OT: Sanchez to stay with Tigers

69 posts / 0 new
Login or register to post comments
Last post
December 14th, 2012 at 11:35 AM
#1
Everyone Murders
Everyone Murders's picture
Joined: 12/14/2010
MGoPoints: 548
OT: Sanchez to stay with Tigers

http://www.detroitnews.com/article/20121214/SPORTS0104/212140423/Report-Tigers-sign-Sanchez-5-years-80M?odyssey=tab|topnews|text|Sports

Well, it looks like Dombrowski signed Anibel Sanchez for a 5 year hitch at $80M.  I'm very curious to see what happens with Porcello now that Sanchez is wrapped up for the foreseeable future.

I thought Sanchez was (imagine Ernie Harwell voice here) long gone.  Looks like more evidence to support the theory that Mike Ilitch is in "win now" mode.  I wonder if this is a deal the Tigers will regret at their leisure - Sanchez is below .500 in W/L for his career, although sabremetricians will quickly point out there are better measures of a pitcher's worth than W-L.  In any event, Ilitch gets a lot of credit for investing in his club and giving Dombrowski the ability to do deals like this.

  • "Of course I care about that stuff.  To the point of irrationality.  It will always be Michigan first, cancer second."  Jim Mandich (RIP)
Top
Tags:

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
December 14th, 2012 at 11:38 AM | iPhone (Score:1)
TheDirtyD
TheDirtyD's picture
Joined: 07/18/2009
MGoPoints: 946

Good re-sign he pitched well in some of the Tigers toughest games.

If you see someone in an airport with Michigan logos on luggage and they are wearing a pilot uniform come say hello.

December 14th, 2012 at 11:40 AM | Way too much money (Score:2 Normal)
WilsonHawk
WilsonHawk's picture
Joined: 07/12/2009
MGoPoints: 131

Way too much money

December 14th, 2012 at 12:40 PM | I hate when rich people spend (Score:5 Normal)
America
America's picture
Joined: 09/19/2009
MGoPoints: 459

I hate when rich people spend their own money in a non salary capped sport to try to win a championship. It really is terrible. Stop spending your own money Illitch I hate it when you operate without a budget!!!

December 14th, 2012 at 1:14 PM | Based on what? Your opinion? (Score:1)
david from wyoming
david from wyoming's picture
Joined: 03/15/2009
MGoPoints: 2814

Based on what? Your opinion?

Are you a park ranger at Yellowstone? Say hi to Yogi Bear for me. - the_big_house 500th

I may not be a 70 year old man. - Herm

December 14th, 2012 at 11:41 AM | Wow, that's alot of money for (Score:4 Normal)
Schembo
Schembo's picture
Joined: 01/06/2011
MGoPoints: 916

Wow, that's alot of money for a fourth starter. 

December 14th, 2012 at 11:57 AM | A fourth starter (Score:3 Normal)
MaiZedOuT
MaiZedOuT's picture
Joined: 08/19/2010
MGoPoints: 893

who would be #2-#3 in most rotations. Detroit has one of the best 4-man rotations in baseball locked down now.

 
“What the mind can conceive, the mind can achieve and those who stay will be champions.”

 

 

December 14th, 2012 at 12:06 PM | I agree.  There is no reason (Score:2)
Schembo
Schembo's picture
Joined: 01/06/2011
MGoPoints: 916

I agree.  There is no reason the Tigers shouldn't run away in the Central this year with a whole year of Sanchez, the return of VMart and the addition of Hunter.  The only reason I might question the signing is that the fourth starter probably only pitches 2 or 3 games in the playoffs at most.  16 million a year could guarantee you a rock solid bullpen (if there is anybody worth it at the moment).

December 14th, 2012 at 12:17 PM | Speaking of the (Score:1)
solo dolo
solo dolo's picture
Joined: 02/03/2010
MGoPoints: 850

Speaking of the bullpen...what are we gonna do with that mess

"I think Hoke has changed the tide on the rivalry. Hell people in Ohio are starting to believe him. Never in a million years I would have thought that. Selling Michigan jerseys is a good start."

