OT Pelini Fired

Submitted by TimStraus on

Per Adam Rittenberg, Bo Pelini has been let go at Nebraska

wbpbrian

November 30th, 2014 at 11:00 AM ^

the Harbaughs, Mullen, Miles, and then Bo. Is that probably our order for the coaching search because the best part of hiring Pelini is that he can come now and work on the program. I really like his first name, if his first name was a forshadow on him being the Michigan coach I would be all for it. but seriously he did quite well at Nebraska with all his 9-3 records. You can argue he was just one win away from making it. He might be a last minute opition if we can't  get our other options. I am interested in hearing how you think he will fit in the program. I actually see him being a safe choice, he is consistent haven't had a coach be consistant since Carr so that may be a good thing.

maizenbluedevil

November 30th, 2014 at 3:09 PM ^

Exactly. Or third options for that matter. I think our realistic options are Jim, miles, and Schiano.

John harbaugh is not coming here and neither is Dan Mullen.

If we don't get jim or Miles were looking at Schiano. I don't think people realize what a possibility this is. I'd much rather have pelini than Schiano.... It's not even close.

That said I think we end up with miles but it's no guarantee.



Sent from MGoBlog HD for iPhone & iPad

BlueHills

November 30th, 2014 at 11:00 AM ^

Pelini would have the resources to win more at Michigan than at Nebraska. He should at least be interviewed to explore whether it'd be a good fit.

I honestly think Nebraska is making a gigantic mistake firing him.

alum96

November 30th, 2014 at 11:05 AM ^

Bo was good for 4 losses every year;  he was basically like an extension of the late Carr years where 3-4 loss seasons were typical but what he lacked the occassional 2 loss season to decompress pressure.  Also while Carr was losing to Tressel a lot those games were competitive.  Bo's fate looks like it was sealed in Madison this year as that was the 2nd completely uncompetitive game vs Wiscy in 3 years on big stages, with 2 different Wisconsin coaches.  It would be like Carr losing to OSU 62-14 twice. 

So yes the overall body of work was solid but you just cant go out there and be non competitive vs what is effectively (now) your top division rival.

Also all these wins for Big 10 teams are deceiving - piling up wins vs Indiana, Purdue, Rutgers, hell Michigan and PSU at this point, and 3 tomato cans in non conf gets you to 6-7 wins a year.  All you need to do is beat an Iowa on top of that and you get to 8-4 pretty easy in this conf.  Which is what makes the current state of UM football that much worse - any competent team that doesnt shoot itself in the foot and gets loads of 4 stars should have 8 wins as a floor in the current state of the conference.  There is a reason OSU is 24-0 in conf in 3 years, and its not because OSU has rolled out 3 juggernauts.

funkywolve

November 30th, 2014 at 12:10 PM ^

With Nebraska that's assuming your 4 stars are relatively spread out through all position groups and not heavily loaded into one position group, ie - oline.  It's also assuming all have stayed.  All I did is look at the number of 4 stars Rivals lists they've had each year for the last 4-5 years.

What service did you use for seeing UM has more than 50% 3 stars?  According to rivals in the last 4 years UM has signed 42 four and five star recruits.

alum96

November 30th, 2014 at 12:18 PM ^

I did a diary on it and I did not include this year's class (2014) because it was a piece more about what the composition of the 2014 team would look like and most successful teams are not going to be loaded with freshman contributors.  So I think it was 2013, 2012, 2011, 2010.  It was something like 52% 3 stars from memory.  I might have  included 2009 for 5th year seniors in that as well, I can't remember.

Larger picture Nebraska recruits in the late teens to late 20s most years.  They fall behind OSU and UM and right about where PSU recruits.  They get plenty of talent to succeed, and more than MSU, Wisconsin and way more than most of their compeition in the west ala Minnesota, Northwestern, etc.

I Like Burgers

November 30th, 2014 at 11:03 AM ^

I feel like Michigan and Nebraska are pretty similar at this point.  Both are living in the past, and both are dealing with unrealistic expectations.  67-27 and four division titles should be about right at Nebraska considering the changed landscape in CFB and the resources/location they have.

Michigan on the other hand, is also living in 1988, but their unrealistic expectations are that they should be winning 10, 11 games a year without changing with the times or doing what it takes to get the job done.

And honestly, I would kill to be Pelini era Nebraska.

SituationSoap

November 30th, 2014 at 12:23 PM ^

The option is very much there, and I for one would not be upset by hiring Bo Pelini. I'm not saying he'd be a slam dunk hire, but we'd know what we were getting, and what we'd be getting is quality running, iffy defense and 9-10 wins per year. 

 

All things considered, that's a massive upgrade over every year but 2011 since Carr left. If we don't get a slam dunk, Pelini is a layup, and that's still going to move the program forward compared to jacking up a 40-foot 3 pointer.

superstringer

November 30th, 2014 at 11:05 AM ^

On the night of the Wiscy debacle (the 2014 version), I posted a message asking if Pelini would get fired from that game.  The majority of people said 'no' b/c he still wins lots of games.

I wonder if our sense of things has been numbed over the past 7+ years.

For Nebraska -- who's the right guy?  Throw $8M at Bob Stoops?

Perkis-Size Me

November 30th, 2014 at 11:05 AM ^

If Nebraska fires Pelini for never doing worse than 8-9 win seasons, there is ZERO excuse to not fire Hoke.

But great. Now both they and Florida are getting head starts. We desperately need Harbaugh now, because I'm afraid if we don't, we'll be settling for the third-best candidate out there.

funkywolve

November 30th, 2014 at 11:21 AM ^

if Harbaugh really is Plan A, UM will be in holding pattern with the coaching search for a month or so.  So just by virtue of Harbaugh being #1 on the coaching list means any other program will have a head start on UM at least when it comes to going after other college coaches.

Unless the Niners fire Harbaugh before the season ends or Harbaugh resigns, the NFL season doesn't end until around NY's Day.  Hopefully, UM has at least reached out to Harbaugh's people to gauge his interest so UM knows whether to be patient or start looking at other candidates.

aiglick

November 30th, 2014 at 12:51 PM ^

This is what happens when coaches are paid extraordinary money. If you are made a millionaire by your organization you better perform or expect to be shown the door. This is only going to continue as fan bases and schools will expect a good return on their investments in these super staffs. It's very logical.

mgochacho

November 30th, 2014 at 11:22 AM ^

I think you're right. I bet there will be a ton of regrets over the next few years. Unless somebody is able to surpass the 9-10 win mark, which is already a solid mark, in their first 3 years there, fan unrest will rise to Michigan levels. Nebraska basically just set the bar at 10 wins plus occasional seasons of 11+. That's nuts.