Home
i'm an actor, not a reactor

Primary links

  • About
    • $upport (lol)
    • Ethics
    • FAQ
    • Glossary
    • Privacy Policy
  • Contact
  • MGoStore
    • Hail to Old Blue
  • MGoBoard
    • MGoBoard FAQ
    • Michigan bar locator
    • Moderator Action Sticky
  • Useful Stuff
    • Depth Chart By Class
    • Hoops Depth Chart by Class
    • 2017 Recruiting Board
    • Unofficial Two Deep
    • MGoFlickr
    • Diaries, Windows Live Writer, And You
    • User-Curated HOF
    • Where To Eat In Ann Arbor
  • Schedule/Tix
    • Future Schedules (wiki)
    • Ticket spreadsheet
Home Forums MGoBoard

Navigation

  • Forums
  • Recent posts

User login

  • Create new account
  • Request new password

MGoElsewhere

  • @MGoBlog (Brian)
  • @aceanbender
  • @Misopogon (Seth)
  • @Aeschnepp (Adam)
  • @BISB
  • @EUpchurchPhoto
  • @FullOfTwitt (Fuller)
  • Hail to the Victors 2016
  • MGoFacebook
  • MGoPodcast
  • WTKA
  • Instagram

Michigan Blogs

  • Big House Blog
  • Burgeoning Wolverine Star
  • Genuinely Sarcastic
  • Go Blue Michigan Wolverine
  • Holdin' The Rope
  • MVictors
  • Maize 'n' Blue Nation
  • Maize 'n' Brew
  • Maize And Go Blue
  • Michigan Hockey Net
  • MMMGoBlueBBQ
  • The Blog That Yost Built
  • The Hoover Street Rag
  • The M Zone
  • Touch The Banner
  • UMGoBlog
  • UMHoops
  • UMTailgate
  • Wolverine Liberation Army

M On The Net

  • mgovideo
  • MGoBlue.com
  • Mike DeSimone
  • Recruiting Planet
  • The Wolverine
  • Go Blue Wolverine
  • Winged Helmet
  • UMGoBlue.com
  • MaizeRage.org
  • Puckhead
  • The M Den
  • True Blue Fan Forum

Big Ten Blogs

  • Illinois
    • Illinois Loyalty
    • Illinois Baseball Report
  • Indiana
    • Inside The Hall
    • The Crimson Quarry
  • Iowa
    • Black Heart, Gold Pants
    • Fight For Iowa
  • Michigan State
    • The Only Colors
  • Minnesota
    • GopherHole.com
    • The Daily Gopher
  • Nebraska
    • Corn Nation
    • Husker Max
    • Husker Mike's Blasphemy
    • Husker Gameday
  • Northwestern
    • Sippin' On Purple
    • Lake The Posts
  • Notre Dame
    • The House Rock Built
    • One Foot Down
  • Ohio State
    • Eleven Warriors
    • Buckeye Commentary
    • Men of the Scarlet and Gray
    • Our Honor Defend
    • The Buckeye Nine
  • Penn State
    • Slow States
    • Black Shoe Diaries
    • Happy Valley Hardball
    • Penn State Clips
    • Linebacker U
    • Nittany White Out
  • Purdue
    • Boiled Sports
    • Hammer and Rails
  • Wisconsin
    • Bruce Ciskie

Links of Note

  • Baseball
    • College Baseball Today
    • The College Baseball Blog
  • Basketball
    • Ken Pomeroy
    • Hoop Math
    • John Gasaway
    • Luke Winn/Sports Illustrated
  • College Hockey
    • Chris Heisenberg (Class of 2016)
    • College Hockey Stats
    • Michigan College Hockey
    • Hockey's Future
    • Sioux Sports
    • USCHO
  • Football
    • Smart Football
    • Every Day Should Be Saturday
    • Matt Hinton/Grantland
    • Football Study Hall
    • Football Outsiders
    • Harold Stassen
    • NCAA D-I Stats Page
    • The Wizard Of Odds
    • CFB Stats
  • General
    • Sports Central
  • Local Interest
    • The Ann Arbor Chronicle
    • Arborwiki
    • Arbor Update
    • Ann Arbor Observer
    • Teeter Talk
    • Vacuum
  • Teams Of The D
    • Lions
      • Pride of Detroit
    • Pistons
      • Detroit Bad Boys
      • Need4Sheed
    • Tigers
      • Roar Of The Tigers
      • Bless You Boys
      • The Daily Fungo
      • The Detroit Tigers Weblog
    • Red Wings
      • Winging It In Motown
      • On The Wings
    • Michigan Sports Forum

