spectacular images of the madness that was the first FA Cup final

    And you think you're crowded at Michigan Stadium

    0 comments
  • Bear Vs. Monkey Bicycle Race Ends With Bear Eating Monkey

    IMPORTANT: Ondre Pipkins not involved.

    11 comments
  • Damon Bullock Has the Greatest Vine Account of All Time

    this is amazing

    7 comments

Paterno Investigation Finds the Real OJ Killers

61 posts / 0 new
Login or register to post comments
Last post
February 10th, 2013 at 12:04 PM
#1
Gameboy
Gameboy's picture
Joined: 11/28/2010
MGoPoints: 494
Paterno Investigation Finds the Real OJ Killers

Paterno family has released their own investigation today (in coordination with ESPN as it seems since they did such a great job with Te'o).

You can read about it here

And surprise, surprise, they find Paterno completely innocent of all allegation, scouts honor.

The "report" basically is a what a defense attorney would argue if this was tried as a criminal case in a court of law. They are arguing that none of the evidence the Freeh Report is beyond reasonable doubt. Which is correct since Freeh Report was never meant to be beyond a reasonable doubt. It was more like a Civil Case conclusion where you just need more than likely as the basis. Shift the goalpost and it is easier to score, go figure.

Here are parts of the new report pretty much says all you need to know

There is another troublesome email implicating Coach Paterno that the Paterno family experts challenge. In February 2001, Spanier, Schultz and Curley met to figure out an action plan about the McQueary allegation that he saw Sandusky assaulting a boy in the shower. The options, according to Schultz's notes: report it to the Pennsylvania Department of Child Welfare, tell the chairman of the board of Sandusky's charity, The Second Mile, and tell Sandusky "to avoid bringing children alone into Lasch Bldg."

Two days later, Curley reported he had changed his mind about the action plan "after giving it more thought and talking it over with Joe [Paterno] yesterday." Curley decided to talk with Sandusky: If Sandusky was cooperative, they would inform The Second Mile, and not alert authorities. And if he was not cooperative, Curley said then, "We don't have a choice and will inform the authorities."

Spanier agreed to this approach, saying, "The only downside for us if the message isn't 'heard' and acted upon, and we then become vulnerable for not having reported it. But that can be assessed down the road. The approach you outline is humane and a reasonable way to proceed."

All three of the Paterno family's experts say this single email is insufficient grounds for Freeh to have concluded that Paterno conspired to cover up the 2001 incident. "The report falls glaringly short of suggesting, let alone proving, any concealment by Mr. Paterno," Thornburgh writes in the report.

Insufficient? By whose standard? Seems pretty damning to most people who read it. If I say it is a cold day today, I think these people would also argue that that statement is insufficient to conclude that today is cold

I am sure the folks at Black Shoe Diaries are celebrating this "report" like a Fourth of July today.

Is it still too late to kick them out of our conference?

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
Tags:
  • MGoBoard
  • Cheated
  • football
  • OJsSearchfortheTruth
  • paterno
  • Pedobear
  • Pedophile
  • PSUtoHELL
  • Sandusky

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
February 10th, 2013 at 12:09 PM | All I got from reading that (Score:5 Normal)
redwhiteandmaize
Joined: 02/04/2012
MGoPoints: 1032

All I got from reading that is that Jimmy Hoffa is buried in the north end zone at The Meadowlands.

"Are you an official here?Because you've officially given me a boner."

  • Login or register to post comments
February 10th, 2013 at 12:36 PM | Hoffa (Score:3 Normal)
DH16
DH16's picture
Joined: 11/19/2012
MGoPoints: 349

I'm pretty sure he's actually buried under my driveway/I need a new driveway but don't want to have to pay to dig it up so the Feds will do it for free

  • Login or register to post comments
February 10th, 2013 at 12:39 PM | If you live in Roseville,MI (Score:4 Normal)
redwhiteandmaize
Joined: 02/04/2012
MGoPoints: 1032

If you live in Roseville,MI then it could be true.

"Are you an official here?Because you've officially given me a boner."

  • Login or register to post comments
February 10th, 2013 at 12:15 PM | Bring back out the statue! (Score:5 Normal)
ryanfourmayor
ryanfourmayor's picture
Joined: 12/06/2010
MGoPoints: 1939

Bring back out the statue!

Spartan's Alphabet: ADEFGHIJKLMNOPQRTUVWXYZ.
  • Login or register to post comments
February 10th, 2013 at 4:41 PM | The one that immortalizes The Runs to the bathroom? (Score:4 Normal)
Muttley
Muttley's picture
Joined: 07/07/2009
MGoPoints: 4588

.

