OT-Sports Reporters on ESPN

Submitted by modaddy21 on

Freaking Jemele Hill..says  " The most dominating performance by an athlete yesterday may not have been on the gridiron, but on the hard court where Kim Clijsters won her third U.S. Open title."

 

You gotta be kidding me.

Fuzzy Dunlop

September 12th, 2010 at 10:53 AM ^

I think you're being generous.  He clearly said that the show was a "waste of time," based solely on the fact that one reporter had the gall to mention a tremendous accomplishment in women's tennis rather than joining the (well-deserved) national Denard Robinson tongue bath.  No duh that football is the most popular sport in the country - doesn't mean that no one can mention great accomplishments in other sports. 

Speed Kills

September 12th, 2010 at 2:19 PM ^

No, you're wrong. I think Sports Reporters is always a waste of time and not only for what they choose to focus on, but also their commentary on said topics.

I don't think women's sports are a joke, but I would have given more validity to their assessment if Clijsters would have defeated one of the Williams sisters or perhaps involved in a really exciting game (6-2, 6-1 is lame no matter the gender). I apologize if my heart didnt skip a beat when I was told she defeated Vera Zvonarev (who? exactly)...

 

Flying Dutchman

September 12th, 2010 at 10:16 AM ^

Beating Notre Dame, AT Notre Dame, with 502 yards of total offense, in your 2nd start....

... far more impressive (to me) than any stupid women's tennis title.

Jemele Hill is like the Ellen DeGeneres of sports reporters, but less funny.

Beavis

September 12th, 2010 at 10:31 AM ^

Jemele Hill grinded her axe pretty hard against Rich Rod - to the point I may or may not have sent her a profanity-laden, drunken email. 

She sucks.  And is a Spartan.  So f*** her.