absolutely terrible. and here i thought the saints were a feel good story that year.
Tennessee is not recruiting well just because they got 18 dudes
absolutely terrible. and here i thought the saints were a feel good story that year.
the NFL is going to have to find an answer to the disconnect between the increasing evidence that football does horrific damage to the human body and the sense among players that causing injury and getting injured (including concussions) are just part of the game. I have no idea how, though.
This is like some Buddy Ryan type shit. I love it. As long as its a clean hit, I have np with it. Im sick of how pussified the nfl has become. You cant even tackle anyone without a flag. Keep the bounties coming.
Vancouver should have totally paid Bertuzzi 500k for his hit on Moore. Mike Tyson should get a bigger gate percentage for biting off part of Holyfield's ear. Don't like getting Denarded? Five thousand for his ACL.
This would be great for sports.
He did say that the hits needed to be legal. Nothing you mentioned was inside the rules.
Instead, how about we say this:
Five thousand for Brady's non-thowing arm.
Ten thousand for either ankle or foot.
Twenty five thousand for his knee.
Fifty thousand for his right shoulder.
One hundred thousand for a concussion lasting more than a week.
What's going to happen to the hits being laid on Brady? Are players going to make hits designed to do nothing but injure? Is that change good for either the human race or the NFL? If we allow these bounties for legal hits, why not bend the rules just a little and lead with your helmet just a tad bit more than normal?
If the hits legal than it's legal, whether he led with a "tad bit more" of his helmet or not. In the end, there's not much you can do to try to add additional injury to somebody on a tackle except for hitting them harder. As long as they are playing a clean game, I don't really see a big problem with giving players extra incentive to make them give some more effort.
but the NFL and the NFLPA feel differently, and apparently several players injured by the Saints do as well. They don't like out of contract bonuses being paid to injure coworkers, and I tend to agree with them.
"I want to express my sincere regret and apology to the NFL, Mr. Benson, and the New Orleans Saints fans for my participation in the 'pay for performance' program while I was with the Saints. It was a terrible mistake, and we knew it was wrong while we were doing it. Instead of getting caught up in it, I should have stopped it. I take full responsibility for my role. I am truly sorry. I have learned a hard lesson and I guarantee that I will never participate in or allow this kind of activity to happen again."
Here's the link to the quote (emphasis mine in the quote above).
Maybe Gregg Williams is lying? His former players don't think so (Washington Post):
The four Redskins players who spoke on condition of anonymity portrayed Williams as a “coach who just took it a little too far,” in the words of one.
I'm curious "Lets Get Denarded". If a team were to put a bounty on Denard next year, would you still be okay with them?
Apparently nobody saw "as long as its a legal hit" in my post. I dont think guys are going to try to tear someones acl on purpose, but if someone puts a legal hit on a player and it just so happens to injure someone, than im fine with it. Its football. There are suppose to be hard hits. Now if a guy intentionally goes after someone knee or hits a guy late, then I have a prob with that.
You're naive if you think that something like this doesn't give incentive to provide illegal hits. The players are already paid to make the legal hits. This has to be incentive to go above and beyond.
Soma plyer makes 1000 bucks to make an illegal hit but then get fined 20k for the illegal hit. Makes sense to me.
How many "illegal" hits we there?
So if Meyer said at a press conference that anyone that knocks Denard out of their game without drawing a foul gets new jobs for their girlfriend and parents, you'd be cool with that? Or if the Giants had come out before the Super Bowl and said there was a hundred grand for anyone who made sure Brady was out of the game without a foul, that would be cool too?
All that's going to do is make sure the attempt to injure plays happen outside the normal scope of play, hopefully when the referees aren't looking.
If it happens outside of the scope of play while the refs werent looking would be constitued as an illegal, dirty play. Look how many games Denard got injured in over the past 3 years. He took some shots. Excluding Michigan St, none of those were dirty plays. Shit happens. The bounty was also for ints, sacks, and fumble recoveries. So the emphasis was not just on trying to hurt someone. I dont think anyone from the Saints seriously injured anyone, could be wrng tho.
Right, but if the goal is to not draw a flag, that's what will happen.
Incentivizing injuries to opposing players is just unacceptable, and has no place in any sport. Even if the criteria is no flag, there will be exponentially more dirty hits if you're being paid to injure someone.
I agree with what you are saying. My point is that if it was not a dirty play, then Im fine with it. But you are, giving incentives for injuries will cause more dirty hits, and thus, more injuries. Again, if its a nice form tackle thay happens to knock the guy out, Im ok with that.
