Home
i'm an actor, not a reactor

Primary links

  • About
    • $upport (lol)
    • Ethics
    • FAQ
    • Glossary
    • Privacy Policy
  • Contact
  • MGoStore
    • Hail to Old Blue
  • MGoBoard
    • MGoBoard FAQ
    • Michigan bar locator
    • Moderator Action Sticky
  • Useful Stuff
    • Depth Chart By Class
    • Hoops Depth Chart by Class
    • 2017 Recruiting Board
    • Unofficial Two Deep
    • MGoFlickr
    • Diaries, Windows Live Writer, And You
    • User-Curated HOF
    • Where To Eat In Ann Arbor
  • Schedule/Tix
    • Future Schedules (wiki)
    • Ticket spreadsheet
Home Forums MGoBoard

Navigation

  • Forums
  • Recent posts

User login

  • Create new account
  • Request new password

MGoElsewhere

  • @MGoBlog (Brian)
  • @aceanbender
  • @Misopogon (Seth)
  • @Aeschnepp (Adam)
  • @BISB
  • @EUpchurchPhoto
  • @FullOfTwitt (Fuller)
  • Hail to the Victors 2016
  • MGoFacebook
  • MGoPodcast
  • WTKA
  • Instagram

Michigan Blogs

  • Big House Blog
  • Burgeoning Wolverine Star
  • Genuinely Sarcastic
  • Go Blue Michigan Wolverine
  • Holdin' The Rope
  • MVictors
  • Maize 'n' Blue Nation
  • Maize 'n' Brew
  • Maize And Go Blue
  • Michigan Hockey Net
  • MMMGoBlueBBQ
  • The Blog That Yost Built
  • The Hoover Street Rag
  • The M Zone
  • Touch The Banner
  • UMGoBlog
  • UMHoops
  • UMTailgate
  • Wolverine Liberation Army

M On The Net

  • mgovideo
  • MGoBlue.com
  • Mike DeSimone
  • Recruiting Planet
  • The Wolverine
  • Go Blue Wolverine
  • Winged Helmet
  • UMGoBlue.com
  • MaizeRage.org
  • Puckhead
  • The M Den
  • True Blue Fan Forum

Big Ten Blogs

  • Illinois
    • Illinois Loyalty
    • Illinois Baseball Report
  • Indiana
    • Inside The Hall
    • The Crimson Quarry
  • Iowa
    • Black Heart, Gold Pants
    • Fight For Iowa
  • Michigan State
    • The Only Colors
  • Minnesota
    • GopherHole.com
    • The Daily Gopher
  • Nebraska
    • Corn Nation
    • Husker Max
    • Husker Mike's Blasphemy
    • Husker Gameday
  • Northwestern
    • Sippin' On Purple
    • Lake The Posts
  • Notre Dame
    • The House Rock Built
    • One Foot Down
  • Ohio State
    • Eleven Warriors
    • Buckeye Commentary
    • Men of the Scarlet and Gray
    • Our Honor Defend
    • The Buckeye Nine
  • Penn State
    • Slow States
    • Black Shoe Diaries
    • Happy Valley Hardball
    • Penn State Clips
    • Linebacker U
    • Nittany White Out
  • Purdue
    • Boiled Sports
    • Hammer and Rails
  • Wisconsin
    • Bruce Ciskie

Links of Note

  • Baseball
    • College Baseball Today
    • The College Baseball Blog
  • Basketball
    • Ken Pomeroy
    • Hoop Math
    • John Gasaway
    • Luke Winn/Sports Illustrated
  • College Hockey
    • Chris Heisenberg (Class of 2016)
    • College Hockey Stats
    • Michigan College Hockey
    • Hockey's Future
    • Sioux Sports
    • USCHO
  • Football
    • Smart Football
    • Every Day Should Be Saturday
    • Matt Hinton/Grantland
    • Football Study Hall
    • Football Outsiders
    • Harold Stassen
    • NCAA D-I Stats Page
    • The Wizard Of Odds
    • CFB Stats
  • General
    • Sports Central
  • Local Interest
    • The Ann Arbor Chronicle
    • Arborwiki
    • Arbor Update
    • Ann Arbor Observer
    • Teeter Talk
    • Vacuum
  • Teams Of The D
    • Lions
      • Pride of Detroit
    • Pistons
      • Detroit Bad Boys
      • Need4Sheed
    • Tigers
      • Roar Of The Tigers
      • Bless You Boys
      • The Daily Fungo
      • The Detroit Tigers Weblog
    • Red Wings
      • Winging It In Motown
      • On The Wings
    • Michigan Sports Forum

Beveled Guilt

Site Search

Diaries

  • New
  • Popular
  • Hot
  • 14 Months Ago: The Fire Beilein Threads.
    stephenrjking - 3 weeks ago
  • ‹‹
  • 2 of 2
  •  
more
  • This Month in MGoBlog History - April 2008: No Spring Game at the Big House! Hockey loses to ND in the Frozen Four!
    Maize.Blue Wagner - 1,415 views
  • 14 Months Ago: The Fire Beilein Threads.
    stephenrjking - 237 comments
  • This Month in MGoBlog History - April 2008: No Spring Game at the Big House! Hockey loses to ND in the Frozen Four!
    Maize.Blue Wagner - 9 comments

MGoBoard

  • New
  • Recent
  • Hot
  • Ibi Watson to Dayton.
    9 replies
  • NFL Draft Eve Debate
    22 replies
  • Scrimmage Observations
    47 replies
  • Quote from Nebraska A.D.
    69 replies
  • PSA: 2018 FOOTBALL SEASON TICKET UPGRADES
    6 replies
  • More MSU takes. From USA Today
    56 replies
  • OT: National Park Week; What's Your Favorite?
    156 replies
  • New Q&A with Cam McGrone, video
    3 replies
  • Rice Commission recommendations to be released today
    75 replies
  • MBB: Wake Forest grad transfer PG Keyshawn Woods commits to OSU
    20 replies
  • Harmoniously OT: UM Men's Glee Club in AZ
    17 replies
  • Coach B w Andy Katz podcast
    3 replies
  • Michigan Alumni Club Scholarship Golf Tournament featuring Honorary Chair Glen Rice - This Saturday in Miami!
    5 replies
  • Hello? Boring Tuesday POSbang Happy Hour Thread
    115 replies
  • OT: UCL Semi-final First Legs
    14 replies
  •  
  • 1 of 6
  • ››
  • More MSU takes. From USA Today
    56 replies
  • NFL Draft Eve Debate
    22 replies
  • Ibi Watson to Dayton.
    9 replies
  • Quote from Nebraska A.D.
    69 replies
  • OT: National Park Week; What's Your Favorite?
    156 replies
  • Scrimmage Observations
    47 replies
  • Rice Commission recommendations to be released today
    75 replies
  • MBB: Wake Forest grad transfer PG Keyshawn Woods commits to OSU
    20 replies
  • PSA: 2018 FOOTBALL SEASON TICKET UPGRADES
    6 replies
  • More evidence of awful culture at MSU, volleyball this time
    62 replies
  • New Q&A with Cam McGrone, video
    3 replies
  • Hello? Boring Tuesday POSbang Happy Hour Thread
    115 replies
  • A piece of U-M broadcast history ends tonight.
    29 replies
  • Harmoniously OT: UM Men's Glee Club in AZ
    17 replies
  • Coach B w Andy Katz podcast
    3 replies
  •  
  • 1 of 6
  • ››
  • Belleville coach Jermain Crowell mad at UM again
    244 replies
  • "Being Not-Rich at UM" Guide
    168 replies
  • OT: National Park Week; What's Your Favorite?
    156 replies
  • The Evolution of Commerce - What Industries are Dying, What's Thriving?
    148 replies
  • Pep Hamilton on Shea: Can extend the play, make all the throws, plus other QB's
    129 replies
  • In-state recruiting rankings update
    125 replies
  • OT - Jalen Hurts possibly looking to transfer
    121 replies
  • Notre Dame Spring Game: analysis from M n B, video
    119 replies
  • Hello? Boring Tuesday POSbang Happy Hour Thread
    115 replies
  • Nebraska football
    105 replies
  • OT: Map of college stadiums that sell alcohol
    96 replies
  • Karsen Barnhart - did we cool on him?
    92 replies
  • OT: College Football video games coming back
    90 replies
  • UCF Knights unveil 2017 championship banner
    89 replies
  • Michigan Vs Notre Dame in 131 days
    83 replies
  •  
  • 1 of 6
  • ››

Support MGoBlog: buy stuff at Amazon

OT: RR Introductory Zona Press Conference

145 posts / 0 new
Login or register to post comments
Last post
November 22nd, 2011 at 3:41 PM
#1
MichTits
Joined: 07/08/2009
MGoPoints: 246
OT: RR Introductory Zona Press Conference

Interesting to see how he is handling his introductory press conference, and if he has learned from any of his PR mistakes in the past. 

Has made me wince a couple times with some of what he says, but overall he's come directly out and addressed the former players to let them know they are all welcome back.  He clearly doesn't know much about UofA tradition, but did say "I'm not just gonna coach Arizona football, I'm going to live it."

Also mentions that he is frustrated to watch all of Michigan's success this year, because he wishes that he was the one coaching them.  He is proud of all of the players though, because he cares about them and they are his guys.

Overall, I think he's doing a fair job.

http://www.arizonawildcats.com/allaccess/?media=284708

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
Tags:
  • MGoBoard

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
November 22nd, 2011 at 3:42 PM
#2
BlockM
BlockM's picture
Joined: 07/03/2008
MGoPoints: 28426
Ok.  Beat Ohio.

Ok. 

Beat Ohio.

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
November 22nd, 2011 at 3:44 PM
(Reply to #2) #3
MichTits
Joined: 07/08/2009
MGoPoints: 246
Fair enough

Beat Ohio!

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
November 22nd, 2011 at 4:09 PM
(Reply to #2) #4
BlueGoM
BlueGoM's picture
Joined: 08/25/2009
MGoPoints: 6062
Yes, Beat Ohio goes without

Yes, Beat Ohio goes without saying.  Actually it should be said everyday now that I think about it.