  • Login or register to post comments
February 10th, 2013 at 12:17 PM | I now want them to do a (Score:5 Normal)
NFG
NFG's picture
Joined: 04/24/2012
MGoPoints: 2136

I now want them to do a report on how the Paterno's would act differently if it was their grandchildren getting raped in showers.

  • Login or register to post comments
February 10th, 2013 at 12:21 PM | When the incidents began to appear as more than just rumor, (Score:5 Normal)
LB
LB's picture
Joined: 09/26/2009
MGoPoints: 5052

I felt it was a matter left up to the authorities, not one the NCAA should involve themselves with. As time went on, I changed my mind. The authorities need to be investigated, and the NCAA needs to be involved because the PSU community truly seems to believe they were victims. I think the longer they drag this on, the worse they look. I suspect that when the entire truth is known, there will be plenty of guilt to spread around the athletic department, the school, the community, and most likely the surrounding area up to and including the state. Be careful driving past, you will probably become dizzy from all the spinning that is, has, and will be taking place there. His family is doing a fine job of continuing to make a mockery of the ideals that were once represented by the statue. The statue is gone, the family needs to go away as well.

May you have a strong foundation
When the winds of changes shift

  • Login or register to post comments
February 10th, 2013 at 12:25 PM | How about this? (Score:5 Normal)
MGoSoftball
MGoSoftball's picture
Joined: 10/18/2010
MGoPoints: 3589

Why wasnt there one more option in Shultz's notes?  CALL 911 NOW!!

Paterno knew what was going on.  He thought he could hide behind the old (But I told my boss about it) line; plausible deniability.  When a crime is committed and it is personally witnessed by a member of the staff; most reasonable people will call 911.

These guys all conspired to cover it up.  What I find more disturbing is they did not fire Sandusky on the spot.  If they did, then I would just say the leadership used poor judgement.  But when they considered asking Sandusky to "AVOID" bringing young kids on campus; that proves they did not care about the health and welfare of the children.

Can the DOE pull their charter?  We have always wondered what to do with spent fuel from nuclear reactors, I say we level the entire town and bury it in Happy Valley.

From the Red Cedar Message Board:  "God hates us."  Yes He does Lil Bro, yes he does.  Everyone hates you.

  • Login or register to post comments
February 10th, 2013 at 1:13 PM | This omits an essential fact regarding Paterno's role (Score:5 Normal)
Yeoman
Joined: 06/08/2011
MGoPoints: 2247

The others were ready to report, but changed their minds after Curley spoke with Paterno. The e-mail record is pretty clear on that point; I can't think of any other plausible explanation other than that Paterno talked Curley out of it.

He didn't just know what was going on; he was an active participant, even the driving force, behind that particular moment in the cover up.

  • Login or register to post comments
February 11th, 2013 at 8:40 AM | I'm not saying this implies (Score:1)
B1G_Fan
Joined: 10/11/2012
MGoPoints: 322

I'm not saying this implies directly to Jerry Sandusky by any means but, innocent people accused of crimes like this. They should have called the police so it could be investigated further and put Sandusky on leave but, firing him on the spot is ridiculous.

  • Login or register to post comments
February 10th, 2013 at 12:54 PM | The whole thing is pretty (Score:4 Normal)
Lionsfan
Lionsfan's picture
Joined: 06/03/2011
MGoPoints: 3894

The whole thing is pretty unbelievable, they even use the USC and OSU scandals as "proof" that other colleges are corrupt, but not PSU

If you're doing nothing, how do you know when you're finished?

StraightDave owes me a steak dinner

  • Login or register to post comments
February 10th, 2013 at 12:54 PM |   From CBS News: Among the (Score:5 Normal)
mGrowOld
mGrowOld's picture
Joined: 10/04/2010
MGoPoints: 13159

 

From CBS News: Among the many criticisms in the lengthy report from the Paterno family, there are a few notable conclusions:

  • Freeh's investigation concluded exactly what it set out to find. Specifically, investigators "produced a report that fit their expectations despite contrary evidence or a more reasonable interpretation."

Unlike THIS report which obviously had NO bias in it whatsoever.......

  • There was no factual evidence to prove Joe Paterno avoided sharing information regarding Jerry Sandusky to avoid bad publicity for the school and/or football program.

Other than those pesky emails that we choose to ignore

  • Jerry Sandusky was an "exceptionally effective manipulator and deceiver." The Paterno family report suggests Joe Paterno did not recognize the former assistant coach as a child molestor after the 2001 incident.