Beveled Guilt

Site Search

Diaries

  • New
  • Popular
  • Hot
  • This Month in MGoBlog History - April 2008: No Spring Game at the Big House! Hockey loses to ND in the Frozen Four!
    Maize.Blue Wagner - 2 days ago
  • Thirteen unlucky minutes (TL;DNR-This is a bit of rant about the refs)
    docwhoblocked - 2 weeks ago
  • Fan Satisfaction Index End of Season Bball Survey
    OneFootIn - 2 weeks ago
  • How likely are we to revert to the mean?
    Bo Glue - 3 weeks ago
  • It's time to avenge Villanova's 1985 NCAA tourney upset over Michigan
    Communist Football - 3 weeks ago
  •  
  • 1 of 2
  • ››
more
  • This Month in MGoBlog History - April 2008: No Spring Game at the Big House! Hockey loses to ND in the Frozen Four!
    Maize.Blue Wagner - 929 views
  • It's time to avenge Villanova's 1985 NCAA tourney upset over Michigan
    Communist Football - 11 comments
  • This Month in MGoBlog History - April 2008: No Spring Game at the Big House! Hockey loses to ND in the Frozen Four!
    Maize.Blue Wagner - 7 comments

MGoBoard

  • New
  • Recent
  • Hot
  • A piece of U-M broadcast history ends tonight.
    6 replies
  • Crootin': Joey Velazquez
    62 replies
  • OT: College Football video games coming back
    79 replies
  • LaMarr Woodley Opening K-8 School in Saginaw
    37 replies
  • SIAP: Jay Feely prom "controversy"
    36 replies
  • Pep and Partridge Pressers
    9 replies
  • Michigan Vs Notre Dame in 131 days
    72 replies
  • WBB Hello: 2020 G/W Makailah Griggs-Zeigler
    11 replies
  • Pep Hamilton on Shea: Can extend the play, make all the throws, plus other QB's
    124 replies
  • OT: Tigers at the 1/8th point
    47 replies
  • Elysee Mbem-Bosse apologizes
    66 replies
  • Baseball's win streak up to 20; beats PSU 14-2 for series sweep
    18 replies
  • OT: Lazy Sunday NBA/NHL playoffs open thread
    39 replies
  • Chris Partridge Presser From This Afternoon, video
    16 replies
  • Beaubien No-Hitter Clinches Sweep of Maryland, 8-0 (6 inn.)
    13 replies
  •  
  • 1 of 7
  • ››
  • SIAP: Jay Feely prom "controversy"
    36 replies
  • This Week/Weekend's Football Visitors
    56 replies
  • New in-state offer: 2020 CB Enzo Jennings
    15 replies
  • Notre Dame Spring Game: analysis from M n B, video
    119 replies
  • Game Day Condos - who's gonna buy one?
    81 replies
  • OT: Record Store Day 2018!
    38 replies
  • OT: Lazy Sunday NBA/NHL playoffs open thread
    39 replies
  • OT: Whose shirt did I buy? Also, thanks for the shirt
    43 replies
  • Michigan Football Hype Video 2018-19 Season
    32 replies
  • OT: RIP Verne Troyer
    58 replies
  • New in-state offer: 2020 TE/DE Braiden McGregor
    11 replies
  • Baseball's win streak at 19 after 11th inning walkoff over PSU
    16 replies
  • OT - LSU Spring Game Currently on ESPN/SEC Network
    33 replies
  • The Evolution of Commerce - What Industries are Dying, What's Thriving?
    148 replies
  • Michigan Mercies Maryland, Softball Wins 12-1 (5 inn.)
    18 replies
  • ‹‹
  • 2 of 7
  • ››
  • Belleville coach Jermain Crowell mad at UM again
    244 replies
  • Police investigating Elysee Mbem-Bosse for death threat against Harbaugh
    224 replies
  • "Being Not-Rich at UM" Guide
    168 replies
  • Semi-OT: What sports would you fix?
    158 replies
  • Elysee Mbem-Bosse disturbing tweets
    157 replies
  • Whats the Best Way to Make Flight Arrangements?
    149 replies
  • The Evolution of Commerce - What Industries are Dying, What's Thriving?
    148 replies
  • Pep Hamilton on Shea: Can extend the play, make all the throws, plus other QB's
    124 replies
  • OT - Jalen Hurts possibly looking to transfer
    121 replies
  • OT: best-selling musical artists by state of birth
    120 replies
  • Notre Dame Spring Game: analysis from M n B, video
    119 replies
  • No additional protest of Shea Patterson appeal by Ole Miss
    113 replies
  • NCAA changes rules to restrict James Doug Foug's super power
    107 replies
  • OT: MSU digs hole deeper, Engler adviser: Nassar survivor's claims of payout 'fake news'
    106 replies
  • Nebraska football
    105 replies
  •  
  • 1 of 7
  • ››

