OT: MGoCyclist Fights Traffic Ticket and Wins!

Submitted by AlaskanYeti on

A cyclist wearing University of Michigan kit was cited by Michigan State Police last summer near Ann Arbor for obstructing traffic. Feeling like he did nothing wrong, the cyclist fought the $200 ticket in district court and lost. After an appeal to the circuit court, however, the ticket was dismissed. Victory! This story is attracting wide spread attention in the cycling community. Good for the guy who I would assume is an Alum.

http://www.mlive.com/news/ann-arbor/index.ssf/2016/03/cyclist_wins_traffic_obstructi.html

 

 

Artie

March 4th, 2016 at 5:59 PM ^

Read this a couple weeks ago. That cop apparently has a history of being a class A dickhole. Good to see he's getting the recognition he deserves.



Sent from MGoBlog HD for iPhone & iPad

sadeto

March 4th, 2016 at 6:05 PM ^

Your title and the Mlive and other headlines all understandably focus on "cyclist fights ticket and wins." That's great but the more important story is "rogue trooper with anger issues chastised by court for arbitrarily interpreting traffic law."

Everyone Murders

March 4th, 2016 at 6:15 PM ^

I generally look at a story like this with a jaundiced eye.  There are nearly as many self-righteous cyclists out there as self-righteous drivers.  Not close to a majority in either instance, but both are shrill and generally foolish.  (I drive and cycle, and both of these dipshit minorities irritate me.)

This one doesn't seem like a close call.  The rider in question barely crossed the storm line on the side of the road (i.e., the white line on the right side of the lane).  And his group was never more than two abreast, and kept over to the right side on a relatively unbusy two lane road.  I really saw nothing wrong here from the cyclist.  Interestingly, the cop singled out the guy in the Michigan gear rather than the one cyclist who may have been riding a foot or two in the lane. 

The cop seemed like a real jerk here.  The cop tells the cyclist that, by waving the cop past, he "was being a smart alec".  WTF?

Here's the deal on that - being a smart alec is not a crime.  (Thank God.)  Even if it was, the Michigan clad cyclist was not be aggressive in the least.  The cop either had a strong anti-Michigan bias, or an incredible case of blue fever.

MMB 82

March 4th, 2016 at 7:30 PM ^

it just pisses me off when other cyclists don't obey traffic laws. Last thing I want to do is get a motorist angry and resentful toward cyclists.

Note to motorists:

-also please obey traffic laws; don't stop to "let the cyclists go by" because it is actually confusing and dangerous. We want you to drive consistently with traffic patterns so we know what to expect.

-please don't honk. We hear you coming just by your engine noise, and many of us have small rearview mirrors attached to our helmets or glasses. I promise I am staying in the bike lane!

Ghost of Fritz…

March 5th, 2016 at 8:00 AM ^

...disobey traffic laws more than car and truck drivers?

I see cyclists disobey traffic laws often. 

But see car and truck drivers disobeying traffic laws (speeding, phone/texting while driving, other stuff)  at an even higher rate.   

As far as I can see 90%+ of car and truck drivers break the traffic laws sometimes, and most do so often.

90% might be geneous to the drivers.  Is there any driver on the road that has never excceds the posted speed limit? 

If you are going to freak out about cyclists breaking the law, then be consistent and freak out about drivers breakding the law too. 

Frank Booth

March 5th, 2016 at 9:20 AM ^

I couldn't have said it better than this. There's a certain hypocrisy spoken any time a bike story is mentioned. People will talk about how many rules are broken by cyclists yet will ignore iniquities of fellow drivers, such as speed limit infractions, phone or seat belt violations, and even non use of turn signals. I think the reasoning is that bike running stop sign >>> car going 5mph over speed limit. People also write about how dangerous and stupid cyclists are, but never write about how dangerous and stupid drivers are. Yes, everyone should obey the law, but the simple fact is most people don't. The rules of the road were set up because cars are very dangerous, not with regard to bikes. Should bikes follow the same standard? Sure. But there are many situations where it is fine for a cyclist to bend the rules, just as it is for a driver to do the same. If one rule is more important than anything other, it is the rule of common sense.

Tater

March 5th, 2016 at 12:47 PM ^

When I rode a bike a lot, the most important law to me was the "law of tonnage."  I never assumed I had anything resembling the right of way, even when I did legally.  

As for this story, the judge in the lower court had to be as big an asshole as the cop was.

Minus The Houma

March 4th, 2016 at 7:36 PM ^

It can be hard to drive in an area where there are lots of cyclists. I have never been to ann arbor but have heard it has a similar feel to Madison, WI, where there were tons of cyclists. They usually were not a problem at all, but even then you had to be careful. It helped that Madison had a very nice bike lane and trail system.

