Home
we had subs it was crazy

Primary links

  • About
    • $upport (lol)
    • Ethics
    • FAQ
    • Privacy Policy
  • Contact
  • MGoStore
  • MGoBoard
    • MGoBoard FAQ
    • Ticket spreadsheet
    • Michigan bar locator
    • Moderator Action Sticky
  • Useful Stuff
    • Depth Chart By Class
    • Unofficial Two Deep
    • 2013 Offer Board
    • Crude Bug Tracking System
    • Third Down Stats
    • Diaries, Windows Live Writer, And You
    • Michigan Future Schedules
    • User-Curated HOF
    • 2013 Recruiting Board
    • Where To Eat In Ann Arbor
Home Forums MGoBoard

Navigation

  • Forums
  • Recent posts

User login

  • Create new account
  • Request new password

MGoElsewhere

  • @MGoBlog (Brian)
  • @aceanbender
  • @TomVH (Tom)
  • RSS Feed
  • iPhone App
  • Facebook profile
  • MGoKindle Store
  • mgo.licio.us
  • Brian @ TSB [Archive]
  • Brian @ AOL [Archive]
  • Sour Salty Bitter Sweet

Michigan Blogs

  • Big House Blog
  • Burgeoning Wolverine Star
  • Genuinely Sarcastic
  • Go Blue Michigan Wolverine
  • Holdin' The Rope
  • MGoFootball
  • MVictors
  • Maize 'n' Blue Nation
  • Maize 'n' Brew
  • Maize And Go Blue
  • Michigan Hockey Net
  • The Blog That Yost Built
  • The Hoover Street Rag
  • The M Block
  • The M Zone
  • The Wolverine Blog
  • Touch The Banner
  • UMGoBlog
  • UMHoops
  • UMTailgate
  • Wolverine Liberation Army

M On The Net

  • mgovideo
  • MGoBlue.com
  • Mike DeSimone
  • Recruiting Planet
  • The Wolverine
  • Go Blue Wolverine
  • Winged Helmet
  • UMGoBlue.com
  • MaizeRage.org
  • Puckhead
  • The M Den
  • True Blue Fan Forum

Big Ten Blogs

  • Illinois
    • A Lion Eye
    • Hail To The Orange
    • Illinois Baseball Report
    • Illinois Loyalty
  • Indiana
    • Inside The Hall
    • The Crimson Quarry
  • Iowa
    • Black Heart, Gold Pants
    • Fight For Iowa
  • Michigan State
    • The Only Colors
  • Minnesota
    • GopherHole.com
    • The Daily Gopher
    • I'm In Love With A Fringe Bowl Team
    • TNABACG
  • Nebraska
    • Big Red Network
    • Corn Nation
    • Husker Mike's Blasphemy
    • Husker Gameday
  • Northwestern
    • Sippin' On Purple
    • Lake The Posts
  • Notre Dame
    • The House Rock Built
    • One Foot Down
  • Ohio State
    • Eleven Warriors
    • Buckeye Commentary
    • Men of the Scarlet and Gray
    • Our Honor Defend
    • The Buckeye Nine
  • Penn State
    • Slow States
    • Black Shoe Diaries
    • Happy Valley Hardball
    • Penn State Clips
    • Linebacker U
    • Nittany White Out
  • Purdue
    • Boiled Sports
    • Hammer and Rails
  • Wisconsin
    • Bruce Ciskie

Links of Note

  • Baseball
    • Big Ten Hardball
    • College Baseball Today
    • The Baseball Zealot
    • The College Baseball Blog
  • Basketball
    • Ken Pomeroy
    • Basketball Prospectus
    • Midmajority
  • College Hockey
    • Chris Heisenberg
    • College Hockey Stats
    • Inside College Hockey
    • Michigan College Hockey
    • Hockey's Future
    • Sioux Sports
    • USCHO
    • Western College Hockey
    • CCHA
      • LSSU Hockey
      • Bronco Hockey Blog
  • Football
    • Smart Football
    • Every Day Should Be Saturday
    • Doctor Saturday
    • CFB Stats
    • Harold Stassen
    • NCAA D-I Stats Page
    • The Wizard Of Odds
  • General
    • Sports Central
  • Local Interest
    • The Ann Arbor Chronicle
    • Arborwiki
    • Arbor Update
    • Teeter Talk
    • Vacuum
  • Teams Of The D
    • Lions
      • Pride of Detroit
      • Fire Millen
    • Pistons
      • Detroit Bad Boys
      • Need4Sheed
    • Tigers
      • Roar Of The Tigers
      • The Detroit Tigers Weblog
      • The Daily Fungo
    • Red Wings
      • On The Wings
      • Behind The Jersey
      • Winging It In Motown
    • Michigan Sports Forum

Archive

  • May 2013 (42)
  • April 2013 (94)
  • March 2013 (104)
  • February 2013 (81)
  • January 2013 (93)
  • December 2012 (74)
  • November 2012 (142)
  • October 2012 (143)
  • September 2012 (107)
  • August 2012 (103)
  •  
  • 1 of 11
  • ››

Get Yer Tickets

Football Display Case

NFL Watches

Follow your favorite team with localtv-satellite.com: Click Here.

