OT: Soccer stuff - Analysis of Hex Table to date

Submitted by superstringer on

This is for soccer junkies.

I look at the current standings of the Hex -- Panama in first on 5; CR, Hnduras and USA tied for 2d on 4; Mexico in fifth (!) on 3; Jamaica in last on 2. Obviously USA is in good shape, after a couple dramatic games.  But it's just a temporary snapshot, 3 of 10 games completed.  It's not a fair analysis because each team's schedule is so different, some have had hard ones while other easy ones.

I wanted to mathematically account for how hard a schedule each team has had to date.  When you apply some subjective metrix to each team's schedule, it turns out, we are in REALLY GREAT shape. Like, book your tickets to Rio good shape.  And Mexico shouldn't be freaking.  And you can easily explain why Panama is, right now, top of the table.

Here's my subjective part of the analysis. I assigned points -- from1 to 20 -- on how difficult it is to play each team in the Hex, both at your home (that is, how good is the other team on the road) and at their home (how good is a team at its home)? As an example, the hardest game in the Hex for anyone is a road game at the USA -- we're undefeated in 20-something WC home qualifiers. Mexico is real hard to play in Mexico too, but oddly, not quite as good at home as we are.  So for any team, a road game at USA is 20 points of difficulty.  Similarly, easiest game in the Hex is playing Panama at your home, that is, Panama on the road is the least competitive.  So a home game against Panama is 1 point of difficulty.  Etc. etc. for all 6 teams in the Hex, both road and away.

Then, I added up all these points on each team's schedule. Because a team doesn't play itself, the degree of difficulty of each team's schedule varies. I judge Mexico that hardest team overall to play (I think considering how they play at home and on the road, Mexico is tougher to play than USA), so Mexico ends up with the easiest overall schedule (because Mexico is not on Mexico's schedule). Etc.

Next, I added up how hard each game has been for each team to date, after 3 games.  So you can see, based on my subjective valuations of how hard each team is to play at home or on the road, who's had the easiest schedule so far, and what's left for each team in terms of overall difficulty, relative to other team's schedules.

Here's a chart (!!!) totalling all of this.  If you don't like my subjective points for how hard it is to play each team at home or on the road, copy this into Excel, you can reassign the points.  Bold/underlined numbers are games already played.  The way to read this is, each team's schedule is read horizontally, across the row -- so the first row, Mexico, shows it has played two home games (vs USA and Jamaica), and one road game (vs Honduras):

  DIFFICULTY OF PLAYING THESE TEAMS AT YOUR HOME   DIFFICULTY OF PLAYING THESE TEAMS AT THEIR HOME   TO DATE    
  Mexico USA Honduras Costa Rica Panama Jamaica Mexico USA Honduras Costa Rica Panama Jamaica Total To Date Pct To Date Remaining
POINTS: 15 11 9 5 1 2 19 20 14 11 10 12        
Mexico   11 9 5 1 2   20 14 11 10 12 95 27 28% 68
USA 15   9 5 1 2 19   14 11 10 12 98 38 39% 60
Honduras 15 11   5 1 2 19 20   11 10 12 106 36 34% 70
Costa Rica 15 11 9   1 2 19 20 14   10 12 113 32 28% 81
Panama 15 11 9 5   2 19 20 14 11   12 118 26 22% 92
Jamaica 15 11 9 5 1   19 20 14 11 10   115 31 27% 84

 

The results exactly confirm sort of what you'd have expected, and particularly, why Panama is on top:

-- USA has, by far, played the toughest schedule to date -- two road games at Honduras and Mexico.  And we have, by far, the easiest remaining schedule.

-- Panama has, by far, played the softest schedule to date -- the only road game was at Jamaica, home games against CR and Honduras.

-- Mexico has had, relatively speaking, almost as easy a schedule to date at Panama.

And that bodes real well for USA -- we've gotten past 39% of the toughness of our schedule (after only 30% of games completed). So our remaining schedule is BY FAR softer than any other team's in the Hex. Four points after two road games at Honduras and Mexico? Yes please thank you.

And it might explain why Panama is up in first place. It's been easy on them so far; but Panama has, by far, the most difficult schedule remaining. Enjoy your time at the top of the table, Panama; you'll need a parachute for where you're going the rest of the way.

And Mexico isn't really in big trouble. While they've played a really soft schedule to date, they have the second-easiest schedule remaining -- the only really tough game for them is at USA (probably guaranteed not to be a win for Mexico).

mgobaran

March 27th, 2013 at 12:34 PM ^

However in the world that we got a point last night is beyond me. It is only a 1 point swing in terms of if we lost or tied, but I think it will help us much more on a confidence level than it does in our standings.

gjking

March 27th, 2013 at 12:49 PM ^

We are tied for 2nd place on points after 3 games, and the 3 teams we've played are the teams that finished 2nd, 3rd, and 4th in the hex for the 2010 world cup, which we won. Also, 2 of these 3 games were away. Yes, we are in great shape.

Next up in June is Jamaica on the road, Panama in Seattle, and Honduras in Salt Lake. If we get >= 6 points from those 3 games, we'll be extremely well positioned. 5 or 4 wouldn't be too bad. 3 or fewer would be troublesome.

 

 

 

 

AnthonyThomas

March 27th, 2013 at 1:17 PM ^

We should get at the very least least six points from those three games. I could easily see us getting all nine, just going on past results. We should win both games at home, and Jamaica are very beatable in Kingston, regardless of what happened there last year.

