Sllepy81

March 21st, 2014 at 7:48 PM ^

at home. Anyone can beat them away from home when the refs are not favoring them. Coach K plus the setting is more pressure on refs then opponents at home, away its open game. I think we could've beat them. Texas though, not so confident against them.

snarling wolverine

March 22nd, 2014 at 9:50 AM ^

The curse of Capel?

Since Coach K rescued him from unemployment three years ago, Duke is just 3-3 in the tourney, with two awful first-round losses (to #15 and #14 seeds, respectively).

Maybe that program is getting a little inbred - all three of K's assistants are his former players (Nate James being the other one).

 

bluebyyou

March 21st, 2014 at 7:51 PM ^

As happy as I was to see Duke go down, I try to keep myself restrained so I don't say something to piss off the anti-hubris gods; particularly when my team plays tomorrow.

Being superstitious is a bad way to go through life.

LSAClassOf2000

March 21st, 2014 at 7:54 PM ^

While we wait for college basketball’s powers that be to invent a new March Madness structure, one that allows Duke to suffer a devastating defeat, advance to the next round, then lose again in a never-ending cycle of shame, this is the best we can hope for.

That was a pretty entertaining read, and I agree with him here - what he describes above needs to happen one day, preferably in a bracket where Duke is awash in representatives from mid-majors and smaller conferences.

BlueCube

March 21st, 2014 at 8:09 PM ^

Avoiding Shame.

 

"We're Indiana Duke. We don't play in the CBI NCAA's.

                                                       

Indonacious

March 21st, 2014 at 9:29 PM ^

Everyone has varying definitions of for real. Do you mean favorites in the Midwest? Title contenders? A team that would of contended for the big 10 if they were in it? Or just a respectable team?

Gulogulo37

March 22nd, 2014 at 12:44 AM ^

It seems pretty obvious that "for real" here means more than "would place fairly high in the B1G". I get everyone knocking the schedule, and tourneys are fluky, but they were a pretty good team last year (9 seed) and made the Final 4. And didn't they bring back everyone from that team? Obviously they wouldn't have gone undefeated in a stronger conference, and you might not think they're the best, but I think it's crazy for someone to say they're not for real (i.e., strong NC contenders).

bronxblue

March 21st, 2014 at 10:01 PM ^

Absolutely true that teams beating top-ranked programs like Duke are no longer "out-of-nowhere" upsets.  There is a clear pattern and formula for beating any team; shoot really well and force them to keep up.  Either that, or have some weird collection of really good, older players and just wear down your opposition.

Princetonwolverine

March 21st, 2014 at 10:56 PM ^

Mercer didn't really come out of nowhere. They beat Florida Gulf Coast in their conference tourney final last week. All Mercer starters are seniors. 

Qmatic

March 21st, 2014 at 11:48 PM ^

No excuse for Duke not succeeding. If the excuse is that they are not "Duke Players" it questions Coach K's ability. Parker, Cook, Suliamon, and Hood is a lineup that should atleast get past the first weekend.

Don

March 22nd, 2014 at 8:49 AM ^

at second-tier programs can now be competitive with elite programs with lots of one- or two-and-done players. In other words, can non-elite but very experienced talent be competitive with more highly-talented programs whose best players never stay long enough to become seniors?

oriental andrew

March 22nd, 2014 at 9:54 AM ^

The premise of the argument is that dook is fielding a young team with high offensive efficiency, but a porous defense. At that high level, there are certainly strong parallels to Michigan. However, we have Beilein and 2014, obviously. GO BLUE!