Support MGoBlog: buy stuff at Amazon

OT-Why is UCLA so Bad?

47 posts / 0 new
Login or register to post comments
Last post
December 12th, 2011 at 11:34 AM
#1
Ziff72
Joined: 07/07/2008
MGoPoints: 8249
OT-Why is UCLA so Bad?

I was reading Doc Saturdays write up on their new coach.  In the write up he explains how exceedingly mediocre they have been.   I grew up rooting for them after the UM/OSU game when they would then go to the UCLA/USC game.  I always considered the UCLA program as at the bottom end of college football royalty, but after being shown their production over the last 20 years they don't live up to that thought. 

Any MGO people in California or that have more intimate knowlege of the program understand why they are not successful?  It seems like a program that would be a sleeping giant, but yet no one seemed to want the job.   Tradition, recruiting base, weather.   They seem to have it all.  I just don't get it.

 

 

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
Tags:
  • MGoBoard
  • football

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
December 12th, 2011 at 11:40 AM
#2
AAB
Joined: 01/14/2009
MGoPoints: 7940
Don't live out there but

The obvious explanatations seem to be that they've hired a couple of atrocious coaches (I know Neuheisel is a name but every team he's ever coached has gotten worse during his tenure), and the fact that USC has been completely dominating southern California recruiting.  

Also, when I opened this thread I assumed it was going to be about the basketball team.  It cannot be fun to be a UCLA fan right now...

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
December 12th, 2011 at 11:47 AM
(Reply to #2) #3
massblue
massblue's picture
Joined: 08/15/2009
MGoPoints: 2658
I know the administrators. The president simply hates big time

college sports and hates idea of spending money on sports and facilites, espcially given the tough budget conditions.  Actually, I wish more schools were thinking the same way.  Also, consider where the campus is, right in the middle of the most expensive area of LA. There is very little college atmosphere.

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
December 12th, 2011 at 1:59 PM
(Reply to #8) #4
CalifExile
Joined: 03/02/2010
MGoPoints: 8735
The president's view is very

The president's view is very narrow and short sighted. Big time programs can generate excess revenue and provide prestige to the school.

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
December 12th, 2011 at 5:04 PM
(Reply to #25) #5
massblue
massblue's picture
Joined: 08/15/2009
MGoPoints: 2658
Can give you OSU, PSU, USC. ....

U of Chicago gave up on big time sports a long time ago. It has not hurt them much.  If there is a level playing field, the benefits will still be there without all of the head aches.

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
December 12th, 2011 at 11:41 AM
#6
Mr. Yost
Mr. Yost's picture
Joined: 07/25/2011
MGoPoints: -9898289
Easy...

They don't pay as much as USC.

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
December 12th, 2011 at 11:45 AM
(Reply to #3) #7
CRex
CRex's picture
Joined: 09/28/2009
MGoPoints: 9002
Yes

Also they don't invest in facilities.  

Also I feel like this entire thread was covered back on 10 December.