Anyway this is a new position for Michigan fans.  Have we ever had a former Michigan football head coach get fired, and wind up a head coach elsewhere?   Moeller went right to the pros, didn't he?

I know some people are irritated by the attention being given to RR during Beat Ohio week, but this is sort of a morbid curiosity type thing.   If RR crashes and burns at Arizona, his critics will be validated and vice versa for his apologists.

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
November 22nd, 2011 at 4:32 PM
(Reply to #26) #5
Section 1
Section 1's picture
Joined: 06/29/2009
MGoPoints: 16556
Bump?

Bump left to become AD at Iowa.  Gary Moeller coached the Lions for a handful of games.  That's the closest I can come up with.  Schembechler, Elliott, Oosterbaan, Crisler, Kipke, Yost; they all ended their coaching days in Ann Arbor.

Moeller (assistant) went off to become HC at Illinois for a time; but that gets us into a very long list of assistants and players who went off to become head coaches.

I'm not sure what school Lloyd Carr was working for after he retired as Head Coach.

Cracks me up to read people's comments about how we need to focus on Ohio [State].  As if it matters what we read and write this week.

And yeah, I suppose that Coach Rodriguez might continue to be a proxy argument for many of us.  It is a two-way street of course.  If people want to continue to bash him, then there will be people who will defend him.  It is really the haters who need to get over Rodriguez, not his supporters.

I find myself caring less in the wake of his hiring at Arizona, but only because I know how hard it will be to use Arizona's success to shame Rodriguez's local media critics.  The sad thing is that while Rodriguez is gone, we still have the Free Press as a daily feature of our football program.

 

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
November 23rd, 2011 at 12:21 AM
(Reply to #38) #6
BillyShears
BillyShears's picture
Joined: 05/27/2009
MGoPoints: 2006
posted from iPhone

Oh thank god. For a second there I thought you were going to make a whole post without mentioning the Free Press.

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
November 22nd, 2011 at 4:48 PM
(Reply to #26) #7
MGoNukeE
MGoNukeE's picture
Joined: 11/11/2009
MGoPoints: 2060
Apologists?

We prefer to be referred to as RR Defenders, because that makes us sound more righteous. No link to the logo and costume; they are still being designed.

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
November 22nd, 2011 at 4:57 PM
(Reply to #46) #8
UMLaw73
UMLaw73's picture
Joined: 11/19/2011
MGoPoints: 92
I like the "Beat Ohio" meme.

I like the "Beat Ohio" meme. Is it always on MGoBlog or is it just new to Michigan football this year?  I feel like in past years it was still Beat Ohio State, or Beat OSU, or Go Blue Beat  OSU.

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
November 22nd, 2011 at 3:44 PM
#9
turd ferguson
turd ferguson's picture
Joined: 12/09/2009
MGoPoints: 26489
So no "THIS IS ARIZONA,

So no "THIS IS ARIZONA, FERGODSAKES" yet?

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
November 22nd, 2011 at 4:15 PM
(Reply to #4) #10
chrs5mr
chrs5mr's picture
Joined: 09/01/2009
MGoPoints: 372
LOL actually not at all...

Think a big miss for him at the presser was his "Why not Arizona?  Why not here?" segment.  He went on for a bit talking about this and makes you wonder what exactly his opinion/thought of Arizona football is.

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
November 22nd, 2011 at 4:27 PM
(Reply to #4) #11
brandanomano
brandanomano's picture
Joined: 09/05/2009
MGoPoints: 5086
"Who says this isn't an elite

"Who says this isn't an elite job?!"

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
November 22nd, 2011 at 6:04 PM
(Reply to #35) #12
nyc_wolverines
Joined: 01/07/2011
MGoPoints: 570
"we've had some pretty good

"we've had some pretty good teams here!"

 

Don't be too enthusiastic Reverend....

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
November 22nd, 2011 at 3:45 PM
#13
bsb2002
bsb2002's picture
Joined: 06/30/2008
MGoPoints: 512
he must know its osu week; he

he must know its osu week; he just got in a "hold hands and sing kumbaya" joke

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
November 22nd, 2011 at 3:45 PM
#14
maizenblue92
maizenblue92's picture
Joined: 01/01/2009
MGoPoints: 11527
Things of note

-He said that all former players are welcome back with open arms.

-The Territorial Cup (rivalry with ASU) will be emphasized everyday.

-Thinks Arizona should be a Top 10 team every year and a power out west.

-Also said that he will live Arizona Football.

 

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
November 22nd, 2011 at 3:53 PM
(Reply to #6) #15
chrs5mr
chrs5mr's picture
Joined: 09/01/2009
MGoPoints: 372
Very good point...

found it very interesting how much he talked the importance of the ASU rivalry.  Another point he learned from his time here, knowing what's important to the school and your fans.

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
November 22nd, 2011 at 3:45 PM
#16
State Street
State Street's picture
Joined: 07/09/2011
MGoPoints: 15302
He told us exactly how he got the job

Rita made AD Greg Byrne the magic Nacho Dip.  Stuff's like liquid cocaine.  

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
November 22nd, 2011 at 4:39 PM
(Reply to #7) #17
TIMMMAAY
TIMMMAAY's picture
Joined: 09/08/2008
MGoPoints: 41340
(No subject)

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
November 22nd, 2011 at 3:48 PM
#18
Humen
Humen's picture
Joined: 10/04/2010
MGoPoints: 7029
Finally

As an Arizona student, I am thrilled about this hire. A reason to buy season tickets next year. It'll be just like four years ago. I'm excited to see them get trampled and then ultimately attain the vindication that we (not to mention RR+staff) were all denied. It's like missing the end of a movie and going home to see it on your television. 

 
 
Top
  • Login or register to post comments
November 22nd, 2011 at 3:48 PM
(Reply to #8) #19
turd ferguson
turd ferguson's picture
Joined: 12/09/2009
MGoPoints: 26489
I'd be excited, too.  I think

I'd be excited, too.  I think good times are ahead for Arizona football.

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
November 22nd, 2011 at 4:41 PM
(Reply to #8) #20
Section 1
Section 1's picture
Joined: 06/29/2009
MGoPoints: 16556
You should be thrilled.

If you guys get a staff that includes Rodriguez, Casteel and Calvin Magee, you are going to have some very big fun with your football program.  I might suggest that you just got the Lute Olson of football, but given Coach Olson's later uneven personal history, that might be inappropriate adulation for Coach Rodriguez.

Arizona is a really lucky football program right now.

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
November 22nd, 2011 at 6:58 PM
(Reply to #8) #21
Nick
Nick's picture
Joined: 06/30/2008
MGoPoints: 1094
hows arizona's offensive personnel?

Rich Rod got anything to work with?

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
November 22nd, 2011 at 3:46 PM
#22
O Fo Sho
O Fo Sho's picture
Joined: 11/21/2011
MGoPoints: 429
Any singing

or hand holding yet? Seriously though.....good luck to Rich Rod.  I would imagine he would LOVE the opportunity to play us in Pasadena someday.

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
November 22nd, 2011 at 3:48 PM
#23
Broken Brilliance
Broken Brilliance's picture
Joined: 09/07/2010
MGoPoints: 4101
So...

Who else is buying an arizona hat?

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
November 22nd, 2011 at 3:57 PM
(Reply to #10) #24
joeyb
joeyb's picture
Joined: 10/12/2008
MGoPoints: 14048
If I'm wearing a hat, it's a

If I'm wearing a hat, it's a Michigan hat.

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
November 22nd, 2011 at 5:01 PM
(Reply to #10) #25
michgoblue
michgoblue's picture
Joined: 11/16/2009
MGoPoints: 20962
Hats

I don't always wear hats, but when I do, I prefer Michigan hats.

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
November 22nd, 2011 at 3:54 PM
#26
chrs5mr
chrs5mr's picture
Joined: 09/01/2009
MGoPoints: 372
Agreed its been hit or miss...

You can tell he's learned from his time here.  He said he was going to learn as much as he can about the traditions there from former players, etc.  He said he plans to get out and meet the fans.  He stressed how they will continue to recruit the key areas for AZ and focus on them.

The opening made me wince as he spoke of his son being in the Top 5 QB class of 2017, who was a decomit from WVU then a decomit from Michigan but he's a commit of AZ and "don't worry he won't decomit".  Thought this was a very odd way of opening his presser.

He's still a little bitter as he continually talks about everyone (fans, admin, etc) pulling in the same direction and all supporting.  But did like the little shout out to Michigan and the players, he definitely didn't want to talk about Michigan but said that we're good and will be good for a long time.

One point of the presser was the stressing of RichRod being a leader of compliance, a move to help calm the minds of the fans.

He did say this will be his last coaching stop, which I'm sure is alot of PR but he touched on that a few times and was interesting.

Good luck RichRod, best to you and your fam.

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
November 22nd, 2011 at 8:52 PM
(Reply to #12) #27
Elmer
Elmer's picture
Joined: 04/22/2011
MGoPoints: 5141
H's justified about being a

He's justified about being a little bitter about not everyone pulling in the same direction.

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
November 22nd, 2011 at 3:51 PM
#28
Ziff72
Joined: 07/07/2008
MGoPoints: 8309
O Let do It?!?!?

Does Demar Dorsey to Arizona make too much sense?

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
November 22nd, 2011 at 4:04 PM
(Reply to #13) #29
ish
Joined: 06/30/2008
MGoPoints: 13990
someone tagged this post as

someone tagged this post as funny, but i bet it's a real possibility.

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
November 22nd, 2011 at 4:14 PM
(Reply to #13) #30
BursleysFinest
BursleysFinest's picture
Joined: 08/24/2011
MGoPoints: 2947
Anything Can Happen

   That would be hilarious, I personally think (i.e. guess) that if Demar doesn't walk on at UM (doubtful) that he ends up at Tennessee

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
November 22nd, 2011 at 3:53 PM
#31
dosleches
Joined: 05/18/2010
MGoPoints: 843
  "I think the huddle the

 

"I think the huddle the biggest waste of time in football."  HALOL

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
November 22nd, 2011 at 3:59 PM
(Reply to #14) #32
joeyb
joeyb's picture
Joined: 10/12/2008
MGoPoints: 14048
Can anyone honestly disagree

Can anyone honestly disagree with him? What does a huddle buy you other than burning time so that you don't get to the line too quickly when you are trying to run clock?