Site Search

Diaries

  • New
  • Popular
  • Hot
  • More Milford Men Than Michigan Men: Comparing the 11-12 and 12-13 Hockey Teams
    MGoBlueline - 1 day ago
  • Future Non-Conference Opponent Recruiting Watch
    EGD - 3 days ago
  • Way Too Late B1G Men's Basketball Scheduling Idea
    BeileinBuddy - 4 days ago
  • The Blockhams in "HOCKEY HANGOVER"
    Six Zero - 1 week ago
  • MGoAcceptance: Another MGoAnecdote
    LSAClassOf2000 - 1 week ago
  •  
  • 1 of 4
  • ››
more
  • Big Ten Recruiting Rankings 5-15-13
    Ace - 1,404 views
  • Future Non-Conference Opponent Recruiting Watch
    EGD - 601 views
  • Way Too Late B1G Men's Basketball Scheduling Idea
    BeileinBuddy - 397 views
  • More Milford Men Than Michigan Men: Comparing the 11-12 and 12-13 Hockey Teams
    MGoBlueline - 248 views
  • Big Ten Recruiting Rankings 5-15-13
    Ace - 51 comments
  • Future Non-Conference Opponent Recruiting Watch
    EGD - 15 comments
  • The Blockhams in "HOCKEY HANGOVER"
    Six Zero - 13 comments
  • More Milford Men Than Michigan Men: Comparing the 11-12 and 12-13 Hockey Teams
    MGoBlueline - 2 comments
  • Way Too Late B1G Men's Basketball Scheduling Idea
    BeileinBuddy - 2 comments

MGoBoard

  • New
  • Recent
  • Hot
  • OT: RIP Dick Trickle and Ken Venturi
    14 replies
  • Siva Admits Trey Burke's Title Game Block Was Clean
    62 replies
  • Softball Open Thread 7pm vs Valpo ESPN3
    36 replies
  • OT Staee shutout by Penn St 9-0 in baseball
    21 replies
  • Alex Bars to Notre Dame
    96 replies
  • OT - The Friday Night Alcoholics - Early Edition Thread
    59 replies
  • Trey Burke current on ESPN2 at NBA Combine
    28 replies
  • OT: End of Drew and Mike on 101WRIF
    39 replies
  • Michigan has #1 recruiting class on ESPN now.
    73 replies
  • The Talented Shallmans
    41 replies
  • OT: Advice on moving to Ann Arbor
    72 replies
  • Speight to compete in Oakland Elite 11 camp
    47 replies
  • Nice Article on Michigan Baseball Signee Hector Gutierrez
    7 replies
  • 2013 Mott Takeover Open Thread
    60 replies
  • OT: Notre Dame 2013, pretty much BCS or bust
    44 replies
  • ‹‹
  • 2 of 7
  • ››
  • B1G Network Helmet Bracket
    34 replies
  • OT: Caption Contest - Preakness Fan
    18 replies
  • Steve Everitt rips Notre Dame!
    46 replies
  • OT: Ron English & Mike Hart to jump out of a plane for new EMU bathrooms
    38 replies
  • OT: Saturday Night Drinking/Open/Tigers Thread
    46 replies
  • OT: ESPN Mag/Insider special $5/Year
    25 replies
  • OT- happy World Whisk(e)y day everyone!
    44 replies
  • OT: IIHF Semifinal US vs Switzerland Open Thread
    3 replies
  • Siva Admits Trey Burke's Title Game Block Was Clean
    62 replies
  • Softball Open Thread 7pm vs Valpo ESPN3
    36 replies
  • Michigan Baseball vs Nebraska on BTN Open Thread
    43 replies
  • Michigan Women's Tennis Swept by UCLA
    4 replies
  • BBall year in review Deleted...
    10 replies
  • OT: Red Wings @ Hawks Game 2 Open Thread
    113 replies
  • OT: Preakness Stakes
    26 replies
  •  
  • 1 of 7
  • ››
  • OT: Red Wings @ Ducks Game 7 Open Thread
    229 replies
  • OT: Red Wings vs. Blackhawks Open Thread
    201 replies
  • Shane Morris to wear the famed #7 jersey, J.J. McGrath #46
    175 replies
  • Jabrill Peppers Announcement Date Set
    169 replies
  • Brady Hoke Calls Notre Dame A Chicken
    163 replies
  • UM 2014 Conf schedule football
    123 replies
  • Brandon on Uniformzzz
    119 replies
  • OT: Red Wings @ Hawks Game 2 Open Thread
    113 replies
  • Notre Dame's Nix fires back at Coach Hoke
    110 replies
  • Alex Bars to Notre Dame
    96 replies
  • GoBlueWolverine's Dre Barthwell: Marvin Robinson to leave Michigan
    96 replies
  • Sparty losing recruits to the rap game
    95 replies
  • PSU about to get blasted again by SI investigative report
    88 replies
  • Michigan has #1 recruiting class on ESPN now.
    73 replies
  • OT: Advice on moving to Ann Arbor
    72 replies
  •  
  • 1 of 7
  • ››

