OT: Season tickets a challenging sell at Iowa

Submitted by Baughlieve on

It sounds like Iowa fans have had enough. Reading some of the comments section, most people are putting the blame on Barta(the AD) for keeping Ferentz.

Now, the athletic department takes on the challenge of keeping season ticket-holders coming back to Kinnick Stadium. And they do so with data from a survey of Football Bowl Subdivision schools that showed just 64 percent of Iowa's 2014 season ticket-holders who responded were likely to renew.

The cost of season tickets will remain the same as last season — $395 for the general public, $325 for faculty and staff — with some enhancements added. If fans order season tickets by March 13, they'll receive $70 to spend at Kinnick's concession stands during games and a 30 percent discount off all items purchased during one visit to Herky's Locker Room before the season starts.

http://www.hawkcentral.com/story/sports/college/iowa/football/2015/02/16/season-football-tickets-challenging-sell-iowa/23465031/

west2

February 16th, 2015 at 6:41 PM ^

thats better than Ferentz? It has to be someone willing to go there and hiring an unknown might be better but the odds are against it.

justingoblue

February 16th, 2015 at 7:03 PM ^

Even with a few terrible years recently, he's still winning at an above average rate for Iowa (.575 to .530), and brought Iowa their first win in a BCS bowl since 1959. He also took them to 12 of their 26 bowl games, had three consecutive top ten finishes (which Fry never accomplished) and was national coach of the year at one point.

I'm not saying Ferentz should be a model of 21st century football strategy or that Iowa shouldn't fire him, but he's got a much better resume than Beckman (and a lot of other coaches out there).

Tater

February 17th, 2015 at 2:09 AM ^

To be fair, Hayden Fry was 143-89-6 at Iowa, for what I think is a .616 winning percentage (sorry, I don't remember what to do with the ties).  Ferentz going .575 is not as good as his predecessor.  

For comparison, Brady Hoke went .608 and we all wanted him gone by the end of this season.  I can see why Iowa fans are fed up.

jmblue

February 16th, 2015 at 8:46 PM ^

Ferentz's tenure has grown stale, but to say Beckman is "10X better than him" is crazy.  There's a reason Ferentz got that huge contract in the first place.  At one time he was one of the hottest coaches in the country.

At this point with Ferentz, it seems like Iowa will always win 6-8 games and play in some minor bowl.  That's not hugely satisying, but at a school that really has no recruiting base, things could be worse.  I mean, for all the grief Ferentz gets, he's actually beaten us in four of the last five meetings.

 

 

 

M-Dog

February 16th, 2015 at 10:25 PM ^

Everyone has beaten us in four of the last five meetings.  That's why we fired two of the last three coaches.

K-State has even less of a recruiting base than Iowa, and they manage to be competitive.  I can see how Iowa fans don't want to settle for being a glorified MAC team.

Sac Fly

February 17th, 2015 at 8:20 AM ^

Ferentz torpeoded his own program when he panicked and hired Greg Davis. They lost their pro-style, ground and pound identity by asking lanky downfield wide receivers to run underneath the coverage and pick up YAC.

He's also the worst game manager in the history of football.

LSAClassOf2000

February 16th, 2015 at 6:50 PM ^

General public numbers have dipped from 40,506 in 2011 to 37,823 last season. Faculty/staff has dropped over that same time period from 4,438 to 4,005. And student sales have fallen from 10,513 to 6,440.

That student number is pretty remarkable really, but you're getting to a point now where some of these student probably have most of their lives coinciding with the time Ferentz has been at Iowa and they cannot remember not punting from their opponent's 35 yard line. I can see where they might want to experiment with other forms of football, maybe even throwing to someone that isn't a tight end. You never know. 

mGrowOld

February 16th, 2015 at 7:01 PM ^

Can't remember not punting from the opponents 35? Shoot just pull out the tapes from any Michigan-Iowa game firing Frenemtz's tenure and you'll see all kinds of gadget plays, 4th down conversions and other "balls to the wall" play calling he shows no other school.

For some reason the site of our helmets cause opponent coaches to go completely batt-shit crazy and then poof. Back to puntasourois-rex.

PurpleStuff

February 16th, 2015 at 7:52 PM ^

$395 (for close to the worst seats in the building) amounts to $56 per ticket over 7 games.  Two of those games are against Illinois State and North Texas.  Let's generously say those games are worth $20 a piece on the open market, and you are still talking about the season ticket price (you know, where you are supposed to get value because you're going to every game and making a bigger investment) being over $150 a game for a pair of tickets to see Pitt, Illinois, Maryland, Minnesota, and Purdue.  Would anyone who isn't a batshit crazy Hawkeye fanatic pay that much to see one of those games?

That's the problem.

UPDATE: Just checked the Iowa website and noticed that someone willing to skip that big rivalry game with Maryland could spend the same $150 on a pair of season tickets to all 20 UI baseball games.  Just $125 if you are bringing your kid between the ages of 6-18.  Kids 5 and under are free, so you can take the whole gang for a low price if you're a serious breeder.

gwkrlghl

February 16th, 2015 at 7:44 PM ^

Just think, at least we're not Iowa. When has anything nationally interesting been won by Iowa? 1980 final four? 1958 feaux football national title?

No wrestling doesn't count

gwkrlghl

February 16th, 2015 at 9:24 PM ^

but it's very much a niche sport. Iowa hasn't been nationally elite in football or basketball in....decades? Makes me appreciate our suffering a bit even though it sucked because a lot of teams would kill to get to that position. 2011 hockey national title game, 2013 basketball national title game, 1v2 game with OSU. A lot of other schools would dream to even get to the position where they play in a game like that

SFBlue

February 16th, 2015 at 10:18 PM ^

They have had some fine seasons, and hard fought wins over Michigan. The 1985 loss to Iowa may have been the bitterest of the Bo era. And under Ferentz they have won exactly as many BCS bowls as Michigan in the last 15 years, plus Ferentz is 6-6 in bowls overall, which is great given the B1G record over that same period. I understand his program has been mediocre the last four or five years, but let's get some perspective here.

PurpleStuff

February 16th, 2015 at 8:21 PM ^

Since that special 1995 season (more than the lifetime of current recruits), they have been a decent team more often than not.  Fitzgerald is 60-53 over his 9 years there (and is still just 40 years old).

At that point things like being Chicago-adjacent and benefitting from the superior academics at NU start to factor into the equation in a way they wouldn't have back in the days of  abject awfulness in Wildcat football.  Picking NU over UI seems pretty logical to me, at this point.

M-Dog

February 16th, 2015 at 10:31 PM ^

If they would dump a little of that Big Ten money into facilities, thay could be a player in the B1G West.

If they had top faciliteis and I was a recruit in the Chicago area, I would want to go there over places like Illinois and Iowa.