Joe's reasons for asking for his sudden retirement, cancelling his long-planned vacation and asking him to not bring young boys into the locker room were for COMPLETELY DIFFERENT AND UNRELATED THINGS.  Honest.

  • The Freeh report was negligent in understanding and analyzing a child sexual victimization case.

Unlike our report which does an excellent job of understanding and analyzing a child vicitimization case.

 

 

  • Login or register to post comments
February 10th, 2013 at 1:42 PM | I haven't read the full (Score:3 Normal)
bluebyyou
Joined: 09/07/2009
MGoPoints: 2682

I haven't read the full Paterno report yet, but one point was very clear.  The Paterno report did not take a fresh look at the evidence. Without looking at evidence, which Freeh did to the extent possible, all you can create is spin.  I'm not sure why PSU would have given Paterno access to the school's information in the first place.  They don't have FOIA (crazy in itself) at PSU and a couple of other Pennsylvania universities, nor are the Paternos and PSU in litigation against one another and consequently, without discovery, the university has no reason or requirement to give the Paternos anything. 

There are still three criminal trials scheduled, and I would almost bet that someone is going to  do a plea agreement in exchange for testimony.  Assuming that happens, it should be interesting to hear what Spanier et al. have to say.

Penn State would love this to go away.  I find a bit of irony in the fact that this family that so loved the school would again create a firestorm of publicity.

  • Login or register to post comments
February 10th, 2013 at 4:26 PM | ...because they care about (Score:4 Normal)
Elmer
Elmer's picture
Joined: 04/22/2011
MGoPoints: 2102

...because they care about Joe's legacy more than the university.

  • Login or register to post comments
February 10th, 2013 at 9:41 PM | No man is more important than the team. (Score:3 Normal)
HermosaBlue
HermosaBlue's picture
Joined: 08/05/2008
MGoPoints: 1428

No coach is more important than the team.



The team, the team, the team.



So that's Bo's version. I suspect the Paterno version would have an asterisk: *Except Joe and any legacy-related considerations.

  • Login or register to post comments
February 10th, 2013 at 1:07 PM | The only good move PSU made (Score:4 Normal)
UMgradMSUdad
UMgradMSUdad's picture
Joined: 07/02/2011
MGoPoints: 1950

The only good move PSU made in this whole affair (and of course it was well after the fact) was to commission the Freeh report. an independent investigation into what went on.  The Paterno family, et al, however are appalled that the report was not a whitewash.

  • Login or register to post comments
February 10th, 2013 at 1:40 PM | When you need to release all (Score:5 Normal)
CRex
CRex's picture
Joined: 09/28/2009
MGoPoints: 8727

When you need to release all kinds of statements and reports to clear your name regarding child abuse, you've already lost.  A decent person wouldn't care what incidental dirty laundry was aired in the process of digging out the child molestors.  Had PSU thrown the doors open and let the FBI sort through the entire athletic department, I would have been fine with PSU getting immunity from the NCAA for any infractions, not related to the child abuse, that bubbled surface when the FBI went through their files.  Given how thick the NCAA rulebook is, it is basically impossible to avoid racking up some minor violations these days.  

At the end of the day when you need your kids to buy a tailor made report to attempt to clear your name, you end up looking that much more guilty.  If Paterno had been a driving force in supporting the efforts to find about the child abuse and hang the guilty parties, he wouldn't need a fluff piece report to save his good name.  

He's scum and PSU needs to grow up and admit their great coach was an enabler of child rape.  

  • Login or register to post comments
February 10th, 2013 at 1:19 PM | what i don't get is the (Score:3 Normal)
quakk
quakk's picture
Joined: 11/22/2008
MGoPoints: 95

what i don't get is the paterno report says paterno was not given an opportunity to refute anything in the freeh report;  freeh says paterno declined.

at the very least, both paterno and mcqueary are guilty of willful ignorance.

  • Login or register to post comments
February 10th, 2013 at 1:38 PM | And... (Score:3 Normal)
VAWolverine
Joined: 11/06/2008
MGoPoints: 1783

Jim Delany groans...

  • Login or register to post comments
February 10th, 2013 at 1:41 PM | And (Score:4 Normal)
CRex
CRex's picture
Joined: 09/28/2009
MGoPoints: 8727

That voice in his head once again says "You know, Pittsburgh would also secure us the PA cable TV market...."

  • Login or register to post comments
February 10th, 2013 at 1:40 PM | My favorite part is this• (Score:5 Normal)
Brown Bear
Brown Bear's picture
Joined: 01/10/2011
MGoPoints: 2615

My favorite part is this

• One major flaw in the Freeh report is that it does not follow a typical standard of courtroom examinations and independent investigations -- the consideration of a person's lifetime record of "moral conduct and altruism." It treats Paterno's long life "as if it were irrelevant to the case."