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
December 12th, 2011 at 11:42 AM
#8
ImSoBlue
ImSoBlue's picture
Joined: 07/10/2008
MGoPoints: 1038
Still a basketball school with no great football tradition . . .

than being a USC whipping boy.

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
December 12th, 2011 at 1:00 PM
(Reply to #4) #9
jmblue
Joined: 11/07/2008
MGoPoints: 56299
Their football tradition

Their football tradition isn't bad.  Alltime they've won 58.7% of their games and 17 conference titles. 

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
December 12th, 2011 at 11:43 AM
#10
MGoJoe
MGoJoe's picture
Joined: 10/02/2008
MGoPoints: 353
I was wondering the same

I was wondering the same thing about Oregon State, Colorado, among others.

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
December 12th, 2011 at 11:53 AM
(Reply to #5) #11
UMfan21
Joined: 09/28/2009
MGoPoints: 22992
posted from iPhone

Oregon state is in a small town in the middle of nowhere. Their facilities are not the best. They had some good years with Ochoa cinco, Steven Jackson, etc. but generally they have a good dline and the rest of the team is poor



Oregon suffers from the same general stuff, though Eugene is much larger than Corvallis. But Uofo is Nike funded so their facilities are top. Itch and that kick started the program.

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
December 12th, 2011 at 1:25 PM
(Reply to #11) #12
outwest
outwest's picture
Joined: 09/24/2009
MGoPoints: 1719
The real OSU

Oregon State also relies heavily on JuCo guys to fill out the roster.  If those players either don't pan out, or get hurt (as was the case this year) they stumble. 

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
December 12th, 2011 at 11:46 AM
#13
Sopwith
Sopwith's picture
Joined: 06/29/2010
MGoPoints: 21301
Not a UCLA insider...

... but I recall reading somewhere that UCLA's President/Board keep the pursestrings very, very tight on any facilities upgrades in the athletic dept and especially so for football.  As a result, they simply don't have the kind of facilities to compete in recruiting, and if you can't compete in recruiting, you can't compete, period. 

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
December 12th, 2011 at 11:49 AM
#14
ChopBlock
ChopBlock's picture
Joined: 12/11/2011
MGoPoints: 2434
it's easy...

They share a city with USC. Although, now that I think about it, two historical powerhouses can share the same geographic area and win year in and year out. Just take the instance of Michigan and Little Br..... ohh... wait...

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
December 12th, 2011 at 11:51 AM
#15
UMgradMSUdad
UMgradMSUdad's picture
Joined: 07/02/2011
MGoPoints: 9518
With the lack of investment

With the lack of investment in facilities and a higher academic standard, UCLA is at a distinct disadvange against some other schools, like USC. 

Illinois is another school that seems like it should be able to be successful in football but has struggled.

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
December 12th, 2011 at 12:16 PM
#16
NateVolk
NateVolk's picture
Joined: 07/19/2010
MGoPoints: 5548
In addition to the

In addition to the facilities, I hear that they are really cheap in hiring coaching staff. They ask coordinators and position coaches to work for less than market rate for big conference schools. Factor in the higher cost of living around that area, and it isn't an attractive spot for elite coaches.

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
December 12th, 2011 at 12:23 PM
#17
Elmer
Elmer's picture
Joined: 04/22/2011
MGoPoints: 5141
Coaching

Many good reasons have been listed, but hiring a good coach has been the main issue.  Back when they had Pepper Rodgers, Dick Vermeil and then Terry Donahue as head coach, they won a lot of games.

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
December 12th, 2011 at 12:28 PM
#18
markusr2007
markusr2007's picture
Joined: 10/21/2008
MGoPoints: 15664
Recruiting and when you start watching the movie

1. UCLA recruiting the last two years has really sucked 2010 (No. 56) and 2012 (No. 41ish).

2. Injuries - there's not a team aside from maybe Purdue that has had more misfortune in injuries. Also attrition has been an issue.

Regarding item 1, UCLA is talented. They had the No. 8 ranked class in 2010, the No. 5 ranked class in 2009 and No. 10 ranked class in 2008.

USC remains the dominant team on the recruiting side in southern California.

