OT: Fire Holland already

Submitted by s1105615 on
I saw that Holland let another prospect (or rather known commodity) in Marchenko go via the waiver wire. This has to be the 3rd or 4th straight year he has allowed a guy go for free rather than trading him or dumping a guy that hasn't proven to be worth his contract (Helm, Jurco, Abdelkader). Am I the only person that is done with this cap and roster management?

coldnjl

February 4th, 2017 at 9:03 PM ^

What truly bothers me is we had a glut of forwards last year and no defenseman...no trade to correct the imbalance. Instead, we signed more forwards in free agency and still can't score, lost young guys on the waiver wire, and didn't play young talented guys until late in the season. It is like Holland truly believes this team can compete...it can't...Go for the cup. This streak is over and the situation we are in now is simply do to him managing his team with the streak in mind instead of the cup

FabFiver5

February 4th, 2017 at 8:59 PM ^

I'm not even a hockey guy, and even I can tell that he's been an abomination over the past decade. Poor personnel decisions, settling for mediocrity, lack of moves when needed. Wings fans must be besides themselves with Holland...if they aren't, they're deifying him for successes from over a decade ago.

Longshot that Stevie Y ever comes back to take the helm, but Holland has to go.

Clarence Beeks

February 4th, 2017 at 9:01 PM ^

He should have been let go several years ago. He's just well past his prime and, frankly, never has really shown he's worth keeping since before the lost season due to the lockout (i.e. when the cap came in). Yes, a Cup in that span, but it came on the coat tails of the pre-cap work. He just doesn't have the tools to compete in the cap era.

93Grad

February 4th, 2017 at 9:04 PM ^

But most fans were deluded by the stupid play off streak and past success. once Lidstrom retired this team was no longer a cup contender. Yet Holland made terrible move after terrible move saddling the team with mediocre to bad players at terrible contracts. Holland is either incapable, unwilling or both, to do what is going to be necessary to truly rebuild.

Mojo Hall

February 4th, 2017 at 9:05 PM ^

He deserves the benefit of the doubt for leading a team that makes the playoffs 25 years in a row.  Nobody is satisfied with losing in the First Round but there is a lot more parity in the NHL under the new Salary Cap.  I'd say give him a chance to reload.....some deals haven't worked out for him (Franzen especially) but he still deserves a shot.

TB12

February 4th, 2017 at 9:14 PM ^

He's had the chance since Lidstrom retired and has completely failed (making the playoffs with Z and Datsyuk was not that hard). I believe the Wings are at the top of the league in salary and we have zero top level d-men or centers. The amount of money wasted on average players like Abdelkader, Ericsson, Helm and Howard is absurd.

GoBluenoser

February 4th, 2017 at 9:06 PM ^

Literally every other fanbase in the NHL would kill to have Ken Holland.  25 straight fucking years in the playoffs!!!  There is way too much parity in the league to be at the top every year.  I'm guessing you all wanted to fire Bowman back in the day as well.  

HateSparty

February 4th, 2017 at 9:15 PM ^

This argument is the worst. Half of the teams make the playoffs. His teams get bounced in the first round. He has horrible talent in the farm system. He has bloated contracts for average play. Guy is bad. 25 years in the playoffs is a puss poor rationale.

HateSparty

February 7th, 2017 at 12:23 PM ^

You live in the GR area or at least are from there, go watch them play.  They play well enough as a team but are not even one line full of NHL players that will make a noticeable contribution.   The Calder team is in Detroit.  How's that transitioning going?

coldnjl

February 4th, 2017 at 9:28 PM ^

His job is to position the team to either win a Stanley Cup or build a team until you can. His current team is made up of these bad decisons:

1)This team has only 6 players who are 24 or younger on a roster that will miss the playoffs. Only half of these are guys you could build a roster around

2) By overvalueing our players, we are saddled with players who never truly developed and who earn WAY more than market value (Nyquist ~5million, Abdelkader ~4.3, Ericcson-4.3mil, Kronwall).

3) We have 10 million combined into two goalies who either can't play or don't appear to be able to carry a team. Pay one goalie big money at a time...only one can play at a time.

4) We spent too much to keep Zetterberg and he is a burden on our salary cap structure. It would have been a hard decision to see him go but it would have been the right one.

Overall, Holland has lost several young players over the waiver wire for nothing. Instead of trading from a glut of forwards to rebalance the roster, he kept signing forwards in free agency. I just don't see any direction

rainingmaize

February 4th, 2017 at 9:30 PM ^

But a lot changes in a few years. For one, Holland's top men have moved on. Yzerman is killing it at Tampa Bay (except this year for some reason) and Nill has done some nice things in Dallas. During this same time Holland has shown an inability to trade, has given out some awful contracts, mismanaged the prospects; and looks like he swung and missed on Blashill (a coaching search in which they didn't even interview another candidate). 

Even if I'm way off on Holland, it is clear the Wings aren't going anywhere and are headed for a rebuild. Do you think a 60 year old GM is going to want to go through with a rebuild? On way or another, its time for something new. 

stephenrjking

February 4th, 2017 at 9:40 PM ^

Can someone who has been able to follow the team closer than I please explain why, with all of the noted and obvious personnel issues this team has, Blashill is considered a major part of the problem?