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
November 22nd, 2011 at 4:03 PM
(Reply to #18) #33
jg2112
jg2112's picture
Joined: 11/25/2008
MGoPoints: 7764
It could've helped keep his

It could've helped keep his 110th ranked defense off the field last year.

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
November 22nd, 2011 at 4:15 PM
(Reply to #20) #34
vbnautilus
vbnautilus's picture
Joined: 10/04/2010
MGoPoints: 2385
Bc

because it's such a good time-waster?

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
November 22nd, 2011 at 4:23 PM
(Reply to #20) #35
Michael
Joined: 06/30/2008
MGoPoints: 1541
You do realize that you can

You do realize that you can run the play clock down without a huddle, right?

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
November 22nd, 2011 at 4:05 PM
(Reply to #18) #36
funkywolve
Joined: 10/08/2008
MGoPoints: 15753
A little extra

time for your defense to rest.

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
November 22nd, 2011 at 4:18 PM
(Reply to #23) #37
Ziff72
Joined: 07/07/2008
MGoPoints: 8309
Serious

Not sure if serious, but it is much more tiring for a defense on the field facing a no huddle.

Look it's simple math if they run more plays they'll score more points.  A hurry up spread will never have the best statistical defense because they play more plays.  If Oregon played Arizona they would run the amount of plays equivalent to a regular 5 qtr game.   More plays more points.   Old school offensive and defensive numbers are skewed when you play uptempo.    

 

 

 

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
November 22nd, 2011 at 4:34 PM
(Reply to #18) #38
Steve in PA
Steve in PA's picture
Joined: 08/10/2009
MGoPoints: 5422
Drives me nuts watching my son's team do it

Just a waste of time.  I fully agree that there's no useful purpose for it at all.

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
November 22nd, 2011 at 4:03 PM
(Reply to #14) #39
BlueGoM
BlueGoM's picture
Joined: 08/25/2009
MGoPoints: 6062
Did you watch the end of the

Did you watch the end of the Iowa game ???  IIRC we burned up about 20-30 seconds at a time we could have used them.

 

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
November 22nd, 2011 at 4:07 PM
(Reply to #21) #40
jg2112
jg2112's picture
Joined: 11/25/2008
MGoPoints: 7764
Did you watch the 9 games

Did you watch the 9 games Michigan won this year?

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
November 22nd, 2011 at 4:17 PM
(Reply to #25) #41
BlueGoM
BlueGoM's picture
Joined: 08/25/2009
MGoPoints: 6062
Settle down there, guy.  It's

Settle down there, guy.  It's going to be OK.  Take a breath.

There are times foregoing the huddle is a good thing.  Numerous teams do well without it.

 

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
November 22nd, 2011 at 5:04 PM
(Reply to #31) #42
michgoblue
michgoblue's picture
Joined: 11/16/2009
MGoPoints: 20962
Sure

And numerous teams do not. 

With one of the worst defenses in college football, there is something to be said for slowing down the game.  And, with a QB who is interception happy (late last year, in particular), it may have made sense to slow it down a bit.

I agree, however, that there are times when no-huddle makes sense.  The problem with RR is that he seems to think that everything is black or white - no middle.  The huddle "is the biggest waste of time."  Or "I will only run a spread option, even though my QB is Nick Sheridan" or "I will continue to run a 3-3-5 even though my DC doesn't know how to run it and it is not working." 

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
November 22nd, 2011 at 4:18 PM
(Reply to #25) #43
Michael
Joined: 06/30/2008
MGoPoints: 1541
Did you watch the previous 2

Did you watch the previous 2 teams to play in the national title game?

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
November 22nd, 2011 at 6:17 PM
(Reply to #57) #44
Michael
Joined: 06/30/2008
MGoPoints: 1541
(No subject)

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
November 22nd, 2011 at 6:18 PM
(Reply to #57) #45
joeyb
joeyb's picture
Joined: 10/12/2008
MGoPoints: 14048
Modern Family Airs on

Modern Family

Airs on Wednesdays

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
November 22nd, 2011 at 5:12 PM
(Reply to #14) #46
dosleches
Joined: 05/18/2010
MGoPoints: 843
I agree w/ him, just thought

I agree w/ him, just thought it was funny he came out and said it.

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
November 22nd, 2011 at 3:55 PM
#47
Corey
Corey's picture
Joined: 07/02/2008
MGoPoints: 1789
That was a little surreal to

That was a little surreal to watch, honestly

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
November 22nd, 2011 at 4:00 PM
#48
Mr. Yost
Mr. Yost's picture
Joined: 07/25/2011
MGoPoints: -9898289
I've spoken with him directly...

I've spoken with him directly (albeit very brief) and he's certainly still hurt by the Michigan situation and he told me it's a love/hate thing in watching them. He wants to see them do well, yet, he feels like this year he could've had the same success with this team.

He was calling our game so I just told him good luck with the broadcast, told him not all Michigan fans are like what you see and hear (and he said "you know, I get that more now than you'd believe...so many people go out of their way to say. Sorry Coach, we wish you the best, we're not all bad!")

It was literally a 90 second convo, but I came away feeling:
#1 He truly does love those guys and loved Michigan
#2 He's still very bitter and feels he got the "raw deal"
#3 He thinks he'd have 9, 10, 11 wins with this team
#4 He still doesn't "get it"
#5 He'll never "get it"
#6 He's had these conversations more than he's wanted to
#7 His ego is hurt because people see him as a "loser" or "failure" rather than a great coach
#8 People think he didn't care about the guys, and that eats him up more than anything

Personally I disagree that this team would be as good as it is now...you can't outscore everyone in the Big Ten and that offense never proved it could work in November. Weather, tougher teams, ball control always hurt that offense. Van Bergan talked about how ball control hurt the defense too. And you had teams that played keepaway, like we did with Nebraska...and ran the ball 50 times in a row *cough* Wisconsin *cough*. Denard could've been awesome, but what's he going to do with 5 possession, feeling like he's gotta put up 35 points or they lose?

I do think he loves the players...not so much Michigan, but I think he cares about this team. I also think that he's going to have trouble getting over his 3 years at Michigan.

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
November 22nd, 2011 at 4:05 PM
(Reply to #19) #49
turd ferguson
turd ferguson's picture
Joined: 12/09/2009
MGoPoints: 26489
Wow, you hit hard in your

Wow, you hit hard in your 90-second introductions.  I'm lucky if I get through the weather in the first 90 seconds that I meet someone.

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
November 22nd, 2011 at 10:51 PM
(Reply to #24) #50
Mr. Yost
Mr. Yost's picture
Joined: 07/25/2011
MGoPoints: -9898289
Kind of my job...

Kind of my job...not to speed interview. But I just went to check and see if they needed anything. That took 5 seconds, and then I had to introduce myself and I did so by saying I was a Michigan fan. So we chatted for like I said a couple minutes and he went back inside the booth.

You just get the feeling he truly believes he had something special coming this year. I'd have to agree to disagree because I never saw that offense do anything vs. a real defense.

I've seen him in interview talk about how proud and how well they played vs. Illinois. That tells me he just doesn't get it. 3 OTs vs. ILLI-FREAKING-NOIS!?! 60-something points?! At home!? No way. I was proud of THIS YEARS team for how they went down there and handled business.

Talk about Malzahn all you want. He had the best player in college football and a QB who was big enough to withstand the hits of the SEC. Same with Tebow. Denard can't be compared to either of those guys.

However, if you put Denard out in the Pac-12 in November on Rich Rod's Arizona team, I'm sure you get something that'll look like Oregon. Those leagues, climates, style of play, everything is different. Stanford, Cal, Washington and USC may play like the B1G, everyone else...not so much. Other than Washington, who isn't that good...you're not going to have to go deal with weather in those games for the most part. Other than USC, you're not going to have to deal with a physical OSU, Wisky, MSU, PSU, Nebraska (now Michigan) style defense. It's different. Period.

Anyway, back to the story...like I said, part of me feels bad for the guy. Part of me wishes he'd just get over himself and realize that he could've done something to help his cause. Hiring a defensive coordinator and letting him do his thing with HIS staff would've been start. Learning the B1G. Having a smoother transition so you don't dig yourself into such a whole. If Michigan goes 6-6, 7-5, 8-4...Rich Rod might still be here.

All in all, I wish him the best...I'm just not worried about him. Because as much as I wanted to agree that he got the raw deal...the fact that he doesn't believe he did anything bothers me just as much to the point where I'm like "f-it...Rich who?"

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
November 22nd, 2011 at 4:32 PM
(Reply to #19) #51
lunchboxthegoat
lunchboxthegoat's picture
Joined: 10/07/2008
MGoPoints: 2978
MY GOD!

Someone get Chip Kelly on the phone! His offense doesn't work in November! Gus Malzahn, too! And the littany of other coaches running the offense that manages to work, score points, and WIN in November!

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
November 22nd, 2011 at 5:18 PM
(Reply to #37) #52
MichiganStudent
MichiganStudent's picture
Joined: 08/27/2008
MGoPoints: 7223
Different conferences,

Different conferences, different climates, different D Coordinators

 

 

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
November 22nd, 2011 at 5:26 PM
(Reply to #60) #53
jblaze
jblaze's picture
Joined: 08/29/2008
MGoPoints: 14173
How many NCs did Chip Kelly win again?

Malzahn isn't even a HC. Auburn isn't even that good without Cam (who is amazing, btw).

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
November 22nd, 2011 at 5:50 PM
(Reply to #63) #54
lunchboxthegoat
lunchboxthegoat's picture
Joined: 10/07/2008
MGoPoints: 2978
Right, its all Cam

Right, its all Cam Newton.

Not replacing something like 15 starters between offense and defense. (the  most of any team in FBS)

No spread team has ever won the national championshp. Good call.