 

 

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
December 12th, 2011 at 12:31 PM
#19
Eye of the Tiger
Eye of the Tiger's picture
Joined: 09/14/2009
MGoPoints: 6277
Combination of several factors

1. The name.  Sure there was a time when UCLA attracted recruits like Troy Aikman, but USC has always been the region's brand name.  It's like Oklahoma State and Oklahoma, or Michigan and Sparty: sure, Little Brother can be good at times, but Big Brother's always going to have that cachet.  It's relatively harder for UCLA to attract national attention and recruits than USC.

2. The facilities.  They are not good.  Across town, USC's are fantastic.  Oregon's are fantastic. Arizona and Arizona State's are better.  

3. A very average approach to hiring (average) coaches.  Both Toledo (10-2 in 1997 and 1998) and Dorrell (10-2 in 2005) had some good seasons, but had a lot of 7-6, 6-6 seasons as well.  That makes them pretty average for the Pac-10, same as Oregon State, Arizona State or Arizona over that period.  Neuheisel was just bad. 

Is Jim Mora going to be Pete Carroll or Bill Callahan?  I'm guessing the latter, based on history.  

 

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
December 12th, 2011 at 12:58 PM
(Reply to #15) #20
befuggled
befuggled's picture
Joined: 07/01/2008
MGoPoints: 2646
Aikman was a transfer

He originally went to Oklahoma. Switzer went to a pro-style offense for Aikman, but when Aikman broke his leg against Miami (YTM), Switzer had to go back to the wishbone. Oklahoma won the rest of its games and a national title with a young Jamelle Holieway at QB, Aikman saw the writing on the wall and transferred to UCLA.

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
December 12th, 2011 at 2:02 PM
(Reply to #15) #21
blue note
blue note's picture
Joined: 02/04/2009
MGoPoints: 438
Just for the record, USC's

Just for the record, USC's facilities are actually really shitty and not what you would expect.

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
December 12th, 2011 at 2:15 PM
(Reply to #27) #22
PurpleStuff
PurpleStuff's picture
Joined: 04/21/2009
MGoPoints: 15963
True until recently

The Sports Arena made Crisler Arena look like the Staples Center and Heritage Hall is nowhere near as nice as most big programs have.  But the school just built a fantastic basketball arena and is currently building a $70MM athletic complex that will be in addition to the existing facilities:

http://dailytrojan.com/2010/10/31/usc-announces-new-student-athlete-faci...

They also just installed a new scoreboard at the Coliseum and are in the process of taking over control of the building from the Coliseum Commission (a quasi-government entity that had run the stadium as a historical landmark and made it nearly impossible to get necessary upgrades/improvements in years past).  The physical improvements on campus and in the surrounding neighborhood just in the last five years are also pretty remarkable as well.

This at a time when UCLA is going over budget and way behind schedule on the Pauley Pavillion renovations. 

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
December 12th, 2011 at 12:33 PM
#23
elaydin
elaydin's picture
Joined: 04/17/2010
MGoPoints: 2325
Everything negative that's

Everything negative that's been said about UCLA should also apply to Cal, yet Cal has been much better over the past 10 to 15 years than UCLA.  In fact, I would think UCLA has easier admissions and more tradition.

The difference has to be in the coaches they've hired.

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
December 12th, 2011 at 1:08 PM
(Reply to #16) #24
jmblue
Joined: 11/07/2008
MGoPoints: 56299
Cal's situation is very

Cal's situation is very different.  Cal is located a good 400 miles north of USC, so they don't share a recruiting territory.  Also, Cal has its own stadium.  UCLA doesn't, which is a significant problem.  But anyway, Cal has historically been terrible.  Only in the past decade have they been competitive.

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
December 12th, 2011 at 3:14 PM
(Reply to #22) #25
elaydin
elaydin's picture
Joined: 04/17/2010
MGoPoints: 2325
my point is that they have a

my point is that they have a lot of the same administration and similar resource issues.  The recruiting footprint is also similar, despite the SoCal/NoCal distance.

I do agree on the stadium, but UCLA still has more of a history and easier admissions, which should help recruiting more than the stadium hurts (and I would think playing in the Rose Bowl would be an advantage over a half empty Memorial Stadium).

