OT: New NFL wage scale.

Submitted by Baldbill on

Here is the new NFL league minimums as I read through the contract. Thought maybe some would like to see it.

Year 0 is the rookie year.

 

Year

2011

2012

2013

2014

0

375k

390k

405k

420k

1

450k

465k

480k

495k

2

525k

540k

555k

570k

3

600k

615k

630k

645k

4-6

685k

700k

715k

730k

7-9

810k

825k

840k

855k

10+

910k

925k

940k

955k

Edit: Added the 3 previous years scale

 

Year

2008

2009

2010

0

295k

310k

325k

1

370k

385k

400k

2

445k

460k

475k

3

520k

535k

550k

4-6

605k

620k

635k

7-9

730k

745k

760k

10+

830k

845k

860k

 

Dreisbach1817

July 29th, 2011 at 10:54 AM ^

Can someone explain how the NFL will be run differently post-strike?  in essence, what did the holdout change?  Aside from this minimum scale and rookie salaries.

JeepinBen

July 29th, 2011 at 11:00 AM ^

The owners wanted more $$, so they changed the revenue split so that the owners get more $$.

The players got better healthcare (lifetime benefits, I believe it used to be only 5 years after you retire) and other safety-related changes (time off, practice hours, no more 2-a-days in pads)

A bunch of lawyers made a bunch of $$ off both sides

Rookie Wages have been scaled back.

Free agency starts after 4 years (used to be 5 I believe)

Rookies are going to face all kinds of struggles this year without offseason workouts/playbooks. Same with 1st year coaches. 

Expect the preseason games to be uglier than normal. Expect the first 2-4 weeks of games to be ugly as well.

All from memory - feel free to add/correct info 

JeepinBen

July 29th, 2011 at 10:57 AM ^

So if we assume someone plays the average career length (3.something) years at the minimum:

375+465+555 = $1,395,000 in earnings over the 3 year career.  Not bad, assuming a middling min-level player graduated with a 4 year degree that's a pretty good start to a career. It's not the mind-boggling numbers that people associate with pro athletes, but it's good work if you can get it for a bit. Hopefully players can be like Brandon Graham and be smart with their $$

turd ferguson

July 29th, 2011 at 11:00 AM ^

Interesting. I don't know what it was before, but I wonder if the rookie-veteran disparity might hurt a lot of veterans (i.e. lead to premature retirement). If you're a low-wage vet, you'd have to convince a team to pay you almost 3x as much as a rookie with a lot more years ahead of him and room to grow. I'd actually want teams to be able to pay me much less than that (unless minimum contracts don't count toward the cap or something).

jshclhn

July 29th, 2011 at 11:00 AM ^

Those making the minimum are probably the biggest winners in this new CBA.

The cap hardly changed from the previous agreement, but those at the bottom of the food chain are getting a larger percentage of the pie.

I'm sure other readers would be interested in adding a column or two for historical perspective - at least 2010 and 2009.  Offhand, I want to say the absolute minimum for 2010 was low $300k's.