OT: ESPN - "Which famous fans follow the top 25 teams?"

Submitted by East German Judge on

Another sign that we are in the dog days of college football is ESPN doing a puff piece about who are the most famous fans of the top 25 College Football teams.  Some predictable ones:

#3 - Michigan - Spike's and my favorite - Kate Upton

#9 - THEE ohio - LeBron James - main reason I wanted GS to win

#13 - Ole Miss - Katy Perry - One helluva (Fun) Bag Person

#15 - staee - Magic Johnson

#22 - UCLA - Jaleel "Urkel" White

 

How do you think they missed???  Complete list at this LINK

Everyone Murders

June 29th, 2016 at 8:02 AM ^

Or, it could be that the prosecutor did a shitty job.  I'm always amazed at how people automatically blame the jury.*

Case in point, the OJ Simpson case.  The prosecutorial team there was dog shit, and lost one of the most winnable cases you're ever going to find.  Yet people blame the jury.

*To be fair to MMM, I did not follow the Casey Anthony case that closely, so maybe it was a dumbass jury.  I stand by my point, though, that too many folks instantly blame the jury when the prosecutors or p.d. have dropped the ball in the case.

Matt Millens M…

June 29th, 2016 at 8:12 AM ^

I totally agree with you. The prosecution can totally boggle cases but not in this one. The evidence was SO obvious she did it. Has far as OJ, yes the prosecution made bad mistakes but that jury wasn't going to find him guilty. No way. Cochran and the team did a masterful job of getting his jury in.



Sent from MGoBlog HD for iPhone & iPad

Everyone Murders

June 29th, 2016 at 8:29 AM ^

Like I noted, I did not really follow that one.  Dipshit juries exist - no doubt about it.

But I disagree on the OJ case:

  • Marcia Clark and Christopher Darden were absolutely terrible.  They took a case that should have been presented in days and stretched it out over weeks and weeks.  This is their fundamental error - taking a "leave no stones unturned" approach in a case with easily understandable and compelling evidence.
    .
  • Clark's aggressive style was idiotic in front of that jury, and both she and Darden came off as condescending.  Which was hilarious because they both were dipshits.
     
  • Clark does not insist on a grand jury hearing, acquiescing to a probable cause hearing which gave OJ's team access to critical evidence in advance of trial.
     
  • Idiot D.A. Gil Garcetti files in L.A. rather than Santa Monica (you know, where the murder actually happened) for reasons that boggle the mind - resulting in a jury pool that on average had a negative view of law enforcement and the establishment.
     
  • Anyone with a lick of sense would be able to glean that Mark Fuhrman is a racist piece of shit, but apparently Clark and Darden could not foresee how easy it would be for the defense team to impeach his testimony.  Stupid, stupid, stupid. 
     
  • And on and on.

And yet people blame the jury.

Clarence Beeks

June 29th, 2016 at 10:42 AM ^

This is completely wrong about the jury and has as much to do with the defense team than anything else (not the prosecutors, as noted by someone else below).  You have to remember that the trial that you saw on TV (with all of the commentators and the evidentiary hearings) was not the trial that the jurors saw.  At the end of the day the prosecution couldn't prove that SHE did it (the defense planted the seed effectively that it could have just as easily have been her dad and the prosecution team had nothing to work with to overcome that) and that's all it really came down to.  Don't take this, in any sense, as a defense of the defendant (because I 100% believe that she did it), but rather that some times it just isn't a stupid jury or a terrible prosecution team, but rather talented and competent defense attorneys that understand that to win a criminal case the prosecution has to establish evey element of the crime beyond a reasonable doubt.  They honed in on the one area where doubt could be created and hammered it the entire trial.

JBE

June 28th, 2016 at 10:36 PM ^

How is Kate Upton even famous? I guess she's worked really hard to show off what she was born with. Michigan should be James Earl Jones or somebody with actual talent.

Tater

June 29th, 2016 at 2:41 AM ^

To be fair, she's a model for whom acting is a second profession.  Iccording to IMDb, somebody likes her:

"Beyond Sports Illustrated, Kate has been featured on the covers of Vogue Italia, British Vogue, CR Fashion Book, Cosmopolitan, French ELLE, GQ, Italian GQ, German GQ, Jalouse, Sunday Times Style, Esquire, The Daily, and Muse Magazine. She has appeared in fashion editorials for American Vogue, Vogue Spain, V Magazine, Harper's Bazaar, and Russian Interview..."

Even if she's just "showing off what she was born with," that's an impressive resume for a fairly young model.  Also, it's not fair to compare someone who's only been in two movies with James Earl Jones, who is one of the best actors of all time.