OT: I World Cup thing I like: English announcers

Submitted by wolverine1987 on

While the refereeing has been nothing short of awful, and the play from some of the soccer power nations has been mediocre (England) poor (Italy) and absolutely disgraceful (the pathetic French), one thing I'm happy about is that we have English announcers to listen to. It was a listless experience in 2006 listening to U.S. announcers who knew little about the game, and I give kudos to ESPN for not trying the usual suspects and instead hiring the English pros. While I thought Martin Tyler was too subdued during U.S. v. England, I thought Ian Darke was terrific in our game vs. Algeria, and watching the other games has been a pleasure for me. I don't know if it's the accent, the vocabulary, the fact that I am a regular Premier League watcher, the knowledge of the game, or likely all of the above, but for me, listening to the English announcing these games just seems right.

PIJER

June 24th, 2010 at 4:48 PM ^

ESPN got it right, not only with the announcers, but perfect timing with giving shots of the crowd's emotions. I am not an avid soccer fan, but I have enjoyed this WC thus far. US being competitive has helped, but I've been watching other games as well.

MC Hammer

June 24th, 2010 at 4:59 PM ^

but I've actually liked Darke more. If i had to equate him with an American announcer it would be Sean McDonough. He obviously knows the game and isn't afraid to share his opinion. He toes the line between getting excited and the right time and being too excitable almost flawlessly. Also, and this obviously doesnt apply only to him, the different way they use the language (talking about a "plot" between Donovan and I think Bradley on a free kick) is interesting to me.

grand river fi…

June 24th, 2010 at 7:47 PM ^

Darke has been fantastic.  I was never a huge fan of his before the tournament, but I think he's been great for the American audience by chaning his style a bit but avoiding condesencion.  I love the way he still mentions lower league clubs players have played for like thier household names over here, 

Martin Tyler is a legend, but hasn't been as impressive as usual, maybe he's over compensating for the American audience, but I imagine as we get to the later rounds I'll be enjoying him and McCoist more and more.

PurpleStuff

June 24th, 2010 at 5:09 PM ^

Fox Soccer started this by just pumping in the Sky feed and it is a great call by ESPN to bring in some of the best in the business for the World Cup.  Definitely beats having Musburger or someone like that doing the call.  Even Harkes doesn't make me want to saw my ears off like the rest of his USMNT co-horts in broadcasting.

Of course, Derek Rae and Super Ally are better than the English poofs you listed.  Just a shame they couldn't hire Andy Gray as well.

MaizeAndBlueWahoo

June 24th, 2010 at 6:59 PM ^

Commentary has been nothing short of tremendous, I think.  I don't know whether it's the word usage typical of soccer ("that attempt was crazily optimistic"), the tell-it-like-it-is honesty ("a criminal defensive effort by Denmark"), the accents (especially McCoist's), the Britishisms ("the defending champs are in a spot of bother here") or just the fact that the commentators, unlike in, say, NFL football, don't feel a need to laugh loudly and patronizingly at each other's jokes and make the story all about themselves.  Very refreshing to hear quality announcing, though.  ESPN's football announcers could take a lesson or eight.

mrfoxdoc

June 24th, 2010 at 7:03 PM ^

It's as if he's trying to emulate his co-announcers, but because he's not as articulate as they are it comes off poorly.  He doesn't speak in anything close to complete sentences, just halting phrases with terrible structure (nouns coming long after they're due).  I can't stand how frequently he uses the words pace, unlucky, and opportunity, or the way he says "to the," which sounds more like tih-da.  But hey, he's probably the best ex-American player/commentator we've got. 

 

Do we know if these announcers are even at the games?  They only seem to comment about things that are currently being shown on the screen, including fan shots, which makes me think they may be sitting somewhere watching the game on a monitor like the rest of us.

03 Blue 07

June 24th, 2010 at 10:56 PM ^

Actually, in a Bill Simmons chat recently, he mentioned that, until the Round of 16, I believe the ESPN radio calls were being done from Bristol via the FIFA feed. You won't find this on ESPN's site touting their coverage, obviously. However, everyone is there in the knockout round for both tv and radio.

I just tried to find it in the chat wrap, but I couldn't seem to find it.

RayIsaac91

June 25th, 2010 at 9:41 PM ^

I have been watching Univision channels. I can't understand much other than the occasional "pelota malo" but I have to believe that it is company policy not to go more than 10 minutes without showing an impossibly attractive, scantily clad woman.

That and Donovan's goal got three "gooooooooooooooooooollllllllllllllll" calls for a 40 second total.