December 14th, 2012 at 1:03 PM | I don't know.  With the (Score:2)
Schembo
Schembo's picture
Joined: 01/06/2011
MGoPoints: 916

I don't know.  With the addition of Hamilton to the Angels, I don't particularly like our chances against them in the playoffs with our current bullpen.  The Angels are stacked right now.

December 14th, 2012 at 1:15 PM | The Angles have a much worse (Score:1)
david from wyoming
david from wyoming's picture
Joined: 03/15/2009
MGoPoints: 2814

The Angles have a much worse bullpen. Remember, they didn't make the playoffs last year at all.

Are you a park ranger at Yellowstone? Say hi to Yogi Bear for me. - the_big_house 500th

I may not be a 70 year old man. - Herm

December 14th, 2012 at 2:10 PM | Only because they played in a (Score:3 Insightful)
Lionsfan
Lionsfan's picture
Joined: 06/03/2011
MGoPoints: 3909

Only because they played in a tougher division. The Angels won more games than the Tigers did

If you're doing nothing, how do you know when you're finished?

StraightDave owes me a steak dinner

December 14th, 2012 at 2:21 PM | LA won 1 more (Score:2)
lbpeley
lbpeley's picture
Joined: 01/29/2009
MGoPoints: 1585

game than Detroit and they split the season series. Come on.

December 14th, 2012 at 2:35 PM | Eh, the addition of Hunter (Score:1)
Maize_Nation
Joined: 07/29/2012
MGoPoints: 197

Eh, the addition of Hunter and V-Mart replacing D Young improves our lineup more than Hamilton improves theirs. Of course, this depends on whether or not V-Mart can return to his pre injury 120 wRC+ level.

Plus, their SP has taken a hit.

 

December 14th, 2012 at 1:57 PM | Either they are going to ask Coke or Rondon (Score:1)
Michigan4Life
Joined: 07/29/2010
MGoPoints: 5674

to be the closer.  Not sure if Leyland will trust a rookie to be the closer.  Rondon has some arm talent and his stuff is electric.  However, his command is very spotty which is a huge concern.  My gut is Coke will get the first nod at closing out games.

They are hoping that Benoit will bounce back and Alberqueue to continue to improve.  Hard to spend money on bullpen because the performance tends to fluctuate year to year.

December 14th, 2012 at 3:09 PM | Rondon's (Score:1)
TyrannousLex
Joined: 11/05/2011
MGoPoints: 274

Been performing well in Venezualan winter ball. Even when he's been roughed up it hasn't come on walks, which is the most important thing (imo) for a young, hard throwing reliever. I agree on Coke; he was auditioning for the job after Valverde imploded, and it might be a great fit for him.

December 14th, 2012 at 4:44 PM | I will answer your ? with my opinion... (Score:2)
BigCat14
BigCat14's picture
Joined: 09/14/2009
MGoPoints: 277

First this solidifies the Tigers rotation as one of the best in ALL of baseball!  They will eat a lot of innings and with that said the Tigers only need an average bully and a future all star closer (Rondon).  I persnall feel like they will be above average which will make this signing look good.  Second Sanchez is getting paid to get the Tigers to the post season.  If he happens to be the #4 in our rotation and does not get the solid starts in the post season as you mention he will be a bull out of the bully.  This is a great signing, wish it could have been for less but that is the way of american sports.

 

Go Blue!

I am thankful to live in an awesome country!!!

December 14th, 2012 at 11:42 AM | W-L misleading (Score:2 Normal)
GoLabattBLUE
Joined: 11/18/2011
MGoPoints: 36

His W-L record is a bit misleading, have to remember that he has spent his career pitching for the Marlins.  His secondary numbers have always been pretty good.  With that being said, $80 million is a lot of money, but hey it's not mine, so I am a happy Tiger fan today.

 

December 14th, 2012 at 12:48 PM | Doug Fister (Score:2 Normal)
Michiganfootball13
Michiganfootball13's picture
Joined: 04/12/2012
MGoPoints: 186

I just always think of what Doug Fister's W-L numbers were like before coming to the Tigers.  When I saw that I was not impressed but when I looked at his ERA and that he was last in the league in run support I was happy with the deal.

Lloyd Brady is my homeboy...for real he is!

