Butterfield

July 23rd, 2013 at 7:29 PM ^

Power thirsty law enforcement officer overreaching?  Color me amazed.  There are some good cops out there, but damnit if there aren't a whole bunch of guys who are hell bent on taking out their vendettas against the rest of the world. 

Butterfield

July 23rd, 2013 at 7:53 PM ^

See I would have guessed the total opposite.  The feds require significantly more education, training, and personality tests that weed out a bunch of the "bad" ones.  The municiaplities who hire anyone who passes out of the local academy are likely to end up with the bottom of the barrel. 

TheGhostofChappuis

July 23rd, 2013 at 8:21 PM ^

That's what I meant - the numbers are backwards in my post.  Generally, federal officers are going to be much more responsible and conscientious.  Heck, for a while, a J.D. was required to enter the FBI, and I believe the tracks to enter still require quite a lot of education.  The DEA, ATF, and EPA certainly aren't taking your average supertrooper.

TheGhostofChappuis

July 23rd, 2013 at 10:10 PM ^

Your post in no way refutes what I said, which is that generally, federal officers are going to be much more responsible than local officers.  You're arguing that they are not immune to mistakes and administrative shielding, a point with which I agree, though that article is hardly sound evidence.

Blue since birth

July 23rd, 2013 at 9:23 PM ^

I think it depends on how you define "good". In my experience* the vast majority of cops aren't heroic types or total assholes. They're just guys/gals punching a clock for a check... Some might not consider that such a great thing considering the responsibilities of the job. Sadly, it would seem to me that the adrenaline junkies or those on a power trip are at least equal (being generous) in numbers to the truly heroic and altruistic LEOs. *Growing up in some rough neighborhoods (aggressively policed) as well as having some cops in the family.

Cope

July 23rd, 2013 at 7:37 PM ^

If I were a cop, it'd be really frustrating when someone is needlessly disrespectful, which one probably faces a lot, and Morrison certainly was being. Arrest-worthy? No. But barking at the police dog when the guy's trying to deal with a disturbance? ..The joys of government work...

Butterfield

July 23rd, 2013 at 7:41 PM ^

People are needlessly disrespectful to others in a whole variety of professions, that's a part of those jobs - teachers, politicians, drive-thru attendants, etc.

If you're going to accept one of those positions, you have to be prepared to expect to deal with idiotic behavior, and be ready to do so in a calm, legal, and reasonable manner. 

taistreetsmyhero

July 23rd, 2013 at 7:45 PM ^

when your job puts you in a position of power, a central responsibility is being able to put up with bullshit and not overreact. If someone is needlessly disrespectful to me, I don't really have the formal authority to do anything about it. It's not chill to arrest people out of spite.

Cope

July 23rd, 2013 at 8:22 PM ^

But, a counterpoint. If a teacher feels disrespected or that someone is getting in the way of the class, he/she may tell the student to step outside, quiet down, etc. Then, if the student refuses, it becomes an insubordination issue. The teacher gets upset and writes the kid up for disrupting the class and disrespect. From the reports yesterday, Hyde barked at the dog, the officer got annoyed and asked Hydr to step to the front of the car, Hyde resisted non-confrontationaly, all the while the cop is getting more pissed bc his police business is being disrupted/interfered with. Now it's insubordination/interference during a police action, like in the class above. Was the cop wrong? Clearly, as decided by the state's attorney. But as someone who isn't a cop but often finds himself in similar situations, it's somewhat possible this bad call was rationalized as such rather than out of spite.

LSAClassOf2000

July 23rd, 2013 at 8:13 PM ^

Some intriguing tidbits exist in the GatorSports article surrounding something Alachua County sheriff Sadie Darnell said about why this likely shouldn't have resulted in an arrest:

"During an interview Monday afternoon, Darnell told The Sun that she believed the deputy was technically correct that Morrison could be charged under the law that prohibits taunting police animals, but she stated that, given the obscure nature of the law and the fact that Morrison was probably unaware of it, a warning would have been more appropriate."

The article also has the dashboard cam view of the arrest, if anyone is interested. 

Blazefire

July 23rd, 2013 at 8:52 PM ^

"Barking at a police dog" is the stupidest thing I can think of. You've had too many. You see a dog. "Hey, man! Look at that dog! Woof, Woof, dog! Woof! Oh cool. He barked back at me." This is not an arrestable offense. Then there was the resisting arrest, but I swear, that gets tagged on to every single arrest I've ever heard of.

"Excuse me, Officer, but why are you arresting me?"

"QUIT RESISTING, YOU!"