shorts

June 22nd, 2013 at 4:08 PM ^

I go to Coyotes games regularly, and they are my son's favorite team. I also have friends/colleagues who work for the Coyotes.

So ... yes. Granted, it might not be a LOT of people relative to, say, if the Wings were to leave Detroit (I'm still a Wings fan at heart, BTW), but there are plenty of Coyotes fans out here.

GoWings2008

June 21st, 2013 at 1:27 PM ^

Quebec may indeed deserve a team more than Seattle, but Seattle is certainly a much better city for an NHL team that Phoenix.  Nothing against Phoenix, I've spent a good amount of time there, but...a hockey town it is not.

APBlue

June 21st, 2013 at 3:06 PM ^

I'm not sure of the specifics, but didn't Quebec already lose a team because they didn't support it?  

If that's the case, I have a hard time saying that Quebec would deserve a team before another city.  Granted, the other city in this particular discussion has lost a basketball team because those citizens wouldn't support it, so forget it all.  

CONTRACTION!!!

snarling wolverine

June 21st, 2013 at 4:03 PM ^

Exactly.  Quebec supported the Nordiques very well, but the exchange rate was brutal for all Canadian teams at that time, and they also lacked a quality arena at the time.  The exchange rate is much better now and they're building a new arena, so those problems are resolved.

I want Quebec to get a franchise back, but I do agree that Seattle's not a bad place if you're looking for a new market.  Seattle's problem, incidentally, was not that they wouldn't support the Sonics.  They just got taken for a ride by a new owner who never wanted to keep them there.

 

 

APBlue

June 21st, 2013 at 4:46 PM ^

Thanks for clarifying. After you two mentioned the problems with the exchange rate, I do remember that being an issue for several years. However, these things being cyclical, isn't it a matter of time before the exchange rate is a problem again? Has the NHL done anything to avoid this problem in the future?

snarling wolverine

June 21st, 2013 at 5:02 PM ^

The exchange rate in the '90s was unusually bad for Canada - it's not normal for the two dollars to diverge that much.  It had to do in part with Canada going through difficult structural reforms.  But anyway, I believe the NHL has adapted its revenue sharing (which hardly existed back then) to take the exchange rate into account.

 

Yost Ghost

June 22nd, 2013 at 9:20 AM ^

Seattle didn't lose the Sonics because of the lack of fan support. The sonics were the only team in town with a championship, unless you want to count the Metropolitans. Fan support had waned in terms of ticket sales because the franchise was knowingly putting out an inferior product. Seattle lost the Sonics because Howard Starbucks Schultz sold the team to a Clay Bennett lead ownership group that he swore would not move the team who then held the city hostage with demands of a new arena on the heels of two $500+ mil stadiums for the Mariners and Seahawks and a fairly recent $75 mil renovation to Key Arena. Bennett was later exposed in emails lying about ever having intentions to keep the team in Seattle. All the while David Stern sat back and watched the whole thing unfold and did nothing to stop it, unlike the role he played for Sacramento and his buddy KJ. / rant

Lionsfan

June 21st, 2013 at 1:32 PM ^

Probably not this season. I read some Tweets this morning from NHL guys, and yes Glendale isn't putting up the money, but the Seattle Arena wouldn't be ready until the 2014-2015 season

Sac Fly

June 21st, 2013 at 1:36 PM ^

Seattle isn't ready. If they played at KeyArena until a new venue was built, it would be like when the Coyotes played at America West Arena.

The floor isn't the right size for hockey, the scoreboard is above the blueline and the seats on the other side are unusable. This is what it will look like if a team plays at KeyArena.

Canada loves S…

June 21st, 2013 at 2:47 PM ^

It was so much better to have a rink downtown.  Lots of bars to choose from for pre and post game libations.  It was so close to my house....

I liked the location of America West so much that I didn't even notice how screwed up it was inside.

MaizeAndBlueWahoo

June 21st, 2013 at 2:03 PM ^

Faulty logic.  Whether Miami and Phoenix "deserve" a team is totally irrelevant to whether Quebec "deserves" one.  A case can be made for putting a team in Quebec, but claiming they deserve a team is specious at best.  It's kind of a privilege, not a right.

jmblue

June 21st, 2013 at 4:18 PM ^

Quebec has the fanbase.  In fact, its junior hockey club (Quebec Remparts) drew over 11,000 fans per game this past season:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Canadian_Hockey_League#Attendance

The Nordiques' problem was the horrid exchange rate in the mid-90s, which was also what caused Winnipeg to lose the Jets around the same time.  They had to pay their players in U.S. dollars while their revenue was in Canadian dollars, which were worth around 60-65 cents back then.

 

UofM Die Hard …

June 21st, 2013 at 1:41 PM ^

the team would have to suffer for the first two years of losing money because Key Arena is dog poo. Once the new arena is built, money will flow in.  Fan base here will support it...4 milly + potential fan base.

 

I will buy season tickets if they come here, too bad the Wings moved to the east will be once in a while when I get to see them play.

 

Go Wings!

pasadenablue

June 21st, 2013 at 1:46 PM ^

Not exactly.  Read this: http://nhltoseattle.com/2013/06/20/potential-gate-revenues-in-keyarena/.

 

The franchise would do okay.  Actually more than okay, due to the excitement around the team.  Ticket prices would be a bit high (due to supply and demand), but it'd be awesome.

 

GOD I WANT A HOCKEY TEAM IN SEATTLE SOOOOOOOOOOOOO BADLY.

 

And I could root for both the Wings and the Mets (i.e. Metropolitans).

UofM Die Hard …

June 21st, 2013 at 2:02 PM ^

I am praying this happens.  I think hockey would do well here, been playing in leagues on and off since I moved here form Farmington Hills in 97...there is a solid hockey scene here.

 

Sounds like you are from Seattle, first brew on me if we run into eachother at the Key.

 

 

jmblue

June 21st, 2013 at 4:25 PM ^

the team would have to suffer for the first two years of losing money because Key Arena is dog poo

What is so bad about Key Arena? It was renovated in the mid-'90s. (There's an amusing YouTube video out there of David Stern raving about it, only a decade before the Sonics moved.)  Surely, with no NBA tenant, they can configure it properly for hockey, right?