December 14th, 2012 at 11:44 AM | Expensive, but he's pretty good (Score:2 Normal)
Meeeeshigan
Meeeeshigan's picture
Joined: 11/01/2010
MGoPoints: 160

Lots of dough, but his postseason ERA was microscopic--could be reaching his prime. Personally, I like this signing (it's not my money, though).

 

December 14th, 2012 at 11:44 AM | So Smyly at the 5 or do we (Score:1)
goblue20111
goblue20111's picture
Joined: 10/31/2010
MGoPoints: 1513

So Smyly at the 5 or do we just throw the best body in there regardless of whether or not we have a lefty in the starting 5?

December 14th, 2012 at 11:47 AM | Sounds Right - Porcello seems like the odd man out. (Score:2)
Everyone Murders
Everyone Murders's picture
Joined: 12/14/2010
MGoPoints: 548

I think Smyly is your fifth starter, and Porcello is very likely off to greener pastures as trade-bait.  I hope there is some good result here for Porcello, as he's still pretty young and just never seemed able to put it all together in Detroit.

  • "Of course I care about that stuff.  To the point of irrationality.  It will always be Michigan first, cancer second."  Jim Mandich (RIP)
December 14th, 2012 at 11:53 AM | Is Porcello really bait?  Not (Score:3 Normal)
icefins26
icefins26's picture
Joined: 02/01/2009
MGoPoints: 10527

Is Porcello really bait?  Not sure he has much value.

December 14th, 2012 at 12:01 PM | He could be a solid rotation (Score:2 Normal)
His Dudeness
His Dudeness's picture
Joined: 11/24/2008
MGoPoints: 13560

He could be a solid rotation guy in the NL. He would probably have a surprisingly good year in his first season in the NL.

or uh, Duder, or El Duderino if you're not into the whole brevity thing.

December 14th, 2012 at 12:34 PM | If I were the Cubs, I would (Score:1)
coldnjl
Joined: 12/31/2009
MGoPoints: 2430

If I were the Cubs, I would offer a middle of the bullpen pitcher for Porcello. Porcello has 4 or so years experience for a winning club, and is 23 or 24 years old I believe. He also doesn't make much. The switch to the NL will improve his numbers, as well as going to a team that can turn a double play or field a ground ball. The Tigers were a horrible team for a ground ball pitcher to play for.

December 14th, 2012 at 12:58 PM | Porcello and a middling (Score:2)
Yinka Double Dare
Joined: 06/30/2008
MGoPoints: 1905

Porcello and a middling prospect could almost certainly get you Marmol.  Cubs were going to trade him straight up for Haren (who only had one year left on his deal) before they got a look at Haren's medicals and backed out.

December 14th, 2012 at 12:58 PM | Porcello still has decent (Score:2 Normal)
WMUgoblue
WMUgoblue's picture
Joined: 12/06/2009
MGoPoints: 3090

Porcello still has decent value, he's a young cost controlled solid MLB starter whose peripherals don't match up with his production.

Blank.....Blank......You're not looking at the big picture here.

December 14th, 2012 at 1:51 PM | Trevor Cahill got a solid (Score:2 Normal)
Maize_Nation
Joined: 07/29/2012
MGoPoints: 197

Trevor Cahill got a solid return for the A's, and Porcello has similar value to what he had.

 

December 14th, 2012 at 2:04 PM | Apparently he does (Score:1)
cadmus2166
cadmus2166's picture
Joined: 01/04/2010
MGoPoints: 1046

http://www.mlbtraderumors.com/2012/12/rick-porcello-drawing-trade-intere...

I do not mean to pry, but you don't by any chance happen to have six fingers on your right hand?

December 14th, 2012 at 11:56 AM | I hope not... (Score:3 Normal)
jmdblue
Joined: 12/01/2010
MGoPoints: 652

Porcello is only 23 with 4 years in the MLB already (makes him seem older) with no apparent arm damage.  He's probably 4 years from his prime, he's signed and he's reasonably priced going forward.  I hope he sticks at #5.

We're gonna play with toughness, we're gonna be responsible and we're gonna play with toughness.  This is Michigan.