What in the flying fuck does his lifetime of "moral conduct and altruism" have to do with this??! His long life IS IRRELEVANT TO THE CASE YOU IDOTS!

Screw the Paterno family. Still only concerned about themselves and can give a rats ass about the victims.

I poop excellence
  • Login or register to post comments
February 10th, 2013 at 2:08 PM | Brown Bear, you have (Score:5 Normal)
trueblueintexas
trueblueintexas's picture
Joined: 11/10/2008
MGoPoints: 1250

Brown Bear, you have highlighted one of the huge aspects of sports (and celebrity)I hate. The argument that on field performance and/or off field persona should in anyway impact people's perception of someone's mistakes.
Based on that theory doing heavy drugs should be ok because Jimmy Hendrix and many other musicians were so good at what they did. Or having an affair should be acceptable because those politicians made it to the top of their profession. Hardly anyone would spout those views off in public and yet in sports it happens more than most would admit.

"Anyone who isn't confused, really doesn't understand the situation." - Edward R. Murrow

  • Login or register to post comments
February 10th, 2013 at 1:44 PM | Voluminous Rationalizing... (Score:5 Normal)
LSAClassOf2000
LSAClassOf2000's picture
Joined: 01/07/2011
MGoPoints: 8722

"He (Paterno) was a true philanthropist, an altruistic community leader, and a national icon. Paterno worked with Sandusky for 30 years. He thought he knew the man. However, he and everyone else in State College who thought they “knew” Sandusky were very wrong." - from the full report

In skimming some  of the more illuminating highlights, I might have missed something, but there are pages and pages of rationalizing here, as well as paragraphs of praise that are ultimately not relevant. They seem to claim that Paterno was not keep in the loop after he took McQuaery's revelations to the administration, but obviously he must have known something since discussions with Paterno were clearly the driver for everything that, well, didn't happen next, if you will. Saying that Paterno "trusted them and their judgment" in no way excuses him from failing to follow up when he heard nothing, nor does pointing out that Paterno simply had not been trained to recognize the signs that Sandusky was an "acquaintance offender", as they term it. Sorry, but Joe doesn't get a free pass because he didn't go to the training. 

"Funny isn't it, how naughty dentists always make that one fatal mistake."

Follow the random tweets of a Michigan alum - http://twitter.com/#!/LorneEC3

  • Login or register to post comments
February 10th, 2013 at 1:46 PM | "Paterno simply had not been trained..." (Score:5 Normal)
Yeoman
Joined: 06/08/2011
MGoPoints: 2247

Of course he hadn't...that's why the law requires you to report, so the situation can be evaluated by someone that HAS been trained.

Crikey.

  • Login or register to post comments
February 10th, 2013 at 1:47 PM | That is the the purpose of (Score:5 Normal)
CRex
CRex's picture
Joined: 09/28/2009
MGoPoints: 8727

That is the the purpose of the report though.  It is long, it has some quotes from people like former governors, and all kinds of one liners you can easily lift out of the report and throw at people who are critical of Paterno.  The entire thing is written so that when someone says something bad about Paterno, you just throw a couple pieces of this report at them and go "Oh how can still believe the Freeh report?  This one is long and has quotes from important people!".  

It will let the boosters go back to swaggering around and acting like the Grand Experiment was an unqualified success.  Plus now they can piss and moan about getting the statue put back up.  

If the Paterno family has proof that Freeh threw Joe under the bus, lawyer up and go after Freeh for slander, libel, and character defamation.  Only they won't, because know this paper shield would be laughed right about of court when Freeh's side brought in the emails and things like that.  

  • Login or register to post comments
February 10th, 2013 at 1:56 PM | Freeh statement in response to the Paterno family report (Score:4 Normal)
LB
LB's picture
Joined: 09/26/2009
MGoPoints: 5052

Title pretty well states it all.

http://espn.go.com/espn/otl/story/_/id/8933344/louis-j-freeh-statement-response-paterno-family-report

Edit: To my way of thinking, this is the salient point. I am a simple person, but until this goes away, I won't listen to anything attempting to refute what happened.

Mr. Paterno was on notice for at least 13 years that Sandusky, one of his longest serving assistants, and whose office was steps away, was a probable serial pedophile. Mr. Paterno was aware of the criminal 1998 investigation into Sandusky's suspected child sexual abuse. Indeed, the evidence shows that Mr. Paterno closely followed that case. Later, in 2001, another one of his assistants, Mr. McQueary, directly reported to Mr. Paterno that Sandusky was sexually abusing a young boy in Mr. Paterno's Penn State football locker room. The evidence shows that Mr. Paterno purposefully ignored this evidence.

