OT-ish: How Top25 teams got their nicknames

Submitted by markinmsp on

An interesting story about each team in present Top25. There is a short paragraph tracing back the nickname for each. UM, MSU, OSU, Wisc., and Nebraska are included. Most are generally known, but a few I found interesting. Most involving a change in name for one reason or the other:

Stanford:

 Knew they were originally called the Indians, but didn’t know the student body held an election to decide on a new nickname, and Robber Barons won, the school president felt the moniker was disrespectful to school founder and railroad magnate Leland Stanford, (even though he historically was considered one).

MSU:

 After name change from Michigan Agricultural College, wanted a name change to disassociate from “Aggies”, after a vote the winning entry “Staters” was deemed too unimaginative for the sports editor of the Lansing State-Journal, so he decided to choose another one and started calling them the Sportans, which he later changed to Spartans..

Oregon:

 Originally called the Webfoots. Californians used it as a derisive nickname for their rain-soaked neighbors to the north, while Oregonians embraced the moniker with pride. However, the present “Ducks” nickname emerged out of sportswriters’ need for a shortened version of Webfoots to appear in headlines. (Again the power of the press.)

article:    How Every School in the AP Top 25 Got Its Nickname

 

LSAClassOf2000

August 27th, 2012 at 2:33 PM ^

"No matter the origin of Bugeaters, Charles Sumner “Cy” Sherman, sports editor for the Nebraska State Journal, was not a fan of the moniker. In 1899, Sherman, who would later help develop the Associated Press poll, suggested Cornhuskers instead" - from the article

That rather made me think of the conversation in "Men In Tights":

"You changed your name TO Latrine??"

"Yeah, used to be Shithouse."

"It's a good change..."

Clarence Beeks

August 27th, 2012 at 5:46 PM ^

Right. And the general connotation HERE (ie in the state where the nickname was an option) is that the term doesn't mean what you think it means. "Cracker" like you are you are thinking (ie in racial terms) is not the same thing. Not even close to the same thing. That is why the nickname would make sense, and even be a valid option here even TODAY. In fact, it's something people in Florida take a lot of pride in. When people here use the term cracker, they are referring to a native Floridian or to Florida's cattle history. It's used all the time here. I mean, seriously, it's so common that there is even a network of highways called "The Florida Cracker Trail" that cuts across the middle of the state from Bradenton to Fort Pierce. Do you seriously think, in today's day and age, if the term had the meaning that you are choosing to assign to it, that it would still be called that and be plastered from end to end with signs calling it that? Obviously, not. Heck, just reference Wikipedia. There is a clear distinction made (ie Google "cracker" and then Google "Florida Cracker"). Please don't project a racial meaning onto the full use of a word that has multiple meanings solely because it's the only way that you have heard it used. To a substantial number of people, and entire state, it has a positive historical meaning; not the negative meaning you are choosing to assign to it.

SteveE

August 27th, 2012 at 6:52 PM ^

According to a number of US History classes I have taken -- both in high school and here at Michigan -- "cracker" originally referred to the cracking of the whip a slave driver used. These men would be referred to as "crackers," and the term has since evolved to mean all white people. While it may have a different meaning in Florida, the term "cracker" definitely does have clear racial undertones, both currently and historically.

Farstate

August 27th, 2012 at 7:19 PM ^

There are plenty of derogatory terms that have alternative inoffensive meanings that either no longer apply or only apply in certain places. You are out of touch if you think that the term cracker would still be a valid option even today for any major sports team in the US.

Clarence Beeks

August 27th, 2012 at 7:52 PM ^

Look, that's fine, but main point from the outset still stands (although I could have worded it better). I'll concede that it wouldn't be a name chosen today, primarily because it would raise precisely this issue, despite the state historical significance.

The thing that makes no sense at all, though, about all of your (not you in particular), is that if this word really were used in the derogatory sense (remember, the negative version you all are thinking of existed back when this naming happened), they would have been using that derogatory term against THEMSELVES. Florida State was not integrated until 1962 (the renaming discussed in the article was in 1947). They were obviously referencing the Florida history, and that was my point at the outset. The term may be derogatory to some (apparently many, judging by the reaction here), but it wasn't at the time, or now, here (historically, anyway). What counts with this is whether it was derogatory AT THE TIME and IN THE PLACE that it was used. In this case, it was not, and suggesting that it was makes no sense. I could have said that better in my original post.

buckeyejonross

August 28th, 2012 at 1:48 AM ^

Just because the general connotation is wrong doesn't mean that it still isn't the general connotation? I'm not arguing the history of the word. I'm arguing that to 85% of Americans, "cracker" is 1) a delicious treat, or 2) an offensive racial slur directed toward white people. I won't even post other examples because no good can possibly come from it, but you're wrong about this.

