Geaux_Blue

December 14th, 2010 at 11:16 AM ^

no players tested positive due to drug test cheating. AKA they have a dog with no teeth. must have tested Derrell Johnson-Koulianos recently and come out negative. 

1464

December 14th, 2010 at 11:40 AM ^

I do see what you did.  The problem is, Justin Feagin and Boubacar Cissoko.  First, let not cast stones from our glass Big House.  Second, as a former college athlete, I can attest that coaches don't have as much of a chokehold on their players' personel lives as most assume.  You gotta just hope that the idiot who decides to pull this doesn't commit to your school.

What these guys did deserves punishment, I am sure.  I think Ferentz is overrated.  But to put this on him is just a touch off base...

tenerson

December 14th, 2010 at 12:41 PM ^

Yes, it was. There have been problems in that family for one reason or another. So right now only 3 guys are in trouble. What a joke. They all scammed the test, so nothing will be done and everyone is free. I don't think this compares to Bubacar or Feagin. That didn't seem to be team wide. This very well could include a bunch of guys.  I will be surprised if this is the last we hear on this situation. Of course, Kirk and Co. were able to cover up a secual assualt case that was pretty damn serious so maybe this will be it.

1464

December 14th, 2010 at 12:18 PM ^

I didn't see the press conference.  If it was systemic, then yeah, I guess you can put it on the administration.  I'm not sure who would fall on that sword, as I can't believe Ferentz had a hand in the drug policy.  Who knows if their lax policy was unique to them, or was a standard...

stillMichigan

December 14th, 2010 at 11:28 AM ^

Press conference is great insight into lax attitude toward poor chararacter within the program. Iowa program is in deep trouble down the road if thats the case. Clayborne's comment that the team quit on the way to Minny makes sense now. I see the Iowa program in trouble unless they clean house which looks unlikely

mGrowOld

December 14th, 2010 at 12:52 PM ^

One of two reasons I suspect given the current circumstances IMO:

1. He had a problem with his fellow players and transferred to avoid being associated with what he knew was happening and would eventually be exposed.

2. He was involved with what was happening and transferred to avoid being busted.

BiSB

December 14th, 2010 at 2:55 PM ^

to attack drug use on the supply side.  Making drugs illegal makes them more difficult to obtain and more expensice, therefore theoretically reducing consumption.  Back-end punishments aim to shift the the demand curve. 

Now... ask me how well those plans work...

WFBlue

December 14th, 2010 at 3:15 PM ^

Me thinks the billions and billions and billions of dollars spent on the "drug war" might not have been such a good use of precious dollars.

Would I rather have a stoner driving my daughter around or someone texting while driving/  Hmmm...neither.  

jmblue

December 14th, 2010 at 6:24 PM ^

It does work in that regard, at least somewhat.  We have a case example: the drinking age.  When it was raised from 18 to 21, drunk driving arrests promptly dropped by a significant amount, and have never returned to the levels at which they were when the drinking age was 18.  People aged 18-20 may still be drinking, but they're at least not getting behind the wheel very often when they've done so.