I've been on the giving and receiving end of injuries over the years, and I have no problem with players going hard. I just don't think we need an incentive for violence outside the scope of the game.
If I were in the NHL right now and got hit at an awkward spot on the boards, ending my career, I would live with it. If I learned there was a bounty on that hit, I would be suing everyone and their mother, and I would be screaming bloody murder if the NHLPA wasn't doing everything they legally could on my behalf.
a bounty definitley blurs the line between sports, and assault. Especially when it is proven that a bounty exists, as that would be premeditated.
-- 25th out of 32 in 2009, when reportedly this bounty system was at its height -- so it seems like these incentive programs weren't helping anyway, which is what they deserve for this crap.
embarrassed for you.
I wonder if this could lead to lawsuits. i also wonder how this may effect the current lawsuits of ex-players vs. the NFL. If this practice is the norm on teams, the NFL could argue that the players do it to themselves, purposefully.
Hope they bust every single player/coach involved and hit them with fines. I'd say triple or quadrouple whatever the money they put in was, plus ten times whatever payouts they got. On top of that, they should be put on some sort of disciplinary probation by the league front office. If they do something stupid while on probation, double the usual punishment. I'd also like to see the NFL publish names in some kind of censure letter.
There's no place for this type of stuff in sports; these guys are animals and need to be punished accordingly.
i've said it before, but this obviously calls for criminal prosecution. conspiracy to commit battery is a good place to start.
The more I think about it, the more this needs to kill the Saints postseason chances for next year, as well as limiting their talent acquisitions for the next several. They probably need a forced coaching change at some level, and the ownership should be on probation, with the threat of losing their franchise for another egregious incident.
The players and coaches should be prosecuted, as you say; I can't believe offering cash for an injury isn't criminal.
It is criminal. It's not even controversial that it's criminal. It's just not prosecuted because the perception is that people don't want prosecutors (who have the leeway to press charges or not) to police stuff like this, so it's not seen as being worth the resources. Tough luck, families of future debilitated players.
I'd even go further. I say SMU the Saints - ban the entire organization from play for a full season, suspension w/o pay for all the players who were involved, and allow any other players on the team who wish to do so to enter free agency w/o penalty. The Saints deserve to be decimated for this. This is by far the worst sports scandal I can remember hearing about.
That's just plain ridiculous. No idea how you even think this should be close to criminal charges or possible jail time from those chargse.
People were paying money for other people to inflict bodily harm? I'm sorry but if you don't see how that is (potentially) criminal, I just don't know what to tell you.
If I offered the sum of $5,000 on MGoBlog to reinjure Brian Cook's knee, what do you think would happen legally? Hint: If you answer anything other than criminal charges, you need to be sure to stay away from criminal jurisdiction in most countries until you brush up on what's accepted in civilized society, and what isn't.
I want cash for choking out my competition. We all know rogers steppin up his concussion prevention game. This makes harrison look like a school boy. Look for some serious examples to be made. Sean peyton is a douche. Sounds like they should have paid out more though their D isnt top notch.
I'm curious to see Sparty's payout for UM players.
Get out of jail free cards
This puts a new spin on the other teams in the league complaining about Suh. While Suh needs to cool it a bit I thought the NFL wide outcry was a bit over the top. Lets see if other players come out and jump on the Saints for there dirty play the way they did Suh. I doubt we hear the same outrcy because the Saints are the darlings of the NFL along with a couple other untouchable teams.
When you stomp on people on the ground and everyone can see it, what do you expect the reaction to be? The guy is a dirty player, face it. The Saints were apparently less overt in what they did, or they spread the dirt around, and it wasn't so obvious. But the Saints conduct doesn't exonerate Suh in any way for what he did.
As I said Suh needs to check himself. But there where teams crying and whining about Suh long before the stomp. Which is in my opinion where he crossed the line. I never said what Suh did was correct. I am just curiouse to see if there will be the same level of outrage expressed as there was with Suh.
Testosterone and macho bravado aside, we're humans first. This should not be tolerated. It's extremely unprofessional, you don't intentionally try to injure your colleagues.
2 Live Crew made it to the big leagues.
I know a lot of people who always root against the Pats b/c of Spygate (a legitimate outlook; I root for them b/c of the Tom Brady/Michigan connection). I look forward to joining them in never rooting for the Saints again either. The two incidents are not even remotely comparable in gravity.
Spartan pregame speech
Narduzzi: Alright whoever takes out Denard gets 5000 dollars.