mgo.licio.us

  • Big Ten football procrastinates on parity-based scheduling, and nothing ever changes

    the just released schedules were a flat-out statement that the B10 doesn't believe SOS will matter in playoff selection

    1 comments
  • Michigan's Glenn Robinson III, Mitch McGary ranked inside top 20 on ESPN's 2014 draft board

    but I thought that draft was supposed to be incredibly loaded?

    1 comments
  • Tim Hardaway Jr. turning heads, viewed as a first-rounder by some teams, analyst says

    If you're gonna go please be in the first round.

    0 comments
  • Michigan-Ohio State once, Indiana-Purdue once? The Big Ten has to protect its hoops rivalries

    another delightful side effect of a 14 team conference

    0 comments
  • Beilein on transfers: All should have to sit a year, regardless of situation

    I disagree.

    0 comments
  • Julie Hermann takes over as Rutgers AD, won't try to spend like Michigan

    GOOD PLAN

    1 comments
  • Jay Harris says no to Michigan State, decides to become a rapper

    hahahahaha

    0 comments
  • The Difference Between A Good Fan And A Bad Fan

    thoughtful piece from Jacobi on middle finger lady

    3 comments
  • Michigan's rising recruiting profile exciting John Beilein, who remains true to his scouting form

    Their high school coaches and AAU coaches have probably a better appreciation of Michigan than maybe they had before," Beilein said. "It's a tough balance right now. Tim Hardaway and Trey Burke weren't really high-profile players, nor was Darius Morris, and all were high-profile players. "We're still looking at 'who is the best fit.' "

    0 comments
  • Charles Barkley discusses Michael Jordan, Dream Team and more - NBA - Jack McCallum - SI.com

    "When I call somebody a midget, clearly I'm not trying to insult f---ing midgets. I'm just using basketball terminology."

    0 comments
  • Why does the NFL make for such bad media?

    robots

    0 comments
  • Pictured: Detroit's Robocop Statue nears completion date

    elsewhere in awesome things kickstarter made happen

    0 comments
  • Spectacular images of the madness that was the first FA Cup final

    And you think you're crowded at Michigan Stadium

    0 comments
  • Bear Vs. Monkey Bicycle Race Ends With Bear Eating Monkey

    IMPORTANT: Ondre Pipkins not involved.

    11 comments
  • Damon Bullock Has the Greatest Vine Account of All Time

    this is amazing

    7 comments

OTish: Legal change impact on sports in CO & WA

84 posts / 0 new
Login or register to post comments
Last post
November 7th, 2012 at 12:04 PM
#1
MikeCohodes
MikeCohodes's picture
Joined: 08/28/2012
MGoPoints: 1261
OTish: Legal change impact on sports in CO & WA

First off - NO POLITICS - this thread is to discuss the impact on sports at both the NCAA and pro level of the recent law change in CO and WA from last night.  I cleared this with the mods on Twitter before posting and as long as we keep it to sports, this topic is fine.  This thread is not to discuss the pros/cons of pot laws themselves, the impact of these laws on federal drug policy, whether or not drugs are even bad or not, or the politics behind such laws in the first place.  Keep it to sports only or risk the mods' wrath.

 

That being said, as we know last night CO & WA legalized recreational pot.  I am curious as to what impact if any this will have on sports in those states.  Since it is still illegal on the federal level, a player still risks major punishments if they choose to partake of the drug.

On the NCAA level - pot is still a banned drug by the NCAA.  Unless they change the NCAA regulations (which I think is unlikely barring a federal law change), a player busted with pot or one that fails a drug test still faces a 1 year competition ban for their first offense and loses a year of eligibility.  (LINK to NCAA drug policy)  I'd think that a player that is serious about their athletics would have to be pretty foolish to risk losing their ability to play the sport.  The only thing I'm sure of is that people will make even more jokes about why someone would go to play in CO or WA in the future, but I really don't see this having too much of an impact on those states' collegiate teams because the coaches will have to be idiots to not hammer home just what the player stands to lose if they use pot.  I'm sure the first couple of year long suspensions will further drive home the point.

