His Dudeness

June 25th, 2015 at 11:29 AM ^

I live in Louisville. The fans here love it. The kids here love it.

On local radio yesterday they literally said "The uglier the better, as long as people are talking about Louisville, it's good."

I mean this team has never had traditional uniforms, they change every year,  so they may as well change them up and get people talking. I honestly dont think they are that bad. And if Adidas : Louisville :: Nike : Oregon  I think it would be pretty cool for the Louisville program.

aplatypus

June 25th, 2015 at 11:29 AM ^

Louisville fans appear to be having a positive overall reaction and like that adidas does lots of unique stuff for them. adidas won't do anything that crazy for Michigan anyway. Nike has done plenty of atrocious uniforms and UA has done pletny of atrocious uniforms. 

The background is the only actually bad thing about those images. 

UofM626

June 25th, 2015 at 11:32 AM ^

Company that is laser cutting there uniforms now. My buddies kid just got back from ASU and I guess moving forward each kids uni will be laser cut to fit that player perfectly. Supposedly he said it was a awesome process and they demonstrated how it is done and kids were blown away by it. Adidas has big plans from what I've seen and been told

MgoBlueprint

June 25th, 2015 at 12:00 PM ^

Nothing against you or your buddies kid, but I'll believe it when I see it. Back in 2008 there was a breakdown of each part of the Adidas football uniform with a caption about the technology and benefit. Even the socks were designed to enhance performance. A year or two later the trotted out and touted tech fit. The reality is that the jerseys were ill-fitting and of poor quality. It seems like the laser cut fittings are a marketing effort to get people excited, the uniforms will probably be the same mishmash of despair and cloth cobbled together.



Sent from MGoBlog HD for iPhone & iPad

His Dudeness

June 25th, 2015 at 11:37 AM ^

Michigan helmets are iconic though, and dont forget Hoke and DB actually DID change the helmets by adding off color numbers.

There is no iconic or traditional unifroms for Louisville Football so nobody cares when they change every other game.

These are also for the big time national spotlight game in Atlanta against Auburn so Adidas is doing their big reveal.

His Dudeness

June 25th, 2015 at 11:49 AM ^

I'm not sure either. I am guessing it was mostly DB, but it happened while Hoke was coach so it's in the "Hoke-era."

I just find it funny that people would blast RR about not knowing Michigan Traditions' "What's next, he gonna change the helmets? LOLZ?!?" and then Hoke came in and the helmets actually did change and nobody really said shit.

denardogasm

June 25th, 2015 at 11:41 AM ^

I think most people on this blog would write the same response if they didn't even look at the renderings.  It's much better than any alternate we've had in my opinion.  The only crazy thing is the undershirt.  The uniform itself is actually pretty simple.  I think it's pretty cool.  You have to keep in mind that Louisville doesn't have half the history of UM.

123blue

June 25th, 2015 at 11:42 AM ^

Said it before; saying it again now - All shoe companies make terrible uniforms if the schools so allow.  It's up to Michigan to maintain a STRONG veto over any garbage whether it be Nike, UA or Adidas.  

All that said, I think I'm seasick.

samsoccer7

June 25th, 2015 at 11:44 AM ^

I think the image background actually makes it looks MUCH worse than it really is.  If I was a Louisville fan, and without the same history as us or Bama or OSU or any of those caliber teams, I'd actually like this.  Seems they are going the Oregon Ducks route with those feathers and other things.  Overall, again, it's probably a plus for a team like Louisville.

aplatypus

June 25th, 2015 at 12:22 PM ^

the school doesn't have long rooted history, and adidas has made them their Oregon in the last couple years. They get a few of these special unis a year, like the ones they did for the FSU night game last year that people here would have hated, but Louisville fans almost all loved. 

Fan tastes are just widely diffrent. 

LandryHD

June 25th, 2015 at 11:47 AM ^

This board does not like anything. I think most of you would prefer watching players run around naked. The undershirt looks pretty cool but if it was the jersey then I would be a little meh.



Sent from MGoBlog HD for iPhone & iPad

ChiBlueBoy

June 25th, 2015 at 11:53 AM ^

Aesthetically some people are "less is more" and the rest are "more is more". In the mountains outside Louisville, the less is mores are regrouping and planning a counter-insurgency.

M-Dog

June 25th, 2015 at 11:54 AM ^

There is nothing different or special about uniformz anymore.  They've lost their ability to impress or even shock.  Every podunk wanna be school is doing it now, from Maryland to Louisville.  It's become a big yawn.

The more this shit happens the more the traditional retro unis like Penn State, Alabama, USC, Texas, and Michigan become cool . . . without doing a thing.

 

Don

June 25th, 2015 at 12:00 PM ^

Nailed it.

The powerful image-creation capabilities of design and illustration software combined with advanced methods of printing the images on fabric and curved plastic surfaces has now made all this complicated graphic stuff—much of which is visually lost to fans in the upper deck—commonplace and ordinary.

Less is indeed more. I just hope that Hackett and JH recognize that.

mGrowOld

June 25th, 2015 at 11:56 AM ^

I think they're cool as Hell and if the player was against a black background instead of what looks like an artist's rendering of what a Jerry Garcia fever-dream might look like you'd all see it.

goblue224

June 25th, 2015 at 11:57 AM ^

The problem here isn't with the uniforms its with the hideous background they used to clash with the uniforms. These probably would look sharp in a early season night game under the lights.