Pat Forde: Michigan is the biggest winner in coaching this offseason

Submitted by BostonWolverine on

File under "Obviously." Pat Forde named Michigan the biggest winner in the offseason coaching carousel. This is, of course, after calling them a "dumpster fire" a couple months earlier. This is just further proof that HARBAUUUUUUGH.

Here's the article:

http://sports.yahoo.com/news/biggest-winners-and-losers-from-the-college-football-coaching-carousel-065221084-ncaaf.html

alum96

January 20th, 2015 at 12:02 PM ^

Pat Forde is a blathering idiot... except for this time.

p.s. Iman Marshall is leaving AA today, per the recruiting twitter folk, have him tweeting "back to cali" this morning so incorrect info about him staying thru Wednesday.   Was a long shot, remains a long shot.

Also some account I've not seen before says Harbaugh will be in Cali after his Texas trip and this WR from Cal (who is REALLY smart - Duke, Brown, Harvard) will be on Harbaugh's radar.  Didnt want to start a thead for these items.

http://247sports.com/Player/Austin-Aaron-34083

gwkrlghl

January 20th, 2015 at 12:11 PM ^

I still love the morons saying that our coaching search was lost and we had no clue what we were doing. Our hire is sooo much better than any other hire in football. Period.

Eat crow media clowns

 

mgoblue0970

January 20th, 2015 at 3:20 PM ^

They won't.

ESPN was talking about coaching searches just the other day and insinuated that it's unheard of for a NFL coach to return to college because good coaches want to be at the top of their profession and chase the Lombardi Trophy. 

mgoblue0970

January 20th, 2015 at 3:21 PM ^

They won't.

ESPN was talking about coaching searches just the other day and insinuated that it's unheard of for a NFL coach to return to college because good coaches want to be at the top of their profession and chase the Lombardi Trophy. 

Stephen Y

January 20th, 2015 at 12:18 PM ^

Wanna know when we have further proof that "HARBAUGHHHH?" When we actually start playing (and hopefully winning games). There is no proof of anything yet.

WestSider

January 20th, 2015 at 12:18 PM ^

a dumpster fire did it for me. I don't care for that kind of overstatement from douchebags who peddle non-original information, and use insult to create controversy.  

mjagger

January 20th, 2015 at 12:26 PM ^

in SEC move from one SEC school to another. I may be wrong, but it seems that it happens at a much higher rate in the SEC than any other conference. 

CRISPed in the DIAG

January 20th, 2015 at 12:37 PM ^

I enjoy listening to Dan Patrick and regulaly download his podcast. But I remember him essentially making fun of UM's process based on a "report" that UM was curating a list of candidates that included [insert usual names here].  The attitude - and I don't thing DP was alone with this - was "doesn't UM realize it is no longer a desination job?!"  

Meanwhile, Cook is chomping at the bit to make a Harbaugh announcement.  

I'm in a good place, mentally, with all of this now.  Could you have imagined a universe that included an OSU national championship, bad MBB beats, Lavert season/possible UM career-ending injury?

*shivers*

LSAClassOf2000

January 20th, 2015 at 12:40 PM ^

Iowa. Speaking of Ferentz—he’s gone from untouchable to unloved by a growing segment of the fan base over the past five mediocre years. Ferentz is standing pat on staff, which is a roll of the dice. But with a golden contract that runs through 2020, maybe he can afford to.

Wouldn't Iowa owe him something like 75% of his unpaid salary through the term of the contract if they did fire him? I think there's a longevity bonus owed to him at the end of this month too, so that's another - I think it is a half million, perhaps more than that. The Hawkeyes really had him over a barrell with that last extension indeed. 

treetown

January 20th, 2015 at 1:20 PM ^

Once upon a time, a sports columnist/reporter might have to produce a piece once a week. Remember that this was in the days when:

1. the player's and coach's private lives were off limits - no pieces about who was out chasing what when. 

2. there was almost no real discussion about contracts, no salary caps and such. The Reserve Clause was still in effect in MLB. The only speculative pieces might be something about trades in the old stove league.

3. Structural issues about the teams, ownership, their behavior and the league were also off limits. The current uproar over Dan Snyder and the DC NFL team name and Donald Stirling pales in comparison to the known behavior of many prior owners/managers in the past.

4. nothing about PED - even though amphetamines were not uncommon in the past (see point 1)

Today pretty much everything is on the record, but not much is written about 1 and 4 out of fear of alienating sources. Not everyone really grasps the nuances of point 2 and the leagues hate it when point 3 is covered. Don't know what metric is used internally to judge writers but clearly number of pieces or things produced each day/week. Another factor is that no one probably calls anyone on wild predictions.