In reply to by lbpeley

FauxMo

February 16th, 2017 at 9:57 AM ^

Niiicccceeee. I love it when people make the most dick-hole-ish interpretation of a comment and run with it. 

No dude, I think a LOT of people on this board hope the situation is bad in general, without really thinking about the particular circumstances, so the punishment is more severe. And if you think those people don't exist, you probably don't get out much... 

ijohnb

February 16th, 2017 at 10:34 AM ^

fear for Sparty (if I have any, which I really don't, at all) is that these current allegations are part of a culture within their athletic department, and that they will make the mistake of addressing these allegations as something obstensible "entirely seperate" from the Nassar investigation and occurences in the past when really there is a toxic element within their athletic department in this regard that needs to be addressed in its entirety.

In other words, because there are likely to be arrests in this case which apparently involves one single incident, it gives them the option to make it look like "problem solved" while actually just sweeping it under the rug/kicking it down the road, and it will later come out that there was actually some connective feature to all of this that is may be more sinister or problematic. 

That may not be the case at all, but the media silence on this issue leads me to believe that there is more to this story and what is being investigated within the MSU football program than just one isolated sexual assault.  I think it would be very wise for them to air out all of their dirty laundry in the light least flattering to them initially as opposed to engaging in anything that could remotely be considered a cover-up at a later date.

 

In reply to by ijohnb

Artie

February 16th, 2017 at 10:36 AM ^

I'd say time will tell, but I said that with the Payne and Appling deal, too. This is a bit more high profile though so I don't think this can get swept under the rug with a big sympathy campaign.

In reply to by ijohnb

bringthewood

February 16th, 2017 at 11:30 AM ^

John U Bacon talks about not turning a one day story into a three day story - or in this case a one 3 month storu into a three year story. It's also like financial reportting - if yoiu are going to have a bad quarter try to move everything bad you can into that quarter.

It would be wise of MSU to bring everything forward, clean it up and take whatever PR, NCAA and legal hits they need at one time. You can see what happens when you dribble it out over time like PSU and Baylor. Don't try to hide shit - bring to light whatever you need to - no coverups. If that means more coaching retirements then so be it.

In reply to by Blue Know It

umumum

February 16th, 2017 at 10:20 AM ^

I see nothing in either of the two links that says that the warrants are "arrest warrants".  They may be.  But they may also simply be applications for search warrants or evidentiary warrants.

xtramelanin

February 16th, 2017 at 5:53 PM ^

it's up to the prosecutor to make a decision - charge or not, and if charge, who and what crimes.   it is not uncommon for the police to be more aggressive in their desire to charge than a prosecutor is when it actually comes to filing a case.  

one other possibility is to send the case back to the cops for further investigation.   there was internet talk earlier about cell phone stuff and those companies tend to move very slowly even in the face of search warrants as it relates to producing information.  if the phones were seized, that too takes time to do the analysis also possibly further delaying the decision time.

EDIT:  espn article says that the prosecutor asked for more information/investigation.  link is here: http://www.espn.com/college-football/story/_/id/18696990/michigan-state…

 

 

evenyoubrutus

February 16th, 2017 at 9:47 AM ^

The user who originally "broke" this situation on Scout (supposedly he is a former player and he was spot on about this before anyone else) claimed that the reason for the delay in releasing this information was as a "favor" to MSU. It was initially supposed to be released middle of last week but they delayed it. Seems like an odd situation to offer up a favor to someone.

Magnus

February 16th, 2017 at 9:51 AM ^

Once things like this are out of the box, you can't put them back in. Whatever players' names are released, they will be forever tainted, even if the allegations are false or overblown. I don't see a huge problem with delaying the release of information in order to let everyone get their ducks in a row. 

Everyone wants speed when it comes to these investigations, but it's more important to be accurate.

RGard

February 16th, 2017 at 10:01 AM ^

Not really.  Their football coach, AD, Finance guy in charge of the police dept, and president spiked an eyewitness report of child sexual abuse.

The alumni keep electing trustees who want to claim there was nothing done wrong there.

I'd change your comment to:

"Penn State has a really sordid history"

Wolverine Devotee

February 16th, 2017 at 10:03 AM ^

I meant results on the field. 

They should've gotten the death penalty and booted from the conference. I called for it back then when it happened and people said it was too much on here.

Baylor should get it. Join the Southland Conference for 5 years.

hunterjoe

February 16th, 2017 at 10:08 AM ^

Why should/do results on the field matter in either of these situations?  Narrow minded at best to put that into either of these discussions.  Both of these situations have absolutely nothing to do with results on the field.  These events changed peoples lives, ruined many of them.  Who gives a flying fuck about results on the field? 

Huzilla

February 16th, 2017 at 10:28 AM ^

This is definitely going to hurt the MSU program, and rightly so.  Stop forcing words into WD's mouth that he clearly doesn't support.  If you care so much about survivors and about punishing abusers, you should be able to understand *exactly* what WD is saying.

MSU (and its 3 suspended players) will get exactly what they deserve.  

ijohnb

February 16th, 2017 at 10:43 AM ^

this involves one incident and there are literally just four actors involved including the coach, and all of them are booted from the program and the legal systems runs its course, I don't really see why this would have any long term impact on the MSU program.  It will hurt them on the field to lose these players right now, but if they handle it properly and it is confined to this incident, why do you think the "program" would be tainted in a Penn-State-esque fashion?  It could be that there is nothing systemic about this.