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
December 12th, 2011 at 4:39 PM
(Reply to #36) #26
jmblue
Joined: 11/07/2008
MGoPoints: 56299
I don't think Cal and UCLA's

I don't think Cal and UCLA's admissions standards for athletes are any different.  (Even for non-athletes, I doubt there's much difference.)

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
December 12th, 2011 at 5:03 PM
(Reply to #40) #27
elaydin
elaydin's picture
Joined: 04/17/2010
MGoPoints: 2325
Back in the day, there used

Back in the day, there used to be.  But then they let in Russell White, and it all went to hell.

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
December 12th, 2011 at 3:28 PM
(Reply to #22) #28
Eye of the Tiger
Eye of the Tiger's picture
Joined: 09/14/2009
MGoPoints: 6277
Cal is good because

They hired a good coach.  

In the same period, UCLA hired two okay coaches and one terrible one.  

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
December 12th, 2011 at 12:50 PM
#29
bluebrains98
bluebrains98's picture
Joined: 01/14/2009
MGoPoints: 1524
UM and UCLA grad's take

Having gone to both schools (and being born and raised in LA), I have always said that the biggest issue with UCLA is the fact that their stadium is 20 miles away from campus. This has a profound ripple effect in that it takes loads of effort for students to get to games and greatly diminishes the gameday experience compared to a school like UM. The result is an apathetic fan base and virtually zero buzz about the program among the students or otherwise. I have often wondered about recruits visiting and going to campus and then sitting in traffic for an hour plus just to see the stadium--that can't help to lure elite talent. On top of everything else, most of their games are on local Fox Sports channels, usually not even broadcast in HD. Football simply isn't a priority, and it should be. They missed their opportunity to strike while USC should have been down, but they let USC dominate, even with one hand tied behind their back. Very sad.

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
December 12th, 2011 at 1:17 PM
(Reply to #17) #30
jmblue
Joined: 11/07/2008
MGoPoints: 56299
I think that's it exactly. 

I think that's it exactly.  Imagine having to drive to Detroit to watch Michigan play a home game.  That would be awful.  And the Rose Bowl, while a nice venue overall, is just too big for their fanbase.  When you draw 50,000 fans in a 90,000-seat stadium, it looks really bad. 

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
December 12th, 2011 at 1:56 PM
(Reply to #17) #31
WolverineHistorian
WolverineHistorian's picture
Joined: 08/10/2009
MGoPoints: 29531
They did take advantage when

They did take advantage when USC was down in the 90's.  Majorly down.  I remember the Trojans were so bad, they were often referred to as SC Community College by the media.  UCLA beat them 8 straight years in the 90's and they had a decent decade with a couple Rose Bowl trips.  Then when Cade McNoun graduated after the 98 season, everything went to hell.  Within a few years, Pete Carroll came to USC with the best players money could buy and the rest was history. 

UCLA was also decent during the 80's.  They played us in 89 and watching the game on tape, I was surprised when Keith Jackson mentioned how many games Terry Donahue had won.  His teams also went 8-4-1 in bowl games. 

But I think you nailed it.  If the students didn't have to go on a road trip just to get to their own stadium, maybe things might be a little different. 

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
December 12th, 2011 at 2:40 PM
(Reply to #24) #32
befuggled
befuggled's picture
Joined: 07/01/2008
MGoPoints: 2646
Three Rose Bowl wins in the eighties

They beat us in the 1983 game. Steve Smith separated a shoulder and little-used backup Dave Hall played in the second half. He threw two touchdown passes and a pick six. The score was 10-0 before Smith was hurt, so I'm not sure we would have won if he'd played the whole game.

They also slaughtered Illinois (45-9 in the 1984 game) and Iowa (45-29 in the 1986 game).

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
December 12th, 2011 at 1:08 PM
#33
96goblue00
96goblue00's picture
Joined: 08/17/2008
MGoPoints: 593
I am truly baffled by this....

