OT: Joe Dumars worst move as Pistons GM? Darko or J. Smith

Submitted by Drew_Silver on

Sorry to go off topic, but I had this bar stool argument last night

Joe D's worst GM move

Drafting Darko or Signing Josh Smith

 

Pistons are 12-3 since they dumped Josh Smith, the guy was just not right for the team in any way.  He jacked so many bad 3's last year (a historic rate).  Josh Smith had a strong track history of being mediocre and a bad shooter.

 

Darko was widely considered to be the #2 guy.  The conventional wisdom in the NBA is to take the Big Guy if 2 guys are about equal.  Darko didn't have any screaming red flags around him.  I know it turned out to be a terrible move, but at the time it seemed at least defendable.

Eastside Maize

January 23rd, 2015 at 2:13 PM ^

 Come here and we get, at the very least, one more ring. I never understood the rationale of we have Tayshaun so we don't need Melo. Melo would've been the Microwave 2.0 for a year or 2. 

translator82

January 23rd, 2015 at 2:14 PM ^

I feel like the Josh Smith signing happened because of Gores' "win now" ultimatum and the fact that Dumars had the money to spend. It was a poor signing.

Darko was high on many draft boards that year and, yes, history shows that was an awful pick. But let's not forget Darko was also a primadonna who let all the hype get to his head. That hype let him think he had the right to play regular minutes each game from the start of the season. When he didn't get regular playing time under Larry Brown (another factor you have to throw in because Brown wanted Darko to play more a traditional post game instead of the inside-outside shooting big-man Euro style Darko was used to on top of the fact this was an NBA Finals bound team with a strong, tight starting nucleus already forged), he sulked. The sulking affected his attitude which affected everything else. He was talented--perhaps not at a No. 2 pick level--but it's not like the guy didn't know how to play hoops. He had a crappy attitude.

I mean...look at his choice remarks after this EuroBasket game in 2007 that didn't go Serbia's way. Talented kid, horrible mindset.

 

DrewGOBLUE

January 23rd, 2015 at 2:24 PM ^

Probably Darko, IMO. With guys from overseas, it seems like there would generally be some added risk taking a flier on them. And it might not have been worth the gamble with Wade, Anthony and Bosh on the board.

Michigan4Life

January 23rd, 2015 at 2:43 PM ^

the Pistons wouldn't have gotten Sheed in a trade. Pistons might've never won the NBA title. Melo would've sat behind Prince and there would be discontent from Melo for not getting PT.

BlueMaize

January 23rd, 2015 at 2:47 PM ^

Just about any GM in Joe's position would have made the same pick at that spot. That's how high all the scouting reports were on Darko. It was a foregone conclusion that Darko was going #2 before Joe made the pick. Even before the lottery happened and selection order was known, Darko was considered a lock in the top 3.

Here's an article from April of that year wondering how high Melo's draft stock would be after his NCAA run and wondering if he would pass up Darko on GM's draft boards. I've swiped the relevant conclusion:

http://www.nbadraft.net/draft-buzz-42203

Even if a team needs a wing player more so than a post player, it's hard to see a team passing on Milicic. Darko is a "once-in-a-GM's-lifetime", or better yet "...GM's-tenure" type talent. Since teams began scouting players overseas, not one prospect of Darko's caliber has come along. He is a proven entity having competed against even better competition than either James or Anthony. 

--------------------------

There are other articles out there from that time frame that say the same thing. Joe Dumars wasn't off in his own world on Darko. And on top of all of that, the Pistons were in a FAR better position than anyone else to take a player at that point that mayhave been a high risk because the team had the number 3 pick but wasn't in rebuilding mode at all. We had just come off of an Eastern Conference Final and had the luxury of taking that high pick because of a previous trade. Darko was a no brainer pick at that point.

Signing Josh Smith was an all around bad move. He gave him WAY too much money (should have learned his lesson on that after Ben Gordon and Charlie V.) He also signed him with the intention of moving him to the 3 because we already had Drummond and Monroe. Playing the 3 amplified all the worst things about Smith's game and negated the best things about it. 

 

QuemeLosBarcos

January 23rd, 2015 at 8:38 PM ^

Darko was certainly overrated by many, but just as many, if not more, thought Melo would be better before the draft.