December 14th, 2012 at 12:10 PM | Porcello should be safe (Score:2 Normal)
BeatOSU52
BeatOSU52's picture
Joined: 11/14/2011
MGoPoints: 588

I disagree with some of the Tiger fans out there constantly thinking we need to get rid of/trade the 23 year old.  He has some inconsistency issues and may never be that ace like we had initially hoped for, but he has great  stuff and great poise.  I guess there's not much more to add to my argument as it's just an opinion that I think we should hang onto Porcello and use him as the number 5 man in the rotation.

 

You can start Smyly in the bullpen, but on of the SPs will naturally get hurt and miss some starts, and Smyly can fill in for him.

We're not teaching them about sports, we're teaching them about life!

December 14th, 2012 at 12:22 PM | Porcello is a ground ball (Score:3 Normal)
VideoTom
VideoTom's picture
Joined: 06/02/2010
MGoPoints: 1852

Porcello is a ground ball pitcher, and in case you haven't noticed, the Tigers aren't the greatest defensive team in the MLB. His style is of much better use on some other team and we could trade for someone who is of much better use to us than the team they are being traded from.

December 14th, 2012 at 12:28 PM | Porcello (Score:2 Normal)
HarBooYa
HarBooYa's picture
Joined: 06/22/2011
MGoPoints: 343

Is the next Smoltz we trade away.  I am a big fan regardless of recent struggles.  

That said, if you can get a legit closer for him like the Pittsburgh guy and win now (next two or three years), I think a GM would have good reason to do it.  My loose unscientific theory is that guys like Smoltz would have had difficulty becoming who he ultimately was had he stayed and not been traded.  So, its false logic to hoard potential talent (when you might actually be surpressing it, diminishing its value and not addressing an area of weakness).  Trade him and give him a chance to get his wings and us ours.

...not sure if this makes any sense and have no idea why I am randomly commenting on this...anyway

GO BLUE....back to wistful thinking on 5 star recruits and dreams of crushing Gamecocks. 

Ahh...that's better.

Be the change, I want you to be.
December 14th, 2012 at 12:35 PM | woah!!! (Score:0 Redundant)
December 14th, 2012 at 1:57 PM | Saying Porcello has great (Score:1)
Maize_Nation
Joined: 07/29/2012
MGoPoints: 197

Saying Porcello has great stuff is, well, laughable.

He doesn't have one plus pitch, not even his sinker is a plus pitch.

His slider is god awful, and his changeup is also very poor, which is why he gets crushed by LHH to the tune of .324/.381/.503.

 

December 14th, 2012 at 10:02 PM | Think we should at least (Score:1)
turtleboy
turtleboy's picture
Joined: 04/22/2011
MGoPoints: 3216

Think we should at least break him in as a set up man before we deal him. I'm still sick about Rodney.

How many times have you been on the freeway and had someone fly by you at 100 mph then end up 2 cars ahead of you at the off ramp? What's the point? -Mark Harmon

December 14th, 2012 at 11:49 AM | Pretty steep, but 5 years (Score:4 Normal)
TimH
TimH's picture
Joined: 01/26/2010
MGoPoints: 298

Pretty steep, but 5 years isn't too bad for a guy who's only 28.

December 14th, 2012 at 11:57 AM | Frankly it doesn't even take (Score:5 Normal)
MaizeAndBlueWahoo
MaizeAndBlueWahoo's picture
Joined: 07/02/2008
MGoPoints: 11823

Frankly it doesn't even take a sabermetrician to point out the irrelevance of the W/L record when evaluating a pitcher's future.  People have been banging that drum for a very long time.  Roger Craig used to say it takes a darn good pitcher to lose 20 games.

"We've beaten Michigan the last four years.  So where's the threat?"

- Mark Dantonio

Blogging the Virginia Cavaliers at http://fromoldvirginia.blogspot.com/<

December 14th, 2012 at 11:58 AM | ERA and WHIP more (Score:2 Normal)
Str8ballin
Str8ballin's picture
Joined: 11/18/2009
MGoPoints: 648

important

I need to go home and put water in Buck Nasty's Mom's dish

December 14th, 2012 at 11:58 AM | We could flip Porcello (Score:-1 Overrated)
December 14th, 2012 at 12:00 PM | Next move: Closer or middle infielder? (Score:1 Normal)
Zoltanrules
Zoltanrules's picture
Joined: 08/23/2009
MGoPoints: 265

Thanks Mr. I  for the best starting rotation in baseball! I would think if we land a closer next...