I'm not snarking, I am legit curious. I would like to know if blame really rests on Blashill or if people are just lending him responsibility for a roster that nobody could make a solid winner out of.

s1105615

February 4th, 2017 at 9:49 PM ^

I'd say Blash is more of a symptom than a root cause. He was a known quantity that had success at the AHL level within the organization. This season he hasn't seemed up to the task of motivating his players. This team is so dreadful to watch because of how disinterested they look most nights. It seems there are nights they'd all rather be doing anything else. That kind of lack of intensity is the coach's fault. Maybe if the Wings had more talent they'd be more engaged, but shouldn't the coach be pushing for that engagement anyway?

clarkiefromcanada

February 4th, 2017 at 10:31 PM ^

There seems to be a willingness among Wings fans to give Blashill a pass and instead just blame performance on talent and the GM. When the Wings parted ways with Mike Babcock there was much discussion on these boards that he was the problem, that Blashill would be an able replacement and that talent acquisition and Holland were the difference between the Wings and then more mediocre operations like Toronto etc.

Talent/Contracts is a problem but a combination of Yzerman/Nill/Jesus isn't going to solve the issue that Blashill has not accomplished anything of note at the NHL level. 

Hotel Putingrad

February 5th, 2017 at 12:09 AM ^

Think Babcock's personality but without the coaching acumen or pedigree. He can't leave his lines alone, he consistently berates the young guys while dogshit veterans make the same mistakes more frequently, and he has zero tactical or motivational expertise. Holland doesn't understand caponomics, but Blashill doesn't understand the NHL.

lilpenny1316

February 4th, 2017 at 11:43 PM ^

Scotty didn't just make the playoffs.  He had us in the conference finals and Cup finals damn near every year.  Plus he was the coach, not GM.

Every other fanbase can have Ken Holland.  If you looked at our cap space, you would see how he screwed up.  He whiffed on just about every big FA signing for the past seven years.  Since the Salary Cap came in, and he couldn't just outspend other teams, he has been below average.  

We traded a first round draft pick to reacquire Kyle Quincey.  We have Steve Ott because of "grit".  We're the only franchise giving out multi-year, multi-million $$$ contracts to guys because of grit.

TB12

February 4th, 2017 at 9:06 PM ^

At best he's a 3rd pairing d-man, which means he's no better than Sproul, Jensen, Oullet, etc. But I totally agree with you on Holland and that it's time to get rid of him. At this point, he's becoming Joe Dumars at the end of his reign with the Pistons. After other GM's figured him out, he had no clue what to do and just kept signing overrated free agents that never worked out.

TB12

February 4th, 2017 at 9:32 PM ^

He was a 7th round pick for a reason. Played for CSKA Moscow (which is one of the best teams in the KHL) and was a -6 there. He did OK in Grand Rapids, but has been below average in nearly 80 NHL games. Was a turnover machine this season before getting injured. Maybe he'll do better in Toronto, but I doubt he's anything more than a 5th or 6th d-man on a good team.

jbrandimore

February 4th, 2017 at 9:44 PM ^

It's true he wasn't a world beater but he was one of the few Wings providing value on the ice compared to his salary. Are Erickson, Kronwall, DeKeyser better? Maybe - but those 3 pull down close to $15 mil of cap space and aren't providing value. To be a contending team you need some players out performing their contracts. The Wings have none.

s1105615

February 4th, 2017 at 9:29 PM ^

My complaint is more about how he never recoups any assets for these young guys instead of exposing and losing them on the waiver wire. Send down a guy like abdelkader or helm, and worst case is you lose the cap hit. In this NHL and this roster, you can't wait for players to be "over-ripe" before playing them and expecting them to contribute. If your picks aren't working out, have the guts to move them for someone else. Letting people go via the wire is a way for Holland to say he was right either way. Either they flop where they go, and he was right to expose him, or they light the world on fire and he can say he knew they would be good, but the cap wouldn't let him keep him. It's managing his job security instead of improving the team.

OneBadMutha

February 4th, 2017 at 9:26 PM ^

The core he won Stanley Cups with was put together before he was GM. First cup he was assistant GM. After that, the next two cups came with that same core. His job was to find someone willing to dump a contract in exchange for prospects to fill gaps on the team. I'm sure he had a part in finding some of the Wings gems but he hasn't found many in the past decade. The 4th cup was his big achievement but even some of that core was there before he became head GM. Since the salary cap, he's not been very good. Equating it to Dumars, I thought Joe did great when the league was physical. He built a team to abuse the handchecking rules. When the league changed the rules, he didn't know how to adjust and almost every move after that backfired. Holland deserves credit for past success but I don't think his strengths are translating well to this new era where every franchises scouts over-seas well and there's a hard cap.

umfan720

February 4th, 2017 at 9:59 PM ^

Ferraro, Pulk, Frk, and now Marchy are borderline nhl players.  No competent GM will trade anything for them when they know they'll be able to get them on waivers.