For every article you can find, there are just as many indicating Melo would be better. This was Simmons shortly after the pick, although he knew at the draft it was a missed opportunity.

http://sports.espn.go.com/espn/page2/story?page=simmons/040407

 

 

BlueMaize

January 24th, 2015 at 10:08 AM ^

The point still stands. Let's say it was 50/50. (On who the better player would be.) Combine that with the fact that the Pistons needed a big man more than a 3 at that time (we didn't have Sheed yet), and the fact that we were in a better position to take a risk because we already had a very good team vs others at the top of the draft who needed someone to make an impact right away. All of that pushed Darko into the no brainer category for Joe,



Sent from MGoBlog HD for iPhone & iPad

LSAClassOf2000

January 23rd, 2015 at 3:01 PM ^

If I had to choose between the two options in the OP, I would probably say Josh Smith only because Darko really was very much hyped at the time he was drafted and it would have been someone else if not Dumars making that selection and possibly having the same story to tell at the end of it. He was also part of the trade which got us a pick from the Magic, which in turn turned out to be Rodney Stuckey, as I recall, so he was useful enough in that respect.

Josh Smith? Did we ever get that bag of balls in exchange? Was it asking too much even then?

Zoltanrules

January 23rd, 2015 at 3:28 PM ^

The guy should be remembered for being an incredible player and good GM.

Every GM misses on evaluating talent. I think the Darko miss was the most serious miss, with DWade and other super talents available. It all worked out during a GREAT run and Dumars made good moves to make that happen.

The JSmith move was bad but seemed to be more out of a position of weakness.

ZooWolverine

January 23rd, 2015 at 3:42 PM ^

In some ways, I am happy about missing out on Carmelo--that 2004 championship team was a great team, with an emphasis on the word team.

If Detroit had gotten 'Melo and still won the championship, I think a lot of the story and understanding of what happened would have been about plugging in the star player and winning a championship. Instead that year was about the team without a bona fide star that played together and won--beating the team full of the biggest stars--and not only do I like that story a lot better, but it made me love the players that won the championship.

umfanchris

January 23rd, 2015 at 3:46 PM ^

Don't get me wrong, both drafting Darko and Josh Smith were huge mistakes. But Joe D screwed the Pistons with 2 moves he made regarding Ben Gordon. First he signed him to 11 Million a year for 5 years. Second trading him away resulting in losing a top 10 pick this year. WIth that trade you knew Joe D wasn't thinking long term. He just was hoping to win a couple more games in the short run and save his job.  

Jayvandy23

January 23rd, 2015 at 5:32 PM ^

At the time, almost everyone felt that Darko was the next Dirk.  Had it panned out, Dumars is still employed by the Pistons.  Smith was a horrible fit for Pistons.  

BLHoke

January 23rd, 2015 at 7:01 PM ^

It's was spending all of the gobs and gobs of cap room they cleared by dismantling that last championship core on Ben Gordon and Charlie Villenueva. Darko is easy to point fingers at in hindsight, but Bosh, Melo and Wade none fit our needs at the time coming off the season we had. Nobody knew those 3 players were going to be future HOFers and we had relatively young Rip and Tayshaun at the 2 & 3 making the need for Wade or Melo not pressing or even remotely considered... And Chris Bosh is a finesse, stretch 4 that didn't fit the gritty mold of Big Ben and Sheed. The idea was for Darko to learn behind Sheed, then seamlessly slide into that role ala Duncan/Robinson, albeit not nearly on the same level. In hindsight, I'm glad we didn't draft any of those 3 because none of them would've fit in that team first mentality, and as we saw at the end of their first contracts, they were all probably migrating anyway. Whether it be joining forces or heading to a warm weather city. What I wish we would have done is trade the pick for a veteran player that would've added depth to our playoff roster, maybe a combo guard that could keep Chauncey and Rip fresh without much dropoff. Or a wing that could get buckets while Prince was expending all of his energy pestering guys like Reggie and Kobe all night on D.