 

May you have a strong foundation
When the winds of changes shift

  • Login or register to post comments
February 11th, 2013 at 8:50 AM |  This was the main thing that (Score:1)
B1G_Fan
Joined: 10/11/2012
MGoPoints: 322

 This was the main thing that got me. Paterno knew about the 98 investigation why would you not take the 2001 allegations from your assistant coach more seriously

  • Login or register to post comments
February 11th, 2013 at 1:41 PM | He did take it more (Score:3 Normal)
Yeoman
Joined: 06/08/2011
MGoPoints: 2247

He did take it more seriously.

He did nothing the first time; this time he intervened to keep the incident from being reported.

  • Login or register to post comments
February 10th, 2013 at 1:46 PM | Good points made. I'm sure (Score:2)
ESNY
Joined: 11/06/2008
MGoPoints: 673

Good points made. I'm sure Coach didn't refer to Sanduskys direct boss/ the most powerful man at Penn St.



/s

  • Login or register to post comments
February 10th, 2013 at 1:48 PM | what are the Paterno's trying to accomplish? (Score:2)
dinsdale613
dinsdale613's picture
Joined: 05/20/2010
MGoPoints: 451

Joe is dead, and most people outside of happy Valley know him now for what he is.  The NCAA is not going to reverse the sanctions that the University accepted.  All this does is show how out of touch they are with the rest of the country.  The Freeh report was never meant to be a legal document.  Trying to refute it as though it is is dumb

I am become Tim Hardaway Jr.  Destroyer of Worlds

  • Login or register to post comments
February 10th, 2013 at 2:26 PM | Paternos want to flip (Score:1 Normal)
YoOoBoMoLloRoHo
YoOoBoMoLloRoHo's picture
Joined: 11/01/2012
MGoPoints: 1002

public opinion ... yet they offer no proof for any actions directly opposite of Freeh's report. Simply attacking Freeh might soften the damning points that Joe masterminded a cover-up or even enabled Sandusky's ongoing abuse - but it doesn't eliminate the fact that he didn't stop the abuse with proper action.

The Paternos actions only reinforce the widespread view of Joe: he was more concerned with his reputation and legacy than anything else, even defenseless children.

Sad people.

"Everybody wants to be a hero, so to speak.  But it takes everybody."  - Charles Woodson

  • Login or register to post comments
February 10th, 2013 at 2:34 PM | They don't seem to have softened this damning point in the least (Score:3 Normal)
Yeoman
Joined: 06/08/2011
MGoPoints: 2247

 

The only known, intervening factor between the decision made on February 25, 2001 and the agreement not to report on February 27, 2001, was Mr. Paterno’s February 26th conversation with Mr. Curley regarding what to do about Sandusky. Again, this conversation was memorialized in the contemporary email, where Mr. Curley said “(a)fter giving it more thought and talking it over with Joe yesterday – I am uncomfortable with what we agreed were the next steps.”

 

http://www.centredaily.com/2013/02/10/3497030/text-of-louis-freeh-respon...

Not a "mastermind", perhaps, but certainly a driving figure.


Read more here: http://www.centredaily.com/2013/02/10/3497030/text-of-louis-freeh-response-to.html#storylink=cpy
 
 
  • Login or register to post comments
February 10th, 2013 at 2:42 PM | Wait, what? (Score:2 Normal)
maizenbluedevil
maizenbluedevil's picture
Joined: 09/12/2008
MGoPoints: 2602

How the hell does that not indicate a cover-up?

Because to me that seems to be exactly the thing it indicates.......  smh.....

 

CJK5H

  • Login or register to post comments
February 10th, 2013 at 3:34 PM | I hate anything and (Score:3 Normal)
goblue20111
goblue20111's picture
Joined: 10/31/2010
MGoPoints: 1505

I hate anything and everything about that vile institution and its delusional fan base. I loathe them more than OSU, MSU and ND combined.

  • Login or register to post comments
February 10th, 2013 at 3:38 PM | Boys.... (Score:3 Normal)
burtcomma
burtcomma's picture
Joined: 11/01/2009
MGoPoints: 2323

Paterno is dead, the court of public opinion and the NCAA have spoken, and all the horse manure pumped out by Paterno apologists including his family and the state of Pennsylvania are not going to change this one iota.  Ignore them and let them flap their gums in the wind, that is all they are doing as they are simply engaging in self-masturbatory delusional speculation that matters not a bit.

