MGoReverend

February 8th, 2011 at 12:49 PM ^

That's too bad.  I for one wish it was already there.  I think a Robocop statue would have really classed up Chrysler's "Imported from Detroit" Superbowl commercial. 

/s

BRCE

February 8th, 2011 at 1:01 PM ^

Good move.

Even when I was a little kid visiting family in Philly I would look at the Rocky statue and think "Really? It's a fictional character!" And a Robocop monument would be a lot tackier than Rocky.

Movies are still too new a medium to spawn a mythical figure of worthy of such heritage and celebration in a city, whereas the Robin Hood statue in Nottingham, England feels appropriate.

AeonBlue

February 8th, 2011 at 2:00 PM ^

I think this...


...should get moved to directly in front of the GM building if we really want to represent what the city has gone through / is feeling...

AeonBlue

February 8th, 2011 at 2:14 PM ^

Lately they've been better and I hear that they're going to be handing out record bonuses all the way down to their hourly-wage employees but I've got a few friends that were hurt a lot by the out-sourcing of a couple of their plants. It's always been that the greater pulse of the city depends on GM. 50's-60's Detroit was the place to be (providing you were white). Now-a-days, not so much for any race.

AeonBlue

February 8th, 2011 at 2:40 PM ^

I guess it comes down to what is more important to the individual. In most you can't really have true capitolism (and market competition) while sticking with only "american made" products. American made stuff tends to be more expensive because we have a minimum salary and age requirement for labor as where Mexico, China, Korea, doesn't necessarily have those things.

So in that respect, I do concede your point but I have to caveat that by saying that how many times have you heard of someone being okay with losing their job to a 12-year old chinese kid because the chinese kid will work for 12 cents/hour? While it's the nature of the beast, that doesn't mean people have to be happy with it.

CRex

February 8th, 2011 at 3:16 PM ^

1.  Korea labor rates are comparable to American ones.  That is why Korea outsources heavily to the Philippines and China for its labor needs.

2.  GM had a workforce structured to serve its needs as one of three major autocompanies in the world.  It used to be Ford, GM, and Chrysler.  Now the Asian companies have eaten into their market and the European companies have expanded their global dealings as well.  If you lose marketshare, you sell products and of course you need to shrink your labor force.