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
November 22nd, 2011 at 5:41 PM
(Reply to #60) #55
lunchboxthegoat
lunchboxthegoat's picture
Joined: 10/07/2008
MGoPoints: 2978
how does your defensive

how does your defensive coordinator effect your offensive success in November? Oregon/WVU/Florida/Auburn never played a game in cold weather? Are you telling me the B1G defenses are just that superior to everyone else in college football that this is the only conference in the country that the spread doesn't work? 

I appreciate healthy skepticism but this is getting ridiculous. Because RR failed the spread doesn't work in the B1G, that's law. Ok...

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
November 22nd, 2011 at 5:51 PM
(Reply to #70) #56
maizenbluenc
maizenbluenc's picture
Joined: 07/21/2009
MGoPoints: 7931
Not sure on the sarcasm level of your statement

but I guess we'll see when Meyer and Co. come to town in Columbus.

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
November 22nd, 2011 at 6:16 PM
(Reply to #70) #57
MichiganStudent
MichiganStudent's picture
Joined: 08/27/2008
MGoPoints: 7223
To your points: 1. Your

To your points:

1. Your defense effects the offense a lot and vice versa. If you have to go 80 yards on every drive you have a much lower percent chance at scoring (i.e. D stops for field position, 3 and outs make the opposing defense tired, having the other team play keep away limits offensive rythm, etc)

2. Oregon/WVU/Florida/Auburn: have played games in bad weather, but I doubt they play as many poor weather games as most Big Ten teams do. 

  • Oregon: November average temps is between highs of 52 and lows of 38 degrees with 7.72 inches of precipitation for the month. Wind is 7.4 mph for Nov.
  • WVU: November average temps is between highs of 54 and lows of 34 degrees with 3.57 inches of precipitation for the month. Wind is 6.0 mph for Nov. (used Charleston data)
  • Florida: November average temps is between highs of 74 and lows of 51 with 2.06 inches of precipitation for the month. Wind is 6.2 mph for Nov. 
  • Auburn: November average temps is between highs of 67 and lows of 41 with 4.74 inches of precipitation for the month. Wind is 7.2 mph for Nov. (used Birmingham data)
  • ANN ARBOR: average temps is between highs of 48 and lows of 33 with 3.09 inches of precipitation for the month. Wind is 11.2 mph for Nov (used Detroit data)

*Weather.com and the NCDC

3. I'm not saying this is a conference where the spread doesnt work, but I am saying that Big Ten defenses are typically more stingy than Big East and Pac 12 defenses. SEC is a great conference with great defenses, but I believe its easier to run an offense in better conditions and in warmer weather. 

4. I didn't say anything about RR failing means the spread doenst work in the Big Ten...so nice try

 

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
November 22nd, 2011 at 6:23 PM
(Reply to #91) #58
lunchboxthegoat
lunchboxthegoat's picture
Joined: 10/07/2008
MGoPoints: 2978
4. to be fair to you, I

4. to be fair to you, I didn't think you meant to say that. I'm just tired of the awful arguments that it can't work in the B1G. Are the circumstances different than in other conferences, sure. But for anyone to assert out and out that it can't work is one of the dumbest things I've ever read and its perpetuated, a lot. 

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
November 22nd, 2011 at 6:30 PM
(Reply to #98) #59
gbdub
gbdub's picture
Joined: 02/16/2010
MGoPoints: 12685
under what train of logic

under what train of logic does the relative success of "run fast holding the ball" and "be a pocket statue who either throws deep or hands off to a slow but big guy" depend on the temperature?

If anything, it's passing that gets affected most by bad weather. RR's spread (and Chip Kelly's spread) are all about the run game.

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
November 22nd, 2011 at 6:30 PM
(Reply to #98) #60
MichiganStudent
MichiganStudent's picture
Joined: 08/27/2008
MGoPoints: 7223
Hey, I'm with you and

Hey, I'm with you and appreciate the response. 

 

If I had to put a stand on something it would be this: when the weather got worse, our offense did not move the ball very well. I love RR's offense, but I was always more confortable with a Wisconsin style offense in the cold, wind, and rain/snow. 

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
November 22nd, 2011 at 6:43 PM
(Reply to #91) #61
maizenbluenc
maizenbluenc's picture
Joined: 07/21/2009
MGoPoints: 7931
Yeah

Our stingy B1G defenses have done so well against the spread in non-conference games.

Me: I think the spread can be adapted to the B1G, and B1G defenses can adapt to the spread. Rich never got a chance to get his offense fully installed, and yes that is in a big part because he totally blew it on defense.

The meme that "ha ha, bring it Ohio, the spread won't work in the B1G" is bravado or naivety at best. It's a matter of finding and recruiting the right athletes (i.e, big and fast), and building a strong defense to go along with it. Rich Rodriguez didn't do the former in time, and didn't do the latter at all. Urban Meyer has done both and won two national championships.

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
November 22nd, 2011 at 6:28 PM
(Reply to #60) #62
coastal blue
Joined: 11/13/2010
MGoPoints: 1955
Unless there is rain/snow

that destroys the field, the whole climate deal is ridiculous. 

The most important factors in a system are talent and experience. This was the first year since 2007 that Michigan could say they have both across the board. That's why it was somewhat pathetic listening to everyone say "Oh man, I really hope we even get 7 wins this year, then I'll be happy." This team was always better than that. 

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
November 22nd, 2011 at 5:42 PM
(Reply to #37) #63
Clarence Beeks
Clarence Beeks's picture
Joined: 09/06/2008
MGoPoints: 11148
To be fair, I'm pretty

To be fair, I'm pretty certain that the point he was getting at was that the offense that RR runs, historically, has substantial difficulty in cold weather and against stronger than average defenses (although, really, most offenses would).  The bigger problem for him, which is now pretty much rectified by going to Arizona, is that his offense really has struggled in cold weather situations.  No idea why, and maybe it's just coincidence, but a number of instances stand out in my mind, both at WVU and Michigan.

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
November 22nd, 2011 at 5:57 PM
(Reply to #71) #64
Ziff72
Joined: 07/07/2008
MGoPoints: 8309
Sample Size

You remember 1 game against Pitt when Pat White broke his hand and the last few years when we played OSU with a JV team.

WV lit up Georgia and Oklahoma in bowl games.  Mich moved the ball well in bad weather games with RR here, but didn't score as well because ya know freshmen, horrid defense etc...

You know who doesn't move the ball well against good defenses in bad weather?   Pretty much everyone. 

 

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
November 22nd, 2011 at 6:17 PM
(Reply to #80) #65
Clarence Beeks
Clarence Beeks's picture
Joined: 09/06/2008
MGoPoints: 11148
"You remember 1 game against

"You remember 1 game against Pitt when Pat White broke his hand and the last few years when we played OSU with a JV team."

Thanks for trying to tell me what I remember, but you're wrong.  I watched a lot of WVU games during RR's tenure there (lived in Pittsburgh; friends at WVU; actually liked RR before he came to Michigan (and still do); etc.).  I'm completely comfortable in saying that I watched way more than you did.

"WV lit up Georgia and Oklahoma in bowl games."

Two problems with this: (1) both games were indoors and (2) Rodriguez was not the coach of WVU for the Oklahoma Fiesta Bowl game.

"Mich moved the ball well in bad weather games with RR here."

Maybe you missed last year's Purdue game?

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
November 22nd, 2011 at 6:19 PM
(Reply to #90) #66
lunchboxthegoat
lunchboxthegoat's picture
Joined: 10/07/2008
MGoPoints: 2978
stop being ridiculous. "like

stop being ridiculous. "like the purdue game last year?" in that case the pro set never works in bad weather because of purdue '95. 

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
November 22nd, 2011 at 6:24 PM
(Reply to #94) #67
Clarence Beeks
Clarence Beeks's picture
Joined: 09/06/2008
MGoPoints: 11148
I was being sarcastic in that

I was being sarcastic in that comment. Apparently that didn't come through...

Let's go a different direction with this one: name me one game where Michigan, under Rodriguez, moved the ball well in poor weather conditions.  Shouldn't be hard, since you're apparently going to defend Ziff72's claim that "Mich moved the ball well in bad weather games with RR here."  Just one will do.

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
November 22nd, 2011 at 6:35 PM
(Reply to #99) #68
lunchboxthegoat
lunchboxthegoat's picture
Joined: 10/07/2008
MGoPoints: 2978
I did not pick up on the

I did not pick up on the sarcasm, my bad.

 

I was just making the point that any offense will struggle in bad weather...to use Purdue last year as the reason this offense sucks in November is pretty weak sauce. 

we were blessed with pretty good weather all November last year. 

We're both supporters of the spread system, RR did a lot wrong at M but running the spread system had nothing to do with it. 

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
November 22nd, 2011 at 6:35 PM
(Reply to #99) #69
gbdub
gbdub's picture
Joined: 02/16/2010
MGoPoints: 12685
Correlation does not equal

Correlation does not equal causation. Please explain precisely why the RR running spread would be less effective than a pro-set offense in poor weather.

Or to put it more directly, if it's cold, wet, and windy, would you rather have Chad Henne or Denard Robinson taking snaps?

We did poorly in November last year. The weather was worse in November. We also played better defenses. Which do you think was the more important factor?

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
November 22nd, 2011 at 11:06 PM
(Reply to #106) #70
Clarence Beeks
Clarence Beeks's picture
Joined: 09/06/2008
MGoPoints: 11148
No idea why.  I'm not

No idea why.  I'm not comparing the effectiveness of the spread versus the pro-style offense.  My point was about RR's offense versus any other offense, spreads included.  Maybe it's a coaching thing, I have no idea; just an observation, but for what ever reason, his teams always seemed to be impacted by adverse weather conditions more than other teams.

In my opinion, the Denard versus Henne question is actually a tough one.

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
November 22nd, 2011 at 11:57 PM
(Reply to #99) #71
Ziff72
Joined: 07/07/2008
MGoPoints: 8309
Ok

ND 08  With Threet and Mcguffie at the controls in a rain storm we went up and down the field.  Turnovers killed us.

The point stands that people who don't like the spread bring up big games where a defense stuffed them never admitting the fact that a traditional offense or any offense would probably struggle.