On the professional level though, I can see this having more of an impact.  I can see more pro athletes buying property in CO or WA, and/or suddenly viewing Denver or Seattle as desirable teams to play for, and I wouldn't be surprised if we hear of an increase of arrests of players in the offseason on federal drug charges.  And altough the NBA supposedly has banned players from doing drugs, a number of players have admitted to using pot in the offseason (or some even during the season) without any punishment from the NBA.  The NFL is harsher, suspending players for failing drug tests (Ricky Williams for one example) but I'm sure there are probably many players there using it as well.  Not so sure on the NHL or MLB in terms of usage by players or punishments from the leagues. 

What are your thoughts on this?  Will we suddenly see a flood of pro talent head to Seattle and Denver?  How many NCAA players will get nailed for failing a test?  I'm curious on everyone's thoughts, and remember, no politics, sports only. 

Twitter:  @MikeCohodes

My Blog - posts on movies, tv, and books; politics; and fatherhood  Updates minimum 3x a week

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
Tags:
  • MGoBoard
  • Drugs Are Bad MMMMkayy
  • other

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
November 7th, 2012 at 12:08 PM | It has begun.  (Score:-1 Flamebait)
Wolverine Devotee
Wolverine Devotee's picture
Joined: 06/29/2009
MGoPoints: -9994437

It has begun. 

When the ADept sells special jerseys and gear, you'll see my picture next to the targeted customer crowd. A sheep.....but a Blue one.....

  • Login or register to post comments
November 7th, 2012 at 12:10 PM | This is politics. (Score:5 Normal)
Brown Bear
Brown Bear's picture
Joined: 01/10/2011
MGoPoints: 2611

This is politics.

I poop excellence
  • Login or register to post comments
November 7th, 2012 at 12:10 PM | I cleared it with BiSB (Score:3 Normal)
MikeCohodes
MikeCohodes's picture
Joined: 08/28/2012
MGoPoints: 1261

on twitter that as long as we stuck to the sports impact aspect we were okay.

Twitter:  @MikeCohodes

My Blog - posts on movies, tv, and books; politics; and fatherhood  Updates minimum 3x a week

  • Login or register to post comments
November 7th, 2012 at 12:17 PM | I just don't see this ending (Score:4 Normal)
Brown Bear
Brown Bear's picture
Joined: 01/10/2011
MGoPoints: 2611

I just don't see this ending well. Anything that rides along the politics line always ends up that way.
Now on the actual question or subject I don't see this changing anything. Athletes who want to smoke pot against their organizations/leagues wishes will do so no matter where they live. Being legal in Colorado still doesn't change the fact that it's against the rules of their league/university. I don't see a mass exodus to those states just because of the law change, most athletes think they are above the law already and will do as they please wherever.

I poop excellence
  • Login or register to post comments
November 7th, 2012 at 12:21 PM | That is a valid point (Score:1)
MikeCohodes
MikeCohodes's picture
Joined: 08/28/2012
MGoPoints: 1261

that I had not considered - the athletes feeling that they are above the law.  I know we recently saw that with Honey Badger on the NCAA level, and we see it all the time in the pros.  I guess I was just thinking that if they wanted to use it with less financial risk of arrest then they might consider moving to those states.

Twitter:  @MikeCohodes

My Blog - posts on movies, tv, and books; politics; and fatherhood  Updates minimum 3x a week

  • Login or register to post comments
November 7th, 2012 at 12:13 PM | Not at all (Score:1 Normal)
cozy200
cozy200's picture
Joined: 01/02/2011
MGoPoints: 873

Its about rule of law.

Its called a royale with cheese

  • Login or register to post comments
November 7th, 2012 at 12:12 PM | I see it as a simple issue (Score:5 Normal)
cozy200
cozy200's picture
Joined: 01/02/2011
MGoPoints: 873

You do not have to play sports. Its a privilege not a right. Each governing body can make their own rules and regulations. If you want to partake then you play by these rules. Period. Now, from a professional standpoint where people choose to live and spend their recreational time that obviously should be up to them. Wether they choose to let that effect the rules they agreed upon with those governing bodies they choose to play under that is their choice as well. Whatever those rules are as usual in life its about choices.

Its called a royale with cheese

  • Login or register to post comments
November 7th, 2012 at 1:18 PM | Well Said (Score:1 Offtopic)
StephenRKass
StephenRKass's picture
Joined: 07/15/2008
MGoPoints: 4202

Your post is well stated. I am part of several voluntary organizations, one of which is job related, which have stipulations about substance use and other actions. Even though I could disregard these directives, I choose not to, as a matter of personal integrity. In one case, I would clearly disqualify myself from my position were I to make certain (legal) choices.

Athletes are in an analogous situation. They have certain rules and guidelines which they can abide by or not. If your employer/team states, "Don't smoke pot or you will lose your job," you have to decide whether that's a risk you want to take. Your employer often has the right to stipulate what you can do, particularly if your actions can affect job performance. A good example would be the stipulation that aircraft pilots cannot drink alcohol in the 4 hours prior to flying. It is generally accepted that drinking alcohol in that time frame could adversely affect job performance for a pilot.