 "I don’t wanna live in Rainbow Land, and you can’t make me!"

December 14th, 2012 at 12:01 PM | Cubs were apparently the (Score:2)
Naked Bootlegger
Naked Bootlegger's picture
Joined: 01/28/2011
MGoPoints: 1213

Cubs were apparently the competition at a rumored 5 yr/$75 million price tag.   Lots of cash to outlay for #4 starter, but will be worth the monetary risk if he solidifies the rotation for the next few years a la (injury-free) Fister.   And he would probably be a #2/#3 starter for many other MLB teams.

I don't know Porcello's trade value.   But he's still so freakin' young, has good stuff (preferably with an athletic infield to back him up) and has pitched in a lot of big games.   He seems to be the odd-man out - unless he learns to pitch left-handed.  

 

December 14th, 2012 at 12:13 PM | We (Cubs) were the first team (Score:1)
goblue7612
Joined: 03/02/2010
MGoPoints: 1019

We (Cubs) were the first team to offer Sanchez 5 years from what I heard. Tigers had been hoping to stick at 4 years, but the Cubs offer of 5 years 75 mill, and eventually 5 years 77.5 mill is what made the Tigers up their offer.

December 14th, 2012 at 12:02 PM | More $ than Verlander?? (Score:-1 Flamebait)
December 14th, 2012 at 12:08 PM | I don't think JV is that kind (Score:3 Normal)
goblue20111
goblue20111's picture
Joined: 10/31/2010
MGoPoints: 1513

I don't think JV is that kind of dude. 

December 14th, 2012 at 12:13 PM | Verlander makes more than (Score:4 Normal)
Committed
Committed's picture
Joined: 04/06/2011
MGoPoints: 407

Verlander makes more than Sanchez...



20 mil a year vs 16 mil a year for Sanchez

What every longshot, come from behind, underdog will tell ya is this... The other guy, may in fact, be the favorite. The odds may be stacked against you, fair enough. But what the odds don't know is...this isn't a math test.

December 14th, 2012 at 12:13 PM | No he's not (Score:2)
davking1980
Joined: 06/11/2009
MGoPoints: 56

The contracts on their face are both 5/$80 but Verlander's was structured at $8 and $12 the first two years, then bumped to $20/year the last 3 years so Verlander is making $20 million this year.  Unless Sanchez' deal is structured to be getting more than that this year, and teams very rarely frontload contracts, he won't be making more than JV.

December 14th, 2012 at 12:59 PM | So both are 5 for $80 (sorry (Score:1)
Michwolve05
Joined: 11/12/2010
MGoPoints: 72

So both are 5 for $80 (sorry I thought JV didn't make as much) and I know that Verlander is not the type to get pissed.  My point that I don't like having Sanchez make as much as the best in the game.

December 14th, 2012 at 2:00 PM | Verlander wasn't a FA when he (Score:1)
Maize_Nation
Joined: 07/29/2012
MGoPoints: 197

Verlander wasn't a FA when he signed his contract.

 

December 14th, 2012 at 12:55 PM | Verlander will get the (Score:2)
WMUgoblue
WMUgoblue's picture
Joined: 12/06/2009
MGoPoints: 3090

Verlander will get the highest contract ever for a pitcher in a year or so, I'm pretty sure he'll be ok with that.



I like this move but don't expect the Tigers to sign Max Scherzer after 2014 because of this deal.

Blank.....Blank......You're not looking at the big picture here.

December 14th, 2012 at 12:10 PM | I wish everyone would stop (Score:4 Normal)
DKohn81
DKohn81's picture
Joined: 02/11/2012
MGoPoints: 711

I wish everyone would stop complaining about overspending. There is no salary cap in baseball and no one has any idea how much owners have. Money doesn't carry over when you die. I for one want the tigers to spend more and go all out for the next two seasons to try and win a WS. Plus little ceasers is making a crap load.

Theme provided by Roopletheme; sidebars adapted from Chris Murphy.