rob f

May 24th, 2013 at 2:53 PM ^

and (assuming each of those hits were HR's or at least for extra bases), I'm not sure yet which swing impressed me most.  Subject to change, I'll call the top 3 of those as follows:

1) waaaay-inside pitch (looked like a hard slider)  Incredible  bat speed, being able to get the barrel out front on a pitch that would handcuff practically anybody else.

2) "your" pitch, down in the strikezone.  Amazing ability to instantly recognize and adjust his swing is being shown, as he lines it towards the right-field stands.  Like you said, a pop-up for most mere-mortals.

3) upper-inside strike (fastball?) that for the majority of hitters is a swing and a miss.   Again, the bat speed wins this battle.

The rest ?  Shows that no pitcher can fool the man, no pitch is safe to throw, any swing can result in a souvenir to any kid sitting in the outfield seats armed with a glove and big dreams.

Blue in Yarmouth

May 24th, 2013 at 2:18 PM ^

I can't say I love MC...but there is one thing for certain (at least in my mind) and that's he's the best all around hitter in baseball right now. Honestly, he might be the best hitter baseball has seen since...I'm trying to find a comparison and it's difficult in my lifetime. Dude is damn good, no question.

Blue in Yarmouth

May 24th, 2013 at 3:15 PM ^

I agree iwth this and the two of them are the two best hitters of this generation. One who has come close to the triple crown a couple of times and one who has won it. Other than these two though I think you have to go way back to find comparables. The two of them are beasts for sure.

Blue in Yarmouth

May 28th, 2013 at 1:36 PM ^

Here are some stats I will show you and you tell me who is who:

Player #1

Years

Hr’s

RBI’s

Avg.

1

7

31

330

2

32

109

318

3

24

115

322

4

41

112

316

5

38

101

353

6

40

111

308

7

40

134

349

8

35

125

347

9

29

109

264

10

15

77

304

Player #2

Years

Hr’s

RBI’s

Avg.

1

37

130

329

2

34

127

314

3

43

124

358

4

46

123

331

5

41

117

330

6

49

137

331

7

32

103

327

8

37

116

357

9

47

135

327

10

42

118

312

Player #3

Years

Hr’s

RBI’s

Avg.

1

12

62

268

2

33

112

294

3

33

116

323

4

26

114

339

5

34

119

320

6

37

127

292

7

34

103

324

8

38

126

328

9

30

105

344

10

44

139

330

Player #4

Years

Hr’s

RBI’s

Avg.

1

33

114

301

2

25

116

292

3

34

103

311

4

46

123

336

5

37

81

312

6

33

104

294

7

42

129

308

8

40

101

291

9

37

122

303

10

34

83

262

In order the players are: Frank Thomas from 1990-1999 (you picked those years), AP from 01-10, MC from 03-12 and Bb from 90-99. Just for interest sake the players ages were FT (22-32), AP (21-30), BB (25-34) and MC (20-30).

I have to say that you are either an incerdible homer when it comes to the Sox and FT or you never actually took the time to see how FT actually stacked up to AP. He is clearly the class of the four players mentioned, but MC has age on his side which is what my comment was referring to in the original post, as in I think he is now as good a hitter as AP is, but he is younger and could continue to improve.

Anyway, sorry for the length of my post, but I needed to back up my opinion with stats.

Blue in Yarmouth

May 29th, 2013 at 9:11 AM ^

I don't give much of a shit about points and get negged a fair amount without saying a word, but this kind of garbage just pisses me off. If you have an issue with my post at least have the  balls to explain when you neg. You don't agrre with my point, fine, tell me why? Was it too long didn't read? Fine tell me that. Whatever the reason, fine, just tell me what it is and perhaps we could have a reasonable debate about it.

In this post I disagreed with someone else and instead of negging them I did some research and provided the basis for my disagreement. People who just scroll through posts negging everyone without any reason provided just piss people off. 

/rant.

Maize_Nation

May 29th, 2013 at 9:35 AM ^

I said 90-97, not 99, 98 and 99 were not elite level seasons, Thomas fell off after that point.

From 1990-1997 Frank Thomas posted a batting line of .330/.452/.600 with a 182 OPS+. His wRC+ were 178,179,176,171,206,169,168, and 179.

The best stretch of Pujols' career would be 03-10. Over that time period he posted a batting line of .334/.433/.635 with a 177 OPS+. His wRC+ were 184,171,167,177,155,184,180, and 164.