There are at least 4 options as to the position you take:

  1. The action is wrong in and of itself.
  2. The action has been declared illegal, and is wrong because of this declaration.
  3. The action has been declared illegal, and is wrong if you are caught.
  4. The action has been declared illegal, which is irrelevant because the laws don't apply to you (above the law.)

With regards to marijuana use, I suspect most would say that smoking pot isn't wrong in and of itself (as witnessed by the law change in CO & WA.) What makes pot smoking "wrong" is that it has been declared "illegal" or off limits. For many, they choose not to smoke pot, because it is illegal. For some, the legality is a mere nuisance, and the issue is whether or not you are apprehended. For a few individuals (athletes, extremely wealthy individuals, well connected powerful individuals,) the law is ignored with impunity, because of the belief that "no one would dare to arrest me." I wonder if this was the kind of mindset with Terrell Pryor et al at Ohio.

Coming back to the OP, I think most athletes would fall into categories 2 or 3. There are a few idiots who would actually take position 4.

"It does not matter how many times you get knocked down, but how many times you get up." Vince Lombardi

 

  • Login or register to post comments
November 7th, 2012 at 5:34 PM | ....... (Score:5 Funny)
amphibious1
amphibious1's picture
Joined: 09/02/2009
MGoPoints: 2132

Florida Wolverines have dreadlocks...

  • Login or register to post comments
November 7th, 2012 at 12:12 PM | kinda impossible for this to (Score:4 Normal)
jhender85
jhender85's picture
Joined: 10/25/2008
MGoPoints: 1381

kinda impossible for this to not turn into a politics thread, but I'd imagine this has zero effect. Most athletes are not allowed to smoke cigs or drink during the season even if they can do so legally, why would smoking pot be any different. Also, the NCAA is a national institution, and weed usage is still illegal on a federal level. End of story.

  • Login or register to post comments
November 7th, 2012 at 1:06 PM | No smoking? (Score:1)
Steve in PA
Steve in PA's picture
Joined: 08/10/2009
MGoPoints: 2345

Vlade Divac never got that memo

 

 

 

  • Login or register to post comments
November 7th, 2012 at 3:20 PM | I don't (Score:1)
ijohnb
Joined: 09/21/2009
MGoPoints: 2782

know about that.  Transporation across states lines certainly is still illegal, and I am assuming that distribution of it is still illegal in these states, but I don't think simple possession and use of personal amounts is a federal criminal violation.  If it was a federal law a state could not pass a law making it legal.

  • Login or register to post comments
November 7th, 2012 at 12:13 PM | People moving (Score:1)
joegeo
Joined: 12/09/2009
MGoPoints: 197

We are no more likely to see NFL talent flood those states than we are to see americans in general move en masse to those states.

  • Login or register to post comments
November 7th, 2012 at 12:13 PM | Behave, everyone (Score:5 Normal)
BiSB
BiSB's picture
Joined: 08/15/2009
MGoPoints: 27875

Behave, everyone.

Except for you people in Colorado and Washington. There are apparently no rules for y'all.

They no longer call me Bisbiño

  • Login or register to post comments
November 7th, 2012 at 12:36 PM | This one is all yours . . .   (Score:5 Normal)
profitgoblue
Joined: 09/01/2009
MGoPoints: 19415

This one is all yours . . .

 

Disgruntled former moderator.  I got a lot of problems with you people!

  • Login or register to post comments
November 7th, 2012 at 10:26 PM | (No subject) (Score:3 Normal)
mark5750
mark5750's picture
Joined: 07/29/2010
MGoPoints: 666

  • Login or register to post comments
November 7th, 2012 at 12:14 PM | Why not? (Score:5 Normal)
GoBlueDenver
GoBlueDenver's picture
Joined: 09/26/2009
MGoPoints: 186

I have yet to hear a reasonable argument as to how this is detrimental to athletes, especially when compared to alcohol.



Also, this is a motherfucking amazing day! Excuse me while I go celebrate!

  • Login or register to post comments
November 7th, 2012 at 12:14 PM | The NCAA also lists caffeine (Score:5 Normal)
State Street
State Street's picture
Joined: 07/09/2011
MGoPoints: 1112

The NCAA also lists caffeine as a banned substance.  That is all.

  • Login or register to post comments
November 7th, 2012 at 12:24 PM | I knew Reggie Bush didn't win (Score:5 Normal)
MGoSteelers
MGoSteelers's picture
Joined: 06/19/2011
MGoPoints: 188

I knew Reggie Bush didn't win that Heisman legitimately!