Gholston: you can count on me!
at University of Miami Nevin Shapiro as well (the bounty to take out Tebow, etc.), so there's at least one allegation of this happening at the college level. Found a website with a quick summary of the amounts and the alleged payouts to players here.
Some of the bounties:
I have long suspected teams like Ohio and MSU, who have often deliberately injured opposing players, of having bounty systems. I think one of the MIami bouties is funny, though. It doesn't excuse the injury bounties, but the thought of some rich, jock-sniffing cokehead offering college players $500 for celebration penalties really makes me laugh.
Was going on with the Redskins too. I liked Gregg when he was coaching here. I wanted him to replace Gibbs. I was disappointed to hear that bounties were going on in DC town too.
Just the wrong way to play the game.
I remember the semi final game against Minnesota. The Saint's players looked pretty deranged trying to kill Favre. They pounded him to the turf at least 10 times that day.
Too bad, Minnesota was playing a road game but clearly had the better talent.
Jonathan Vilma put up $10,000 to incentivize someone to knock Favre out of the game
I think that can be taken a few different ways.
10k to the guy that cheap shots Favres knees and takes home out of the game.
10k to the guy that hits Favre so hard he won't get up.
I think it's the latter....if that was the way it was intended I have no problem.
Looks like with a 10K award, the line between the former and latter could have been very, very thin.
If its a legal hit what's the problem?
If a coach tells a player to hit him so hard he doesn't get up, that's illegal?
Isn't Ray Lewis thing to do this every play?
I really don't have a huge problem either. Mostly because they get paid wayyyy way too much to play football.
They're not rewarding players for making a hard hit unless they injure an opponent. When the focus is put on injuring your opponents, then it's more than likely some lines are going to get crossed. Those attempts won't all be good clean hits.
Frankly, I find this whole debate unsettling. Injuries are a part of the game, an unfortunate part. Deliberate injuring your opponents should never be a legitimate tactic. At the very best, it's unprofessional.
think this is awesome, I know it is wrong but I love real football where people get straight jacked. Not this horrible touchy bull crap Roger G. has me watching every Sunday now.
There is a difference between man I want to hit that guy hard and man I want to put my helmet upside his knee and put him out of the game. Whats next hey Ill give you twenty grand if you Mike Utley Devin Hester.
will suck for the Saints next year. Stay tuned to see if THEIR injury rate skyrockets.
Attempting to injure people is unacceptable. Play hard and make legal hits, that's good, but no one should be trying to injure opposing players. Players make hundreds of thousands of dollars at least to play in the nfl. Serious injuries jeopardize that money. Plus with free agency and the cuts due to cap space etc, a saints player could easily find himself playing against the saints in a short time with his former players getting paid extra to injure him. Whoever sponsored this needs to get a ban from the game. People involved should probably be suspended.
Great, another reason for Goodell to further kill defenses. Does an extra $1,000 really motivate these guys? Stupid coaching move, much better ways to encourage your players without giving Goodell another example of "football has gotten too rough, we need MOAR RULEZ".
Take their next two first round draft picks, prevent the Saints from using their franchise tag for two years, and knock 30% off of the salaries of any player/coach caught. That would be the end of that problem.
Proper (dis)incentives are key here.
I'd be 100% behind this, better yet: death penalty?
We frequenters at MGoBlog should have a bounty for good zingers and comebacks at new posters or lurkers from other skoolz. Like if some Ohio troll comes on the blog, the first MGB regular to say something spicy to put him in his place and make him cry gets 100 extra points, etc etc. Cuz, you know, "everybody does it." -- T. Pryor (referring to murder, but, that's close.)
but Brian took all our fun away.
Someone tell the Saints that just because they're in Louisiane they aren't in the SEC.
they don't oversign!
not oversigning is the only reason that the Saints can afford to pay their players more than the SEC does.
their D was great this year /s
it was also done by him at Arizona
Everything within the rulebook is fair game, it's just incentive to do what they're supposed to do anyway, which is to inflict maximum violence.
There's a huge element of hypocrisy here. Players put a lot of blame the league's way for not protecting them from injury.... to go and do something like this (and I don't believe for a minute the Saints were the only one with a bounty pool) makes it ring hollow the next time a current player speaks out against the league about injury protection. Check your own ranks first.
The Steelers Kimo Van Oelhoffen's *hit* on Carson Palmer's knee on the first play of the game in the 2005 playoffs. I'm suprised Palmer still has a career left after that bullshit.
This is the beginning of the end for the NFL
Mike Martin might be even more NFL-ready than we already think (see: Bret Bielema 2010).
I deny all responsibility