It's close, but Thomas has a clear lead in OPS+ and an even bigger advantage in wRC+ over their best years. Same class of players, but Thomas has the clear edge IMO.

It wasn't until 2010 when Cabrera posted his first wRC+ greater than 160, and he's posted wRC+ of 171,177,166, and currently sits at 194. Like I said, Cabrera is still in the midst of his hitting peak, so he could still catch up to the level Thomas was at in the early 90's, but he's not there yet.

And I'm a Tigers fan, not a White Sox fan, so no homerism.

Blue in Yarmouth

May 29th, 2013 at 10:27 AM ^

That stat really has nothing to do with the individual hitter and more to do with what he is worth to the team. The debate here is who is the better hitter, not who meant more to his team.

We may just have some philisophical differences where what makes a good hitter is concerned, but things like OBP just don't do it for me. I look at the raw data because I don't care whether a guy walks a lot or gets hit by pitches. 

What I am referring to is who I think are the best hitters in the game and to me, AP has had a better career than FT. He has hit for a better average, hit more homeruns and produced more runs batted in than Thomas over a similar timeframe 

Again, it seems we just look at different things when evaluating a players ability which is fine. For me and how I evaluate a players ability AP is the top dog. 

As to your last point...you're fortunate...I'm a Jays fan and have very little to cheer about these days (or the past two decades for that matter).

Maize_Nation

May 29th, 2013 at 6:05 PM ^

wRC+ measures an individual hitters performance. It's basically an improved version of OPS+.

It really has nothing to do with the team.

I'm not debating the overall career of Thomas/Pujols, just looking at their peak years, and IMO Thomas had the better peak. Obviously you disagree, and as you said it is clearly because of philoshpoical differences. Thomas and Pujols were much closer in terms of OPS+ than they were in wRC+, and that's because OPS+ undervalues OBP, which is where Thomas was greater, and places greater value on SLG where Pujols was greater.

And that's fine, they were both historically elite hitters during their prime years, it's mostly splitting hairs when differentiating players of their caliber.

Wolverine0056

May 24th, 2013 at 2:21 PM ^

Even though I am an Indians fan, Cabrera is one of my favorite hitters to watch these days. As shown in the gif, he can hit damn near anything and everything. I can't imagine being a pitcher and having to face him.

Fhshockey112002

May 24th, 2013 at 2:56 PM ^

Six homeruns, one of which was in the strikezone. I don't think there is a consistant way to get him out. He hits more "good pitch" homeruns than anyone I can remember.

Unfiltered Manball

May 24th, 2013 at 3:50 PM ^

Cabrera's ability to hit pitches that are not strikes- and hit them hard- will be required for the foreseeable future.  He is so hot right now, that he will not see many strikes.  I would also expect him to have a huge increase of walks, no matter how well Prince is hitting.  And when Feilder is hitting, we will punish them.  

Great time to be a Tiger and Wolverine!

Edit:  AND also a great time to be a Red Wing!

LSAClassOf2000

May 24th, 2013 at 3:12 PM ^

It's actually nice to see those swings presented in this way - I would think his mechanics are some of the best in the game right now if not the best period. It is certainly one of the most fundamentally sound swings that I have seen from any batter in my memory anyway. He fully extends his arms and basically covers the entire strike zone and then some. I believe Mike Lowell once termed it as "taking a direct path to the ball" (speaking to how he keeps his hands close and can adjust to just about any pitch), which Miguel Cabrera seems to do nearly every single time at the plate

WhoopinStick

May 24th, 2013 at 3:26 PM ^

I love these baseball gifs.  I can't stop watching them.  Sure glad Miggy's a Tiger - the guy is proving to be one of the best of all time.

SalvatoreQuattro

May 24th, 2013 at 4:12 PM ^

greatest Tiger. When Al Kaline says he hasn't seen a hitter like Cabrera you know the guy is way beyond special. He is approaching the rarefied air of Williams-Dimaggio-Aaron-Ruth.

HailToA2

May 24th, 2013 at 6:17 PM ^

Trout is proving to be awesome and may be on to a Cabrera'ish career if he continues the trend for a long time (since Cabby as been doing it since day 1). But as impressive as Trout is.. he's gotta prove it for a while longer. Any talk of Cabby roiding is nuts.. he's been this beast since he started.. but he happened to reach his prime recently.

Gulogulo37

May 25th, 2013 at 10:11 AM ^

The one low and away is most impressive. Look at how is back foot steps back as well, that's not a lot of power on the hit relative to what he's capable of. Obviously it helps going into right, but it's like he just tapped it and still sent it out.