  • Login or register to post comments
February 10th, 2013 at 4:26 PM | The Court of Public Opnion. (Score:1 Normal)
Section 1
Section 1's picture
Joined: 06/29/2009
MGoPoints: 14296

Ahh, the court of public opinion.  We all know how infallible that court is.

I'd like to make a living, handling appeals from "the court of public opinion."  The only problem is the one that former Labor Secretary Ray Donovan asked after being aquitted of fraud charges in a Bronx federal court:  "Which office do I go to, to get my reputation back?" 

 

 

  • Login or register to post comments
February 10th, 2013 at 5:43 PM | Court of public opinion (Score:2)
burtcomma
burtcomma's picture
Joined: 11/01/2009
MGoPoints: 2323

At this point, both a criminal court and the NCAA and the B1G and the court of public opinion have all spoken, and all come to the same conclusion, so your whining, much like that of the Paterno family and PSU and PA governmental officials is moot!

  • Login or register to post comments
February 10th, 2013 at 6:26 PM | Well, no, as a matter of fact. (Score:0 Flamebait)
Section 1
Section 1's picture
Joined: 06/29/2009
MGoPoints: 14296

Do you imagine that the Sollers report in any way diputed the Sandusky guilty verdict?  It didn't.  It dealt only with Paterno's personal involvement.  Paterno wasn't found guilty in court, and he wasn't a personal party to the NCAA and Big Ten inquiries, so Paterno never had a chance to defend himself personally.

But notice what is going on here.  The position that I have taken isn't that Paterno is innocent or guilty.  I've just asked about a careful analysis of both sides.  And of course I am pretty cynical about people who are lambasting the Sollers report without even having read its 238 pages.

Just speaking personally, I am always interested in the instances and methodologies by which large numbers of people come to incorrect conclusions. 

[Bonus: Your citation of the trial court verdict in Sandusky's case (a verdict with which I have no basis to quarrel) is so funny, in the context of the thread's title.  And the OJ verdict.  We all know how well that L.A. criminal jury did in identifying the killer.]

 

 

  • Login or register to post comments
February 10th, 2013 at 6:26 PM | "During the investigation, we (Score:3 Normal)
Yeoman
Joined: 06/08/2011
MGoPoints: 2247

"During the investigation, we contacted Mr. Paterno's attorney in an attempt to interview Mr. Paterno. Although Mr. Paterno was willing to speak with a news reporter and his biographer at that time, he elected not to speak with us. We also asked Mr. Paterno's attorney to provide us with any evidence that he and his client felt should be considered. The documents provided were included in our report."

  • Login or register to post comments
February 10th, 2013 at 7:07 PM | Not my job. (Score:0 Normal)
Section 1
Section 1's picture
Joined: 06/29/2009
MGoPoints: 14296

Look, it has never been my aspiration to be the defense attorney for the Estate of Joe Paterno, Deceased.  He declined to be interviewed.  He wasn't a party, was he?  He didn't have counsel in the case.  Penn State was doing an elaborate dance of contrition.  Paterno might have thought that he'd have been made the fall guy in the University's dance, no matter what.

I'd feel bad about your cited quote, if I was somebody like Wick Sollers, protesting every charge against Paterno.  But I'm not.  If Paterno is truly guilty as sin, it's no problem for me.  I just like the best-told and most interesting story.

 

 

  • Login or register to post comments
February 10th, 2013 at 9:54 PM | "Paterno never had a chance (Score:2)
Yeoman
Joined: 06/08/2011
MGoPoints: 2247

"Paterno never had a chance to defend himself personally."

I don't expect you to feel bad about the Freeh quote. I don't even expect you to notice that it contradicts what you had just posted.

  • Login or register to post comments
February 11th, 2013 at 3:34 PM | See... (Score:1)
Section 1
Section 1's picture
Joined: 06/29/2009
MGoPoints: 14296

See; reply to burtcomma, below.

 

 

  • Login or register to post comments
February 11th, 2013 at 2:52 AM | As always, you miss..... (Score:2)
burtcomma
burtcomma's picture
Joined: 11/01/2009
MGoPoints: 2323

the point, oh ye of obvious obtuse thought and inability to see what is painfully obvious to the rest of the intelligent world, is that the matter is moot, there is no smoking gun of evidence to be found to take away the already handed out verdict nor to do anything to exonerate Joe Pa who has no defense as all you could possibly say is that he either knew what was going on and did little to nothing, in which case he is a lying sack of crap, or he did not know and should have known, in which case he was a proverbial idiot of the first degree, and you and all those who want to continue to debate the issue somehow thinking that the standard of proof for deciding that Mr. Paterno is guilty is the same as that for a criminal trial are full of the proverbial wit and wisdom normally attributed to those who flunk out at MSU.....

