M-Wolverine

April 26th, 2012 at 7:14 PM ^

And I'd have been the THIRD open thread... It's time. Hopefully not OT, but probably will be till tomorrow.

Farnn

April 26th, 2012 at 7:22 PM ^

Taking a RB so high rally doesn't make much sense to me, considering the emphasis on passing, the short average career of RBs, and the Mathletes analysis of the impact of a returning RB in the college game.

BursleysFinest

April 26th, 2012 at 7:25 PM ^

    Link??? (on the Minn/Cleve trade).... doesnt really make sense from Cleveland's side, anone they wanted at 4 is gonna bethere at 3 (can they really want USC's OT that bad when they have Joe Thomas)

MichFan1997

April 26th, 2012 at 7:42 PM ^

on twitter with some nice comments:

"I know Trent Richardson is supposed to be GREAT, but I still think taking a RB with the third overall pick is a waste of resources.

The issue isn't how good is Richardson. The issue is Richardson vs. avg RB compared to Claiborne vs. avg CB or Kalil vs. avg OT.

It's a lot easier to find an avg RB than it is to find an avg OT, and it is a lot easier to find an avg OT than it is to find an avg CB."

Hlprn302

April 26th, 2012 at 7:44 PM ^

I agree it's very poor form to put such stock in a RB (a lesson all Bears fans learned over and over). However, here in Ohio the general belief is that the defense is headed in the right direction, but the offense is so stagnant that its unwatchable. Cleveland needs that excitement-especially with a very solid L side of the lineand a possession qb

WolvinLA2

April 26th, 2012 at 7:51 PM ^

Then do what every smart team does - if you don't need a top-5 type position (CB, DE, OT, QB) or aren't quite high enough to get the good ones, trade down, not up.  They should have traded down and taken a guy like Doug Martin, and they would have had more picks to build with rather than fewer picks.  Or they could have picked a WR and kept their later round picks.

This screams terrible decision to me, but it's the Browns, so yeah.

BiSB

April 26th, 2012 at 7:48 PM ^

But try to convince a Packers fan that they shouldn't have taken Barry Sanders over Tony Mandarich. Even IF Mandarich had panned out, Barry carried the Lions for a decade.

Individual players have their own values.

WolvinLA2

April 26th, 2012 at 7:52 PM ^

I have a bet with people from home:  Who gets taken first - Mike Martin or Kork Coupons.  Most mock's think they win, but I'm holding out hope.

mGrowOld

April 26th, 2012 at 8:04 PM ^

Browns season ticket holder here.  I LOVE the trade.  Bout time we did something with those damn low round draft picks we've been stockpiling.  Nice move.

JT4104

April 26th, 2012 at 8:05 PM ^

so why is it taking the colts more than 20 secs to have the card up and ready to read. This is the part I hate about the draft, everyone knows who you are picking, why even put it on a clock just get it over with.