I live in LA so I am little familiar with the territory. There are many reasons why Div I athletes should flock to its campus: (a) you have beautiful weather almost the entire year; (b) UCLA has a beautiful campus nestled in one of the nicest parts of LA (it actually has a college town feel); (c) academically it is one of the best schools in California and the entire country (Berkeley and Stanford are ranked slightly higher, and I am not counting Cal Tech because I am pretty sure that they do not have varsity football/basketball, etc.); (d) lots of beautiful ladies for the guys; (e) California is one of the big high school football states (along with Florida, Texas, Ohio) that produces a ton of D-I talent. What kid wouldn't want to play there? I am guessing that main reason is that UCLA does not have much of a tradition when it comes to football and is not known as a NFL factory. UCLA sort of lives in the shadow of USC when it comes to football, at least. The only reason why, imo, is USC's history but, other than that, imo UCLA is much more attractive for the reasons listed above. USC is in one of the worst neighborhoods in LA and I the campus itself is nowhere as nice as UCLA's.

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
December 12th, 2011 at 2:01 PM
#34
PurpleStuff
PurpleStuff's picture
Joined: 04/21/2009
MGoPoints: 15963
Recruiting

USC's dominace has definitely hurt, but UCLA has also failed to bring in the guys who don't go to SC.  I can think of a number of high profile kids out of southern California who passed on the Trojans, but none of them became Bruins.  Vontaze Burfict went to ASU, Desean Jackson went to Cal, Donovon Warren went to Michigan, DeAnthony Thomas went to Oregon, Darrell Scott went to Colorado.

They also haven't added any high profile players I can think of from outside of the area, at a time when Oregon is bringing in guys like LeMichael James from Texas, Stanford has recruited well nationally, and USC has added a ton of out of state talent (Mike Williams was from FL, Jarrett and Cushing were from NJ, McKnight was from LA, LenDale White was from CO, Fred Davis was from OH, Nick Perry and RoJo from MI, etc.).  This wasn't always the case when guys like Freddie Mitchell (FL), Cade McNown (OR), and Skip Hicks (TX) were leading UCLA to ten win seasons.

I don't think the stadium distance really factors into the ability to land recruits (the issue has always existed but UCLA didn't have the same problem in the past).  But poor facilities and poor coaching hires (Karl Dorrell?) at a time when schools like Oregon, Cal, and Stanford have had some of their most successful teams ever and USC has dominated on the field while going through significant upgrades off the field (actually higher than UCLA in USNEWS rankings now, continue to develop the area surrounding the campus and push back the more unsavory adjoining neighborhoods etc.) have doomed them to also ran status the last decade or so.

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
December 12th, 2011 at 2:32 PM
#35
ken725
ken725's picture
Joined: 10/26/2008
MGoPoints: 27659
Along with what everyone said

Along with what everyone said about the administration, they have really become just a basketball school. 

They also just hired Jim L. Mora Jr. who has flamed at every place he has been in the nfl.  With basically no college coaching experience who knows if he can actually recruit.  Maybe hiring a coach who did poorly in the NFL is a great plan it kind of worked out for USC. 

LA fans are obnoxious bandwagoners and fair weather fans.  There is nothing more that I want to see than UCLA beat USC, but it seems like that might not happen anytime soon. 

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
December 12th, 2011 at 2:40 PM
#36
bronxblue
Joined: 11/22/2008
MGoPoints: 59158
The coaching is one issue,

The coaching is one issue, but they also don't enjoy a monopoly on the LA scene (or at least a shared one with USC) that they probably had 10-15 years ago.  Yes, national programs like UM, OSU, Texas, ND, and MSU always recruited there to various degrees, but now you have kids going to Utah, Boise St., etc. that used to stick closer to home.  So that has to be part of it. 

But honestly, not every big-name school is going to be good at every sport, and UCLA was always viewed as a basketball school to me, and I'm guessing that is a sentiment shared by others.  And yes, I know that the UCLA president doesn't like to spend on facilities, support big-time sports, etc. - that's probably true at more schools than you think, yet at least some of them probably field better teams than UCLA does.