I like when people point to LSU stopping Oregon.   Well Oregon put up a lot of points and yards on LSU.  Much more than Alabama did.  The only 2 teams that evne sniffed  a decent offensive performance against LSU were Oregon(run spread) and WV(pass spread)

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
November 23rd, 2011 at 12:37 AM
(Reply to #133) #72
Clarence Beeks
Clarence Beeks's picture
Joined: 09/06/2008
MGoPoints: 11148
You minimize probably the

You minimize probably the most important part: "Turnovers killed us."  Sure, they moved the ball well in that game, and several others with similar conditions, but is that not part of his offense struggling in poor weather conditions?  I mean, unless I'm missing something, what we started talking about here wasn't whether or not the offense could move the ball, but whether or not the offense has struggled (relatively more than other offenses) in poorer weather conditions.  The causes might be different from game to game, but they are problems nonetheless.

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
November 22nd, 2011 at 6:20 PM
(Reply to #90) #73
MichiganStudent
MichiganStudent's picture
Joined: 08/27/2008
MGoPoints: 7223
Thank you. My sentiments

Thank you. My sentiments exactly. 

 

For some reason, RR seemed to struggle in poor conditions.

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
November 22nd, 2011 at 6:20 PM
(Reply to #80) #74
Clarence Beeks
Clarence Beeks's picture
Joined: 09/06/2008
MGoPoints: 11148
And just so you don't waste

And just so you don't waste your time, because I saw you make this argument in response to someone else, I actually like Rodriguez and the spread option offense.  My comments here are only about the offense that Rodriguez runs; not about the spread option in general.  I just wanted to be clear about that.

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
November 22nd, 2011 at 5:56 PM
(Reply to #37) #75
micheal honcho
Joined: 10/27/2010
MGoPoints: 1369
OK, I'll bite. Hey guess

OK, I'll bite. Hey guess what, those offenses have elements of the RR spread & shred, as do about 50 others you could mention. However, none of them run the QB anything even near to what RR's system does.

Pat White-191 carries

Pat White-197 carries

Denard Robinson-235 carries

Show me a Chip Kelly or Gus Malzahn offense with a QB shouldering that load, expecially a particularly undersized one playing in a conference full of NFL talent.

Did I miss something or did a USC team full of freshmen & sophmores on D just beat Chip? Do you think he'll stand a chance when those are juniors & seniors at USC?

Get me Les MIles on the phone so I can ask him if he'd rather face Oregon again or Alabama, he's not escared of their trickety offense.

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
November 22nd, 2011 at 6:04 PM
(Reply to #79) #76
Ziff72
Joined: 07/07/2008
MGoPoints: 8309
Just Don't Get It

Yeah Gus Malzhan would never have his QB run that much. 

Sincerely,

Cam Newton

Have you ever heard of a kid named Tebow?

Listen you have no idea what you are talking about.  Who would Miles like to face?  You have no idea.  I don't think he wants any part of Oregon again.  They moved the ball much better than Alabama did.  Does Alabama have a better team?  Maybe.  They also have like 20 NFL players to Oregon's 5 so what are you saying?

As for USC.  They have been embarrassed by Oregon the last few years with much more experienced teams.  They win 1 of 3 on a missed FG and now all of a sudden the spread doesn't work?

Just say you like power football over option football.  Both work just fine if you get the right kids.  This argument is stupid.

 

 

 

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
November 22nd, 2011 at 6:22 PM
(Reply to #84) #77
micheal honcho
Joined: 10/27/2010
MGoPoints: 1369
Cam was a freak, you have him

Cam was a freak, you have him on your team you run him as much as allows, Tebow played in RR/Urban Meyer's system and ran a ton. You didnt mention Meyer in you original post.

Point is, I like power football because, all other things equal, its the best. See NFL for supporting data.

Now, I've likened the spread to the winged-T that run in hundreds of high schools across the country because they both do the following things well

1. exploit the inexperience of the defensive players

2. allow lesser/smaller offensive linemen to be effective

3. Are easy to teach players that you're only going to have for a couple years

4. Keep defensive coordinators playing a guessing game

This is all great and admirable stuff, and if Michigan wants to relegate itself to an also ran, not capable of getting top talent then they should run a system that give them a schematic advantage, however if Michigan wants to compete with the perrenial best of the best(USC, OSU, LSU) who have NFL talent on board and run NFL based systems, then Michigan had better get NFL bound players and coach them as such.

Oregon is a flash in the pan at this point, no NC's, a few good years and have yet to beat a quality SEC team(unlike Lloyd who owned their asses).

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
November 23rd, 2011 at 12:05 AM
(Reply to #97) #78
Ziff72
Joined: 07/07/2008
MGoPoints: 8309
You're Wrong

Was Bo wrong when he ran the option?  Lou Holtz?   Barry Switzer?  I can't believe Tom Osborne was able to overcome that schematic disadvantage against  Miami and Florida to win back to back titles.  Florida, Oklahoma, Auburn flash in the pans running that sissy spread.

Any coach will tell you an option atack will work at any level beacuse it is simple math.  

LSU runs option, Alabama is in the pistol.

Not sure how else to tell you but you are wrong.  

Power football is great.  I grew up on it and I love it, but to argue against the spread at this point is to say the world is flat.  Both schemes work well if taught well.

 

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
November 22nd, 2011 at 6:07 PM
(Reply to #79) #79
gbdub
gbdub's picture
Joined: 02/16/2010
MGoPoints: 12685
Pat White had Steve Slaton.

Pat White had Steve Slaton. Oregon has Lamichael James. We had Vincent Smith.

I think that's your difference right there.

Ask Les Miles if he'd rather play Alabama or last year's Auburn again. Hint: he lost to one of those teams.

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
November 22nd, 2011 at 6:15 PM
(Reply to #79) #80
lunchboxthegoat
lunchboxthegoat's picture
Joined: 10/07/2008
MGoPoints: 2978
Cam Newton had more rushing

Cam Newton had more rushing attempts than both of those players you've listed last year. 

I'm sure if you asked RR if he wanted a 6'5 240lb 4.5 40 running manbeast as his QB instead of a 6'0 200lb guy he'd take it. 

You're right, it was all USCs defense smothering that gimmicky offense that Chip runs out there. They held them to a paltry 474 yards. 

 

2 Turnovers, blocked punt, miss FG. 

Oregon's offensive capabilities had nothing to do with their loss. 

Your argument doesn't make sense. 

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
November 22nd, 2011 at 5:13 PM
(Reply to #19) #81
michgoblue
michgoblue's picture
Joined: 11/16/2009
MGoPoints: 20962
Great observations

I agree with almost everything that you note.

RR is a guy who really does love his players, and really does feel that he got a raw deal.

On the raw deal thing, I don't see how he can feel that way, given that in his 3 years here, he won 3,5 and 7 games, got blown out by OSU all three years, lost to MSU all three years, only won a handful of B10 games in total over three years, and capped his time with a blowout embarassment (despite having those 16 extra practices and a healthy team) in the Gator. 

On an objective basis, setting aside all of the noise, he did not perform up to expectations - not even close - and he was fired for it. 

As to the whole "get it" thing, I agree - he just doesn't get it, and he never will.  Watching this presser confirmed it.  Watching RR say that he will emphasize the ASU rivalry every day, that he will "live ASU football" and that he will learn all of their traditions, to me at least, came off as him saying "I should have said these things at Michigan, so I will say them here, because saying them and playing into the whole rivalry, tradition thing will show that I get it and showing that I get it is important."  ASU is not Michigan - I don;t know shit about Arizona, but are they as into their traditions?  Is the ASU rivalry a big deal like the OSU rivalry is to us?

Whatever, I am sorry for getting on my soap box, but I just needed to vent.  All of the attention being paid to RR during OSU week brought back my "please fire this guy . . . I am so happy he is gone" feelings.  Again, sorry.

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
November 22nd, 2011 at 6:01 PM
(Reply to #58) #82
maizenbluenc
maizenbluenc's picture
Joined: 07/21/2009
MGoPoints: 7931
OK so lets talk about something

totally not relevant to Michigan like pervs at PSU instead, or it's Tuesday, what are your drinking.

Seriously, Rich Rod being hired somewhere else is relevant. So is the Urban Meyer developments down in Columbus. While I agree that discussion about Ohio versus other common opponents, and other analyses about The Game is more appropriate for this week, most of that kind of content doesn't get posted in MGoBoard, and this topic drives clicks.

We already did all the Bo reminiscing last week. The pressers have been pretty bland. (With the press asking questions like Hoke was hired yesterday - maybe there is more national press that haven't been around during the season?)

So relax, and don't click on the Rich Rodriguez threads if you would prefer to focus on what to have at tailgates, etc.

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
November 22nd, 2011 at 6:26 PM
(Reply to #58) #83
gbdub
gbdub's picture
Joined: 02/16/2010
MGoPoints: 12685
So, if RR talks about

So, if RR talks about rivalries, he's just doing it to appease the fanbase and "doesn't get it". If he doesn't talk about rivalries, he doesn't understand what's important to the fanbase and "doesn't get it". Way to set up a no-win scenario there.

Look, if you just don't like the guy that's totally fine. He rubbed you the wrong way. It happens. But say that. Don't couch your personal dislike in the nebulous concept of "getting it" whatever that means.

RR thinks he got a raw deal because he told Mary Sue and Bill Martin going in that things were going to take 3-4 years and would be rough before that time. But he got zero support through the bad times and cut loose after three years. He thought Michigan would be a first-class place where he could expect class treatment and only the best for his players and coaches, but it wasn't - he was sniped at at every step for faults real and imagined, and still got zero support from the AD. He knew he needed a good DC, but Martin was tight with the purse-strings. He had to take the fall for the bad blood with WVU because Mary Sue and Bill Martin put a gag order on him (because they didn't want to risk their own skins). Then, on the way out, DB intentionally fires him too late for him to land a good job and then doesn't give him a Gator Bowl ring, just to rub it in a little more.

In his mind, and I'd say this isn't terribly unrealistic, he probably believes he came in and was exactly who he told everyone he was going to be - and yet he was never backed up by his bosses, depite being vilified for being the coach they hired him to be.