Blazefire

August 27th, 2012 at 2:46 PM ^

Originally, Toledo was known as the Munnies, for Toledo Municiple University. In the early 1900's, perenial power Pittsburg came to play, and the game turned out somewhat exciting, with Toledo putting up surprising fight. The Pittsburg press wanted to cable home the name story ASAP and hated the name "Munnies", and so pressured the student press editor to come up with something right there in the press box. Having nobody to consult with and decidedly lax PR standard in the day, the kid said he thought the team was impressive against the heavily favored Panthers and said he thought they flew like Sky Rockets. Pitt writers shortened that to Rockets, and the name stuck.

In the 70's, and again briefly in the ealry 90's, there was some talk about changing the team name to the Jeeps, per the Toledo Jeep plant, and changing the team colors to Olive Drab and Tan army colors, but thankfully that didn't go through.

jeag

August 27th, 2012 at 3:40 PM ^

"Pittsburg" was spelled without the H from 1890-1911. The time periods check out.

 In 1890, the United States Board on Geographic Names decided that the final h was to be dropped in the names of all cities and towns ending in burgh. (Throughout the period 1890-1911 city ordinances and council minutes retained the h.) In 1911, after protest from citizens who wished to preserve the historic spelling, the United States Board on Geographic Names reversed its decision and restored the h to Pittsburgh.

source: http://www.carnegielibrary.org/exhibit/hname.html

 

MichiganManOf1961

August 27th, 2012 at 3:51 PM ^

I stand somewhat corrected, though it is a little confusing to read in the present.  And he should have cited his sources, as I doubt he took the lack of an h at the time into consideration if he was writing that from memory.

I prefer it with the h. 

~Herm

WolverineHistorian

August 27th, 2012 at 3:01 PM ^

Kansas State was originally the Aggies too.  But the "fighting spirit" of their players gave them the nickname of the Wildcats. 

Isn't there a dozen schools with the wildcat mascot?  It's so common I wonder if the "fighting spirit" is used as a reason for all the schools getting that nickname. 

Even the Simpsons poked fun at how common that mascot is.

Who are we?

The Wildcats!!!

Who are we gonna beat?

The Wildcats!!!

MGoCombs

August 27th, 2012 at 3:09 PM ^

"Yost felt the reason for the nickname concerned the trading of wolverine pelts which occurred in Sault St. Marie for many years. The trading station served as an exchange between the Indians and other trappers and fur traders, who would eventually ship the products of to the Eastern United States. Because many of the furs were in fact wolverine pelts, traders may have referred to them as "Michigan wolverines", leading to the state nickname and ultimately to the University of Michigan representation."

http://campusinfo.umich.edu/article/wolverine-mascot

Yost disagrees with Scott Allen at Mental Floss. I tend to agree with Coach Yost on matters.

Vasav

August 28th, 2012 at 7:36 AM ^

That's a great link, and thanks for posting it. I'd heard of the Toledo connection, and the fur-trapping origin before, but I had always thought that the name "Wolverines" became truly synonymous with Michigan after General Custer rallied the Michigan Cavalry Bridage with "Come on, you Wolverines!" most famously heard at the battle of Gettysburg, where the Michigan Brigade defeated JEB Stuart and protected the Union's flank, assuring victory.

But if the name was being used by 1861 by the University, then there must be something to those other origin stories.

oriental andrew

August 27th, 2012 at 3:15 PM ^

How I wish Arkansas' student body had voted for heliotrope as the school's official color...

Funny that the msu guy actually meant Spartans, but misspelled it at first.  Lol-worthy.

And the entire entry for Louisville:

Louisville chose Cardinal as its nickname sometime around 1913. The cardinal is Kentucky’s state bird.

 

Don

August 27th, 2012 at 3:50 PM ^

The students at the newly-minted MSU put their collective creative brainpower to work, and they come up with the brilliant solution of "Staters."

Idiots... the proper choice was "Staeers."

Don

August 27th, 2012 at 4:01 PM ^

Maybe it's different where you were raised—apparently things are different in Florida or Georgia—but I've spent my entire life in SE Michigan, and I can assure you that the term has always been very pejorative, especially in usage by african-americans. Basically, "cracker" has been more or less synonymous with "redneck" for a long time in informal usage around these parts.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cracker_%28pejorative%29

MichiganManOf1961

August 27th, 2012 at 7:11 PM ^

Last time I checked, Florida State plays games outside of Florida and Georgia, so I don't think that would've flown very well in the rest of the United States. 

Analogy: A British tobacco company trying to sell "fags" in the US.

I understand your position, but I don't think it holds water.

~Herm