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
December 12th, 2011 at 3:13 PM
(Reply to #30) #37
Rabbit21
Rabbit21's picture
Joined: 11/12/2009
MGoPoints: 19366
Most Academics hate college

Most Academics hate college sports.  The problem is there's a difference between the ones that acknowledge reality and pay proper attention to Athletics knowing the potential payoffs and the ones who decide to be actively hostile and treat them as a necessary evil and as an unnecessary expense.  Block at UCLA is in the latter group and he was the same way at Virginia.

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
December 12th, 2011 at 3:06 PM
#38
Feat of Clay
Feat of Clay's picture
Joined: 08/10/2009
MGoPoints: 3698
All these responses and no

All these responses and no one wants to blame on it that weird blue color of their jerseys yet?

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
December 12th, 2011 at 3:13 PM
(Reply to #32) #39
Rabbit21
Rabbit21's picture
Joined: 11/12/2009
MGoPoints: 19366
That color is awesome!

That color is awesome!

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
December 12th, 2011 at 3:21 PM
(Reply to #32) #40
ken725
ken725's picture
Joined: 10/26/2008
MGoPoints: 27659
The powder blue is a classic

The powder blue is a classic when it comes to college uniforms. 

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
December 12th, 2011 at 6:38 PM
(Reply to #37) #41
M-Dog
M-Dog's picture
Joined: 07/06/2008
MGoPoints: 147117
Yes.  They're powder blue,

Yes.  They're powder blue, yet still different from Carolina blue.  They are very distinctive.  

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
December 12th, 2011 at 3:31 PM
#42
96goblue00
96goblue00's picture
Joined: 08/17/2008
MGoPoints: 593
five reasons to play at UCLA

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
December 12th, 2011 at 5:04 PM
(Reply to #39) #43
tjyoung
Joined: 08/23/2009
MGoPoints: 467
isn't

that 10 reasons?

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
December 12th, 2011 at 6:56 PM
(Reply to #43) #44
M-Dog
M-Dog's picture
Joined: 07/06/2008
MGoPoints: 147117
You win MGoBlog for today.

You win MGoBlog for today.

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
December 12th, 2011 at 7:00 PM
#45
vbnautilus
vbnautilus's picture
Joined: 10/04/2010
MGoPoints: 2385
UCLA is a mess

It basically comes down to money and effort.

My wife works at UCLA and I was there for many years as a grad student and later faculty (I'm now at USC so I also have some contrast). 

First of all, the entire UC system is a mess right now with the California state budget in crisis and they have been bleeding quality faculty and staff at every level, as people find other places to work instead of taking huge pay cuts or furloughs.   I can't imagine that they are going to have an easy time coming up with the increased salaries necessary for top level coaches and assistants in the current budgetary climate. 

Second, the culture at UCLA is pretty weak when it comes to football.  Coming from UM I was just totally disappointed at going to football games when I arrived at UCLA... you have to drive an hour plus to get to Pasadena crumbling Rose Bowl with empty seats.  The student body did not seem to care very much about the team... basketball was much more important to them. 

Most of the top schools have new state-of-the-art facilities.  UCLA has nothing to offer in that regard, nor are they any plans for it.    USC is putting a whole new building up right down the street from me for football, and the whole culture here is completely obsessed with it and devoted to it.   

UCLA is just not making football a priority.  

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
December 12th, 2011 at 8:16 PM
#46
WolvinLA2
WolvinLA2's picture
Joined: 11/13/2009
MGoPoints: 52761
I think battling USC in

I think battling USC in recruiting is way overblown. There are a ton of talent in Southern California (not to mention even more that would like to go there) and USC can only take 25 or so a year. Of the top 30 players in CA (all blue chips, 13 are committed to non-USC schools, 11 are uncommitted, and only one is committed to UCLA. So it's not that UCLA can't compete with USC for recruits, it's that UCLA can't compete with any of the teams recruiting CA. Cal, ND, and Oregon are all out-recruiting UCLA in California, and other schools like Michigan, Oklahoma and others are doing just as well.

In addition to all that, it's what others have said: No $$$ support for facilities or coaches and a stadium that's an hour drive away from campus are all things keeping UCLA from being good.

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
Powered by Drupal, an open source content management system
Theme provided by Roopletheme; sidebars adapted from Chris Murphy.