Mr. Yost

April 10th, 2016 at 2:23 PM ^

Hopefully Beilein can pull off Alec Peters from Valpo and keep him from the NBA Draft.

He can come to Michigan for a year and also get Thronton to transfer in, sit while Walton is a senior and compete for the starting PG role with Xavier Simpson.

Lanknows

April 10th, 2016 at 5:32 PM ^

is more likely.

Consider:

Beilein has recruited elite HS forward many times before and come close (e.g., Brown) or been successful (GR3), while he has never taken a grad transfer.

There is a report of contact between Beilein and Jackson's camp, no such report for Peter.

CorkyCole

April 10th, 2016 at 2:30 PM ^

I'm not sure if he would want to come here since Simpson is the expected successor to Walton. Pretty similar situation. Probably will want to go somewhere where he's expected to be "the guy." Would be nice to have another point guard of his quality, however. No reason Beilein shouldn't seek this out at the very least. Just don't see it happening, and not because Beilein can't recruit.

Stringer Bell

April 10th, 2016 at 4:36 PM ^

I'm not sure a big time talent like Thornton looks at the 60th rated recruit in the country and thinks he can't beat him out.  Besides, we need all the help at PG we can get after Walton leaves.  I really don't want to see Dakich playing minutes again, no offense to him.

Richard75

April 10th, 2016 at 8:47 PM ^

Agreed. You know, it's funny: When Ray Jackson came here as I believe the #82 recruit in the country, a lot of outsiders snickered and said it was the Fab Four plus one more. Now when we get a guy in the bottom half of the top 100, we treat him like he's the future of the program.



Sent from MGoBlog HD for iPhone & iPad

King Douche Ornery

April 11th, 2016 at 9:07 AM ^

By the time he was a senior, only he and Jimmy King were left from the Fab Five, and the others on the team besides he and King were, to put it generously, poop.

CorkyCole

April 11th, 2016 at 12:13 AM ^

Well Xavier Sinpson would be considered in the same exact class as Thornton after the transfer redshirt. And you make this comment as if he's not that good of a recruit. He's coming in as a future PG starter. That's what both Beilein and Simpson expect. Not sure how you can't given the current roster (1 senior starting PG then a walk on and a Non-true PG/SG in MAAR). You're risking pissing off Simpson and running him off as well. All guys should want competition, but whoever is the starter of those two wouldn't be the starter for the duration of their careers unless the other gets injured. That would more than likely result in one of those two transferring anyway, wouldn't you think? And I'm pretty sure Thornton wouldn't want to transfer twice. I'm just saying that I could see why Simpson coming in could affect his desire to go to his past #2 school of choice. Thats all.

Perkis-Size Me

April 10th, 2016 at 2:43 PM ^

You're telling me you don't want a former 5* recruit to come into this program?

I'll bet you're one of the guys who said Beilein needs to bring in better talent, too. Frankly, I'd welcome this kid with open arms. This team needs a shot in the arm in the talent realm, and he may be able to provide it. If he can help us win, and he doesn't have severe character/academic issues, Beilein should go after him.



Sent from MGoBlog HD for iPhone & iPad

Maize_Nation

April 11th, 2016 at 8:36 AM ^

The reason he left, according to his trainer, is because he was not used how he wanted and expected to be used:

"I was in Coach K's office when he told Derryck he would be used in a ball screen offense," Edwards told 247Sports' Jerry Meyer. "Looking at this year's team, I think he knew he wouldn't have the type of team to follow through on that promise. Derryck was in on 20+ ball screen situations this year, and in comparison (Providence freshman) Kris Dunn was in over 250+ situations ... to me, he was lied to."

The Baughz

April 10th, 2016 at 2:36 PM ^

You don't want him bc he wants more playing time? He'd be lucky to get 10-12 minutes next yr with the class Duke has coming in. It seems to foolish to not want a kid just bc he wants more pt.



Sent from MGoBlog HD for iPhone & iPad

Mr Miggle

April 10th, 2016 at 2:42 PM ^

We were an early favorite. By the time he committed, I don't believe he even had us in his top 5. That being said, there was some mutual attraction, maybe it can get rekindled.

 

robpollard

April 10th, 2016 at 3:36 PM ^

How about the actual incoming PG we have next year was the starter for the Ohio vs Kentucky All-Star game?

How about one of our incoming centers had "at least 5 blocks" in said game?
https://twitter.com/BFQuinn/status/718966905235771393/video/1

I'd know we'd all love 5-stars to come in every year (a la Duke and Kentucky), and I'd certainly take Thornton if he wants to come here and fits along with Xavier, but we have plenty of hope for the future, even without Thornton.

robpollard

April 10th, 2016 at 11:18 PM ^

"Ohio vs Kentucky" means the best high school players in each state. UM has the best HS player in Ohio (certainly the best PG); he played in this game, along with a C who looked athletic (from a shot blocking perspective at least, which we haven't had since forever) -- that should get UM fans excited.

"Duke, Kentucky" refers to college programs. They are very, very, very good. If we need to have recruiting classes as good as them for a UM fan to get excited about the future, you're going to be waiting a long time.

So....I don't understand your point.

TheDirtyD

April 11th, 2016 at 10:02 AM ^

Having the best high school player in Ohio might have merit but KY as a high school athletic state generally produces less than a handful of division 1 college prospects. UK basketball had one player from KY actually play factoring minutes. Maybe two if you count Hawkins. They generally don't recruit the state. They have had more meaningful Michigan high school players than KY ones. Over the last few years. So while Ohio kids dominated KY it sounds like. That shouldn't come as a surprise.



Sent from MGoBlog HD for iPhone & iPad