Yeah he lost, and that's what matters most to the average fan, but we all know there was a lot more to it than that, places where he really was treated poorly.

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
November 22nd, 2011 at 5:21 PM
(Reply to #19) #84
FrankMurphy
FrankMurphy's picture
Joined: 08/19/2008
MGoPoints: 10000
I don't think we would have

I don't think we would have been 9-2 heading into The Game under Rich Rod, but that's because of the defense, not the offense. When Casteel decided to stay at WVU, it exposed Rodriguez's cluelessness about defense. Even if he fired GERG, there's no way he would have hired a DC of Mattison's caliber and allowed him to do his job without constantly meddling with the scheme. And his position coaches were also part of the problem (especially Gibson, as has been discussed extensively on this site).

But aside from that, I never thought he was anything but a class act and a stand-up guy. I hope he's learned from his mistakes. I'll definitely be rooting for him to succeed at UA. 

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
November 23rd, 2011 at 12:20 PM
(Reply to #61) #85
chrs5mr
chrs5mr's picture
Joined: 09/01/2009
MGoPoints: 372
I wish him luck but....

unfortunately it doesn't sound like he's going to leave the defense alone:

“I like to run the odd front because it gives you versatility, but even the 3-3-5 now has morphed into a 3-4. I’m going to try to hire the best defensive coordinator I can, and if his schemes and philosophy can match some of the parameters I give him, then we’ll do that...I’m not married, so to speak, to a 3-3-5.”

http://tucsoncitizen.com/wildcatreport/2011/11/22/exclusive-one-on-one-with-rich-rodriguez/

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
November 22nd, 2011 at 4:12 PM
#86
Ziff72
Joined: 07/07/2008
MGoPoints: 8309
agree/disagree

I think you have a great read on his psyche, but your questions about scheme have been beat to death.  Haven't Oregon, Florida, Auburn etc. been enough to prove that the spread can work? 

1. Spread works

2. It works in bad weather

3. Ball control is a byproduct of good offense/defense not a game strategy.

Also Van Bergen is quoted in Brian's UVF as saying this team had something going that people on the outside could not see and they didn't want that to be ruined regardless of who the coach was.  So you may not think RR could have got them to 9-10 wins but the players on the team did.

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
November 22nd, 2011 at 9:51 PM
(Reply to #27) #87
SalvatoreQuattro
SalvatoreQuattro's picture
Joined: 11/30/2010
MGoPoints: 39920
They can believe anything they want

But the paucity of coaching acumen on the defensive staff tells me that their hopes were based more on blind faith than reality. True believers will hold on even when it is obvious to a blind person that things are not working.



A rational being can see that Rich's program would not have succeeded with the egregious defense that he had. His special teams were also awful. Being bad at two-thirds of the game does not augur well for future success.

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
November 22nd, 2011 at 4:42 PM
(Reply to #36) #88
lunchboxthegoat
lunchboxthegoat's picture
Joined: 10/07/2008
MGoPoints: 2978
perception is

perception is reality.

sometimes you have to tell people what they want to hear even if it doesn't have any relationship to anything in reality. 

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
November 22nd, 2011 at 6:48 PM
(Reply to #44) #89
gbdub
gbdub's picture
Joined: 02/16/2010
MGoPoints: 12685
He tried the "say what you

He tried the "say what you believe" approach at Michigan and was vilified for it. Now we're back to Fort Schembechler.

If RR has a problem with honesty, it's too much of it.

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
November 22nd, 2011 at 4:53 PM
(Reply to #42) #90
lexus larry
lexus larry's picture
Joined: 01/22/2009
MGoPoints: 1430
Agreed

with you and Ziff below.

Sadly, too many in the "Michigan Football Family" - ex-players, alums, ex-coaches, admins, columnists, fans - insisted that because THEY didn't read/hear those things that RR was saying to the team, he must not have believed them, or didn't know them, or whatever.

Including a 90 second interaction with our former coach. 

That guy doesn't get it, and seemingly, never did, right?

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
November 22nd, 2011 at 4:45 PM
(Reply to #36) #91
Ziff72
Joined: 07/07/2008
MGoPoints: 8309
Boiler Plate

He said the exact same things at the Michigan presser.   All coaches say the exact same thing.  The only thing he might have learned is to mention the traditions, but I think he said that at the U-M presser. 

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
November 22nd, 2011 at 4:48 PM
(Reply to #36) #92
Section 1
Section 1's picture
Joined: 06/29/2009
MGoPoints: 16556
I think press conferences are for the press.

Not players.

Personally, I interpret Rodriguez's comments as intended for the press.  And that the message can be summed up this way:

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
November 22nd, 2011 at 5:10 PM
(Reply to #36) #93
Greg McMurtry
Greg McMurtry's picture
Joined: 02/25/2009
MGoPoints: 17262
It's funny

I bet no one at Arizona cares what he's saying, they're just thinking: "sweet we got Rich Rodriguez."

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
November 22nd, 2011 at 6:51 PM
(Reply to #77) #94
gbdub
gbdub's picture
Joined: 02/16/2010
MGoPoints: 12685
Jeebus the NCAA stuff is

Jeebus the NCAA stuff is annoying. It's getting mentioned in every article. Why? When you've got coaches getting canned for lying to the NCAA, covering up illegal benefits, and oh yeah looking the other way when you hear about child rape?

Damn, if the worst thing you have on a coach is that his kids stretched for 20 minutes too long on Mondays (even though they didn't exceed 20 hrs for the week), that coach is a freakin' saint.

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
November 22nd, 2011 at 7:25 PM
(Reply to #119) #95
gbdub
gbdub's picture
Joined: 02/16/2010
MGoPoints: 12685
The fact that Michigan was

The fact that Michigan was tagged with a "major violation" is just proof that the NCAA had a really dumb definition of "major violation" that's since been changed.

Basically, RR's staff was guilty of committing a minor (and apparently inadvertent) accounting error against a Byzantine rule set that most coaches don't understand. The violations provided at best a miniscule competitive advantage (much less than St. Saban Memorial, which continues unabated).

I'm not saying RR's absolved, but he's hardly a scofflaw, and acting like that should disqualify him as a coach is silly alarmism by the media.

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
November 22nd, 2011 at 4:52 PM
#96
deadlift425
deadlift425's picture
Joined: 11/24/2009
MGoPoints: 88
I hope he succeeds in

I hope he succeeds in Arizona.  I personally love the read option offense(see Oregon for an example).  If he can get a good defensive coordinator like Casteel, I see no reason he can't win 8-9 games a season in the Pac 12.

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
November 22nd, 2011 at 5:07 PM
(Reply to #48) #97
chrs5mr
chrs5mr's picture
Joined: 09/01/2009
MGoPoints: 372
It will be interesting...

who he gets for his staff.  He mentioned a couple of times that he had 3-4 guys that he's had long ties with from WVU and Michigan, then kind of covered it up by saying "if they accept and come".

I believe all those guys found jobs, so do they leave after a year?  Does Barwis leave after just opening his gym?  Casteel leaving would be very interesting.

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
November 22nd, 2011 at 5:36 PM
(Reply to #53) #98
JD_UofM_90
JD_UofM_90's picture
Joined: 11/09/2009
MGoPoints: 4197
Ring, ring....

Hey Coach Jackson, this is Rich.  Just wanted to know, have you ever been to Arizona?

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
November 22nd, 2011 at 5:45 PM
(Reply to #53) #99
maizenbluedevil
maizenbluedevil's picture
Joined: 09/12/2008
MGoPoints: 6887
I'll bet Barwis goes with

I'll bet Barwis goes with him.  An integral part of RR's philosophy is to have the kind of conditioning that will maximize quickness as opposed to size.  Barwis specializes in this.  

It'd be easy for Barwis to maintain ownership of his gym and keep his name on it while delegating the day-to-day operations to a staff, and go with RR to Arizona.  

I would be surprised if this is not what ends up happening.

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
November 22nd, 2011 at 9:17 PM
(Reply to #73) #100
justingoblue
justingoblue's picture
Joined: 11/16/2010
MGoPoints: 29685
Not to mention, if I were

Not to mention, if I were Barwis I'd be seeing dollar signs. He's got his gym in Michigan, if he can find someone to run it (while still leaving himself available for consultations when needed) 90% of the time and get a job at Arizona, he'd be doing very well for himself.

Good for him, guy is clearly very respected in his profession and he deserves to get paid off his accomplishments (if that is his goal).

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
November 23rd, 2011 at 12:17 AM
(Reply to #53) #101
Yeoman
Joined: 06/08/2011
MGoPoints: 13242
As far as I know, the only

As far as I know, the only member of his Michigan defensive staff that got promoted was Jay Hopson, who became a DC briefly and is not currently coaching. The rest are still position coaches so Arizona would be a horizontal move back to a familiar situation.

He seems to be certain he had the right formula here and would have won with his staff and this year's players. I suspect he'll try to put that defensive staff together again, maybe with Hopson as his coordinator, or maybe with Hopson back in his old slot and somebody new brought in to "coordinate".

God help him, whoever he is. I hope anyone contacted for the position puts in a call to Scott Shafer before he accepts.

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
November 22nd, 2011 at 5:10 PM
#102
HighKnees
Joined: 08/04/2008
MGoPoints: 57
Beat Ohio

Beat Ohio.

Also, I know RichRod had a lot to deal with here, but this constantly repeated idea that he was put upon and faced tremendous adversity is wearing me out.  I think every chapter of Three and Out contained a quote to the effect of "if they would just leave me alone, I could really make this work."  Maybe it's true that RichRod faced more adversity than your average coach at a big time football program (maybe!), but at a certain point, I think that attitude becomes counter productive.  Not just in football, but in all jobs.  I think that "woe is me" attitude and blame-deflection may have contributed to RichRod's failure here as much as anything else.  (Oh, and a defense that was not fundamentally or schematically sound).

And I'm tired of him expressing his frustration that he can't be the one coaching us to 10 wins this year.  You know what, if RichRod is still here, we don't have 10 wins.  He had 3 years to pick a decent DC and defensive coaching staff.  He had 2 years to teach Will Campbell to keep his butt down and not stand up on the DL.  He had 3 years to teach J.T. Floyd how to cover.  He failed to do that nad failed to hire someone who could.  What makes him think he could find the right person for the job in year 4?

