BursleyBaitsBus

January 11th, 2017 at 10:18 PM ^

Chargers should honestly rename themselves and start over in another city. Second rate franchise in LA unless the Rams REALLY suck for the next 10 years. 

Cali Wolverine

January 11th, 2017 at 11:33 PM ^

stadium in the NFL in a few years. The Charges have ZERO fans in LA so the situation in San Diego must really be bad...only way Charges will get fans in LA is if they completely rebrand themselves. The truth is the Raiders are the most popular NFL team in Los Angeles...but the Rams would hate for the Raiders to share their stadium because they are the bigger draw. Chargers will be the new Clippers...both from San Diego and terribly run.

Mr. Yost

January 12th, 2017 at 12:15 AM ^

 

I don't know why...but I wish the Raiders went back to LA. The Rams changed their name. And the Chargers were the ones going to Vegas.

But I agree, that said...what major cities are out there and would succeed? San Antonio? Orlando? Portland? Oklahoma City? Birmingham?!

...there isn't too much left.

On the same thought, I'd like to see Jacksonville move as well. NOT TO LONDON. I think they'd be better off in any of the cities I named above except Birmingham - that was a joke.

Mr. Yost

January 12th, 2017 at 1:17 PM ^

This is my point...we're out of big cities in this country.

I do think Toronto could support a team. Mexico City could as well, but that could be a disaster.

Hey 20 year old kid, here's 30 million guaranteed...now go live in Mexico City!

Jacksonville should look at Toronto since the Bills didn't move. Although I'm not sure they have Jaguars in Canada.

bacon

January 11th, 2017 at 10:21 PM ^

Macadangdang! This is really big news!  

The NFL didn't leave them much of an option here. Fuck rodger and the league. No love for san diego mind you. I just can't stand the league.

Frank Booth

January 11th, 2017 at 10:22 PM ^

I'm still really confused why the Raiders weren't moved to LA. Of all the teams that might move, they make the most sense, since they share a market in the Bay Area with the 49ers.

Navy Wolverine

January 11th, 2017 at 10:36 PM ^

So both the Raiders and the Rams couldn't get out of dodge fast enough 20 years ago because LA couldn't support two NFL franchises then (some would argue LA couldn't support one). What is so different this time around? Maybe the Raiders should move to San Diego.

Bluetotheday

January 11th, 2017 at 10:53 PM ^

This sucks...per the tribune, spanos has yet to send relocation letter, so it's not final. We will only have the padres of this goes through, not good. At least they serve great beer at the stadium

mGrowOld

January 12th, 2017 at 12:53 PM ^

I thought the Chargers home unis back in the 60's where the best looking uniform I'd ever seen.  I rooted for John Hadle, then Fouts and remember that brief, brief time when the corpse of Johnny Unitas wore the bolts.

My other favorite AFL team growing up was the Houston Oilers.  So now they're both gone and that makes me sad.

Image result for houston oilers vs san diego chargers

The Dreaded Re…

January 11th, 2017 at 11:04 PM ^

Chargers fan as a kid, loved Junior and Butts and Means all the way up through LT and Gates, but Spanos has been pulling this shit and soaking the taxpayers the whole fucking way.  They even had a seat guarantee where the city bought up all the unsold seats.  At every home game.  For ten years.

 

So long Spanos.  You want a new stadium, you pay for it.  Hell, San Diego is probably one of the smarter cities if they let the team walk; viewership is dropping and the stadium costs just keep climbing, meaning cities with NFL franchises lose more and more money.  The Chargers had a $1.8B proposal for a downtown stadium.  The Chargers offered to pay $350M of that.  GTFO with that.

 

Those powder blues definitely still the best uniform in the NFL, though.

Yooper

January 11th, 2017 at 11:16 PM ^

No way Kronke wants to share LA. NFL agrees. This is about getting Kronke and the NFL (and Spanos) to write bigger checks to build a stadium in San Diego since it's clear the voters won't approve a subsidy. LA doesn't want two teams. Kronke won't diminish his ROI on the Rams. A deal will happen-it won't include a second team in LA