OT: How are Inge/Raburn still playing pro baseball?

Submitted by ypsituckyboy on

Kind of a slow day on the board, so I figured I'd toss this out there after Raburn grounded into what is probably his 100th double play of the season. Not only does Raburn play awful defense, he's hitting barely above .200. I don't know if I'm missing something here, but I'd definitely take Jordan Taylor at 2nd and batting 9th over Raburn.

Inge = basically the same story.

Why doesn't Don Kelly play over both of these guys? Batting .250 isn't fantastic, but an additional .050 in the average is more than enough to make up for the supposedly superior defense of Inge.

jfoust81

July 3rd, 2011 at 2:40 PM ^

Terrible. I could stomach Inge as our 9 hitter but not with him and Rayburn in the lineup more than Avila and Boesch. Leyland is trying to get fired it seems

AAB

July 3rd, 2011 at 2:46 PM ^

because he's one of the best defensive 3rd basemen in the league (even if he's not as good as he once was).  Raburn is still playing because they're hoping he regains his form from last year.  

ypsituckyboy

July 3rd, 2011 at 2:52 PM ^

Inge is not one of the best defensive 3rd basemen in the league. Pretty sure a lot of people in Detroit think that, but few elsewhere. It's a little tough to argue, though, since that's something that's hard to quanitfy.

Either way, this is precisely why we should've cut Inge loose and kept Polanco.

MGoChippewa

July 3rd, 2011 at 3:20 PM ^

Fair enough, I'm not trying to say he's Mark Reynolds or anything like that.  But he sure isn't Adrian Beltre either.  A lot of Tigers fans like players like Inge because they're "gritty" and they fit the city's personality.  I hate that something as small as diving into the stands once every two weeks outweighs his average defense and bottom of the league bat.

MH20

July 3rd, 2011 at 3:44 PM ^

I can't believe I am saying this, but Don Kelly has been an offensive force compared to Inge this season.  As for defense, Inge has been regressing for the past couple of seasons.  I could live with that if his offense wasn't so unbelievably awful.

turtleboy

July 3rd, 2011 at 6:38 PM ^

I get critical of him in a hurry, but I suppose this half season should matter about the same as the half season that got him in the home run derby towards his overall standing. With the stregth in his arm I'd like him picking off runners from the outfield. He has a better arm than Ichiro or Choo IMO just not a better bat. I've seen him pick off runners at home from the outfield with no bounce on more than one occasion.

MGoChippewa

July 3rd, 2011 at 3:05 PM ^

It's actually pretty easy to quantify, Inge is an average 3B, so keeping him in the lineup for his average defense and subpar bat isn't a great argument.  UZR is a widely accepted defensive statistic, which you can find here.

animals77

July 3rd, 2011 at 2:56 PM ^

I do not think Sizemore would have ever developed to what he is doing in Oakland if he stayed with the Tigers.  I just do not believe the Tigers have the coaches in place to develop many of the talent they have.  Granderson is a starter in the all star game, Matt Joyce and Sizemore are all playing very well offensively with their current teams, but struggled their last year (or, their entire careers) with the Tigers.  Lloyd McClendon is a horrible hitting coach in my opinion.  The major offensive problems (manufactoring runs) have been occurring for the past 4 years and neither he or Leyland have fixed it no matter what the lineup looks like. 

The major problem for the pitching staff is the amount of innings they give up base-runners in.  This has been a big problem for the past few years and Leyland (being this great manager according to many people) has not been able to fix it or put the proper man in position to fix it.  Games like yesterday's are big reasons why so many people still have doubts about the Tigers.  Playing against a Giants team that has a worse offensive production then they did last year (even if they won the WS) and putting your second best pitcher in game 2 of the series that sees the Giants not pitching their two best pitchers in should go well for the Tigers, but the end result was a 15-3 spanking. 

coldnjl

July 3rd, 2011 at 3:03 PM ^

Bc they are both better than you...alot better...alot better...

People fail to realize how difficult the thinking side of baseball is...THey both have shown that they can play and be great bball players. They both have never been amazing can't miss talents (even with BI all star appearance), but with this roster, they give this team the best chance to win in the playoffs if and when they start to hit

Fresh Meat

July 3rd, 2011 at 3:30 PM ^

I think you must have intentionally tried to miss the point, that's the only way to explain your comment.  Of course both players are a lot better than the OP and the rest of us, that's a stupid thing to say.  That has nothing to do with whether or not either guy is good enough to play in the bigs. 