His statue is gone, his legacy tarnished, and the evidence is fairly convincing that he knew what was going on but put damage control short term over doing what was right when his own personally promoted image was otherwise.  He and his family can join you and whine all the way until the Lord returneth, but it is and will be a waste of time whether you have any respect for the court of public opinion or the facts in evidence or not.

  • Login or register to post comments
February 11th, 2013 at 3:31 PM | Careful, sonny boy... (Score:0 Trolling)
Section 1
Section 1's picture
Joined: 06/29/2009
MGoPoints: 14296

If you are going to play with big words and ideas you had better understand what they mean.

You really don't mean that the case against Paterno is "moot"; I'll help you out and tell you for your own benefit that what you meant is that the case against Paterno is "settled."  If the case against Paterno was "moot," it would be "subject to debate."  Although that's an archaic definition of "moot" that I personally don't like.  And if we were to apply that classical definition, it would mean the opposite of what you'd like to say. 

The other, better and more current definition of "moot" is that it is a subject that is merely academic; a hypothetical question.  (Hence "Moot Court competition."  Wherein students argue a point that is either a hypothetical case or one that has already been decided and they are merely re-arguing it for the exercise.) 

And the current practical definition of moot in common Americal legal practice today is that a "moot issue" is one wherein a question no longer has any practical consequence.  Such as when a family is arguing over the methods of someone's end-of-life care, and the patient in question dies.  Or when two parties are arguing over ownership of a sailing vessel and it sinks.

All of those definitions of "moot" mean almost the opposite of your intended meaning.

You're welcome.

As for the question of Paterno's defending himself (this is in answer to an earlier challenge to me); this is unfortunately a bit more legal arcana, but there is a legal concept known as "collateral estoppel" (and related concepts, going by different names, such as res judicata) in which a litigant can be held to an earlier legal outcome if certain conditions are met.  Three basic elements are: (1) There must have been prior litigation in which identical claims were raised (or could have been raised). In general, claims are sufficiently identical if they are found to share a “common nucleus of operative fact.”  (2)The parties in the second litigation must be identical in some manner to the parties in the original litigation, or be in privity with the parties in the first action.  Note: A party is considered to be in privity with a party in the original litigation if: (a) The nonparty succeeded to the interest of a party;  (b) The nonparty, though it did not technically participate in the first suit, controlled one party’s litigation in that suit; (c) The nonparty shares a property interest with the party; (d) The party and the nonparty have an agency relationship (agent/principal); or (e) The party otherwise adequately represented the interest of the nonparty in the previous litigation.  And the third element is (3): There must have been a final judgment on the merits in the original litigation.

There is virtually never an application of "collateral estoppel" or res judicata in criminal matters; such is the seriousness with which we treat those allegations.  But even in a civil context, and applying the most basic concepts to Paterno, we can easily see that Paterno may not have had his own interest adequately represented by Penn State.  And since Paterno wasn't even a party to the first "case," (it wasn't even really a civil case, much less a criminal case), and since Paterno clearly did not "control" the defense of the first case, he can't possibly be legally held to the former outcome.  Yes, they "invited" Paterno in to the investigation (yeah, right) to be interrogated and tell all what he really thought.  Which no lawyer in his right mind would ever entertain in the legal climate of that time.

So the case against Paterno is by no means "moot," and it isn't even settled (except perhaps in your own mind) by any cognizable legal standard.

Yeoman, you sir are welcome as well.

And because you brought up the use of "obtuse," I'll say this much because the Board membership is so customarily obtuse about such matters; No, for the third time I am not playing the role of Paterno's defense lawyer.  I have no freakin' idea what the guy did or didn't do.  Just like most of you.  Most of you, who haven't read the full Freeh Report and/or Sollers report.  If somebody has read both reports, you're a better man than me, I'll be the first to admit.  I don't think I could stand 238 pages of Penn State detritus.

 

 

  • Login or register to post comments
February 10th, 2013 at 9:19 PM | Clever quote but (Score:2 Normal)
Blue 2
Joined: 02/10/2013
MGoPoints: 1

Clever quote but quite inapposite. Donovan was acquitted on charges widely viewed as political. While Paterno was never charged with a crime, it's hard to suggest the Freeh report was somehow politically motivated. Freeh had no reason to implicate Paterno in a coverup, and the fact Penn State accepted his report also suggests it was a legitimate effort to report the truth.