I wish the guy all the best.  I like his offensive scheme, and I think he's a guy that tries in general to do the right thing.  But his constant refrain of not getting a fair shake and wishing he was the one enjoying success in 2011 is really wearing on me.

Beat Ohio.

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
November 22nd, 2011 at 5:18 PM
(Reply to #54) #103
michgoblue
michgoblue's picture
Joined: 11/16/2009
MGoPoints: 20962
slow clap

If I knew, how, I would insert that gif of the guy doing the slow clap.  That, sir, was awesome.  Well said.  Fair and right to the point.  If RR is here, we don't have 10 wins - the defense was never going to improve with him at the helm.

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
November 22nd, 2011 at 5:44 PM
(Reply to #54) #104
Section 1
Section 1's picture
Joined: 06/29/2009
MGoPoints: 16556
?

Which Three and Out did you read?  The one by John U. Bacon?

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
November 23rd, 2011 at 12:04 PM
(Reply to #72) #105
brucek58
Joined: 10/08/2011
MGoPoints: 19
Maybe you could recommend a

Maybe you could recommend a Kumon location near him.

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
November 22nd, 2011 at 6:57 PM
(Reply to #54) #106
gbdub
gbdub's picture
Joined: 02/16/2010
MGoPoints: 12685
1) WE DON'T HAVE 10 WINS YET

1) WE DON'T HAVE 10 WINS YET GOOD LORD DO YOU WANT TO HEX THE WHOLE THING!?!?!

2) Would you rather he not give a damn about how the kids he recruited were doing? Would you rather he say, "yeah that Hoke guy is a way better coach than me". He loved his team and wishes he was there leading them. He thinks he's the best man to lead them. I'd be really worried if he didn't.

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
November 23rd, 2011 at 1:02 PM
(Reply to #113) #107
HighKnees
Joined: 08/04/2008
MGoPoints: 57
That's fair

1).  Yeah, I meant roughly 10 wins - not that we're going to have 10 wins.  Because that's for the football gods to decide.  (Checks over shoulder, hopes "Beat Ohio" intro and outro appeases football gods).

2).  Totally fair.  I expect him to want the team to win and to follow what they are doing.  And no , I don't expect him to say "Hoke is better, I couldn't have done this."  What bothers me is the "I wasn't treated fairly" attitude.  If he can't talk about Michigan without making excuses (if I had only had a third opportunity to choose a DC), then I think he ought to just avoid the subject.  

Any how, this is turning into more of a rant than I wanted it to be.  Sorry for the borderline flaming.  I'm going to follow my own advice - if I don't have anything nice to say about RichRod, then I just won't discuss him at all.  

Beat Ohio.

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
November 22nd, 2011 at 5:39 PM
#108
wolverine1987
wolverine1987's picture
Joined: 07/07/2008
MGoPoints: 11614
"One of the five greatest minds in college football."

That is a hell of a quote about RR from Urban Meyer. Anyone idiot that says RR can't coach (which surprinsly you do see a bit here and a lot on other sites) or that his system doesn't work in the B10, or other such drivel, can just think about the quote and STFU. 

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
November 22nd, 2011 at 6:05 PM
(Reply to #67) #109
michgoblue
michgoblue's picture
Joined: 11/16/2009
MGoPoints: 20962
quote

Hmmm.  Let's weigh the evidence:

In the "anyone idiot (sic) that says RR can't coach or that his system doesn't work in the B10 . . . can STFU" column, we have a quote.  A quote by Urban Meyer (the new OSU coach, apparently), who has never coached in the B10, and who got his ass handed to him by stodgy old boring Lloyd Carr.

In the column that believes that RR's offense is not well suited to the B10 or that RR is not a great HC, we have:  THE WORST 3 YEARS IN MICHIGAN HISTORY, complete with the worst Michigan defense EVER, GERG, rotating D coordinators, 15 wins in three years, OSU blowouts, a Gator humiliation, team chaos, the worst transition I have ever witnessed (and I have watched cfb for almost 20 years), poor recruiting, 2 straight collapses once we got to the B10 part of the schedule and, wait, a new coach who has taken the identical players and turned them into a top defense AND a balanced, productive offense on the verge of possibly getting 10 wins - gasp, in the first year of a transition.

But, yeah, you do have that quote.

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
November 22nd, 2011 at 6:57 PM
(Reply to #85) #110
wolverine1987
wolverine1987's picture
Joined: 07/07/2008
MGoPoints: 11614
Sorry, you are wrong,

not just a different opinion, but wrong. That's first. Second, Urban Meyer knows more than you about who can coach. Period. There is no other "column." He is right because he knows WAY more than you (and I). Your opinion is talk radio quality--just because it is a fact that Michigan did not go well for him, that doesn't obscure the fact that he can coach. There are many other facts that disagree with your opinion, and for the ultimate rejoinder to your opinion, see Urban Meyer and Bob Stoops. Plus his record at WVA. And his offense here. There is no comparison. Sorry again.

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
November 22nd, 2011 at 7:09 PM
(Reply to #85) #111
MGoNukeE
MGoNukeE's picture
Joined: 11/11/2009
MGoPoints: 2060
Thanks for the MLive material.

--Discrediting Urban Meyer despite earning 2 national champions in his first 4 years of coaching at Florida.

--Using blanket statements about the team's win-loss record rather than specifics regarding why it was Rodriguez's coaching that led to his win-loss record.

--The false statement that the last 3 years were the worse 3 years ever (you meant "worst 3-year period").

--Mentioning how poor of a recruiter Rodriguez is despite that he shouldn't have needed to start many of his recruits in the first few years of his tenure, and that his recruits are performing well under Mattison/Hoke.

--Never refuting the claim that RR's offense is not well suited to the Big Ten.

--WTF does "team chaos" mean? You mean how he brought the team together so Hoke/Mattison don't have to deal with the transfers he did? Or should Rodriguez have done more to prevent Lloyd Carr's direct undermining of him in his first year?

--Here's something that may surprise you: comparing this year to last year, Hoke's record against common opponents is identical to Rodriguez's record. See, I can make statements that are 100% truth and blanket the underlying cause too. Now, I think Hoke will prove this wrong by beating Ohio State this weekend, but part of the reason why he wins is because Ohio State is in turmoil right now, without last year's coach or quarterback.

If you want to continue this stimulating discussion with me, come join me on MLive.*

*I'm not on MLive.

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
November 23rd, 2011 at 12:20 PM
(Reply to #85) #112
brucek58
Joined: 10/08/2011
MGoPoints: 19
If I remember correctly,

If I remember correctly, Michigan's defenses under Lloyd were torched by spread offenses. Northwestern games come to mind often. How did we do against Oregon in 2007? We gave up 39 points and 624 yards. The game was over by halftime. That's just off the top of my head. As for the Florida game, I seem to remember that it was more that we outscored them than we shut their offense down. Florida scored 30 points for crying out loud.

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
November 22nd, 2011 at 6:10 PM
(Reply to #67) #113
micheal honcho
Joined: 10/27/2010
MGoPoints: 1369
Urban Meyer?? The guy who

Urban Meyer?? The guy who tore up the SEC before Saban showed up? The guy who had carte blanche on recruits of his choice in Florida because at the time he coached Miami & FSU were off the map? The guy who brought us TEBOW? Of course he loves him some RR. He copied his damn playbook and had great success with it until Saban & Miles got up to speed with their systems.

My fondest memory of Urban Meyer is watching Lloyd Carr & company beat his ass & give the NFL a free preview of what Tebow would look like facing a real defense.

Fuck Urban Meyer, he's a buckeye wanna be who coached a team of convicts & talked bad about Michigan, his quotes about anybody don't amount to a hill of shit to me.

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
November 22nd, 2011 at 6:55 PM
(Reply to #88) #114
wolverine1987
wolverine1987's picture
Joined: 07/07/2008
MGoPoints: 11614
Don't be an ass,

Unless you can't help it that is. Your post is patently ridiculous and idiotic. You are both factually wrong, and given other posts I've seen from you, ignorant.

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
November 22nd, 2011 at 7:05 PM
(Reply to #88) #115
gbdub
gbdub's picture
Joined: 02/16/2010
MGoPoints: 12685
Can we stop pretending that

Can we stop pretending that Lloyd's last win somehow invalidates everything Urban Meyer did at Florida? Sure, it was a great game and a big win, but a) Michigan should have been in a better bowl (they lost a lot of games that year with banged up starters on offense) and b) Michigan won mostly by being more spread-like.

Urban Meyer can coach. Regardless of anything else you may think about him, dude can coach (so can Saban, who I have no qualms saying is a complete ass).

I think we can beat him, but let's not pretend we'll do that by Lloyd-balling him to death.

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
November 22nd, 2011 at 5:39 PM
#116
chrs5mr
chrs5mr's picture
Joined: 09/01/2009
MGoPoints: 372
Did find this interesting...

Per ESPN:  Rodriguez has signed a five-year, $9.55 million contract to coach at Arizona. The university will pay $8.05 million and the rest will come from Nike and IMG.  

Didn't know Nike and IMG made deals like this...

http://espn.go.com/college-football/story/_/id/7269857/arizona-wildcats-sign-rich-rodriguez-five-year-955-million-contract

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
November 22nd, 2011 at 5:40 PM
#117
A2Fan
A2Fan's picture
Joined: 02/05/2009
MGoPoints: 1264
No Shotgun Wedding this time . . .

Horace Greeley would approve, as do I.

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
November 22nd, 2011 at 5:48 PM
#118
Marc 71
Joined: 04/10/2009
MGoPoints: 57
Mr. Yost

That was great stuff.  After reading Three and Out, I agree that RR did get a raw deal from the administration but you're right that he "didn't get it".  He couldn't put any of the ingredients together properly to cook up a defense even though the recipe is obvious to any coach...so he would not have achieved the success Brady Hoke has this year.  But I was in his corner in spite of taking shit from most of my class of '71 mates so I wish him well.

