JamieH

July 29th, 2015 at 1:19 AM ^

Goodell is the kind of egomaniacal stupid that NEVER really learns from mistakes. He just keeps trying different variations of the same failed strategies and is stunned every time when they blow up in his face. Everytime Goodell isn't allowed to just be a dictator, he loses badly.

seniorbearcat

July 29th, 2015 at 7:28 AM ^

Bringing the federal courts into the equation is playing with fire...IF Brady is completely innocent, the move could be brilliant and exonerate him and make the NFL look terrible. If he is guilty, the NFL will spend big money to flip one of those ball boys who has a get out of jail deal and make Tom Brady like Barry Bonds (with Bonds win at all costs approach, 8 years later and still getting appeals courts to overturn obstruction of justice charge/conviction), in the conversation of GOAT, but an a$$hole that everybody dislikes. Playing with fire!


Tom Brady's 1st mistake was that press conference he did...public opinion has been out there based on HIS words. When your guilty until you prove your innocence in this media society (see anything related to police in this country), why give the media / legal teams free advice to dissect. If I am innocent, I let my lawyers handle the job they are paid handsomely for and not let on that I am holding the laydown hand. The nice guys who might be somewhat in the Grey area who cooperate always dig their own graves in one way or another.

Roc Blue in the Lou

July 29th, 2015 at 12:31 AM ^

This is boring.  I would like to have seen Tom Brady rush into the face of the Commish ala George Brett and go all Purple Kellyish on him...with like 5 or 6 guys holding him back while he yelled and spitballed sunflower seeds into Goodell's chops.

UMgradMSUdad

July 29th, 2015 at 1:08 AM ^

As I understand it, Brady's biggest problem is that the NFLPA ceded power to the commisioner to do exactly what he's doing: essentially to be prosecuter, judge, and if Brady doesn't like the decision, the appeals judge also.  The players association royally fucked the players over with this aspect of their last labor agreement.  Goodell was granted the power by the NFLPA to do exactly what he's doing, and it's not likely to be the concern of the federal courts to interfere.

UMForLife

July 29th, 2015 at 8:18 AM ^

I am reading enough people say he shouldn't have destroyed it as it was asked to be handed over to a third party. I say this. If the third party, say his lawyer, says that there was no relevant evidence, would they stop? No. He would say that not enough evidence was turned over. They will trust no one. Goodell is a contradicting moron. In the case of Ray Rice, he wasn't very forthcoming. It is like I hire an auditor to audit myself and reveal to everyone that I did nothing wrong. I find it ironic that a guy is so worried about a stupid football than other bodily harm done by his players. I watched 10 games last year. Either lions or Patriots. That is all I will watch. This whole arrangement with owners being his boss and he is their teams' boss, is a silly arrangement. You are telling me a wife beater and a kid beater gets 16 games with a special provision to get money and a guy allegedly messed with a ball gets four games. And the guy making the decision can sleep at night. This whole things sound just like the stupid arrangements they make in Washington -- Self serving billionaires. /stop rant

michelin

July 29th, 2015 at 9:36 AM ^

• neither he or his coworkers did anything of which they have been accused.


• the cell phone revelation is an intentional attempt by the NFL to distract from their lack of real evidence of any wrongdoing.


• In fact, he destroyed the cell phone only after his lawyers told the NFL they had no right to it under ANY circumstances—that Brady would not set an NFL precedent for further invasions of other players’ constitutional rights to privacy.


• he never wrote, emailed, or texted to anyone anything about football air pressure before the issue was raised


• he had already turned over to Wells all the information he requested; and the NFL knows they already have all the texts in question.

 

Had Brady been allowed to speak or communicate on his appeal instead of being subjected to a gag order, he could have addressed the replaced phone before the NFL got to frame it as it did.


https://www.facebook.com/TomBrady

bacon

July 29th, 2015 at 9:50 AM ^

The question is, where is the line drawn.  The media are so quick to assign blame to Brady for not giving his cell phone records, but what if the NFL had demanded to search his home or his car?  Would people think he's guilty if he said no?  According to the NFL, they have the right to suspend him because he won't let them search his phone, but the same logic applies, they could have suspended him if he didn't let them search his home too. It's just that the media wouldn't have been as pro-NFL if they'd asked Brady to search his home and Brady said no.

Cold War

July 29th, 2015 at 11:14 AM ^

Sorry, I just don't feel the connection to Brady that I feel to many former Michigan players. He acts like an entitled, arrogant prick, and, yeah, he bends the rules in ways many others don't.

I think that's pretty much the opposite of what we want to see from our guys.