  • Login or register to post comments
November 7th, 2012 at 12:15 PM | I can't speak for every (Score:5 Normal)
JimLahey
JimLahey's picture
Joined: 01/18/2011
MGoPoints: 2369

I can't speak for every sport, but almost every hockey player I know partakes in the green herb at least occasionally in the off-season, and several during the season (maybe twice a month give or take). Once you get down to the AHL and ECHL you have several guys who do it every day. It just isn't seen as a big deal.

While it is against the rules of the league, they don't test for it and when it shows up on a test, the worst that will happen is they'll give you a verbal warning. If they tested and enforced a ban on marijuana in the NHL, they wouldn't have any players left.

Just think about this...when was the last time you heard about a professional athlete in one of the 4 major team sports getting in trouble for testing positive for pot? Never, it doesn't happen. Pot related issues only arise when players are stupid enough to get busted with it in their cars or out in public, ala the Detroit Lions players.

I've decided to lay off the food for a while, and go on the booze.

  • Login or register to post comments
November 7th, 2012 at 12:18 PM | And Bri'onte Dunn(s mom). (Score:4 Normal)
State Street
State Street's picture
Joined: 07/09/2011
MGoPoints: 1112

And Bri'onte Dunn(s mom).

  • Login or register to post comments
November 7th, 2012 at 3:05 PM | +1 !!! (Score:2 Funny)
Section 1
Section 1's picture
Joined: 06/29/2009
MGoPoints: 14295

There has been a serious shortage of references to Brionte Dunn's mom, now that we are in November. 

I thank you for correcting that situation.  Let's not let it happen again.  There can never be too many referfences to 2012's Mom of the Year!

 

 

  • Login or register to post comments
November 7th, 2012 at 12:19 PM | Ricky Williams (Score:0 Flamebait)
MikeCohodes
MikeCohodes's picture
Joined: 08/28/2012
MGoPoints: 1261

in the NFL was the only example I could recall or easily find for getting suspended by a pro league for pot usage.  You're definitely right it doesn't happen a lot, which was why I was thinking that all of the sudden the Denver and Seattle teams might get an influx of free agents.

Twitter:  @MikeCohodes

My Blog - posts on movies, tv, and books; politics; and fatherhood  Updates minimum 3x a week

  • Login or register to post comments
November 7th, 2012 at 2:48 PM | Ricky Williams had other (Score:1)
tsabesi
Joined: 09/28/2009
MGoPoints: 159

Ricky Williams had other problems that made it so he was on a shorter leash if I recall correctly. That may end up happenning, where it's used by the NCAA or whatever organization to add negative consequences, but for most players it's not enforced.

  • Login or register to post comments
November 8th, 2012 at 11:47 AM | Just had a pleasure (Score:1)
Michigan4Life
Joined: 07/29/2010
MGoPoints: 5662

of interviewing the director of scouting department for a NFL team last year.  He mentioned that if you take player's name off the board for failed drug test on pot, there almost literally wouldn't be anybody left on the board.  He estimated about 85% of the players have gotten caught with pot or failed pot test before ever taking a first snap as a NFL player.  He said what matters the most is the frequency and the time in which they failed the team.  The less frequent, the better.  The earlier the time, the better because if you got caught early on and never failed again, it tells him that he matured.

Look at Calvin Johnson.  He admitted to smoking pot at GT in NFL combine interview.  Did it deter him from getting drafted at #2 overall? No.  Did it deter his success in the NFL? No.

  • Login or register to post comments
November 7th, 2012 at 12:15 PM | Also, (Score:3 Normal)
BiSB
BiSB's picture
Joined: 08/15/2009
MGoPoints: 27875

John Infante (@John_Infante) has had some interesting insights into this. I recommend reading his Twitter feed from yesterday.

They no longer call me Bisbiño

  • Login or register to post comments
November 7th, 2012 at 12:26 PM | great recommendation (Score:0 Trolling)
MikeCohodes
MikeCohodes's picture
Joined: 08/28/2012
MGoPoints: 1261

so the Bylaw Blog guy has a Twitter feed.  Thanks for the heads up, I second this, go follow him if you're on Twitter everyon.

Twitter:  @MikeCohodes

My Blog - posts on movies, tv, and books; politics; and fatherhood  Updates minimum 3x a week

  • Login or register to post comments
November 7th, 2012 at 12:17 PM | NCAA won't allow use (Score:5 Normal)
JeepinBen
JeepinBen's picture
Joined: 01/22/2010
MGoPoints: 9529

It'll still be a banned NCAA substance like Sudafed. Players are regularly drug tested and held to NCAA standards, not just Federal, State, or Local laws.

While a hypothetical Colorado football player can now use marijuana without breaking Colorado laws, he would still be breaking NCAA rules and subject to punishment.

"Over? Did you say, over? Nothing is over until we decide it is!"