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
November 22nd, 2011 at 6:00 PM
#119
NateVolk
NateVolk's picture
Joined: 07/19/2010
MGoPoints: 5548
The same old questions arise

The same old questions arise whenever you see Rich as a head coach talking about the team. Is he about the program and the players or about what Rich can do to further his genius label leading the program?    Huge difference as far as the tone and culture.

That question always spoke to his inability to connect with the players and to get them to really want to win for him. 

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
November 22nd, 2011 at 6:07 PM
(Reply to #81) #120
Ziff72
Joined: 07/07/2008
MGoPoints: 8309
Check

You obviously didn't read the book.  

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
November 22nd, 2011 at 7:09 PM
(Reply to #81) #121
gbdub
gbdub's picture
Joined: 02/16/2010
MGoPoints: 12685
Huh? What are you even

Huh? What are you even talking about? Jeebus if we're ranking coach egos RR was probably in the bottom half of the B1G, let alone the SEC.

By all accounts his players at Michigan - at least the ones willing to work hard - loved the guy and he loved them back.

 

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
November 23rd, 2011 at 12:33 PM
(Reply to #81) #122
MH20
MH20's picture
Joined: 10/30/2008
MGoPoints: 17278
Hi, I'm Nate Volk, and I

Hi, I'm Nate Volk, and I irrationally hate Rich Rodriguez.  To further my hate of him, I make patently false generalizations in order to continually make him look like a total monster.  Oh, and please don't ask me about anything relating to Three & Out, because I didn't read it, mostly because it was purposely slanted in RR's direction and I hate that man with all my being.

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
November 22nd, 2011 at 6:33 PM
#123
BlueinLansing
BlueinLansing's picture
Joined: 09/01/2009
MGoPoints: 16425
Arizona is currently

#114 in defense.  Anything RR does there next year will be an improvement.

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
November 22nd, 2011 at 6:43 PM
#124
MGOBLOGNORCAL
MGOBLOGNORCAL's picture
Joined: 11/30/2010
MGoPoints: 9
I was a Michigan fan.

I was a Michigan fan. Starting today, I am an Arizona fan.

If you want to know the REAL TRUTH about what happened to the great Rich Rodriguez at Michigan, I highly reccomend reading John U. Bacon's new book, "Three and Out." If you don't have the time, here's a summary (I'll be as brief as possible without leaving important information out):

...It all starts with the coaching search. The first choice of Bill Martin (our former athletic director) and the search committee he assembled was Iowa's Kirk Ferentz. That's who Bo Schembechler said he wanted before he died, and as a result, that's who Lloyd Carr and the rest of the Michigan family wanted (Bo was a very, very powerful man here). So Ferentz was reached out to, he agreed to come, and the papers were ready to be signed. But Mary Sue Coleman (the school president) vetoed the hire. Before she came to Michigan, she was the president at Iowa, and she hated Kirk Ferentz because his players got into so much trouble there. This was the first curveball of the search process; and not including Mary Sue Coleman in the search comittee was the first of many mistakes made by Bill Martin.

...The second choice of Bill Martin and the search committee was L.S.U.'s Les Miles. Miles was reached out to, he agreed to come (after finishing his national championship season), and the papers were ready to be signed. But Lloyd Carr vetoed the hire (I guess he had enough influence to do so). Before he died, for reasons that are still debated (I can explain in detail, if requested), Bo Schembechler made Lloyd Carr promise him that Les Miles would never be the head coach at Michigan. This was the second curveball of the search process; and not including Lloyd Carr in the search committee was the second of many mistakes made by Bill Martin.

...The third choice of Bill Martin and the search committee was Rutgers' Greg Schiano. He was reached out to, he agreed to come, and the papers were ready to be signed. But once Greg Schiano learned that his assistants were actually going to have to take a PAY CUT to come to Michigan, he renegged. This was the third curveball of the search process; and not recognizing the value of assistant coaches was the third of many mistakes made by Bill Martin.

...Bill Martin and the search committee had no idea what to do at this point and couldn't agree on a fourth candidate (Jim Harbaugh was never considered as a real candidate, in either search, due to negative remarks he made about the schools academic policies for athletes). So, Lloyd Carr decided to handle things himself. He wanted to hire Mike DeBord (his offensive coordinator), Ron English (his defensive coordinator), or Brady Hoke (his former assistant head coach). But Bill Martin and the search committee agreed that none of these candidates were high-profile enough. So, Lloyd reached out to a high-profile candidate that Bo Schembechler admired - Rich Rodriguez. Lloyd sold the idea to Bill Martin and the search committee, and the papers were signed.

...Then the real trouble began. There were two major problems. I'll start with the simpler problem. Bill Martin (one of the greatest penny-pinchers in the history of college sports) wouldn't give Rich enough money to lure Jeff Kasteel, his long-time defensive coordinator, away from West Virginia. In fact, Bill Martin wouldn't give Rich enough money to lure any of the defensive coordinators he wanted. So, Rich was instead forced to hire a cheap defensive coordinator he didn't want (Scott Shafer), and then another the next season (Greg Robinson). The results clearly speak for themselves. In contrast, Dave Brandon (our new athletic director) gave Brady Hoke $1,000,000 a season to hire Baltimore Ravens defensive coordinator Greg Mattison. Those results also clearly speak for themselves.

...Now the more complicated problem. Lloyd Carr (who became our assistant athletic director after he retired as head coach) wanted Rich to retain all of his assistants when he arrived (...to run the spread option!?!?). Rich interviewed all of Lloyd's assistants and decided to retain only one. This INFURIATED Lloyd and the Michigan football family. Lloyd and his friends wanted Rich out before he ever coached a single game. They wanted a "real Michigan man" to be their head coach. So, they went into full-on sabotage mode (I know it sounds crazy, but trust me, it's very, very true).

...Immediately, funding from alumni clubs dropped drastically. NFL alumni started saying their high schools and "Lloyd Carr's Michigan" in their player introductions. Former players across the board publicly ripped Rich in the media. High school coaches that Lloyd and his friends knew started encouraging their players not to go to Michigan. Former players that were in some way connected to recruits started telling them not to go to Michigan. And worst of all, Lloyd's people in the athletic department repeatedly leaked false information to the press...leading to a two year - recruiting class killing - NCAA investigation (which ultimately concluded that Rich wasn't counting 15 minutes of pre-practice stretch time towards the total number of practice hours). Eventually, Lloyd and his friends got their wish. Rich was fired. Brady Hoke was hired.

...Rich Rodriguez had EVERYTHING going against him here. He was completely sabotaged by those he was working for. And he still managed to put together one of the most prolific offenses in the country. Now that his players have an actual defensive coordinator, they're projected to play in a BCS bowl game.

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
November 22nd, 2011 at 7:10 PM
(Reply to #108) #125
jmblue
Joined: 11/07/2008
MGoPoints: 56299
If we did not have a "real

If we did not have a "real defensive coordinator" from 2008-2010, whose fault is that?  I don't understand how people talk about RR like he was our offensive coordinator only.  I mean, if you want to think of him as basically a glorified OC, I don't necessarily disagree - but the fact is, he was accountable for the entire program, not just the offense - and he was very bad at many aspects of running it.

 

 

 

 

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
November 22nd, 2011 at 7:15 PM
(Reply to #115) #126
MGoNukeE
MGoNukeE's picture
Joined: 11/11/2009
MGoPoints: 2060
Not all on RR

He could have done more to fight for Casteel to come join him, and in hindsight should have. However, given that Casteel was Rodriguez's first choice and turned him down because he wouldn't have gotten paid enough, Bill Martin and Michigan are also at fault.

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
November 22nd, 2011 at 7:18 PM
(Reply to #120) #127
jmblue
Joined: 11/07/2008
MGoPoints: 56299
Why is Jeff Casteel

Why is Jeff Casteel apparently the only defensive coordinator in the country that Rich Rodriguez can co-exist with?  Why can't he work with another DC?   If he really can't do so with anyone else, that's a huge problem.

 

 

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
November 22nd, 2011 at 9:44 PM
(Reply to #108) #128
SalvatoreQuattro
SalvatoreQuattro's picture
Joined: 11/30/2010
MGoPoints: 39920
Goodbye. Don't let the door hit you on the way out.

I cheer for the program, not the coach.

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
November 22nd, 2011 at 11:52 PM
#129
Black Socks
Black Socks's picture
Joined: 11/30/2009
MGoPoints: 14365
Man I wish Rich Rod luck.  He

Man I wish Rich Rod luck.  He will do well there.  But after watching the press conference, I am glad that Hoke is coaching Michigan.

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
November 23rd, 2011 at 12:25 AM
(Reply to #131) #130
Section 1
Section 1's picture
Joined: 06/29/2009
MGoPoints: 16556
A serious question...

How on earth did Brady Hoke get such a reputation for conducting brilliant press conferences?  Brady Hoke may be a good coach, and a good guy.  I have no reason to doubt either one.  But I cannot think of a single brilliant thing that Brady Hoke has done, or said in a press conference. 

On the all-time ranking of coaches who were brilliant in dealing with the press, Brady Hoke must be somewhere around #200.  He is relentlessly good at repeating the customary boring, uninformative, noncommittal, coach-speak truisms.

Where does this business of Brady Hoke blowing everybody away with his press conference appearances come from? 

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
November 23rd, 2011 at 12:45 AM
(Reply to #137) #131
HELLE
HELLE's picture
Joined: 07/26/2011
MGoPoints: 2399
Hoke!

He's a big lovable guy that we just can't get enough of.

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
November 23rd, 2011 at 1:35 AM
(Reply to #139) #132
UMgradMSUdad
UMgradMSUdad's picture
Joined: 07/02/2011
MGoPoints: 9518
Hoke points with style and

Hoke points with style and authority.  And he says "Ohio." And he doesn't wear red.  What else do you want?

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
November 23rd, 2011 at 12:15 AM
#133
Jon Benke
Jon Benke's picture
Joined: 01/04/2010
MGoPoints: 1453
wait, just to be sure...

Does this mean his son de-committed from Michigan?

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
Powered by Drupal, an open source content management system
Theme provided by Roopletheme; sidebars adapted from Chris Murphy.