OT - Your Top 5 All-Time Best NFL Running Backs

Submitted by xtramelanin on

Mates,

I am having a discussion with my older sons, and they were asking me who I thought were the top 5 all-time best NFL running backs.  As a Lions fan I will always list Barry Sanders as #1, but then who do you list after that?   Walter Payton was great.  Jim Brown in his day, but I don't think he'd be much of a stand out today.   Marshall Faulk?  Eric Dickerson?   I'm not an Emmitt Smith fan since he got to play with one of the all-time great offensive units every assembled (Jerry Rice, you did too, you sore loser), but he was certainly a very good pro back.  Who else should be considered?  

So, who do you have in your top 5?

1.  Barry

2.

3.

4.

5.

I hope you are with family and friends having a very fun but sane holiday.  

XM

(yes it's OT, but at least it's football related....)

MichiganTeacher

July 3rd, 2016 at 8:09 PM ^

The force that through the honolulu blue fuse drives the football! Love me some Dylan Thomas.

But on topic, Jim Brown is the obvious co-no. 1 with Barry. I don't see anyone else on that tier.

Next tier down I have, in no order, Payton, Campbell, OJ unfortunately, Dickerson.

Half a tier below that I have Sayers.

Then Smith, LT, and AP.

Wolfman

July 3rd, 2016 at 10:38 PM ^

He would be hanging out with Ray Rice.. He was not a nice man. As one poster said, he was a hell of a football player, but that applies to any position. If you wanted to find the best five at any position, chances are that Jim Brown would be among the best at almost any position. 

Just look at the '58 All Pro Team, with Nitchke, Ditka and all others, and you will find he was bigger and faster than almost every player on the field. Personally, i don't think running over people 30-40 lbs lighter than you and .3 seconds slower than you in the 100 yd dash proved a whole hell of a lot. other than you were the best player of that era. Does it carry over. You would have to wonder how he would do againt the Lawrence Taylors', Reggie Whites Yet, this is who he faced when he broke the l.o.s. You think people like Nitchscke and Butkus actuall tood a chance, with their lack of lateral speed had  a chance of catching him whn he was in full stride? I don't personally. 

There is a reason Alabama has such a fine rushing attack. They have tremendous OLmen and then also have big, fast RBs that dominate at the collegiate level. Many of those are fine runners when they hit the NFL, but very few have seasons like they did at Bama on a consistent basis. That is why I don't think Jim Brown, as a pure running back, would crack the top ten.Everyone else on that last, especially Barry Sanders, the greatet ever, are there because they were the best RBs of their era, not because they could dominate any position on the field. He had an unbelievable advantage, and if not taken into account, you are doing your unofficial poll a disservice. 

Does realizing Jim Brown would be the only defenseive player of his era that would be as good as Jim Brown the RB, therbey the only man to have a decent chance to bring him down one-on-one in the open field really make him the best RB or all eras? If you replaced the defenders he faced with names like Suh, White, Taylor, Harrison, Donald, Jones, Kuechly, etc, would he sill air as well? I think not, but make your aguments. You won't have to do that with the others, because the transformation had already taken place. 

Got nothing against Brown except for his women abusing ways, but he was a hell of a football player. My contention is being the best football player of the 50s and early 60s does not translate into greatest RB ever. 

 

tasnyder01

July 4th, 2016 at 2:00 AM ^

Because you can say that about almost anything, at any time. It's how you stand out RELATIVE to your peers, because you are given the same equipment/training as them. In a vote of best scientists, we'd assume guys like Bacon and Galileo are giants, but if you compared Galileo/Bacon to Einstein, he would laugh at them for their assumptions. He kind of, disproved Galileo.* The same for sports. Yes, people have weight training now, and could destroy people from back then. Also, we live longer, have better diets, and are (for better or worse) heavier than previously. That doesn't mean that people who didn't have that are worse, relative to their peers. TL;DR Denard is slow because people in the future are faster than dilithium. Or, if that's heresy, Einstein is dumb because Hawkings exists. *admittedly, don't know much about the subject, but you catch my drift. Believe others are between those two giants.

LSAClassOf2000

July 3rd, 2016 at 5:08 PM ^

I might as well have done this, because a shocking few among the parents at my daughter's school seem to be able to get the name straight. I find that I have this conversation maybe 2-3 times a month with someone at a meeting: 

"What's your daughter's name?"

"Astrid."

"Oh, Ashley...."

"No, Astrid."

"What ethnicity is that?"

"It's Germanic."

"So, French?"

"Fine, whatever you want to believe."

xtramelanin

July 3rd, 2016 at 3:07 PM ^

interesting factoid:  years ago (post murder of nicole and ron) we played football in new york and they put us up at the downtown athletic club, a very cool place.  we had dinner in the heisman room the first night and all around the room were the portraits of every heisman winner, except one.   OJ's picture was nowhere to be found.  

Goggles Paisano

July 3rd, 2016 at 5:38 PM ^

That's great way to describe it. Payton was a more complete football player and probably the most complete football player of any RB.  But Barry is #1 for me because his Electricity carried a bit more weight than Payton's completeness. Barry was just unreal.   

BIGBLUEWORLD

July 3rd, 2016 at 3:08 PM ^

Jim Brown, Gale Sayers, Walter Payton, Barry Sanders, Eric Dickerson.

Okay, I didn't include O.J. Simpson. So you can call my list: Top five running backs who didn't commit murder.

Mocha Cub

July 3rd, 2016 at 3:09 PM ^

1. Barry

2. Jim Brown

3. Walter Payton

4. Eric Dickerson

5. Emmitt Smith or Gale Sayers

 

I just can't rank Emmitt that high because of the line that he ran behind. If Barry had his o-line, he would have had every major running back record. P.s. fuck OJ

BlowGoo

July 3rd, 2016 at 3:10 PM ^

1. Payton

2. Brown

3. Sanders

4. Emmitt Smith

5. LaDanian Tomlinson

[6. Faulk

7. Sayers]

 

* Disqualified:

-*O.J. Simpson

-*Adrian Peterson

trueblueintexas

July 3rd, 2016 at 3:19 PM ^

I think this list is as close as you can get. You could always argue to add or remove one or two but these five always have to be in the conversation. Edit: anyone saying Emmitt shouldn't count because of the o-line and offense surrounding him is a butt hurt Lions fan. The guy has the most yards, a ton of touchdowns and Championships. You can still be one of the best while having great talent around you.

softshoes

July 3rd, 2016 at 4:08 PM ^

It's the same arguement people use against Chris Osgood. Oh you can't count him because anyone could have goaltended behind those Wings teams. Bullshit. Ozzie has over 400 wins/3 cups and that thinking is going to keep him out of the Hall. I hate the Cowboys but I don't see how  you can leave Smith of a list.

1 Jim Brown He's first, YPC puts him above all others.

2 Barry

3 Sweetness

4 Gale Sayers

5 Smith

ABOUBENADHEM

July 3rd, 2016 at 4:37 PM ^

one that thinks he was great as part of the Cowboy's system and OL? If you consider the team Barry was playing for and the fact that he quit playing with lots of gas left in the tank, I think there is/was no one better. And Barry did it all on his own. (Plus, I just like that he'd hand the ball to the ref no matter how great the play was that he had just made.)