  • Login or register to post comments
November 7th, 2012 at 12:19 PM | This says it all - and I (Score:3 Normal)
Tauro
Tauro's picture
Joined: 06/30/2008
MGoPoints: 656

This says it all - and I don't see the NCAA changing this rule even if every state legalized pot.

  • Login or register to post comments
November 7th, 2012 at 1:19 PM | How regular do you think the (Score:4 Normal)
This is Michigan
Joined: 08/02/2010
MGoPoints: 1218

How regular do you think the NCAA tests players?



Yearly, the NCAA only tests a handful of players from a select number of teams at each school. They also test a handful of players from teams that make it to the post season.



Each school also has their own set of policies and although they tend to test more players the penalty is far less egregious. First offense at most schools is a slap on the wrist and a call to their parents.



Personally, I was not tested one time by either my institution or the NCAA in the 5 years I participated as a student-athlete.

  • Login or register to post comments
November 7th, 2012 at 1:43 PM | Frequency of testing is a seperate discussion (Score:2)
JeepinBen
JeepinBen's picture
Joined: 01/22/2010
MGoPoints: 9529

All I"m saying is if an NCAA athlete is caught by the NCAA for having used weed, it wont matter what the state law was.

"Over? Did you say, over? Nothing is over until we decide it is!"

  • Login or register to post comments
November 7th, 2012 at 2:00 PM | Every Year (Score:2)
IowaBlue
Joined: 05/25/2011
MGoPoints: 26

We were drug tested every year during our on site school physical before our season started before we could participate in any activities. 

We were never tested additionally for any end of the season tournament participation, etc; but that didn't mean we were not subject to any random testing that they would have decided to do.

I'm just glad they didn't test for alcohol consumption on the weekends!

 

  • Login or register to post comments
November 7th, 2012 at 2:32 PM | There are plenty of schools (Score:1 Normal)
justingoblue
justingoblue's picture
Joined: 11/16/2010
MGoPoints: 10858

There are plenty of schools that don't drug test during physicals, though. That policy varies from AD to AD (and possibly even coach to coach).

Go Blue!

  • Login or register to post comments
November 7th, 2012 at 12:17 PM | I don't think pro athletes (Score:1)
UM2018
UM2018's picture
Joined: 10/10/2012
MGoPoints: 152

I don't think pro athletes will be more likely to want to play for Denver or Seattle teams. If they want to smoke weed theyre going to do it regardless of wether its legal or not in the state they live in.

-UM class of 2018 

  • Login or register to post comments
November 7th, 2012 at 12:22 PM | It also is not quite legal. (Score:2 Normal)
jfoust81
Joined: 12/18/2010
MGoPoints: 155

It also is not quite legal. Have a few federal hurdles to clear first.

  • Login or register to post comments
November 7th, 2012 at 12:22 PM | What impact? (Score:5 Normal)
BLUEintheface
Joined: 11/07/2012
MGoPoints: 2

Welcome back Colorado football!

  • Login or register to post comments
November 7th, 2012 at 3:08 PM | I sort of see this... (Score:1)
Section 1
Section 1's picture
Joined: 06/29/2009
MGoPoints: 14295

But I kind of see Colorado getting Top-10 recruiting classes, and then going 1-11 every year.

 

 

  • Login or register to post comments
November 7th, 2012 at 12:25 PM | I'm moving to Colorado,  I (Score:3 Normal)
Andrew Jackson Jihad
Andrew Jackson Jihad's picture
Joined: 10/30/2011
MGoPoints: 1008

I'm moving to Colorado,  I support this law!

www.eatacheeseburger.blogspot.com Brian Cook has read this blog!

  • Login or register to post comments
November 8th, 2012 at 2:10 AM | How do I go about (Score:1)
rob f
rob f's picture
Joined: 11/11/2010
MGoPoints: 700

changing my mgousername to "rob f in Colorado"?

  • Login or register to post comments
November 7th, 2012 at 12:26 PM | The only correct answer is (Score:3 Normal)
Butterfield
Butterfield's picture
Joined: 01/15/2011
MGoPoints: 1941

The only correct answer is you'll have to wait to see what the federal response to this will be.

For medical marijuana, the US DOJ  had a long standing memo (the Ogden Memo) that stated the use of marijuana remained a violation of the Controlled Substances Act but it would not be a priority to enforce that particular law except in egregious circumstances.  That memo was repealed and replaced  in 2011 and there is some concern in states that allow for medical marijuana sales/use that users, growers, and distributors could be prosecutred.  For this issue - a matter of recreational use - I would expect even more consequences. 

In all likelihood, these state laws will go down in the history books as symbolic attempts to show support for changing federal policy and little else. 

The swag is back. 