Now, when I lived at the beach it was a whole different world beach cruisers know no rules.

Mojave Gold

March 4th, 2016 at 6:18 PM ^

Do cyclists have to obey stop signs?  Very few of them do in Seattle.  That's usually where bad things happen.

Esterhaus

March 4th, 2016 at 6:38 PM ^

 

Michigan roadways are in a terrible condition. This comes as a surprise to you denizens, I know. I visit other parts of the world where the weather and traffic volume concerns are comparable, and the roadway states tend to be noticeably superior. We need to fix our roads and other infrastructure with the talent and labor of our own (preferably local) citizens so that cyclists, a growing reality, are not forced to transit dangerous roads.

As for the Trooper, and I usually respect them as being the most professional among Michigan law enforement, I sincerely hope the next ten times he steps out of his taxpayer-funded car that a truck cruises by and splashes a ton of mud on his uniform freshly cleaned from the last mudder fo' car. Okay that joke was like a Michigan roadway.

Blazefire

March 4th, 2016 at 7:31 PM ^

Many roads in Monroe county don't even have a shoulder. Certainly not one my trike would fit on.

I support cyclists, except the jackass 14 year olds a few years ago that thought it was hilarious to weave down the middle of Lewis Avenue. Had they been my kids, I'd have made them watch while I used their bike to break all their stuff.



Sent from MGoBlog HD for iPhone & iPad

Esterhaus

March 4th, 2016 at 7:56 PM ^

 

Is that once a motor vehicle-versus-cyclist accident does occur, the motor vehicle operator is substantially more likely to lose at costly litigation. It isn't always the car driver's fault.  Cycling involves physical exertion and a cyclist's objective judgment may be impaired the longer the cyclist rides or on hot days, under personal stress etc. Consequences for the bicyclist may be severe if an accident occurs, and the public (jury) won't want to pay for this, so a motorist conceivably may be unfairly determined responsible. Be safe out there, especially given the weather looks to improve soon.

Trump

March 4th, 2016 at 7:35 PM ^

As a cyclist/runner, good for him, but... Some of these cyclists need to respect the cars following the speed limit.



Sent from MGoBlog HD for iPhone & iPad

LSAClassOf2000

March 4th, 2016 at 8:19 PM ^

Here's the DashCam video from the article, if anyone is just curious about the incident itself. You would think this officer just caught someone on the "Most Wanted" poster in the post office.

xtramelanin

March 4th, 2016 at 9:09 PM ^

the cyclist isn't allowed to ride abreast - see MCL 257.660b (i think).  but contrast that with the cop behaving like an 'adam henry', and they cancel out.  hope they both learn. 

Esterhaus

March 4th, 2016 at 9:53 PM ^

 

Well that's standard in certain contexts. Who am I to challenge this "law." It would be against interest.

As for both cyclists and motorists, you need to exercise the elusive common sense thingie and then you should be fine. The Trooper ignored this precept, and he has earned his fair helping of consternation. What a jackwagon.

Michigan Made

March 4th, 2016 at 10:27 PM ^

of alpha hotel cyclists as well. the laws change from city to county with regard single file to 2 abreast. many will hear a car and get over. many group cyclists like to take an entire lane on Huron River Drive in the township with little to no regard for traffic, and respond to cars who object with "call your rep and tell them to widen the road". they're my favorite. gets pretty dangerous trying to pass them.

GG Allin

March 5th, 2016 at 12:25 PM ^

But cyclists tend to ignore stop signs and clog up lanes when riding in huge packs. Cyclists have to obey the same laws as if they were driving a car or a motorcycle. And where I live, I have yet to see one obey a stop sign. They plow right on through as if they believe they have the right away and have the right to blow stop signs. And I am not anti cyclist. I am an avid cyclists who hates cyclists who give cyclists a bad name by ignoring traffic laws!

Ghost of Fritz…

March 5th, 2016 at 12:43 PM ^

I see cyclists go through stop signs without making a full stop too.

My point is that I also see car and truck drivers break traffic laws every time I am out driving.

If you are going to freak out about the former then you better be prepared to freak out about the latter.

I am not necessarily defending cyclists who violate the traffic laws in ways that create danger.

I am just saying that car and truck drivers are no better in terms of violating the traffic laws in ways that create danger. 

Most people drive.  Only some cycle.  When the former break traffic laws most just treat it as a normal thing.  When cyclists do so, it is The End of Civilization and Must Be Stopped.  Or it gives All Cyclists a Bad Name.

Why don't all of the traffic law breaking drivers give all drivers a bad name?