BLHoke

January 23rd, 2015 at 7:07 PM ^

Could be worse... Could've missed out on Jordan AND Durant, while instead drafting 2 of the biggest big man busts in the history of the league. Think about how good Portland could be with Durant and Aldridge as their core. Maybe they don't finish low enough to draft Lillard, but each ensuing draft would've shaken down a bit differently. Maybe they a pass first pg in the years after.

RuebenRileyonRye

January 23rd, 2015 at 7:18 PM ^

Dumars gets a pass on Darko because everyone thought he was a can't miss. Dicky V. thought Darko was a better pick than LeBron. He was sold as a Dirk but a higher ceiling. But honestly, Dumars was always horrible at drafting, getting lucky with Prince in '02 and Okur in '01. He missed on so many others topping it off by passing on Trey Burke his last time around. That was a no brainer to me, seeing they needed a PG and he was a Michigan guy. Would have filled a big need and sold more jerseys.

He lost his mind with free agent signings and trades starting with the Iverson deal and went down hill from there. Honestly, I don't remember one person saying that signing Josh Smith in any way was good for Detroit.

It broke my heart because I was a diehard Pistons guy from way before my dad took me to see Game 5 of the 88 finals against LA. Dumars was my hero and after 2004, I thought he could do no wrong. To this day, I feel like he lost his mind and forgot how to be a good GM. Maybe he was just lucky in 04, but he made some great moves to get the guys to win that year. Ugh. Such a bummer.

RuebenRileyonRye

January 23rd, 2015 at 11:43 PM ^

I guess I say he "got lucky" because I think Prince was a late first round pick that out played most of the lottery picks that year.  No one figured he'd be such a contributer as quick as he did.  Okur was a shot in the dark second round pick because he was still under contract over seas.  He played on a very high level in '04 when he finally came and that's why Utah gave him such a fat contract.  I'll give you Monroe and Drummond, even though no one thought Drummond would have been there when they were picking.  I see Drummond as a "gift" pick because of where they got him.

I guess I just think about all the picks he had even before Darko and they stunk.

snarling wolverine

January 24th, 2015 at 12:19 PM ^

If you draft a guy that everyone else overlooks and he makes an immediate impact, shouldn't that to be your credit?  San Antonio isn't usually called lucky when their picks always seem to pan out.

European players are normally under contract when NBA teams draft them.  There is usually a buyout process that takes place.  That's not what caused Okur to go so low.  For whatever reason he was not considered that good of a prospect.  Dumars saw his potential though.

Dumars definitely drafted some busts, but also Prince, Okur, Maxiell, Afflalo, Stuckey, Knight, Monroe, Drummond, KCP - on the whole it's not a horrible draft record.  It's a mixed bag, which is probably true for most GMs.

Mannix

January 23rd, 2015 at 8:24 PM ^

Darko was a consensus top 5 pick, IIRC. It wasn't as if the guy was terrible.

Dumars worst move (among plenty like Gordon, Villanueva, etc) was J Smoove.



Sent from MGoBlog HD for iPhone & iPad

QuemeLosBarcos

January 23rd, 2015 at 8:32 PM ^

People definitely thought Detroit would take Darko, as it was widely broadcasted. Many, if not most, thought Carmelo should be taken ahead of him.

Not to mention, no one thought anyone was on par with LBJ. He was the most hyped prospect ever and the clear choice at #1. No one else was tier 1.

 

 

turtleboy

January 23rd, 2015 at 8:45 PM ^

Worst move? trading Chauncey and keeping rip. Second worst, replacing Wallace with Nazr Mohammed, then CWebb for 1 year, then nobody. I mean we had some $50m available that Ben turned down, a roster full of bench talent who-would-be-starters for other teams, but Boston trades for Sheeds best friend Kevin Garnett and not us.

Dale

January 24th, 2015 at 2:34 AM ^

The billups for ai trade sunk the franchise and made the nuggets winners for years. I don't think any other move dumars made is even in the conversation.

antidaily

January 24th, 2015 at 8:08 AM ^

Man, he really went from being a genius to a total bust. The way he built that 2004 team was magical. Then he trades Billups, drafts nobodies for like 10 years, then blows $90m on Gordon and Charlie V. And Calderon. And 5 different coaches and WTF. Yer fired!