  • Login or register to post comments
November 7th, 2012 at 1:39 PM | Perhaps (Score:3 Normal)
TIMMMAAY
TIMMMAAY's picture
Joined: 09/08/2008
MGoPoints: 5948

Though I think time will prove you wrong on your last point.

not just "douchey" MGoBlog user, but now TRUSTED MGoBlog user

  • Login or register to post comments
November 7th, 2012 at 1:58 PM | So do you think the Feds will (Score:2)
Butterfield
Butterfield's picture
Joined: 01/15/2011
MGoPoints: 1941

So do you think the Feds will just give up their power and let states do whatever they please, even if it's in violation of federal law?  In this case, I would be proven wrong. 

Or will the federal law change to allow for free use of marijuana?  If federal law changes, these state laws helped achieve what they were intended to achieve - to show the federal goverment that this is something the people want.  In this case, I think I'm right.  These state laws didn't override federal law so they would be the symbollic first step towards a national policy change. 

The swag is back. 

  • Login or register to post comments
November 7th, 2012 at 2:49 PM | For my money... (Score:2 Normal)
justingoblue
justingoblue's picture
Joined: 11/16/2010
MGoPoints: 10858

I could definitely see the federal government declining to do anything for a long period of time. I haven't seen anything that would indicate support for national legalization, and I haven't seen anything from the administration/DOJ that makes me think prosecuting these cases is something that would actually become commonplace. I agree that eventually something will have to happen on their end, but that could be a long time from now, and could happen in a country with pot legal (in varying degrees) in like thirty states.

Go Blue!

  • Login or register to post comments
November 7th, 2012 at 2:58 PM | Could very well be, but (Score:2 Normal)
Butterfield
Butterfield's picture
Joined: 01/15/2011
MGoPoints: 1941

Could very well be, but everything I read suggests that the feds are arming for a fight and have had enough with states trying to override federal law.

The swag is back. 

  • Login or register to post comments
November 7th, 2012 at 3:09 PM | Do you mind... (Score:2 Normal)
justingoblue
justingoblue's picture
Joined: 11/16/2010
MGoPoints: 10858

pointing me in the right direction to find some of that material? It's a topic of interest but it's been about six months since I've done any reading on it.

Go Blue!

  • Login or register to post comments
November 7th, 2012 at 4:17 PM | I'd suggest a simple google (Score:1 Trolling)
Butterfield
Butterfield's picture
Joined: 01/15/2011
MGoPoints: 1941

I'd suggest a simple google search and compare the 2009 DOJ "Ogden Memoradum" with the 2011 "Cole Memorandum".  I believe you'll find, after comparing, that there is a fairly substantial shift in policy directive to federal law enforcement agencies as it relates to enforcement of the Controlled Substances Act. 

I don't have any links made of gold, but here is one from last year that does a nice job summarizing the shift:

http://www.denverpost.com/breakingnews/ci_18391545 

And here is one that describes the uptick in enforcement in California, how a political figure in that state was upset about it, and how that political figure showed her displeasure with another highly recognizable political figure (trying to stay as innocuous as possible here)

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/05/03/nancy-pelosi-medical-marijuana_n_1474854.html 

The swag is back. 

  • Login or register to post comments
November 7th, 2012 at 3:15 PM | The tone of your comments (Score:2)
MGoViso
Joined: 09/27/2009
MGoPoints: 321

The tone of your comments combined with your posting of a Reason.com link - you must be working hard to not dispense personal opinion! 

  • Login or register to post comments
November 7th, 2012 at 3:56 PM | Reason for that is simple, I (Score:2)
Butterfield
Butterfield's picture
Joined: 01/15/2011
MGoPoints: 1941

Reason for that is simple, I don't have a personal opinion.  HOWEVER - I  work as a City Planner for a suburb of Phoenix and I was responsible for writing my city's Medical Marijuana Ordinance  when the voters here approved medical marijuana a couple years back.  I had to perform a ton of research and preparation for that, of course, so I probably have a bit more knowledge than the average poster when it comes to this topic.  Figured I may be able to lend some insight and nothing more....

The swag is back. 

  • Login or register to post comments
November 7th, 2012 at 6:11 PM | So (Score:-1 Flamebait)
TIMMMAAY
TIMMMAAY's picture
Joined: 09/08/2008
MGoPoints: 5948

You're right no matter what happens. Got it.

not just "douchey" MGoBlog user, but now TRUSTED MGoBlog user

  • Login or register to post comments
November 7th, 2012 at 6:32 PM | So (Score:1 Trolling)
Butterfield
Butterfield's picture
Joined: 01/15/2011
MGoPoints: 1941

Your reading comprehension is terrible because the entire first paragraph describes a scenario where I'd be wrong.  Got it. 

The swag is back. 

  • Login or register to post comments
  • 1
  • 2
  • next ›
  • last »
Powered by Pressflow, an open source content management system
Theme provided by Roopletheme; sidebars adapted from Chris Murphy.