AnthonyThomas

March 27th, 2013 at 3:35 PM ^

It's not really optimism, it's realistic. We haven't lost at home in a qualifier in a while. Jamaica simply aren't very good. We've beaten them before. Of course qualifying is difficult, but beating teams that are less talented should be expected, especially at home. We beat Honduras in San Pedro Sula in 2009, drawing at Azteca is certainly the equivalent to winning in a place like Kingston, etc. Six points should be the minimum expectation from that set of fixtures.

MaizeAndBlueWahoo

March 27th, 2013 at 5:52 PM ^

Jamaica did earn a tie at Azteca as well, so while we're thumping our chests over that result, we might be smart to remember we're not the only ones.  And they're ranked right next to Costa Rica at the moment.  A team that's good enough to beat us at their place, which they did last round, is good enough to take seriously and not as an automatic three points.

AnthonyThomas

March 27th, 2013 at 12:52 PM ^

Cool analysis.

I would rate Costa Rica above Jamaica in terms of toughness, though. The US has never won there. 

We definitely are in good shape after last night. The Honduras match was not an ideal start to the Hex, but the boys bounced back nicely.

CliffSnotes

March 27th, 2013 at 1:07 PM ^

Nicely put together, Superstringer.

I also like Grant Wahl's idea of tracking the "Win at home, Tie on the Road" Theory, which would get you 20 pts in the Hex.  He suggests giving 0 pts for the desired result of a home win or road tie.  You get +2 for a road win, but you are penalized 2 pts for a tie at home and penalized only 1 pt for a road loss.  It doesn't take into account schedule difficulty, but it gives a clearer picture of "defending your turf", and if you have ground to make up.  Here's the current standings based on this measure:

 

USA             -1

Costa Rica -1

Panama      -2

Honduras   -3

Jamaica      -3

Mexico         -4

 

Combining your chart with Wahl's Index, it shows that not only does the USA have the easiest remaining schedule, but we are right on track. Meanwhile for Mexico, while they do have an easier remaining schedule, they need to make up some ground, as they've endured two home ties.  If Mexico doesn't win any road games, it is imperative that they win out at home.

 

Michiganguy19

March 27th, 2013 at 1:36 PM ^

should allow us to move to the top of the rankings 2 good wins at home, and maybe at least a tie on the road, would give us 11 pts through six games. And put us on pace for around 18-20pts, well into qualification, esp based on how teams are tieing and competing.

MGlobules

March 27th, 2013 at 2:25 PM ^

it will put a smile on his face. Just watched the first and last 10-15 minutes last night, which featured a cannonade of Mexico shots at Guzan's body, but the back line held. In the early going, meanwhile, we really looked at times like a top-flight squad. Another strong finisher like to go with Clint Dempsey (I'm looking at you, Landon Donovan). I'm holding out hope that this team can round into solid form for Rio, be pushing our way down among the top 25 squads, or so, make some noise on the world stage. I'm not a terribly knowledgeable fan; is that a reasonable hope to entertain?

P.S. A NYTimes article about the match this morning seems to hint that Dempsey is not fond of Klinnsman; anyone else got a whiff of this? I also saw Alexei Lalas quoted as saying that Donovan was completely burnt out, which I sympathize with. . . 

I love watching those two teams play, btw. A lot of the Mexico players are really cool. 

ken725

March 27th, 2013 at 3:16 PM ^

Do you have a link?

I think Donovan might be done with the USMNT.  I'm just happy he is finally back with the Galaxy.  Hopefully gonna make it a 3-peat this year.

I'm not saying the Mexico players aren't cool, I just hate that team.  For me, El Tri is the soccer version of Ohio State.

I Bleed Maize N Blue

March 27th, 2013 at 5:42 PM ^

NYT: "For U.S., Tie in Mexico Feels a Lot Like Victory"

Asked yet again about a recent story in The Sporting News in which some players anonymously questioned his tactics and leadership, Klinsmann said: “My job is to help them to reach the next level and to challenge them. I’m not here to pamper anybody. So maybe we have a little argument down the road. But in order to hopefully elevate the program — we want to break into the best 10-12 nations in the world one day down the road — I have to challenge them, and maybe some players are not always complimentary.”

Sporting News: "Friendly fire: U.S. coach Jurgen Klinnsmann's methods, leadership, acumen in question"

NYT piece from last week on Landon Donovan:  "The Missing Piece"

AnthonyThomas

March 27th, 2013 at 5:51 PM ^

I think Donovan will be convinced to come back. I understand too why he might be burnt out, but he's also gotten a pretty substantial amount of rest and separation from the national team over the last year. He's always had a ton of pride in playing for the national team, and i couldn't see him passing up a chance to play in a World Cup in Brazil.

MichiganTeacher

March 27th, 2013 at 10:47 PM ^

We're also in a much better position now because we seem to have found a center back, and possibly a center back pairing, in Gonzalez and, maybe, Besler. Also, say what you want, but Beasley was a beast in the snow in Denver and held up reasonably well last night considering that Mexico relentlessly attacked through his spot after he got the early yellow.

Can't quite put a finger on it but Denver and Azteca were the first two times I ever felt like I was watching a 'settled' team rather than an experimental one under Klinsy. Took too long, but better late than never. Especially last night, they had a clear tactical plan to play tight and force long balls, keep everything in the air, and play for grind and counterattack, which has pretty much always been our style.

I was as big a doubter as anyone after Honduras (well, after all of 2012 really), but this past week has given me a lot of hope.