The Washington Post has a long piece about how injuries in the NFL may not be treated the same way as they would outside of football. The injury to RGIII in the Skins' playoff game has been the subject of much debate.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/sports/redskins/nfl-medical-standards-prac...
Do no harm? NFL’s medical dilemma.
There is medicine, and then there is NFL medicine, and the practice of the two isn’t always the same — a conflict that was never more apparent than during a January playoff game.
Below is a link to a graphic in the article showing injuries by year, by position and by average weeks a player is on an NFL injury report.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/sports/nfl-injuries-increasing/2013/03/16/...


“We hear all the time that players know what they signed up for, know the risk,” said Smith, the players’ union chief. “And with respect to those players and their beliefs, that’s fine. We are not challenging what they believe. Nonetheless, the employers still have an obligation to provide a workplace as safe as possible.”
One of the most illuminating parts of this piece, in my opinion, comes when they talk about the disparity in the level of detail given to players about their injury versus the level of detail provided to the team. It seems to me that "informed consent" is an essential component to intelligently evaluating risk and that, in the end, the players should be fully advised of their condition.
Smith is also correct, I believe. At the end of the day, it is the team's obligation to provide a safe workplace, or at least as safe as possible. There might be only so much you can do in the NFL, but it seems clear that more could definitely be done. Keeping your employees fully informed of incidents (whether it happens to the employee or others) is part of that in most other workplaces, including mine (we have linemen, substation people, and others who do dangeous work), but we are also rquired by law to have a certain level of reporting as well as knolwedge sharing.
I would have to think that having outside medical services which are not beholden to team management would help some. Removing team interests from the equation and making it something closer to the patient-doctor relationship with full disclosure probably would extend some careers (and therefore maximize the success) of quite a few players.
Interesting read. Thanks for sharing that.
"Funny isn't it, how naughty dentists always make that one fatal mistake."
Follow the random tweets of a Michigan alum - http://twitter.com/#!/LorneEC3