OT: Homeless Baylor Player Has Eligibility Revoked by NCAA for Accepting Housing Help

Submitted by Sports on

This shit just drives me up the wall. I get that the NCAA's goal truly is to level the playing field and give everyone a good experience (while making an asston of money) but this is insane. 

Link: http://www.sbnation.com/college-football/2015/2/25/8107233/silas-nacita-baylor-football-ncaa-eligibility

Tater

February 25th, 2015 at 2:23 PM ^

I keep hoping that something ends up being the "tipping point" that forces the NCAA to stop stealing opportunities from their "student-athletes" and forces them to allow athletes the same rights that any other student on a scholarship has.

It would be great if someone with deep pockets, such as the ACLU, took them to court.

Wu

February 25th, 2015 at 11:51 AM ^

Luckily this will get enough attention that the NCAA will be forced to reverse course. Still blows though. And Mark Emmert looks like a toad.

MgoBlueprint

February 25th, 2015 at 11:52 AM ^

I feel like the ncaa is stringer Bell without the respect. Ruthless, too smart for their own good, but not as smart as they think they are. At the end of the day it will all catch up to them.



Sent from MGoBlog HD for iPhone & iPad

FreddieMercuryHayes

February 25th, 2015 at 11:58 AM ^

A great bureaucracyonce again gets it wrong.  Who would have thought that would happen?  Seriously, this needs to get corrected, provided he is/was actually homeless and such.  You can make exceptions for humanitarian reasons.  Besides If it was a close friend that provided housing, I just don't see how that is a violation.  Seems they would provide housing regardless of playing football at Baylor.

That said, seriously dude, you were homeless and you got a full ride to Cornell to play football, but turn that down, then can't pay for Baylor at first, go to community college, and then eventually walk on?  I mean, I'm all for perseverence in chasing your dream, but damn, you know how blessed you are to be able to get a full ride to Cornell, and you pass that up? 

The Mad Hatter

February 25th, 2015 at 11:56 AM ^

"he earned a 4.1 GPA and a scholarship playing football at Cornell."

"Nacita walked on at Baylor in June, homeless and hungry, sleeping on friends' floors and taking pictures of book pages from the campus store to study on his phone. He still made Academic All-Big 12."

 

This kid should get a medal, not thrown off the team.  Motherfuckers.

CompleteLunacy

February 25th, 2015 at 12:03 PM ^

We wouldn't want Baylor kids having the massive competetive advantage of having a bed to sleep in. That's crazy talk. 

Oh that NCAA. It's all about the student-athletes with them. I'm sure.

1464

February 25th, 2015 at 12:16 PM ^

If I follow your reasoning, ISIS is burning people to death so this guy shouldn't whine about a bed. There have always been different levels of bad. Anybody with eyes can see that. Just because something isn't the worst thing ever, are you suggesting we don't speak out against it?

jmambro13

February 25th, 2015 at 12:06 PM ^

This is so wrong it makes me sick! This cannot be swung as a positive in any way. An orgaization that says that it always has the best interest of the student athlete but then deny eligibility for accepting something that all those suits have never had to worry about, shame on them.

AnthonyThomas

February 25th, 2015 at 12:12 PM ^

You know an organization is bad when its name alone can give people the justification to do things they would find morally reprehenisble if they weren't working for that organization. 

The Mad Hatter

February 25th, 2015 at 12:25 PM ^

A douche nozzle is an item inserted into a vagina for the purposes of cleaning.  We all like cleanliness, and many of us like vaginas, so I don't see how douche nozzle can be used as a pejorative.  It is a functional item.

An asshat on the other hand is completely useless.  Why does my ass need a hat?  I'm already wearing pants.

Ergo the NCAA is best described as a group of asshats.

74polSKA

February 25th, 2015 at 12:53 PM ^

I honestly feel bad for the kid and hope there is a way Baylor and the NCAA can work this out to get him back on the team. I also think the NCAA has a lot of stupid regulations and is generally worthless. That being said, if you replaced the "close family friend" that helped him get an apartment in the story with "booster", would everyone still be outraged with the NCAA's decision?

The biggest problem I see with the story is that the NCAA selectively enforces their rules. They come down on a homeless player for accepting housing and look the other way when other rules get broken (Cam Newton's dad comes to mind).

samdrussBLUE

February 25th, 2015 at 12:55 PM ^

Someone please explain- kid was not on an athletic scholarship.  Is that independent of the NCAA eligbility rule? I don't know the rules, but maybe it is best for me to just conclude that they are illogical

FauxMichBro

February 25th, 2015 at 1:02 PM ^

one could envision a scenario where a player walks on, i.e. leaves a scholarship available for another player, but this "walk on" could be compensated by a booster in the form of cash or housing. i don't know the exact rule, but my guess would be the ncaa would guard against this.

Lou MacAdoo

February 25th, 2015 at 1:02 PM ^

Our country makes me sick. We're completely fucked. I just got done watching a bunch of John Oliver on youtube and I just feel like detaching from the world. Maybe live in the woods like Mick Dodge. I doubt the wife would be to fond of that though.

FauxMichBro

February 25th, 2015 at 1:27 PM ^

that's not what i'm doing. i'm trying to put things in perspective; we are way ahead of most places in the world. can we get better? of course, but to state that "we're completely fucked" in the context of some college kid getting screwed over is just absurd.

The Mad Hatter

February 25th, 2015 at 1:38 PM ^

anymore. In fact, we've fallen behind the rest of the industrialized world in just about every measurable category.  I don't think we get the top spot in any of them anymore.

Per capita GDP, access to and quality of health care, time off from work, infant mortality, % of the population living in poverty, education, and on and on.

The only thing we lead the world in anymore is military spending.