  • Login or register to post comments
February 10th, 2013 at 3:44 PM | It's a joke of a report. It (Score:3 Normal)
ESNY
Joined: 11/06/2008
MGoPoints: 673

It's a joke of a report. It criticizes the Freeh report for not interviewing important people (the very same people that are facing criminal charges) or reviewing all emails due to the fact that Penn st changed their emails yet the Paterno fluff piece didn't do ANY investigating. It relies solely on straw men arguments, effusive praise of the legacy and morality of JoePa and a willing suspension of disbelief.

  • Login or register to post comments
February 10th, 2013 at 4:07 PM | There's no use in arguing (Score:2 Normal)
Swazi
Swazi's picture
Joined: 08/13/2010
MGoPoints: 2556

There's no use in arguing over this anymore.

Just know that the bombshell Penn Staters were hoping for that would some how get the sanctions lifted, didn't even come close to happening.

If you need drugs to be a good writer, you're not a good writer.

-Rod Serling

  • Login or register to post comments
February 10th, 2013 at 4:15 PM | I think when a school (Score:3 Normal)
bronxblue
Joined: 11/22/2008
MGoPoints: 12582

I think when a school community and prominent parties are implicated in something, the natural response is to become overly defensive.  It happened at UM with the Fab 5, and the same at USC with Bush and SMU with the player payments.  People, especially those unconnected to the actual parties, inevitably become overly emotional and defensive because the implication is that by being attached to the school, they too are connected to the crime in some way.  That isn't true, of course (a professor in the physics department or a fireman in Happy Valley with two kids at PSU has nothing to do with Sandusky and Paterno covering up child abuse), but the illogical response and "you aren't seeing the whole story" rationalizations naturally flow out.  

But over time, the truth will remain and the noise will disappear.  While the Freeh report is not perfect, it provides a fairly clear picture of the dysfunction in the AD at PSU, and in particular how prominent people involved with the football team failed to recognize Sandusky's actions. I'm sure one can spin certain emails and conversations to mitigate Paterno's direct knowledge of specific instances, but the overall narrative exists because the facts point to it.  Kids were assaulted for over a decade and nobody stopped it from happening, and there were ample opportunities to stop it beforehand.  But it will take time for people to accept this depressing reality, that a man who is obstensibly a good person still acted poorly, and that while you can still cheer on the Lions you also have to accept that its most prominent former leader made some mistakes.  Nobody should have deified Paterno to begin with, and the fact these truths make that harder fall on the zealots to mitigate, not everyone else.

  • Login or register to post comments
February 10th, 2013 at 4:19 PM | Has anybody linked the actual 238-page report yet? (Score:-1 Trolling)
Section 1
Section 1's picture
Joined: 06/29/2009
MGoPoints: 14296

This is the actual report.  At "paterno.com":

http://www.paterno.com/Overview/default.aspx 

(Click on the embedded button to download the .pdf of the report.)  I have to confess that I haven't the time, to read the full Freeh report, and then the 238-page "Sollers" report.  Now, I have never much liked Penn State and I never was all that comfortable with their being in the Big Ten conference.  For my own reasons.  Schembechler-era kinds of reasons.

Not that I anticipated the Sandusky scandal.  (Although I asked a very knowledgable Penn State fan, at the "Manningham" upset game, why it was that Sandusky -- the heir apparent in the late nineties -- had been so suddenly "disappeared."  And that fan quietly said that he didn't know.)

The Sollers report isn't such a bad piece of work, from the parts I spent about 45 minutes reading.

I'd like to hear from some credible, neutral journalist/reviewer about both sides, and a deconstruction of the two competing reports.

And I'd urge Michigan fans to just try to be a bit circumspect about Paterno personally, since he was very nearly signed to be the Head Football Coach at Michigan in the winter of 1968-69, and it was largely Paterno's recommendation that one Glenn E. "Bo" Schembechler of Miami (Ohio) be interviewed for the job.

 

 

  • Login or register to post comments
February 10th, 2013 at 4:26 PM | PSU community and paterno family remain delusional (Score:1)
pbmd
pbmd's picture
Joined: 04/24/2010
MGoPoints: 195

please stop

the members of the family and the university community have shown us by their actions over many years that they are isolated, delusional and unaware of the national outrage.

PSU should mend its ways and become an example of transparancy and de-centralized power in college sports.

pbmd

  • Login or register to post comments
  • 1
  • 2
  • next ›
  • last »
Powered by Pressflow, an open source content management system
Theme provided by Roopletheme; sidebars adapted from Chris Murphy.