OT: Tigers v Rangers

Submitted by Geaux_Blue on

Early struggles by Cabrera is country strong and brings it to 3-5. Fielding error and nice hit puts Tigers at the corners, 2 outs, bottom of the 3rd

Indiana Wolverine

July 19th, 2010 at 8:51 PM ^

has had his bumps along the way but I like what I see from the guy overall.  Sad to say but Bondo is a 4 starter and nights like this are going to happen to your 4/5 guys especially in the AL 

steelymax

July 19th, 2010 at 11:44 PM ^

Maybe your forgot the "best lineup in baseball" with the second highest payroll in 2008 was good enough to get them last place.

Not to mention failing to clinch the division in the final game of the regular season twice since he's been here.

Yeah, he helped the team to a World Series in 2006, but remember they did lose to the worst team to ever win it all.

Not saying the Tigers should win it all every year, but he doesn't make adjustments... as evidence by this team consistently scoring early in games and getting shut out as the game goes on. Also having hot streaks early in the season only to falter in the second half.

OMG Shirtless

July 19th, 2010 at 11:57 PM ^

2006: The Tigers finish above .500 for the first time in more than a decade and go to the World Series.

2007: Tigers remain in contention until the final month, despite the team's pitching staff spending more than 400 days on the disabled list.

2008: The Tigers make a huge trade and get Miguel Cabrera and Dontrelle Willis in the off-season. Everyone expects the Tigers to win the World Series. Cabrera has a good year, but Willis turns out to be a complete train wreck. Other key players do not perform anywhere near their norms, including Justin Verlander, Kenny Rogers (hurt), Jeremy Bonderman (hurt), Joel Zumaya (hurt), Edgar Renteria (just plain sucked). The team is unable to weather all those injuries and off-years and finishes last.

2009: Going into the season, nobody expected much, yet the team forces a 163rd game. Still it wasn't a cakewalk, as there were key injuries and huge falloffs from career norms by key players. Magglio provided nothing most of the year; ditto for Guillen. Granderson and Polanco had huge drops from their career norms. The catcher we acquired hit far below than expected. Inge's knees rendered him essentially useless in the 2nd half. On the mound, a huge comeback by Verlander and unexpectly good seasons by Porcello and Jackson were tempered by zero production from Willis, a huge dropoff from Galarraga, and injuries to Bonderman, Robertson and Zumaya.

2010: Most people don't expect much going into spring training, as this is viewed as a retooling year. But at the halfway mark, the Tigers are in the thick of things, despite having only one consistent starting pitcher and black holes at C and SS.


Stop me at the part where the manager has done such a piss-poor job. Because I just don't see it.

http://www.motownsports.com/forums/detroit-tigers/83823-has-jim-leyland…

chitownblue2

July 20th, 2010 at 10:42 AM ^

Can you come up with examples for playoff teams that lost 2/5 of their rotation for virtually the entire year, and had a 3rd starter curl up a die (Willis)? Was Willis Leyland's fault?

steelymax

July 20th, 2010 at 1:42 PM ^

Of course not everything is the manager's fault. Every team has to deal with bad luck.

But there is a distinct trend of second-half failures every season Leyland has managed in Detroit... and with all the players and coaches who have come and gone the last 4 and a half seasons the only common factor is the manager.

I suppose Bobby Cox has never had injured pitchers his 20 years of managing the same team....

chitownblue2

July 20th, 2010 at 1:45 PM ^

I asked a very specific question pertaining to your prior statement. I'm not saying it hasn't happened - but show me these playoff teams that lost 3/5 of their opening day rotations. You've said "you bet" Bobby Cox has dealt with it. Put your money where your mouth is. Did he, or are you going to keep dodging with generalities?

bronxblue

July 20th, 2010 at 7:48 AM ^

Would you prefer we return to the Buddy Bell era of complete irrelevance?  They have finished with a losing record exactly once since 2006, and this year they'll probably finish with a winning record as well.  It wasn't that long ago that this team challenged the modern record for losses in a season.  I'll take some annoying loses as long as we never have to go through consecutive losing seasons.  You think it is fun being a Pirates or Royals fan right now?  Even if Leyland doesn't lead this team to a WC title any time soon, he has instilled a sense of winning that you simply cannot let go if you are a mid-sized baseball market. 

jeag

July 20th, 2010 at 10:38 AM ^

The Buddy Bell years are underrated by most. You could pick up the 8 dollar pepsi seats, eat your hot dog and pop, and then go sit between the dugouts. The games always featured plenty of offense. Also, you didn't have to worry about the drunk guy or whiny kid sitting next to you, because nobody was sitting next to you.

Yinka Double Dare

July 20th, 2010 at 11:12 AM ^

For those that can look past his, uh, colorful personality, he's actually acknowledged as one of the best handlers of a pitching staff around.  The low rate of injuries to their starting pitchers since Ozzie has been the manager can't be a fluke.  And he does it with both vets and young pitchers.

Of course, even the magic of the Ozzie/Don Cooper/Herm Schneider trio couldn't keep Peavy from another random injury. 

bronxblue

July 19th, 2010 at 10:56 PM ^

When I saw it was 2-0, I had a horrible feeling Guillen would swing at the next pitch and hit into a DP.  This team can hit at times, but far too often they leave guys on base when they should just take what the pitcher is giving them and not try to drive it over the fence.