Raburn can't hit and he sucks at D.  At least Inge gives some D, whether it's not as good as it once was or not.  No excuse for Raburn, he sucks at all phases, despite being better than me at baseball.

DutchWolverine

July 3rd, 2011 at 3:48 PM ^

...because they are both better than someone on a blog message board...really?  That may be the worst comment/justification ever written.  And to say they both have shown to be "great bball players" is a little strong.  Solid/useful/not going to destroy the team bball players may be more accurate.

animals77

July 3rd, 2011 at 5:52 PM ^

cold:  What are you talking about?  You reference to the thinking side (possibly referring to McClendon and Leyland), then change it to playing which both of them do not do as they are manager and hitting coach.  When you are touted as this great manager, then the same types of mistakes should not be happening for 4 years.  McClendon is not a good hitting coach, and that is evident on manufactoring runs that the Tigers have a hard time doing, and the great playing of some former players on their new teams.  Can you give credit for what he has done with Boesch?  Maybe, but 1 good example does not solidify his reputation as being good compared to the many bad ones. 

MH20

July 3rd, 2011 at 3:48 PM ^

He is incapable of the ordinary; he'll either do something great or make you want to smash large objects with idiotic mistakes/little league at-bats.

Seriously an amazing catch, though.  But I still think he's a putz when it comes to the game of baseball.

MH20

July 3rd, 2011 at 3:58 PM ^

Of course as many of us make disparaging comments toward Inge and Raburn, each do great things to help preserve/ensure a Tigers victory.  Raburn makes a fantastic diving catch in left to keep the lead, and Inge hits a triple to deep center to drive in two runs.  Haha.

Wolverine318

July 3rd, 2011 at 11:01 PM ^

it is nice to athletes get special treatment with our judicial system. Any other joe gets 2-3 DUI's is facing jail time and losing their license, but not miggy as long as he is hitting homers...

Now who wants to see him hit some dingers!!!!

 

Tacopants

July 3rd, 2011 at 8:23 PM ^

Inge's problem is that he's not taking enough pitches.  He's swinging at 30% of pitches outside the zone.  Cut down on that and he cuts down on his K rate, maybe takes a few more pitches and actually swings at strikes.

Also his sub .200 BA with RISP isn't exactly the hallmark of a clutch hitter.

MGoBender

July 3rd, 2011 at 4:11 PM ^

They're both on the fence right now.  We really don't have any other viable options though.

Raburn is going to provide you much more offensive production that Santiago and Inge is going to hold down third defensively.  They simply are just barely better options than the young utility guys we have.

I don't think anyone would be saying we don't need to upgrade the positions, but there's little Leyland can do about it right now so I don't understand the vitriol towards him.

BRCE

July 3rd, 2011 at 5:46 PM ^

There is no accountability for Dombrowski's blunders or for Leyland's assinine decisions as well as his pitiful results (NO division titles despite arguably having more overall talent than any other club in the Central since 2006). They're in "the club."

Inge, as much as any player, is also in the club and I'm convinced Illitch doesn't want to see him anywhere else. The guy sells merchandise and is adored by many of the Tigers' more clueless (some call them "casual") fans who drive out from places like Brownstown and Gibralter to enjoy a night at the park and cheer on players whom they know little about. 

For a guy with Inge's production history to be in his eleventh consecutive big league season with the same franchise is simply mind-boggling. I defy anyone to show me a current player with a comparable situation.

 

 

 

chitownblue2

July 3rd, 2011 at 5:58 PM ^

What team do you guys watch where not a single player is struggling? Raburn and Inge play because they are the best options - Raburn has hit for two years in the 2nd half. Giving him a chance to turn it around makes much more sense than handing 200 additional ABs to Don Kelly.

althegreat23

July 3rd, 2011 at 6:17 PM ^

Inge and Raburn must have pictures on Leyland and Dombroski.

And if Brandon Inge is so good on defense, why does he make so many errors? Just because he makes a web gem once every week or two doesn't make him a great defensive 3rd baseman.

MGoBender

July 3rd, 2011 at 6:34 PM ^

Inge has 6 errors on the year.  That's two more than 3B league-leader Chipper Jones.  Granted, Inge was on the DL for two weeks, but still. 

Inge is ranked eighth in fielding percentage and third in range factor.

He's good defensively.  Any one bitching about his defense just sounds stupid.  Is he the best in the league?  No, but he's up there.  And he's the best on the Tigers and that's kinda the point.